Image

Chevy Bill Ayers: A Classic Ride for Limousine Liberals

User avatar
Red Square says something quite similar to what I was about to post--and good Progressive that I am, I even had a link ready to copy-and-paste. But he said it all.

And that, Pupovich, is why I obey him. How can you possibly ever question that?

PINKIE


Commissarka of Vodka, Shovels, Beet of the Week Program, HBO, and Guest Soaps
Best Producer of the Year, Marina Kay Cosmonautic Cosmetics
Master Planned Economics Instructor, Tank & Shovel Factory
Ranked #1 on Google for "Crimes Against Everything" Thread
Awarded the Order of Hillary
Awarded the Order of the Mime
Website jumpofftheledgeforpeace.org (blog updated hourly with new posts copied and pasted with MimeSwipe)
The Spring 2008 Collection of Pinkieware--Available Now!
Click here to download my favorite tunes!

"I like rich people. I like the way they live. I like the way I live when I'm with them." --Uncle Max in The Sound of Music.

User avatar
"Obey" is a good progressive word that unfortunately is almost forgotten these days and it is our duty to bring it back through "obey" awareness campaign. The artist who made the Obama poster has made a career on promoting the "obey" image, so the "obama" idea was only three characters off. We must cheer his efforts to "manufacture quality dissent" and "propaganda engineering."

Now, speaking of an avatar with big hooters I think we had one already after the unfortunate accident with Chairman Punchenko who fell off the ledge and was brought back to life as Ms. Parton:

Image

User avatar
Comrade Betinov wrote:I demand that he be subjected to a special Progressive hat tax.


I agree that Comrade BFH must pay the Progressive Hat Tax to atone for his big hat which, in all fairness, is clearly a luxury. And there is nothing more righteous than to tax a luxury at a ridiculously high rate, Comrades.

Now then, I myself am excused from this Progressive Hat Tax since the cockade on my ushanka is, well, a little higher up in the Maypole than others. I am also a public servant which means I am excused from paying taxes. Me paying taxes is essentially me giving money to government only to have them give it back to me. It defeats the purpose, Comrades, and is therefore silly.

User avatar
Ivan Betinov wrote:...myself, and me, don't even have hats.
Why do you need a hat when you have a tank :P

User avatar
Chairman M. S. Punchenko wrote:I agree that Comrade BFH must pay the Progressive Hat Tax to atone for his big hat
Chairman you just suffer from Big Hat envy......

User avatar
LoneRedStar wrote:Chairman you just suffer from Big Hat envy......
BHE? New socialist disease for masses? Can only apply to those with no hat and envy for those with. Yet we are all equal so how can anyone have hat let alone big hat when others do not? This is confusing capitalist pig game designed to create chaos among the party faithfull. Down with hats and big hats onward to equality and fairness. Let those who have hair share with those without and remove reason for wearing hats to cover bald spots caused by capitalist worry of stock values.
Power to the troddendown and States taxing private jets.

User avatar
Red Square wrote:we must without doubt put a tax on the size of boobs.

That being the case, it is imperative that we distinguish between those comrades who were naturally cursed with excessive boobage, so they are not taxed unfairly, and those who on their own volition, chose to promote sexism and competitiion who should be taxed heavily.

As Commissar of Eco Prostitution and Mental Health, as well as Director General of the Pup's Party Pleasure Houses, it is clear that this would fall under my auspices. Therefore, I take full responsibility in screening these individuals, and collecting the tax. It's a tough and dirty job Comrade Cube, but damn it! Someone has to do it!

User avatar
Chairman M. S. Punchenko wrote:Now then, I myself am excused from this Progressive Hat Tax since the cockade on my ushanka is, well, a little higher up in the may pole than others.
You and I and most of the hat wearing comrades here would not be subject to a tax Chairman. It is a simple, "horizontal" tax code. One is only taxed by the portion of the hat that exceeds the furthermost tip of one's ears. Clearly, you and I wear hats that are proplerly proportioned to our ear width.

