Image

Dreaded Internet Rules: Will They Affect The People's Cube?

User avatar
[img]/images/Stalin_Computer_Nyet_Neutrality.jpg[/img]

[img]/images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]
Democratic FCC commissioner balks at net neutrality rules

Dearest, most beloved, Comrade Red Square,

I am very concerned about the new internet "regulations" that will, when all is said and done, restrict all internet content.

Does that mean us? The People's Cube™ has come to mean very much to me. I found the love of my life here, as well as some of the most wonderful people I have ever known.

The People's Cube™ is an oasis in a desert of emptiness.

Just asking.

User avatar
Image Are the thought police smart enough to realize this joint is a parody site?

User avatar
Dear Comrade Pamalinsky! We have filed your question under the reference number #RS874-187810 and expect to answer it in full sometime towards the end of this Five Year Plan.

In the meantime, rest assured that the Party is actively working on your behalf and monitors all your activities for your own good. The more we progress towards Next Tuesday, the more the entire Internet will resemble the People's Cube, so you have that going for you.

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:Just asking.
[img]/images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]
I think you can pretty much figure that if Obama is pushing for it, it's got to be bad. I understand that he's not releasing the contents of his proposed regulations for review by the general public, so that is one indication. The whole issue is extremely confusing, which is most likely by design.

Remember, everything Obama does is for politikal purposes. He could give a rat's ass about actually improving things for the average American schmuck. So, if these regulations are implemented, they will probably end up being used by the Demokrat party to intimidate, censor, and shut down any politikal opposition on the internet.

At the very least, we will probably end up with taxes and permit fees being imposed on websites, paying more for internet services, and having to deal with crappier service.

User avatar
Red Square wrote:Dear Comrade Pamalinsky! We have filed your question under the reference number #RS874-187810 and expect to answer it in full sometime towards the end of this Five Year Plan.

In the meantime, rest assured that the Party is actively working on your behalf and monitors all your activities for your own good. The more we progress towards Next Tuesday, the more the entire Internet will resemble the People's Cube, so you have that going for you.
Da, The People's Cube™ is like beta version of Internet 2.0. Like Kindergarten for Kommunists so to speak. This will become major event. People in future will remember where they were when they first realized they can no longer log in to political websites. Those of us fortunate enough to have cut our teeth at the Kindergarten Kube will make transition without skipping beat. Others will scratch heads wondering what to do next, while we kontinue push toward next Tuesday. Thank you Mother-Kube for korrekting my selfish nature with kollektivist thoughts.

User avatar
Have no fear comrades!
Just as the Socialist worker's party of Germany once protected Jews and other undesirables by concentrating them in camps, so shall our Glorious leader Barack Insane Obama Mmmmm.. mmmmm.. mmmmm!!

Shall Protect the Internet - from the glorious people's paper Slate:
The FCC's Plan to Protect the Internet
Sens. Leahy and Blumenthal explain why the commission's net neutrality rules should be adopted.
This is a key moment in the history and the future of the open Internet. Targeted FCC action will protect and promote the Internet as we know it today, a dynamic platform that has led to stunning innovation and economic opportunity for millions of Americans. We must not lose sight of that goal or take it for granted: The driving force of the 21st-century economy must remain open and accessible to all. We have no doubt that that is a bipartisan goal, and we urge all sides to keep that in mind when the FCC acts on Feb. 26.
Image If you study history (so you don't repeat the same freaking mistakes) you will see certain events that take place that in retrospect are turning points but are not recognized to be so at the time.

July 1863 is a good example – two events took place that chanced history but for those living through those tumultuous times it wasn't as evident.

The current era error is one of those times. For us we have two events taking place that could wreck havoc on our future freedom.

We have the afore mentioned misnamed net neutrality Government takeover of Al Gore's Creation AND we have the Legalization of Obama's Illegal amnesty by the GOP.

Both mean dire consequences for the future – In the case of net neutrality it will mean the government will have much greater control over the Web… and your TV experience(From the Washington Compost):
How the FCC could use an obscure Internet power to change the pay-TV market
In a few days, the Federal Communications Commission will vote on the government's strict new net neutrality rules for Internet providers. And while the proposed regulations are mainly focused on whether companies like Comcast can block or slow Web sites, a small piece of the rules could give the government wider authority over television programming — and by extension, your TV experience.

