Image

At Last We Are Gender Neutral

User avatar
Comrades,

Good news abides. We are progressing forward! Thanks to our brothren and sisterin in the Obama regime administration and their faithful work for the cause. "The words “mother” and “father” will be removed from U.S. passport applications and replaced with gender neutral terminology, the State Department says.

“The words in the old form were ‘mother' and ‘father,'” said Brenda Sprague, deputy assistant Secretary of State for Passport Services. "They are now ‘parent one' and ‘parent two"

[attachment=0]passport.jpg[/attachment]

No more will citizens and peoples alike, be embarrassed, humiliated or feel the fool because of wordage on our government mandated passports. Who gives a wit about parentage or the outdated mother and father units? Are we not all equally oppressed free to have whatever units are fitting to the times? Two papa figures; two mama figures; all that matters is the Papa Obama figure and his nanny providers in his regime administration, does it not?

Rest easy. The next time you apply for your government mandated passport, you will not have to hang your head in shame at being a progressive bastard.... just fill in the blank with unknown parental unit and proceed on your way.

User avatar
Make way for the hermaphrodite cyborgs!!!!

User avatar
Red Rooster wrote:Make way for the hermaphrodite cyborgs!!!!
Oh yes, definitely. Here is one that has now been emancipated. Image

User avatar
Do inanimate objects count?

ie
Washer & Dryer?
2 Washers ?
2 Dryers ?

3 Washers, 1 Dryer?

As long as they are not kapitalist coin op types, of course.

User avatar
Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:Comrades,
Good news abides. We are progressing forward! Thanks to our brothren and sisterin in the Obama regime administration and their faithful work for the cause. "The words “mother” and “father” will be removed from U.S. passport applications and replaced with gender neutral terminology, the State Department says.

I must denounce this terminology. Should be "Thanks to our".... comrades, peoplefriends, telletubbies, or biological pneumatic oxygen consumption machines.

User avatar
Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:
Red Rooster wrote:Make way for the hermaphrodite cyborgs!!!!
Oh yes, definitely. Here is one that has now been emancipated. Image

Ahhh... reminds when I was but a small plucker, quite a pretty progressive cockrel.

[Note to self: Inquire about rooster botox from local veterinarian.
]

User avatar
Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:
Red Rooster wrote:Make way for the hermaphrodite cyborgs!!!!
Oh yes, definitely. Here is one that has now been emancipated. Image


Nice purple sweater she is wearink!

User avatar
Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:
Red Rooster wrote:Make way for the hermaphrodite cyborgs!!!!
Oh yes, definitely. Here is one that has now been emancipated. (photo) Justin Beiber
This explains so much. . . and here I thought it was human, not a cyborg.

Image Hahahah. . .! Here I thought I was the only one who knew the illness known as Beiber Fever. It's actually quite nice to know there are others on here who's ears bleed everytime they hear it "sing."

User avatar
Most loyal Red Rooster, you are of such correctness. I denounce myself for fall prey to the wicked wordage of "brothern" and "sisterin". My bad.

ah yes, Kim_J, it is indeed, although glorious red would be preferred for the he/she.

Shovel, I am sure there would be NO discrimination in laundry products, bridges, etc.

User avatar
Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:"The words “mother” and “father” will be removed from U.S. passport applications and replaced with gender neutral terminology, the State Department says.


You are kidding, right?

User avatar
Is Comrade Frauline "kidding"? We do not know, we only listen to the current truth as professed by The Party™. If Comrade Frauline says this is truth, it must be truth... then again...

WE ARE WATCHING HER, VERY CLOSELY, ALWAYS WATCHING!
Last edited by Red Rooster on 1/8/2011, 12:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason for editing this post: Hey! Let's celebrate our differences by becoming absolutely the same! Uniformity Is Diversity.

User avatar
New Paradigm wrote:
You are kidding, right?


There are no jokes in Islam or the Collective.

User avatar
No kidding, N.P. We have reached a new level in automatic self paradoy with this development.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/0 ... z1AP39K4Xw

Truth is stranger than fiction. Government is stranger than truth. I salute the Collective for engineering this supreme piece of timely, meaningless sensitivity.

User avatar
Comrades,

We must promptly prepare educational materials (including illustrative and compelling agitprop posters, videos, scripted-dialogues, etc.) to enlighten the masses before the tea-partiers can corrupt their minds with thoughts and images seeking to drag the masses back into the abyss of genderism. Thus, we must deal effectively, decisively and persuasively with the kind of nonsensical questions/assertions that tea-partiers are certain to ask/make regarding the enlightened new approach by our State Department and Immigration services. As Doctor Obama, I am specially qualified to provide insightful suggestions for this educational process:

Tea-Party Ignoramus: Okay, Progressives, now that there are to be "Parent One" and "Parent Two" instead of "mother" and "father" (or, Heaven Forbid, "father" and "mother") representing the old-fashioned concept of biologically-immediate ancestors, which parent is number "one" and which is number "two"? In other words, what (who?) comes first: The sperm inseminator or the egg incubator? The rooster or the chicken? The chicken or the egg? The phallor or the phallee?