User avatar
I hereby introduce an EXCESSIVE QUOTE USE tax that will measured by the portion of the quoted text that exceeds the furthermost tip of one's ears.

If one is to trust the Party censors, they have just went in and removed about 15 inches of excessive quoting from the last several posts only, leaving just the bare survival minimum per post. The next time this happens, the Party censors will be also removing inches from the message that follows the quote. Repeated offenders will have inches removed from their heads.

What is a large excessive quote above one's tiny post if not the sublimated Big Hat Envy (BHE)?

We must nip in the bud this new disease that is sweeping our collective, and the best way to do it is through a few demonstrative executions, Che Guevara style.

User avatar
At last, my art subsidy arrived in the form of a freebie Paint.net. It seems to have all the working tools as that capitalist Paintshop has that I admit, I have little talent for. But I finally had my first minor success, and so now, it is only fair to make a comparison...

Comrade with Lenin knows what to hide.....
Image
Or loyal, devoted Party dog with proper, Party approved proportions....
Image

User avatar
Did all of you read Red Square's post? I'm not about to snip a quote from it, for fear of having something snipped from me.

It's begun! It's started! The Yahooization of this group. And it's all your fault, Pupovich!

First you want to know why there are no signature blocks. So the Chairman and I make signature blocks to shut you up, and then you complain they're too big! Now, Our Glorious Leader has imposed the Excessive Quote Use tax.

You know where it goes from here, don't you? Next we'll only be allowed to choose from a limited assortment of subject lines. Then people will complain there are too many frivolous one-line posts. After that, we'll be told that if we're addressing a post to one particular individual, we have to put the addressee's name in the subject line, so Lenin forbid none of the other hundreds of people here must risk the horrible, agonizing inconvenience of having to stop and read that message only to find it has nothing to do with them personally. Eventually, these boards will wither and die from lack of use because everyone's afraid to post for fear of offending "list nazis" like you, and in the end, I predict--you read it here, let the record show--I predict it will be YOU, Pupovich, who logs onto the Cube one day, looks around, and asks, "Where is everyone? Why doesn't anyone post anymore?"

For this I've had to add a new line to my signature block.

PINKIE


Commissarka of Vodka, Shovels, Beet of the Week Program, HBO, and Guest Soaps
Best Producer of the Year, Marina Kay Cosmonautic Cosmetics
Master Planned Economics Instructor, Tank & Shovel Factory
Ranked #1 on Google for "Crimes Against Everything" Thread
Awarded the Order of Hillary
Awarded the Order of the Mime
Website jumpofftheledgeforpeace.org (blog updated hourly with new posts copied and pasted with MimeSwipe)
The Spring 2008 Collection of Pinkieware--Available Now!
Click here to download my favorite tunes!
Save Our Cube from Yahoogroupish List Nazis! Click Here to find out how you can help while adding frequent flyer miles to your favorite credit card!

"I like rich people. I like the way they live. I like the way I live when I'm with them." --Uncle Max in The Sound of Music.

User avatar
I will have you know I agree with the Cube 110%, even if perhaps I am at fault on occasion. I have never understood comrades who when they quote say a post with a video in it, feel compelled to include the video again.

If you will notice, I have refrained from this crazed signature block wrecking some have engaged in... though of course my block would far outstrip any I have seen so far.

User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie, Comrade Lone Red Star, it doesn't matter whether or not I need a hat. I doesn't matter whether or not I could even use a hat. What matters is that I don't HAVE a hat, and somebody else does. Sure, I could go out and buy a hat, but that would entail both expense and effort on my part, and set a dangerous precedent of me taking responsibility for my own welfare. Thus ALL you comrades with hats owe me, not just Big Fur Hat. He just happens to be the most visible of the hat oppressors, but for centuries now I have been oppressed by all those who wear hats. I bet you all wore hats while you were slaughtering the Buffalos and Indians and Polar Bears.