And in the case of Obama's Illegal amnesty we will have the imprimatur of legitimacy of Obama risible actions – meaning that more people will flood over the border.

And when they vote for their largess looted at gunpoint for them by the government it will tip the scales to the socialist side.

That's the dire situation as I see it – let us all hope I am dead wrong on this and we won't look back on this moment as the beginning of the end of freedom.

User avatar
Comrade Šterpin wrote:
Image

....We have the afore mentioned misnamed net neutrality Government takeover of Al Gore's Creation AND we have the Legalization of Obama's Illegal amnesty by the GOP....


Image
The RINO establishment disgusts me to no end. If you think the Demokrat Lite Party (formerly known as the "GOP") has our backs and gives a shit about America, then you are sadly mistaken. Mooch McConjob should be removed from the senate and be tried for treason. I'm expecting Cryin' Tammy Fay Boehner to betray us next.

User avatar
Gummipuppe wrote: Image
The RINO establishment disgusts me to no end. If you think the Demokrat Lite Party (formerly known as the "GOP") has our backs and gives a shit about America, then you are sadly mistaken. Mooch McConjob should be removed from the senate and be tried for treason. I'm expecting [highlight=#ffff00]Cryin' Tammy Fay Boehner to betray us next[/highlight].
Image Did you not mean "again" rather than "next"?

User avatar
RedDiaperette wrote:
Gummipuppe wrote: Image
The RINO establishment disgusts me to no end. If you think the Demokrat Lite Party (formerly known as the "GOP") has our backs and gives a shit about America, then you are sadly mistaken. Mooch McConjob should be removed from the senate and be tried for treason. I'm expecting [highlight=#ffff00]Cryin' Tammy Fay Boehner to betray us next[/highlight].
Image Did you not mean "again" rather than "next"?

Image
"Next," as in this instance. Oh, yes, the RINO rat bastard has a history of betrayal and treachery, so that would be "again" as well.

At this point, we're screwed.

User avatar
RedDiaperette wrote:
Gummipuppe wrote: Image
The RINO establishment disgusts me to no end. If you think the Demokrat Lite Party (formerly known as the "GOP") has our backs and gives a shit about America, then you are sadly mistaken. Mooch McConjob should be removed from the senate and be tried for treason. I'm expecting [highlight=#ffff00]Cryin' Tammy Fay Boehner to betray us next[/highlight].
Image Did you not mean "again" rather than "next"?
Image Yes Komrades, 'tis true. We are ALL Demokrats now. The Party™ has successfully swallowed the oposition through cunning use of ridicule and shame. The Glorious World of Next Tuesday™ is much closer than we think, komrades. There may be a few stray holdouts for konservatism within our government, but not enough of them to restore us to the terrifying world of individual liberty and self-reliance. Despite Amerika being under the oppressive thumb of the kapitalist GOP swine such as Ronald Reagan and the Bush dynasty, the nation has still progressed toward our ultimate goal of equality. Getting back to the pathetic ideal of 'personal responsibility' (spit) would require elekting so many filthy konservatives, that it is all but impossible. The only chance for liberty to fester among us would be to nominate and elekt konservatives repeatedly over the course of dekades. Communist Viktory is within our grasp Komrades! Amerikan Liberty is in the throes of death. We the People alone hold the power over our destiny.FORWARD!Image Truly my friends, the GOP no longer represents the preservation of our freedom. Many of them are merely interested in enriching themselves and maintaining their power. What we must do is make it politically expedient for them to represent our interests. They are getting rich representing the interests of their donors. Many may have begun with good intentions, but are corrupted shortly after their arrival in D.C. I was proud to elect Senator Rubio, but have already informed him I will not make the same mistake again. There are a handful who have not sullied themselves yet, but I am not certain that the machine will allow them to take power, unless we DEMAND it. After 20 years as a Republican, I registered as an Independent for the first time after Romney lost in 2012. Hold firm to the principles of liberty, and do not allow the media to pick our nominee again!

User avatar
Battlebot Potemkin wrote:Image Are the thought police smart enough to realize this joint is a parody site?
No, I don't think so. That's why I am concerned.

