Thanks, Red Walrus. The answer is in the updated post above yours (the Party has the exclusive right to update history, which then becomes the exclusive reality).

To clarify:

O'Brien turns a dial and Winston receives a painful electric shock. The needle is at 40; O'Brien tells him he will increase the amount of electricity if Winston lies to him. O'Brien asks Winston if the past exists. Winston replies that it does. O'Brien responds that the past exists in the mind of the Party only. To become sane, Winston must see through the eyes of the Party.

Red Walrus wrote:

guy-thinking.jpg

Pshaw! That's an easy one. It's because only our leaders know for sure. And with those lying videos of Muslims murdering vast numbers of people continually being broadcast, our leaders must keep us believing correctly after every slaughter of the infidel (for unknown reasons), that Islam is a religion of peace. Next Tuesday will only arrive when all good comrades believe all korrekt thoughts. Right? What do I win?

After 8 hours Fox, CNN and MSNBC News still don't know the motivation of the shooter in Baton Rouge...Does the MSM know less than the rest of the world?

We are told that women in Western societies are disadvantaged and oppressed. And then there are all these transgendered men wishing to be women.

If being a woman is so bad and gender is fluid, why aren't there more women changing their sex to become men and to enjoy male privilege?

Not a question but more of a circular conundrum thingy: Millions of people are destroying the planet, and if we don't do something to stop it, millions of people will die.

If Socrates is so darn smart how come I never see him asking any of the questions?

For that matter, if Socrates is so darn smart how come he keeps on asking people things over and over again? Didn't he learn the first time?

If Socrates is so darn smart how come he never has any answers?

When some smart aleck author throws you a Socratic question now you know what to say. It's whataboutism Socratic questions without using the "what about." But whataboutsocrates, huh? Huh?

Margaret, here is proof of Socrates' smartiness, um, I mean smartness. He was like, smart, ya know?



He might even ask something like: Dude, knowing that all of your political gurus were spectacularly and embarrassingly wrong about the 2016 election, why are you still hanging on every word as if they really knew what they were talking about? Dude?

Margaret wrote:If Socrates is so darn smart how come I never see him asking any of the questions?

If Socrates really did exist and was so influential, why are there no written records of him? We only have Plato's word to go on....

Another Socratic question:

If socialism and communism are really great as long as the right people are in charge, how come the wrong people always find ways to be in charge every time it's tried?

Red Square wrote:... how come the wrong people always find ways to be in charge ...

Barely Socratic:

Is it because (see Bill/Ted/Socrates and wind + dust above) the right people, in socialism/communism, are (metaphorically/existentially) ‒ phhht... ‒ blown by the wind of Revolooshun, and ‒ arrgh... ‒ bite the dust?

Red Square wrote:... why aren't there more women changing their sex to become men and to enjoy male privilege? ...

Wait, wait.

Here a womyn is about to switch in a man, and there - still womynhood! - whispers her/his/zir intuition: huh, "man"? wait, darling. privilege, maybe. but then - predator, oppressor, crusader?

And next the pangs, should zir target "man" be "of color". Or/And, Allah forbid, Mahometan?
All privileges out, victimizer stain and supremator stench in!

Barely Socratic, a solution(?):
Shouldn't womyn, with soul-fluids sloshing penile, switch into... like, myn?

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:Shouldn't womyn, with soul-fluids sloshing penile, switch into... like, myn?

Here you go. A few good myn.

[img]/images/various_uploads/Pussyhats_Men_Myn.jpg[/img]

.

A list of qestions similar to this topic has been making rounds on the Internet, and they are good.

• If Liberals don't believe in biological gender then why did they march for women's rights?
  
• If women do the same job for less money, why do companies hire men to do the same job for more money?
  
• Since only 11 million people have Obamacare, how will 24 million people die if it is repealed? Will an additional 13 million people be randomly shot?
  
• If you rob a bank in a Sanctuary City, is it illegal or is it just an Undocumented Withdrawal?
  