User avatar
What do you call the dome thingy on top of your jar Comrade Brain? It keeps the rain out of your jar, keeps your brain nice and warm when it's cold outside, and it to could have some cute saying or sports logo added to it, so it is equal to our hats. Well, not mine of course since mine has the KGB sky blue band.

User avatar
Dear Betinov, the lid on your jar is just as adequate as my red headscarf. Let us be happy with what The Party has given us!

Besides, big hats are such a nuisance. Not only do people stare at them all the time, because they're so big, but their size can cause headaches, and if something of that size isn't adequately supported, then over time, as it ages and gravity takes over, the hat will weaken, wear out, and grow limp and sagging. Soon the sides of BFH's hat will surely be drooping down over his head. Check out Pupovich's ears.

Also, people tend not to take you so seriously when you have a big hat. It's as if people think it's supposed to compensate for little or no brain, and they treat you accordingly. And you, sir, obviously have a brain! (But neither do you have a big hat.)

I'll confess, sometimes it bothers my self-esteem to have only a flat little headscarf. But I've also been reassured by those who can see beyond that to my other, more Progressive qualities that they would rather I wear something on my head that can fit right into their hands. They assert that anything beyond that is just a waste.

(Or is that just something they say to get past first base?)

User avatar
Hat = oppressor of brain. Betinov is right. The lid is not hat, is manhole for Party to reach out, give care, and take according to needs.

So is KGB hat with sky blue band. You just never realized it.

User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie wrote:But I've also been reassured by those who can see beyond that to my other, more Progressive qualities that they would rather I wear something on my head that can fit right into their hands.
I'm not changing your avatar to that one, no way.

User avatar
I wouldn't touch that one with the Chairman's 10 foot pole.

Praise Lenin! At last Commissarka Pinkie has renounced the use of her signature!

User avatar
I was talking about my headscarf. What did Red Square and Pupovich think I was talking about?

And I forgot my signature last post because it was quite early when I made it, and I hadn't yet consumed my morning ration of vodka as I was waiting for it to finish distilling.

PINKIE


Commissarka of Vodka, Shovels, Beet of the Week Program, HBO, and Guest Soaps
Best Producer of the Year, Marina Kay Cosmonautic Cosmetics
Master Planned Economics Instructor, Tank & Shovel Factory
Ranked #1 on Google for "Crimes Against Everything" Thread
Awarded the Order of Hillary
Awarded the Order of the Mime
Website jumpofftheledgeforpeace.org (blog updated hourly with new posts copied and pasted with MimeSwipe)
The Spring 2008 Collection of Pinkieware--Available Now!
Click here to download my favorite tunes!
Save Our Cube from Yahoogroupish List Nazis! Click Here to find out how you can help while adding frequent flyer miles to your favorite credit card!

"I like rich people. I like the way they live. I like the way I live when I'm with them." --Uncle Max in The Sound of Music.

User avatar
Pinkie, Pupovich--Due to your lack of complete agreement with my semi-coherent screed self-pity declaration of victimhood clean and articulate expression of righteous indignation, I have no choice but to denounce you as hatists. True, we have been allied in the past in the noble cause, but I had no idea what you people really stood for. You were my comrades, who raised me and nurtured me upon my arrival at the collective, but occaisionally I would hear some things that--revealing the typical prejudices of hatted people--disturbed me even then. Although I modeled myself after your precepts and found in you the guidance I needed in forming my core values, I had no idea what you were actually saying when I wasn't there. Or when I was there. But now I am here. I just hope we can put this all behind us now. As soon as you give me lots and lots of cash to compensate me for my lack of a hat.

User avatar
Why, you pompous pickled piece of peevish, petulant . . . whatever. Did you not read my last post? I don't have a hat, either. Or were you thinking the same thing as Pupovich and Red Square?

That aside, these are the facts, Brain Boy:

You have a lid on your jar.

