Image

Action Alert - Democratic Party needs new image!

User avatar
Comrades,

Call to arms.

Seems Weaker Speaker Pelosi recent attempt to reach out to Hollywood to improve upon the Democratic Party image has failed.

Now it is upon us, the collective artistic talent of the Peoples Cube to come to the aid of our party.

https://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2010/de ... CMP=twt_gu

Image
This time we must be very clever in how we put new lipstick on the pig change our image.
Every time we rebrand seems the Rethuglicans find ways to smear and demonize our brand.

It first started with the original Progressive era and the ignorant masses rejected that, so we started calling ourselves "Liberals". Along came Ronald Raygun and the KKKonservative Movement and they destroyed the "Liberal" label.

So now we are back to calling ourselves "Progressives" and the Vast Reich Wing Conspiracy, Glen Beck, and Hate Talk Radio™ are now destroying our new image.

We even tried to rebrand as "Democratic Socialists" and that label too was demonized.
https://www.progressive.org/node/130774

So we scurried like rats reverted back to being "Progressives" again.
https://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=29612

Now our brand is again in need of change.

Of course we all know the rule ... never, never, never admit that you are a Communist, The GNOP will destroy you.

https://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2009/07/green_jobs_czar.html

As you know, the American sheeple are not intelligent enough to understand what we stand for.

Image
So we must now deceive re-educate the unwashed masses in such a way to not change what we stand for, or the Current Truth™ , so we must again put a happy
face on it.

Comrades, your party is calling ...

User avatar
I don't understand the "put lipstick on a pig". . . does not Nanski have ON lipstick? But I digress, it is truly shameful that our most dedicated, social communist are fearful of being known as communist, when they should wear their red proudly. Look at how successful Cuba has been. It is unAmerkican, to be forced to hide our true selves. I denounce that!

User avatar
Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:I don't understand the "put lipstick on a pig". . . does not Nanski have ON lipstick? But I digress, it is truly shameful that our most dedicated, social communist are fearful of being known as communist, when they should wear their red proudly. Look at how successful Cuba has been. It is unAmerkican, to be forced to hide our true selves. I denounce that!

Fraulein,

Yes, Nanski does wear lipstick, however, perhaps you have not been educated on the concept of Gradualism?

Image
The Fabian society understood this concept well. The road to the Glorious World Of Next Tuesday™ is not by violent overthrow of the KKKapitalist, it is death by a thousand cuts.

Notice the sheep is not really a sheep in the image below.

Image
You see, I was able to achieve overthrow of the greedy KKKapitalists in my country, however, I did not reveal to my public supporters my true nature prior to the revolution, otherwise it would have been very difficult. As such, I thought best not to "wear my red proudly" at that time.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/castro/timeline/index.html

I even promised free elections after the revolution .. he he he. Now that card has already been played, so I made it difficult for others to follow my method.

We must now follow the advise of the great Comrade Nikita Khrushchev ...

"We can't expect the American People to jump from Capitalism to Communism,
but we can assist their elected leaders in giving them small doses of Socialism,
until they awaken one day to find that they have Communism."

User avatar
Comrades,
This is shocking newz, from her actions I thought she had an on going relationship with the National Socialist version of ET, I guess that would be Steve. Speel.

In our open society, this kind of info needs to be kept secret, even from LeakingWiki.Prog Off: The book has a confusing title because he is neither President, nor Obama. Prog On

User avatar
Comrade Tooorisky wrote:Comrades,
This is shocking newz, from her actions I thought she had an on going relationship with the National Socialist version of ET, I guess that would be Steve. Speel.

In our open society, this kind of info needs to be kept secret, even from LeakingWiki.

Sorry, the relationship is out in the open.

rsz_nancy_pelosi_et.jpg

User avatar
Comrade Infidel,

Perhaps it is a great match, his money; her do anything for money attitude.

User avatar
Infidel Castrate, you said you were "able to achieve overthrow of the greedy KKKapitalists in my country, however, I did not reveal to my public supporters my true nature prior to the revolution, otherwise it would have been very difficult....." This sound like a quote from our dear Leader, does it not? I am thinking Obama has studied your ways of success.

User avatar
What happened to the "No Labels Party?"

(Would calling them nihilists be labeling them?)

User avatar
Comrade Whoopie wrote:What happened to the "No Labels Party?"

(Would calling them nihilists be labeling them?)
Comrade Whoopie,

Seems that "party" was found to be just re-distributing labels. But they still can be
Useful Idiots™ perhaps.

https://gothamist.com/2010/12/13/did_no_labels_steal_design_from_mor.php

Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:Infidel Castrate, you said you were "able to achieve overthrow of the greedy KKKapitalists in my country, however, I did not reveal to my public supporters my true nature prior to the revolution, otherwise it would have been very difficult....." This sound like a quote from our dear Leader, does it not? I am thinking Obama has studied your ways of success.