• Why is each ISIS attack now a reaction to Trump policies, but all ISIS attacks during Obama's term were due to Climate Change and a plea for jobs?
  
• If Muslims want to run away from a Muslim country, does that mean they are Islamophobic?
  
• If Democrats don't want foreigners involved in our elections, why do they think it's all right for illegals to vote?
  
• Is the DNC is mad at Russia because it 'thinks' they are trying to manipulate our elections, or because Russia is exposing that the DNC is manipulating our elections?
  
• How did the Russians get Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC to steal the Primary from Bernie Sanders? How did Russia get Donna Brazile to leak debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debates?
  
• Why is it that Democrats think superdelegates are fine, but they have a problem with the electoral college?
  
• If Donald Trump deleted all of his emails, wiped his server with Bleachbit and destroyed all of his phones with a hammer, would the Mainstream Media suddenly lose all interest in the story and declare him innocent?
  
• If Hillary's speeches cost $250,000 an hour, how come no one shows up to her free speeches?
  
• If you don't want the FBI involved in elections, why nominate someone who's being investigated by the FBI?

Mrs. Red Square wrote:

• If you don't want the FBI involved in elections, why nominate someone who's being [highlight=#ffff00]investigated[/highlight] by the FBI?

It was retroactively classified as a ‘matter', not an investigation. Or maybe it was a madder. A Maddow? Is that guy from MSNBC a Russian spy sent to corrupt our perfect and always korrekt news media?

Here's another Socratic question:

If the Democrats and the media weren't helping in the Russian influence campaign to polarize America, sow distrust in its institution, and pit people against each other, what would they be doing differently?

And another good one, from Margaret:

If everything is a social construct, isn't the idea that gender identity is a social construct, itself a social construct?

A question for Jussie Smollett: If Trump's America is as violent and hateful as you imagine, why do the Democrats and the media need a constant string of hoaxes in order to prove it? Including your own hoax, until it was debunked?

A similar question for the media: If Trump's America is so terrible, why did you need a Jussie Smollett to make this case? Why all your best efforts to besmirch America turn out to be hoaxes?

https://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog ... 20510.html

I've been doing it wrong this whole time...

Historians Uncover Lost Socrates Dialogues Where He Just Gave Up And Started Screaming That Opponent A F*cking Brainwashed Shill

Fear not comrade, it's fake news. The word "racist" doesn't even show up once. Nothing to see here, let's tend our beets.

So let me see if I have this straight—or should I say right? No, maybe I should say correct:

Trump never fired Mueller. Oh, he thought about it. Even asked one of his lawyers about doing it. But he never actually did it. Yet because he thought about it and talked about it, that makes him guilty of obstruction of justice, for which he should be impeached and sent to prison?

Hillary, on the other hand, actually violated federal law with her mishandling of classified information, which might have posed a grave threat to national security. Yet because she didn't really intend to do it, she's exonerated?

Commissarka Pinkie wrote:So let me see if I have this straight—or should I say right? No, maybe I should say correct:

Trump never fired Mueller. Oh, he thought about it. Even asked one of his lawyers about doing it. But he never actually did it. Yet because he thought about it and talked about it, that makes him guilty of obstruction of justice, for which he should be impeached and sent to prison?

Hillary, on the other hand, actually violated federal law with her mishandling of classified information, which might have posed a grave threat to national security. Yet because she didn't really intend to do it, she's exonerated?

As Socratic method the Socratic question would be: What is meant by the word 'justice'?

As Party method the Party question would be: Who the hell is Hillary and Mueller? Never heard of them!

A condensed digest from an anonyumous mass mailing on BLM, CHAZ/CHOP, Antifa, etc.

The "Summer of Love 2020" update

• Why are school teachers the number one occupation of the Antifa terrorists according to the FBI?
  
• Why did it take Nancy Pelosi 34 years to get offended by those Confederate statues?
  
• Maybe it's the criminals, not the cops, who need to be defunded and better trained to obey the police?
  