I have only a scarf on my head. How does that make me a hatist? A scarf isn't a hat, anymore than the lid of your jar. If anything, you and I should be joining forces to demand our rights.

Granted, I was perfectly happy with my headscarf for many years, until recently when the Empress and Obama started clamoring to convince me that I have, in fact, been miserable about it all these years, and what's more, they feel my pain--which I didn't even know I was suffering until they pointed it out--and they each have a plan to start the healing.

What say you? And do keep in mind that it's Saturday night and I've been drinking more than usual, so my "shovel finger" is a little itchy.

User avatar
Ivan Betinov wrote:Thus ALL you comrades with hats owe me, not just Big Fur Hat. He just happens to be the most visible of the hat oppressors, but for centuries now I have been oppressed by all those who wear hats. I bet you all wore hats while you were slaughtering the Buffalos and Indians and Polar Bears.

My hat is 60% cotton, 40% hemp, grown locally with organic process. All party-approved and ecologically correct.

Comrade Ivan, I don't have a jar, but I am not demanding from the collective that all jar-endowed party members provide me compensation.

I hereby call on comrade Red Square to levy a jar tax, and an out-of-body-brain tariff.

(As an aside, comrade Ivan, no hard feelings...I saw you in 'Young Frankenstein' cast as Hans Delbruck's brain, and you were brilliant. Who was your stunt double???)

User avatar
Comrade Brain in Jar, I suppose you have not seen where I recently denounced myself For the Common Good™? But I beg to differ with you as neither I nor Pinkie are hatist. You do not see us criticizing other hatless comrades do you? We are accepting of all with hats or without hats....provided said hats are not of the sort that try to make other hat wearing comrades feel intimidated such as Big Fur Hat. Actually, it doesn't bother me from an intimidation POV, I am simply concerned about what he has underneath said hat that he has so far failed to confess. I considered if Churchill Downs was under there, but apparently there was no hat lining visible to the spectators there.

However, while Commissarka Pinkie, nor I have shown the slightest hint of any ThoughtCrime™ in regard to hats, you seem to show the classic signs of big hat envy.

User avatar
Pinkie, as our beloved leader--whose avatar, I may point out, doesn't even have a head, much less a hat--informed the collective, a lid is not a hat. I'm not worried about how YOU are discriminated against. I am the one that matters. Me-me-me!

Meow, all you have to do to get a jar of your very own, courtesy of the Party, is fill out a HillaryCare Organ Donor Card.

Pupovich, your hatism has blinded you. It doesn't matter if you've never been cruel or indifferent to differently-hatted or hatless individuals. What matters is that you didn't immediately agree with me and thus that makes you guilty. You and all the others need to embrace the responsibility of your Hat Guilt and start giving all us hatless people justice.

User avatar
Oh, and what about our feelings of inferiority we get when we see a comrade whose head is so naturally beautiful that he does not need a hat to cover up some problem? I wear a hat to show my rank, and to cover up my problem "bad fur" days.

User avatar
But what does this mean for people such as myself who do not wear hats as a luxury, but as a necessity? Since I have no hair to protect my head from the Sun, thanks to Global Warming and the Algore's ($BUH) efforts to raise awareness, I on occasion need to wear a hat when I go outside.

I have a suggestion. Since I am a member of The Party™ and the Inner Circle™, I pay no tax since I am more equal than others.

--
ZB

User avatar
I believe I have already provided a fair and equitable plan. No taxes to be paid on hats provided they do not exceed the width of one's ears. In other words, it would be simply an excess tax.

User avatar
Commissar Pupovich wrote:I believe I have already provided a fair and equitable plan. No taxes to be paid on hats provided they do not exceed the width of one's ears. In other words, it would be simply an excess tax.



NYET!!!

My Soviet garrison cap is much wider than my ears! Hell.... It's wider than my shoulders!!!

So I say NYET!!! Members of the Inner Circle™ are more equal than others! Only proles pay this tax!!!