Yes, "Hope and Change" and "Fundamentally Transforming America" are crypto-Marxist terms.

User avatar
Comrade Whoopie wrote:What happened to the "No Labels Party?"

(Would calling them nihilists be labeling them?)
Their label is No Label Party, no? So, is that not a label? But I do love how we Progs keep fooling everyone with who we are and aren't decade after decade.

User avatar
Infidel Castrate wrote: Of course we all know the rule ... never, never, never admit that you are a Communist, The GNOP will destroy you.

You commies should start calling yourselves Democratic Capitalists. It fools everyone. You can champion the free market but at the same time claim that the free market is owned by the masses and so everything is decided democratically. When someone claims you're commies you tell them no, we're capitalists! When someone says you're socialists say no, we believe in capitalism and democracy.

Pretty soon no one will even remember what capitalism was.

Oops, too late.

The only people that can see through that kind of logic are then denounced as enemies of democracy and capitalism.

Capitalism, it's the other communism.


User avatar
Very good, Shovel! Very good indeed, that will really annoy those teabaggers.

User avatar
$.$. Halliburton wrote:
Infidel Castrate wrote: Of course we all know the rule ... never, never, never admit that you are a Communist, The GNOP will destroy you.

You commies should start calling yourselves Democratic Capitalists. It fools everyone. You can champion the free market but at the same time claim that the free market is owned by the masses and so everything is decided democratically. When someone claims you're commies you tell them no, we're capitalists! When someone says you're socialists say no, we believe in capitalism and democracy.

Pretty soon no one will even remember what capitalism was.

Oops, too late.

The only people that can see through that kind of logic are then denounced as enemies of democracy and capitalism.

Capitalism, it's the other communism.

Excellent thought on calling something just the opposite of what it really means. It will fool the sheeple proles and only us elites will know the real intent. Very Progressive IMO.

"Democratic Capitalists" would be like the terms

Employee Free Choice Act
Federal Reserve
Military Intelligence
The Social Security Trust Fund

We could nominate you for Press Secretary ... but I have some pause. Your use of the term "You commies" makes me skeptical of you.

Security to aisle 3 please!



Shovel 4 U wrote:The Free Party. Duh.

If the MTE had been elected I think the party image would not need to be changed.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yzBvQ9E ... re=related

User avatar
$.$. Halliburton wrote:
You commies should start calling yourselves Democratic Capitalists. It fools everyone.

We don't take advice (not even good advice) from stinkin' reactionary capitalist pigs. We're gonna keep doing the same failed shit whether you like it or not.

(So there!)

I think we should start calling ourselves "Populists" in spite of the fact that our policies aren't popular or represent what the majority wants.

kid.jpg

User avatar
It was a hard choice for the selection ...

I was thinking about

Swindlers List
Jurassic Pork

But I decided to make this one instead. The new look of the Democratic Party, and still out looking for your treasure.

Image

User avatar
Is Janetalia trying to cop a feel? I don't think Dear Leader approves having his breasts fondled.

User avatar
Image

The idea of a Hollywood Makeover was a good one. But Spielberg was a mistake. Only George Lucas has the talent to show off our princess to the full extent of her princessness.

Lilly: gilded!

User avatar
Comrade Whoopie wrote:
$.$. Halliburton wrote:
You commies should start calling yourselves Democratic Capitalists. It fools everyone.

We don't take advice (not even good advice) from stinkin' reactionary capitalist pigs. We're gonna keep doing the same failed shit whether you like it or not.

(So there!)

I think we should start calling ourselves "Populists" in spite of the fact that our policies aren't popular or represent what the majority wants.
Okay. I'll buy that. Except for the "Populists" idea. Maybe you damn commies should try the truth and see how that works. Rebrand yourselves as the Aristocracy party. Democratic Aristocracy. Tell everyone that you are a reactionary movement against the Enlightenment and everything its produced. That's what the Left is, you know. You wouldn't believe how many people deep down inside resent everything the Enlightenment has produced. Go for the truth. You stand for empire building throughout the federal, state, and local governments throughout the land. You can offer the common man titles of nobility and landed estates for fidelity to the Crown.

Oops, too late. You're already doing it. There really is nothing new under the sun.

User avatar
$.$. Halliburton - thanks for the grand idea. The masses are going to be royally screwed for the common good, even if I have to steal Supercommissar Maksim's photoshop for this one.

Image

User avatar
I have no idea what this means, it just seems funny. "A finger that matters"?

Image

User avatar
lumberjack wrote:
The idea of a Hollywood Makeover was a good one. But Spielberg was a mistake. Only George Lucas has the talent to show off our princess to the full extent of her princessness.

Lilly: gilded!
Image
Seems to be a good way to cure pre-mature ejaculation.

Red Square wrote:I have no idea what this means, it just seems funny. "A finger that matters"?

Symbolic of the "Party of Unity" As in ... we are all "one".



 
POST REPLY