• Why does the Left accuse the Right of wanting a war? Isn't it obvious that if the Right wanted a war, there wouldn't be any Left left?
  
• Does anyone see the irony in George Floyd's funeral having a police escort?

Red Square wrote:

• Does anyone see the irony in George Floyd's funeral having a police escort?

For that matter, does anyone see the irony in the mourners for George Floyd's death having trashed a funeral home during one of their rampages solemn mourning processions in my neighborhood?

(surely peeving Socrates for the umpteenth time with this question:)

• How is the very concept of "PoC" (and "xLM") not outright "RRRacism!!!" ?

RedDiaperette wrote:... trashed a funeral home ...

Hypothesis: Refused to distribute free golden coffins to the community of PoCs ?

Red Square said:

Winston begins to understand and practice doublethink, to refuse to believe what he knows is true, and to truly believe what he knows is not.

Unseeing the doublethink of those very rebels without a real cause Houston bookstore women you met - the rebels against traditional hospitality and grace...because well...??? has been 'pelipsky's main goal to full recovery.

And those Obama-Kapitalist pig stores!!...and now all this spray painting marble columns going on today - and this is REAL marble - not that FAKE marble 'pelipsky was forced to make in gulag - but REAL marble, comrades!! And this real marble is being spray painted and FAKE NEWS acts like it's All OKAY! They don't care between FAKE marble and FACT marble because for some reason a journalist means not caring about these differences between FAKE and FACT through secret process of object without a subject nothink.

These rebels against the very traditions The MotherLand Made Great Again that dared to compare their 'resistance' to everything that is associated with Texazistan's legendary hospitality and grace upon the opportunity to meet you, actually planned in advance an opposition front to the title of your book which challenged their sacrificial tithe to the State Shakedown that drove them to be inhospitable and ungracious frothing animals.

...but seriously all this spray painting REAL marble...get's 'pelipsky's mythical soul all ready to like do something Comisarka Pinkie was talking about back in the days we're recalling here...as 'pelipsky was 'there'...well not there there...but was a more hospitable stop on the original bus tour...so was 'there' in the mythical soul of 'pelipsky ...and just go out and grab a Rainbow...or a maybe even a BLM flag...especially if it's got fringe! Those fringed flags are like...fringe!...and grab that fringed flag--- and just burn it. Just get out a zippo and just watch that fringe start to burn...for a change.

And then use 'pelipsky's issued this morning shovel to whack those assfringe embers until they are out just like Smokey the RED Bear said. Only YOU can prevent Fringe Fires, comrades!

forelock tug of shared horification memories holed up in our mythical souls, most Red Square.
Jackalopelipsky
Russian Asset
#BR 549
with love, xxx

I cannot believe this has not been erased, erased, erased from the interwebs!!! So many truths need to be re-truthed here! Long Live Lenin!Oops... damn peoples computer is not reliable for Current Truth!

The Ghost of Red Rooster wrote:I cannot believe this has not been erased, erased, erased from the interwebs!!! So many truths need to be re-truthed here! Long Live Lenin!

darthlenin.jpg

Oops... damn peoples computer is not reliable for Current Truth!

'pelipsky 'knows' that photoshop is Russian Trickle Down Technology.
Photos are shopped according to current favor. Program started in Soviet Union.
All comrades know this...or will find out soon.

'pelipsky

From Genosse Dummkopf -

How is the sex chromosome a social construct, but melanin isn't?

Red Square wrote:From Genosse Dummkopf -

How is the sex chromosome a social construct, but melanin isn't?

The answer is: Shut-up!

Margaret wrote:

Red Square wrote:From Genosse Dummkopf -

How is the sex chromosome a social construct, but melanin isn't?

The answer is: Shut-up!

There is one sure way to tell a male chromosome from a female chromosome. (Pull down their genes.)

Red Square wrote:

Margaret wrote:

Red Square wrote:From Genosse Dummkopf -

How is the sex chromosome a social construct, but melanin isn't?