--
ZB

User avatar
Where is the problem Comrade? As a member of the Inner Circle, you also collect said taxes, so in effect, only the less equal ones with hats exceeding their ear span would have to pay, while you, as an Inner Circle Comrade, can rightfully boast that you too have to pay your fair share of tax. It's a win win.

User avatar
Ivan Betinov wrote:Pinkie, as our beloved leader--whose avatar, I may point out, doesn't even have a head, much less a hat--informed the collective, a lid is not a hat. I'm not worried about how YOU are discriminated against. I am the one that matters. Me-me-me!

GRR#$%^&*# Betinov! Why do you keep repeating stuff I've already said as if I haven't said it a zillion times already?

I KNOW YOUR LID IS NOT A HAT!

JUST AS MY HEADSCARF IS NOT A HAT!

Sheesh.

And quite frankly, your me-me-me attitude disturbs--well, me.

That aside, I believe The Party is discussing a tax on big hats--the bigger the hat, the bigger the tax. That's only fair to hatless people like you and--well, Pinkie, and even Red Square. With his deft hand, your clever brain, and my pretty face, I think we--ALL RIGHT, WHO JUST SPRAYED THEIR VODKA ACROSS THIS PAGE? Ewww, phlegm! Anyway, as I was saying, Comrade Betinov, I think you and he and I can come up with something that's even more fair--a tax credit for those of us with no hats at all!

What say you now? And try again not to respond with, "But my lid is not a hat."

User avatar
I'm sorry Pinkie, but your adherence to the sad 19% who still belive in hatism as a way of life is just sad. You obviously have been duped by the Bush-Haliburton-Stetson conspiracy. Recent Polls have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that 81% of the American public want to see hats for the masses and you still cling to your Brownhat marching orders. Are you just going to repeat the standard hatist talking points, or do you have anything to actually contribute to a real intellectual discussion.

Anything?

Anything at all?

User avatar
Comrade Betinov. while as you know the Commissarka and I have had some minor disagreements of late, I can assure you that she has never been a 19%er.


User avatar
Well as we know, and I wasn't going to mention this, but now I am trapped.... PeoplesMath™ proves they are equal.

User avatar
Ivan Betinov wrote:I'm sorry Pinkie, but your adherence to the sad 19% who still [HIGHLIGHT=#ffff00]belive[/HIGHLIGHT] in hatism as a way of life is just sad. You obviously have been duped by the Bush-Haliburton-Stetson conspiracy. Recent Polls have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that 81% of the American public want to see hats for the masses and you still cling to your Brownhat marching orders. Are you just going to repeat the standard hatist talking points, or do you have anything to actually contribute to a real intellectual discussion.

Anything?

Anything at all?

Let's stick to The Real Issues that The People care about, shall we? I "belive" you should learn to spell in addition to reading. You know what happens to those who never learn to read or write? They can't get a decent job anywhere, so they end up joining the military and dying for Bush's oil. Is that what you want, Betinov? Maybe YOU'RE the one who's a 19 percenter!

And I never said people who want hats shouldn't have them. I'm merely "relaying on" the opinions of others because their thoughts, no matter how absurd, support my cause of bringing Bush to justice.

Pinkie the Impudent Child, and never you mind what age she's closing in on.

User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie wrote: Anyway, as I was saying, Comrade Betinov, I think you and he and I can come up with something that's even more fair--[HIGHLIGHT=#ffff00]a tax credit[/HIGHLIGHT] for those of us with no hats at all!


I stand in shock and awe of your amazing Socialist mind, Commissarka!!!

Like a true Socialist you have reminded us an important concept of Marxism and the Democratic Party. Wealth Redistribution!

--
ZB

User avatar
Zampolit Blokhayev wrote:Like a true Socialist you have reminded us an important concept of Marxism and the Democratic Party. Wealth Redistribution!

Ah, but there are also times I believe my comrades see wealth redistribution as the goal. One must never forget that the redistribution of wealth is but a tool, a means to get to the true goal of elimination of class differences.