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:
Battlebot Potemkin wrote:Image Are the thought police smart enough to realize this joint is a parody site?
No, I don't think so. That's why I am concerned.
Are you afraid that they will love us or hate us? Regardless of how they actually see us, in the pursuit of "net neutrality", I think they will paint us as an expendable part of the extreme left that should be eliminated in the interest of balancing fairness with the sites on the right that will also be eliminated. You know, like when the IRS kept saying how they also discriminated against left-wing organizations (to make it look fair).

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote:
Pamalinsky wrote:
Battlebot Potemkin wrote:Image Are the thought police smart enough to realize this joint is a parody site?
No, I don't think so. That's why I am concerned.
Are you afraid that they will love us or hate us? Regardless of how they actually see us, in the pursuit of "net neutrality", I think they will paint us as an expendable part of the extreme left that should be eliminated in the interest of balancing fairness with the sites on the right that will also be eliminated. You know, like when the IRS kept saying how they also discriminated against left-wing organizations (to make it look fair).
Yes.

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:
Konservative_Punk wrote:
Pamalinsky wrote: No, I don't think so. That's why I am concerned.
Are you afraid that they will love us or hate us? Regardless of how they actually see us, in the pursuit of "net neutrality", I think they will paint us as an expendable part of the extreme left that should be eliminated in the interest of balancing fairness with the sites on the right that will also be eliminated. You know, like when the IRS kept saying how they also discriminated against left-wing organizations (to make it look fair).
Yes.
In that case Komrade Alinsky (Any relative of Saul's is a komrade of mine.), I propose a contest to create a new header for the site to make it klear to all Party regulators that this site is satirikal in nature. With the need for advertising a thing of the past, the space can be used to deklare our Kubic Neutrality through unmistakable colorful banners. Image

User avatar
Don't worry Comrade Pamalinsky. We did address this before. This time someone is attempting to stop such. Our allies need to move aside and allow it to happen.

[img]images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]

If we push this into the light, they will not succeed.

User avatar
Hammer and Loupe wrote:Don't worry Comrade Pamalinsky. We did address this before. This time someone is attempting to stop such. Our allies need to move aside and allow it to happen.

[img]images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]

If we push this into the light, they will not succeed.

Thanks, Hammer. I love the light because it let's me see things, and, gosh darn it, I look pretty after all these years, but know so many who shun it. They could look pretty, too, but just don't see that! I don't understand it. I mean, looking pretty is what it's all about, right? : • )

Komrade Konservative_Punk, Your reassuring display leaves not much more to say. Thank you!

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote:
Image
Truly my friends, the GOP no longer represents the preservation of our freedom. Many of them are merely interested in enriching themselves and maintaining their power. What we must do is make it politically expedient for them to represent our interests. They are getting rich representing the interests of their donors. Many may have begun with good intentions, but are corrupted shortly after their arrival in D.C. I was proud to elect Senator Rubio, but have already informed him I will not make the same mistake again. There are a handful who have not sullied themselves yet, but I am not certain that the machine will allow them to take power, unless we DEMAND it. After 20 years as a Republican, I registered as an Independent for the first time after Romney lost in 2012. Hold firm to the principles of liberty, and do not allow the media to pick our nominee again!

Image
I agree totally. The RINOs like Rubio, Boehner, et al, use the Tea Party and other conservative groups to get voted into office, then stab conservative constituents in the back to satisfy the needs of their "donor class." The donor class bankrolls both the Demokrat Lite Party and the Demokrat Party. To the donor class both parties are the same... simply a means to advance their personal agenda. They could give a rat's ass about what the voters want, laws, the Constitution, and the health of America. As a result, both parties are merging into one unified, stinking pile of excrement.

Once the Demokrat Lite Party RINO establishment conducts the "night of the long knives" to eliminate any remaining conservative Republicans, voting will become irrelevant. We will have a one-party system where the average middle class schmuck get's screwed no matter if they vote "R" or "D."

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote:Image

But is not satire counterrevolutionary?

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote: In that case Komrade Alinsky (Any relative of Saul's is a komrade of mine.), I propose a contest to create a new header for the site to make it klear to all Party regulators that this site is satirikal in nature. With the need for advertising a thing of the past, the space can be used to deklare our Kubic Neutrality through unmistakable colorful banners.

I heard watermarx paper for printers have words and images which will work for our media.

User avatar
RedDiaperette wrote:
Konservative_Punk wrote:Image

But is not satire counterrevolutionary?
Yeah, but, so what? The powers-that-be don't care.