Progressive Educator: Listen carefully, Tea-Party Ignoramus-- Biological origin is now irrelevant. No longer may those we previously described as "humans" (a term tainted by male genderizationationally patriarchial thinking by inclusion of "man" as the root of the word) be perceived as having come into existence by such archaic, biological methods. Therefore, to eliminate such human chauvanism, the species formerly identified as "human" must hereafter be identified as "A Uniform Type Of Matter Allowed To Obey Neutral Standards" (hereafter, "AUTOMATONS" or "Automaton"). Likewise, what would previously have been desccribed as a "child" of a "mother" or "father" must be correctly identified not as a "boy" or "girl," but as "Not Yet Differentiated Automaton" (hereafter, "NYDA" or "Nyda"), and, of course, in order to reverse the stress on GAIA or Parent Nature (formerly patronizingly known as "Mother Nature") caused by excessive population growth among Automatons, no two Automatons would be entiled to more than one-point-five (1.5) Nyda, and no single Automaton would be entitled to more than zero-point-five (0.5) Nyda.


Tea-Party Ignoramus: If "human" is now prohibited as a manifestation example of "genderism," what about menstrual cycle?

ProgressiveEducator: Such soon-to-be-obsolete function will be known as the "unicycle."


Tea-Party Ignoramus: What about the onset of menses?

ProgressiveEducator: This will be known as the "icycle" (a derivation of icicle)



Tea-Party Ignoramus: What about menopause?

ProgressiveEducator: This will be known as pausety (a derivation of paucity)


--Doctor Obama

User avatar
oOOooooOOOoooooooOOOoooOOOOOOoooOOOOoooOOOOooooOOOoooooo.....

Now I am for having the hurting of the head...

And it is not to be from my turbin being too tightly wound!

What is to become of my name? Am I not to be Mrs Al Czarweary? If I am not Mrs then what am I? And what of our dear Fraulein? Is she... I mean IT... not to be the Frau any more?

On other hand then what will be for happening to burkha wearer? Will everyone now be the burkha wearer or will no one be for such wearing?

I am in need of Beet Kool Aid!

User avatar
And are we all anatomically politically correct?

User avatar
Comrades,

Your glorious words have been heard, and I, R.Rooster.ESQ have solved this very gender diversion in a section of the new Healthcare... ahhhhhrrrrrmmmm.... Obamacare bill:

SEC. 13000000013. REMOVAL OF APPENDAGES REQUIREMENTS. (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 66666 of the Healthcare Code of 1995 is amended by adding at the end the following new subsections: (g) APPLICATION TO ROOSTERS AND OTHER SUBSPECIES OF THE GENESIS "MALE". (h) APPLICATION TO HENS AND OTHER SUBSPECIES OF THE GENESIS "FEMALE".—Notwithstanding any special regulation prescribed by the Czar or Secretary before the date of the enactment or after of this subsection, for purposes of this section the term ‘person' includes any manna, vegetable, or mineral that is not currently defined as part of a collective organization exempt from this requirement by special permission of rule 5150(a). ‘‘(i) REGULATIONS.—The Secretary or Czar may prescribe such regulations and other guidance as may be appropriate or necessary to carry out the purposes of this section, including new and sudden rules to prevent malfeasance.''. (b) PAYMENTS FOR RECUSAL OR OTHER ANNULMENT VIA PREFERED PROCEDURES.— Subsection (a) of section 6044 of the Healthcare Code of 1995 is amended— (1) by inserting excessive ‘‘amounts as consideration as property,'' to be confirmed as ‘‘wages,'', (2) by inserting ‘‘gross proceeds,'' in ‘‘copious amounts, or other'', and (3) by inserting ‘‘gross proceeds,'' after ‘‘setting forth the amount of such'' to your local commissar. (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this section shall apply to payments made after December 31, 2010.

Remove your appendages. Or. Open you checkbooks. Case Closed.

User avatar
OMG! Androgyny my fav subject. I can't wait until we are all Sweet Pea Flowers, the wonderful smell of pungent patchouli dressing the beautiful masses as a whole automation of the coming of the Age of Aquarius.

Androgynous Aquarius ecstasy will fill the world with metrosexual progdom for the Progressive world of Next Tuesday.