Of course we are all in favor of wealth redistribution. Where would I get the means to pay for my dacha, the staff, the limos etc, that I need to do the important work of the Party. But some here are so committed to this that they have no qualms taking their contributions from even those who barely have enough to make a contribution. Grant it, we do not wish for them to build any sums that could cause them to re-examine their committment to the cause, but we do need to be prudent in our "pruning."

User avatar
Oh, FINE! Mock me because my education was destroyed by my angst over not having a proper hat, and that was all George Bush's fault!! Him and his hat-lackeys like you. I quit. I'm going to go find a nice, long, convoluted screed on another website and cut and paste it into another thread here, because you don't play fair.

User avatar
Comrade Betinov, no need to be upset. Here, come with me and lets have a drink.... Oh, never mind. Here, I will pour some into your jar. Is that better?

User avatar
Are you trying to get him drunk or preserve him?

User avatar
When it comes to the Party's Vodka, is there a difference?

User avatar
At last! You're finally catching on, Betinov! Yes, of course it's all Bush's fault. They refused to give you the hat you're entitled to . . . and this traumatized you so much that you couldn't concentrate in school, so you lashed out, got bad grades, was sent to the principal's office for many a talking-to, and in the end, because no one would let you do what you wanted or give you everything you wanted, you dropped out with no other option but to join the army . . . which is exactly what Bush and his minions were counting on all these years since you were born!

Do you see the big picture now? It's all part of the nefarious Bush-Cheney-Halliburton scheme to get you into the military so you would die to satisfy their insatiable, imperialist lust for oil!

User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie wrote:
Ivan Betinov wrote:I'm sorry Pinkie, but your adherence to the sad 19% who still [HIGHLIGHT=#ffff00]belive[/HIGHLIGHT] in hatism as a way of life is just sad. You obviously have been duped by the Bush-Haliburton-Stetson conspiracy. Recent Polls have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that 81% of the American public want to see hats for the masses and you still cling to your Brownhat marching orders. Are you just going to repeat the standard hatist talking points, or do you have anything to actually contribute to a real intellectual discussion.

Anything?

Anything at all?

Let's stick to The Real Issues that The People care about, shall we? I "belive" you should learn to spell in addition to reading. You know what happens to those who never learn to read or write? They can't get a decent job anywhere, so they end up joining the military and dying for Bush's oil. Is that what you want, Betinov? Maybe YOU'RE the one who's a 19 percenter!

And I never said people who want hats shouldn't have them. I'm merely "relaying on" the opinions of others because their thoughts, no matter how absurd, support my cause of bringing Bush to justice.

Pinkie the Impudent Child, and never you mind what age she's closing in on.


Ummm Comrade jar jar brain has problems spelling because that was the part injured in his young frankenstein appearance.

User avatar
[TABLE][TR][TD]Comrade Betinov, We at the Hello Kitty World Domination Collective feel your pain.[/TD][TD][/TD][/TR][TR][TD]
Henceforth you shall no longer go hatless. Let Pinkie therefore suffer hat envy. At the sight of your GREATNESS !!!
Image
[/TD][TD] Image[/TD][/TR][TR][TD] [/TD][TD] [/TD][/TR][/TABLE]

User avatar
Comrade Lone Red Star, I am touched. But I don't like being touched. It is a legacy of all the violations I have endured since the election was stolen back in 2000. It is too late to try to make it better by giving me exactly what I demand...Now I have to find something else to complain about. Let's start with the size of the cap badge....

User avatar
What's with the girly Master Chief? I know there's this one, but that's not the real master chief or this pink one pictured above. Who is this new Spartan II?

User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie wrote:...you dropped out with no other option but to join the army . . . which is exactly what Bush and his minions were counting on all these years since you were born!

Do you see the big picture now? It's all part of the nefarious Bush-Cheney-Halliburton scheme to get you into the military so you would die to satisfy their insatiable, imperialist lust for oil!