User avatar
Palinsky in Natural Light.jpg
Pamalinsky wrote:
Hammer and Loupe wrote:
If we push this[highlight=#ffff00] into the light[/highlight], they will not succeed.

Thanks, Hammer. [highlight=#ffff00]I love the light[/highlight] because it let's me see things, and, gosh darn it, I look pretty after all these years, but know so many who shun it. They could look pretty, too, but just don't see that! I don't understand it. I mean, looking pretty is what it's all about, right? : • )
Yes, and nothing could be prettier than being bathed in Natural Light. (Natural Light always makes things look prettier to me.)

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote:
Palinsky in Natural Light.jpg
Pamalinsky wrote:
Hammer and Loupe wrote:
If we push this[highlight=#ffff00] into the light[/highlight], they will not succeed.

Thanks, Hammer. [highlight=#ffff00]I love the light[/highlight] because it let's me see things, and, gosh darn it, I look pretty after all these years, but know so many who shun it. They could look pretty, too, but just don't see that! I don't understand it. I mean, looking pretty is what it's all about, right? : • )
Yes, and nothing could be prettier than being bathed in Natural Light. (Natural Light always makes things look prettier to me.)
Ha, Ha! Well, OK, it has to be the "right" light. Ha! Ha! Very good, my friend. I need all the help I can get at this point in my life. As do us all.

User avatar
Image And yet, and yet ... I can't help thinking that there's still something so enterprising in the American Spirit that someone(s) will come up with a new medium to do an end run around these regulations on the Internet. After all, talk radio took over when even cable TV was squelched; the Internet took over when even talk radio was threatened; and who knows what will suddenly appear when the Internet is defanged? Samizdat lives ... and yes, even after all these years of bitter experience, I still believe in the American Spirit. Someone, somewhere, is already starting to think up the next samizdat medium. (Okay, okay, so I'm a wide-eyed dreamer. That's because I'm an American, a South Bronx slum kid who made good.)

User avatar
RedDiaperette, while I am in agreement that the nature of the individual rests in the ability to overcome, don't overlook the big picture which has been an ongoing effort to the destruction of the free market which has been to make it a cultural artifact by exhausting it to subjugation, warfare and corruption. We are being confronted daily with a subjective process where media, academia, the political and judiciary have institutionalized the alienation from any reality to build a glorious world of collective of make believe.

User avatar
Comrades,

The correct short hand for the Squeeker of the House is Bo'ner,
This may be hard for some, for him it is NOT!!! He lives in the land of limp.
Last edited by General Confusion on 2/26/2015, 6:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason for editing this post: addition or was it subtraction.

User avatar
General Confusion wrote:Comrades,

The correct short hand for the Squeeker of the House is Bo'ner,
This may be hard for some, for him it is NOT!!!He lives in the land of limp.

Komrade General, I find it ironic that the Squeeker is so limp even though his name is Bo'ner.

M84
User avatar
Ah, Next Tuesday. I give thanks to Comrade Obama's reign for freeing me from the burden of uncensored, government-free internet. Praise Obama!

User avatar
Comrade Phalkyn, my soaring bird,

Are you serious? We may be safe and cool for now but, sooner or later, they will be onto us. I, along with you, agree about the Prog Off and Cone of Silence thing (which I abuse from time to time because I forget). That alone could get me sent to the Gulag.

Red Diaperette, I go for all that American Spirit™ stuff, too. It is building up much torque for the next expression of itself. I eagerly await this. IOW, I absolutely love you. (I lived in Manhattan for about 16 years so that means something!)

Trashmouth, what a stunning, and moving, post. Awesome!

General Confusion, he does, indeed live in the land of the limp. Thanks for pointing this out. I don't believe it will ever stop.

User avatar
Gummipuppe wrote:
General Confusion wrote:Comrades,

The correct short hand for the Squeeker of the House is Bo'ner,
This may be hard for some, for him it is NOT!!!He lives in the land of limp.

Komrade General, I find it ironic that the Squeeker is so limp even though his name is Bo'ner.
Yeah! I mean, doesn't this guy realize he's got a PR problem with his name? Comerad Weiner made the same mistake. He, also, doubled down on his stupidity, just like Boner.Jeez, get real, Boner! And, you too, Weiner, though, it's too late for you now. Your wife is now in the clutches of the next FEMALE POTUS! Isn't that fabulous?