User avatar
Why do Rethuglikkkans hate science so much?

Are they afraid of science?
Is it too hard for them to understand?

Do they hate it because they can't manipulate it to support their non-reality-based positions on everything? We put the Current Scientific Truth ™ right in front of their eyes and still they don't see...

Binary_fission.JPG

Will it be long before "BONER" assembles a prominent panel of fundamentalist theologians, kkkonservative columnists and a few token paid for scientists to take up the question of whether the theory of evolution should be banned from the nation's classrooms?

Primordial slime is my parental unit, dammit!

2885449590069910675EwEoSH_ph.jpg
(G4A Family Photo Album - Pic 1)

Add a little lightning and it evolves...

Obama Amoeba.jpg
(G4A Family Photo Album - Pic 23)

GREAT DARWIN, WHAT IS IT THAT IS SO HARD FOR THE "KNUCKLE DRAGGERS" NOT TO BELIEVE?

The science is settled.

Comrades, Primordial Slime & Lightning are the korrekt answers for the passport questions.


But stay tuned. In Tea Party America, ignorance is strength. Bitter clingers.

User avatar
I believe this is all in honor of our dear teleprompter. If I remember correctly, did not the esteemed race baiter leader Jesse Jackson not proclaim that he was going to remove the dear teleprompters nuts? And I'm not referring to the diet Moochelle has him on. And considering how the dear teleprompter has performed against America's enemies, I would say Jesse has achieved his mission.

User avatar
Opiate of the People wrote:
New Paradigm wrote:
You are kidding, right?


There are no jokes in Islam or the Collective.
The Frau does not joke about such important matters involving the importance of the collective and our governments politically correct, socialist agenda! Do I look like Conan to you, dear prole? No, I do not. And I we take the peoples business doings with most sincerity.
Just as we can trust ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC and CNN for the accurate truth, we can trust the Frau and the loyal Progs in the Cube. And mucho gracie to you, dear Comrade Shovel, for such an accurate photograph.

User avatar
Groucho Marxist wrote:And are we all anatomically politically correct?
I am thinking that is a private matter to be vieweddiscussed with one's self, but in any case, whether we are with or without anatomically political correctness should be of no consequence, since the goal is all being fair and equal. Mrs. Al, I ponder if we should not drop the Ms. Mrs. and Mr. from our verbiage altogether? (review paragraph #1). They are divisive terms, are they not, and do not promote equality. Who cares if we have identifiers? The care is with the equality of gender nuetrality........ or something like that.

User avatar
Mrs Al Czarweary wrote:oOOooooOOOoooooooOOOoooOOOOOOoooOOOOoooOOOOooooOOOoooooo.....

Now I am for having the hurting of the head...

And it is not to be from my turbin being too tightly wound!

What is to become of my name? Am I not to be Mrs Al Czarweary? If I am not Mrs then what am I? And what of our dear Fraulein? Is she... I mean IT... not to be the Frau any more?

On other hand then what will be for happening to burkha wearer? Will everyone now be the burkha wearer or will no one be for such wearing?

I am in need of Beet Kool Aid!
To answer your first question Al Czarweary, the most Current Truth I have seen is, you should change to "Parental Unit Al Czarweary" due to the change by the State department.

User avatar
A most eloquent suggest, Commissar_Elliott but possibly for those without the need nor necessity (or burden) of being a "parental unit"... maybe a Spousal Unit Czarweary would suffice. I should ponder changing to Ex-Spousal Unit Pulloskies but I am not sure it has quite the 'ring' to it?

User avatar
Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:A most eloquent suggest, Commissar_Elliott but possibly for those without the need nor necessity (or burden) of being a "parental unit"... maybe a Spousal Unit Czarweary would suffice. I should ponder changing to Ex-Spousal Unit Pulloskies but I am not sure it has quite the 'ring' to it?
Wait a tic, isn't "parental unit" or "spousal unit" discriminatory in nature? As such, I think I'm going to have to side with the Rooster on this one, let us drop our titles (or appendages as he put it). . . hey. . . maybe that's something we all should do on here.


Image Oi, that pun.

User avatar
But, if I dropped my appendage then I would be 'Pulloskies', which is discriminatory in and of itself, since the name belongs to the now deceased ex-Mr. Pulloskies and I would have the need to revert back to a singular title belong of 'Ms.', which would be the name of my masculine parental unit.
And what would Mrs. Al Czarweary become?

This is so much to ponder.... I think a wee bit of vodka is called for.