Not to worry though, by his couragous donation of his body to the party, he no longer can pass the entrance requirements. Unless of course they get wind of Comrade Brain's current state, and decide he would make an excellent "carbon based computer" for their Star Wars defense plan.... which gives us an idea doesn't it?

User avatar
he would make an excellent "carbon based computer" for their Star Wars defense plan....

Better re-think that one, Pupovich. Back when I had a body I had to take off both shoes and drop trousers to play blackjack.

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:What's with the girly Master Chief? I know there's this one, but that's not the real master chief or this pink one pictured above. Who is this new Spartan II?


That is The Great Halo Kitty in Commando Colors

User avatar
Figures. Stupid Hello Kitty, cashing in on Master Chief's success.

He would still win in a fight.

User avatar
<a href="https://s244.photobucket.com/albums/gg2 ... vrolet.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="https://i244.photobucket.com/albums/gg2 ... vrolet.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

Señor Chavez is without a hat and he posesses the third greatest progressive mind in the western hemisphere behind our many titted empress and Obama.

User avatar
Ivan Betinov wrote:
he would make an excellent "carbon based computer" for their Star Wars defense plan....

Better re-think that one, Pupovich. Back when I had a body I had to take off both shoes and drop trousers to play blackjack.

Ah, but that is no longer an issue for us anymore is it Comrade Brain in a Jar?

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:What's with the girly Master Chief? I know there's this one, but that's not the real master chief or this pink one pictured above. Who is this new Spartan II?

They should reproduce The Masterchief Remix with Halo Kitty in it:



User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:It's Private Franklin Delano Doughnut!
<br>He's funny.

Back when I played the original Halo PC, I had one account named "Maj @$$hole." He was my TKer for Red v. Blue Capture the Flag. I didn't want to give my main account name, "Piecemaker," a bad name by TKing with him, unless it was out of revenge of course...

User avatar
Hmmm... TKing isn't very popular....

I sure hope I don't run into you in any games anytime soon. Unless it's TF2. No team damage there fortunately. Unless you're playing the spy. Jerk.

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:Hmmm... TKing isn't very popular....

I sure hope I don't run into you in any games anytime soon. Unless it's TF2. No team damage there fortunately. Unless you're playing the spy. Jerk.

Yeah, but TKing can be amusing sometimes. I haven't played Halo much since grad school, although I've always missed it. I played it first on XBOX and then PC. A few of us bought the full version, but people mostly played the demo (which makes Blood Gulch as the setting for rvb all the more priceless). Those of us with the full version ended up going back to the demo and playing it most of the time. We had a postdoc that went by Dr. Chicken in the lab and in the game (Now he's a chemistry professor). He had a cult following in the Halo PC demo - he was either completely loved or completely hated. He did mostly TKing and typing in really messed up things with the ultimate goal of pissing people off enough to shut the game down.

I know. It's only amusing if you're on the giving end.

It would be fun to play online with you sometime, Betty, when I can get back to it. I own many games but don't have much time to play lately. Also, time coordination would be tricky since I live in South DPRK right now. I have an XBOX 360 but haven't even gotten around to purchasing Halo 3 yet...

gg

User avatar
I've got a few games (not a lot), but if you're ever online in any of your games and see anyone named Not Matlock, It'll be me.

And you don't have to TK to have fun. Evidence:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPoKaoJu0m4
<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUPzN7tp7bQ

<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/rzcJ6dnWsNg&h ... ram><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:I've got a few games (not a lot), but if you're ever online in any of your games and see anyone named Not Matlock, It'll be me.

And you don't have to TK to have fun. Evidence:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPoKaoJu0m4
<br>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUPzN7tp7bQ


I didn't TK very often and only did it on the demo version. Believe me, I know you don't have to TK to have fun.