The answer is: Shut-up!

There is one sure way to tell a male chromosome from a female chromosome ...

Komrades, komrades, I beg you... You can't fight in here. This is Corona Time!

Genosse Dummkopf wrote: Komrades, komrades, I beg you... You can't fight in here. This is Corona Time!

        Mystery item No. 1

... more persuasion (and for younger Komsomoltsy, if any):

.

      Hide it back  (Turn mouse upside down and click. If that doesn't work, try standing on your head)

To My Dear Friend Comrade Dummkopf

Sir, let me say I deeply appreciate your inclusion of my 'favorite' movie in your post but, you cut out my cameo with Peter Sellers!!! I'm very disappointed and have notified the Peoples Air Defense Center in Omsk to make sure you realize what a 'slight' you have made.

As Always! Your Humble Liquidator, Doing more for the Environent since Pol Pot!

Dimitri!

Dimitri Kissov wrote:... but, you cut out my cameo with Peter Sellers!!! ...

Komrade Dimitri, uh, uh.. disappointing, disappointing, indeed.. yes, regrettably.. but.. but.. you see.. uh, comrades of the MovieClips Kollektive got, uh, uh, those time-quota limitations (ukas from Politbyuro!), uh.. uh.. and then, uh, those royalties, you know (not rubles, hard valuta!), and all that...

But, but, they didn't dare to skip the glorious praise, transmitted by fatso DeSadeski: ... Our Premier is a man of the people, but he is also... a man, if you follow my meaning. So, maybe a samokritika session, but no show trial this time?

Anyway, it's all their fault, ja? The MovieClips. Their fault! (your Nagant, uh.. wouldn't it love now to crawl back into the holster?)


... aaaand:

Would Karl Marx be happy or sad to learn that the working classes in the 20th-21st centuries would live better and have nicer things and entertainment options than the 19th century capitalists - and that it would happen without any revolution, dictatorship, and the killing fields?

A question for the progressive trend setters about the Glorious World of Next Tuesday:

If a biological man identifies as a woman, will they be required to wear a burqa?

Likewise, if a biological woman identifies as a man, will they still be required to wear a burqa?

Have the esteemed academics in gender studies consulted their friendly Sharia experts?

Also, inquiring minds would like to know about the requirement for FGM in both cases.

Red Square wrote:Why do we never hear the term left-wing fringe?

Because the whole of the left wing is fringe.

Red Square wrote:Would Karl Marx be happy or sad to learn that the working classes in the 20th-21st centuries would live better and have nicer things and entertainment options than the 19th century capitalists - and that it would happen without any revolution, dictatorship, and the killing fields?

Karl Marx was a miserable bastard who wouldn't be happy about anything that didn't perpetuate a constant state of revolution and class struggle, just as his current followers need a constant state of race and identity struggle.

Red Square wrote:A question for the progressive trend setters about the Glorious World of Next Tuesday:

If a biological man identifies as a woman, will they be required to wear a burqa?
No, they would be beheaded under Sharia law.

Likewise, if a biological woman identifies as a man, will they still be required to wear a burqa?
No, they would be beheaded under Sharia law.

Have the esteemed academics in gender studies consulted their friendly Sharia experts?
No, for fear they would be beheaded under Sharia law.

Also, inquiring minds would like to know about the requirement for FGM in both cases.
FGM is not a requirement, but any man caught pretending to be a woman would be beheaded under Sharia law (although his genitals might be mutilated first just for fun).

It's made easy to see how people find comfort in the religion of peace.Gotta love it, or you'll be beheaded.

We now have ChatGPT to answer all those questions. I tried that on this thread - Fun with ChatGPT

I also asked a new question:

Since Trump was protested by thousands of women wearing vagina hats, why haven't Trump supporters do a counterprotest wearing penis hats?

ChatGPT gave a very extended answer.

ChatGTP is droll. A ChatKJP would make for a fun Socratic advice column. I wonder what she/it would say?