User avatar
Comrade Fraulein,

I have no doubt some of your anxiety will be relieved by this report indicating that the Progressive No-Labels Movement has seen fit to preserve a vitally important element of Progressive Genderizationism (a vital exception to our plan for the Progressive De-Genderation of America) designed to accelerate the masses' embrace of the Wisdom of Progressive Leaders:



Image

.


--KOOK

User avatar
Ivan Betinov wrote:No kidding, N.P. We have reached a new level in automatic self paradoy with this development.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/0 ... z1AP39K4Xw

Truth is stranger than fiction. Government is stranger than truth. I salute the Collective for engineering this supreme piece of timely, meaningless sensitivity.

Unreal...so sexual embarrassment harassment, rape, and the "never hit a woman" deal are gone now too? Is assaulting a homosexual just assault now or is it still hate crime?

Under "race" will the only option be "human" now?

Who was responsible for this?

User avatar
At the end of the day, New Paradigm, we are. That's the big burden of democracy, one we all too often try to dodge. Government "of the people, by the poeple, for the people" carries with it responsibility for the action of the government we elect.

But on a less philosophical level, this is a canary in a coal mine moment. We have allowed those we have elected to appoint a myriad of unelected bureaucrats who have gotten completely out of control...which was one of the specific offenses enumerated against the British Crown in the Declaration of Independence: "He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance." No, I'm not calling for a new revolution; it is not needed as long as we do have free elections.

Decisions like this one do not serve any purpose. They are driven solely by an ideological point held by a decided minority. If they stood up in a public meeting and proposed gender neutral phrasing for passport applications they would be voted down; in some places they would be laughed out of the building. So instead of standing up and airing their position in public forum, they angle their way into the bureaucracy, where their madness can run unchecked. And the end result is that as a nation we look like idiots.

User avatar
Comrade Ivan Betinov, you are right.

There were always kids that screamed "no fair!" and ran away crying to tell a teacher. They knew if they could be the first to present themselves as a victim the teacher would impose rules on all the kids just to spare themselves from the bitching of thin skinned loser and the ones who raised it that way.

They grow up and expand their nonsense.

I believe the system should protect the weak but it already does for the most part. This is just stupid.

Does anyone know how much these bureaucracies cost per year?

User avatar
I understand the Jiffy LOBO™ process, but what are going to have endure to achieve compliance with gender neutral/anaomically polictical correctness? Frankly, I'm a bit concerned.

User avatar
I think all this non-specific gender stuff is for the Birds and the Bees. Men will be men and women will be women. When you blur those lines of distiction then what?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MP-Ehx ... re=related

User avatar
Komrdes, I ask, who decides who is Parent 1 and who is Parent 2? I think this, while very progressive, is an unnecessary step. We should advocate parent be removed from the language entirely. All infants should be micro-chipped at birth and issued a World passport.

Making the USKKKA passport more progressive is no less than putting lipstick on a pig, if you know what I am saying. A prole is a prole, and they shouldn't be traveling anyway. They should be on a farm, or in a factory, contributing to the state. Who the homogametic host was is irrelevant.

User avatar
Rikalonius wrote:Komrdes, I ask, who decides who is Parent 1 and who is Parent 2? I think this, while very progressive, is an unnecessary step. We should advocate parent be removed from the language entirely. All infants should be micro-chipped at birth and issued a World passport.

Making the USKKKA passport more progressive is no less than putting lipstick on a pig, if you know what I am saying. A prole is a prole, and they shouldn't be traveling anyway. They should be on a farm, or in a factory, contributing to the state. Who the homogametic host was is irrelevant.

This is a most astute and well founded, thought out progressive idea, Comradette Rikalonious. You show the makings of a truly great Made Prog. Keep up the good work but do not over think yourself. We must also conserve our brilliance.

User avatar
Unlike letters, there is no equality in numbers comrades. We should call these parental units A and B.

User avatar
Comrade Whoopie wrote:Unlike letters, there is no equality in numbers comrades. We should call these parental units A and B.
I think X,Z and K have something to say to you.

User avatar
Grigori E.R. wrote:I think all this non-specific gender stuff is for the Birds and the Bees. Men will be men and women will be women. When you blur those lines of distiction then what?
You might say, right idea - wrong species.

But don't fret, comrades! The Motherland's advanced Gender Neutral Studies Program has created The New Gender-Neutral Man to be emulated by all forward-thinking progs. Too bad this role model doesn't procreate, or the progressive utopia would have been achieved within one generation.

The dance is called "I'm a wave." The lyrics go like this: "Im a wave, I'm a new wave. Just give me time, I will flood your land."


User avatar
For comparison, watch this nonsensical, extremely gender-specific dance by two lazy representatives of the bourgeois class who never even once leave their chairs during the entire sequence.



 
POST REPLY