User avatar
Yeah, Halo 3 has a really annoying thing so if you quit a team game, you lose experience and thus part of your ranking. If you TK and someone kicks you, your overall score goes down. My little brother did it when we were playing split screen multiplayer and he got us kicked. It's pretty annoying. However, what is fun to do is to go into free for all games and cooperate with someone else to gang up on everyone else. I do that a lot in GTA IV.

PS, what's your XBL gamertag?

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:Yeah, Halo 3 has a really annoying thing so if you quit a team game, you lose experience and thus part of your ranking. If you TK and someone kicks you, your overall score goes down. My little brother did it when we were playing split screen multiplayer and he got us kicked. It's pretty annoying. However, what is fun to do is to go into free for all games and cooperate with someone else to gang up on everyone else. I do that a lot in GTA IV.

PS, what's your XBL gamertag?

OK. I'm a total loozer. I've had an XBOX 360 Elite since last Christmas and haven't played it yet beyond a few minutes or even tried to set up XBL. :( Thus far, only my son has been playing it. Hopefully, I'll get some regular gaming time starting in the next month or so (long, complicated story as to my time constaints, but I suppose age with accompanying responsibility is the short answer).

We should have Red Square set up a Red Gamers Forum section for us... ;)

User avatar
That actually sounds like a good idea. There are a lot of video games with political messages, and others that are about are between commie countries and Amerikkka.

Does your son have Live? What's his gamertag? What games does he have?

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:That actually sounds like a good idea. There are a lot of video games with political messages, and others that are about are between commie countries and Amerikkka.

Does your son have Live? What's his gamertag? What games does he have?

I haven't set up Live yet, so he doesn't have access either (he's only 11). His games are my games, pretty much (I don't let him play M- or some T-rated games). We'll see in the next month how hard it is to set up XBL from South DPRK.

User avatar
There's a setting that automatically sets everything up for you. It didn't work well with our home network, so we had to enter everything by hand. The only drawback is that a year's subscription is $50.00.

User avatar
Premier Betty, I could not find the thread we were "discussing" the merits of Star Trek vs the inferior Star Wars, but I thought you would get a laugh out of this....


User avatar
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/71Oo-BjKzCE&h ... ram><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

User avatar
I think we have a new powerful candidate here!


User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:Yes we do....

Yes we can!



User avatar
Ivan Betinov wrote:May I go to the bathroom first?

Doesn't a similar rule to not peeing in the pool apply here?

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:Yes we shall!

Taking the country from "No we shant!" to "Yes we Shatner!"


User avatar
Perhaps we might!

P.S.: Has anyone else noticed the terrible grammar being disseminated with the phrase "Change we can believe in"? That's a phrase ending in an unnecessary preposition. When you can leave off the preposition and it won't change the meaning, you should leave it off. Properly it should read "Change we can believe."

User avatar
Mikhail, you've raised a very intriguing point. It's one thing to believe change, but quite another to believe in change.

After playing around with Google, I typed "believing in" and got a list that included "believing in . . . magic, unicorns, aliens, miracles, Bigfoot," numerous references to "God" and/or "Christianity," and . . . surprise! "Barack!"

Methinks I see a pattern here.

User avatar
Good catch, Pinkie. As always, I am impressed by your ability to see through an idea to the logical conclusion. I knew that there was something funny about that phrase, but I just couldn't put my finger on it. You have enlightened me once again. Thank you.

User avatar
What sort of classism is this? This debate about unnecessary prepositions and poor grammar smacks of male whiteism and it's divisive politics. This coming from stalwarts of the Party! Have we given up the principles of PeopleSpeak™ as well?

User avatar
The Obama campaign is using Higher Ebonics, a dialect of PeopleSpeak™ that the unwashed masses can readily understand in. The "grammar rules" are that there aren't any at.

Now can we go back to disusing Star Trek and Bill Shatner for President? Shatner will build a bridge to the Twenty-Third Century...

User avatar
We dare not think of Shatner for President! Even now I hear the RNC cabal are considering replacing McCain with the Shatner since they know the base is not excited with McCain.


 
POST REPLY