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote: Yeah! I mean, doesn't this guy realize he's got a PR problem with his name? Comerad Weiner made the same mistake. He, also, doubled down on his stupidity, just like Boner.Jeez, get real, Boner! And, you too, Weiner, though, it's too late for you now. Your wife is now in the clutches of the next FEMALE POTUS! Isn't that fabulous?

Komrade Bo'ner only lives up to his name when he has one for tea baggers and conservative Republicans. His betrayal and treachery towards them is most glorious and inspiring. He is a true hero of the revolution.

When I hear "Trust me" I cringe.
And when I next hear "I'm from the government and I'm here to help" I look for hiding places.
And when the next statement is "You can't see it until we enact it" I realize it's probably too late.

User avatar
Comrades, there is nothing to fe ar about the Cube getting shut down, as we are the (only) korrect site for news.

User avatar
Hey, Comrade Red, Thanks for The People's Cube™ graphic at the beginning of this post. Most appreciated. I saw what you did there.

User avatar
Pamalinsky! You met the love of your life here at The People's Cube! Well, believe it or not, I just met the love of my life today while listening to the radio, though he sounded a lot like someone that I, too, could've met at the Cube. Anyway, I was forced to drive around with another freaking person who wanted me to listen to Rush Limbaugh. It would've been hell on earth if not for a wonderful progressive dreamboat named Hector who really told him off!

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015 ... neutrality

RUSH: Here is Hector, San Antonio, Texas. It's great to have you on the program, Hector. Hello.
CALLER: Hey, how you doing? I want to know why you have to lie to all these great people out there about net neutrality.
RUSH: Why am I lying about net neutrality?
CALLER: You know it's not gonna do anything to hurt anybody's ISPs or anything. It's gonna actually help people.
RUSH: (laughing) Ah, Hector, I love calls like this.
CALLER: Why are you laughing, it's true.
RUSH: No, no, Hector, what point, what objective could I possibly have? How would I gain anything by lying to anybody about this?
CALLER: You're just doing it to try to get Obama -- people upset about Obama and the FCC.
RUSH: People already are upset about Obama. I don't have to do anything --
CALLER: I'm not upset with him. I'm somebody.
RUSH: Well, you should be. It's exactly people like you who are being played for suckers and fools. You need to wise up, Hector.
CALLER: Me wise up? You're the one that's telling people, "Oh, my God, you're gonna lose your ISP. You're gonna lose everything. These tech blogs are just making me crazy." The tech blog people are trying to put people at ease.
RUSH: (laughing) Hector, are you pretending to be Brian Williams today, by any chance?
CALLER: No, I'm not Brian Williams. Why do you think I'm Brian Williams? I'm trying to make sure that people understand that they have a right to free Internet and the fastest Internet possible, and the best way to do it is let the government get involved in it.
RUSH: You want people to understand they have a right to free Internet and the fastest Internet possible and the fastest way is to let the government get involved in it?
CALLER: Yes.
RUSH: (laughing) You know what's happened here, folks? He's lying. He's lying. He's trying to sell me on the lie. I offered this to callers two weeks ago, in honor of Brian Williams. See if you can do it, call here and sell a lie, tell me something that's not true, see if you can sell it, get away with it. Hector, I have to applaud you. You are sticking with it.
CALLER: What do you mean, I'm sticking with what? I have to drive around in a freaking car with another person to try to tell me that this is what I need to listen to?
RUSH: Hector, you're great. I appreciate the call. Mission accomplished.
And just like that, I'm in love with Hector. As you can see by the transcript, he's sweet and sensitive, and I know he must, like, totally understand me, because he uses the same talking points I do! Why, I love him so much that I'm ready to conceive his child and then abort it.

Like him, I'm not upset with Obama, because I'm somebody. And like Hector, I believe the best way to do anything is to let the government get involved in it.

I trust the government.

I'm a Democrat.

User avatar
Thank you for sharing that C.P. I was unable to receive that transmission today, as I was busy tending the genetically modified beets in my garden which are sprouting early this year due to the ravages of Global Warming... er, Climate Change. I often like to listen in on the enemy talking points beacause I like to keep my komrades close and my enemies even closer. I hope that Hector will reciprocate your affections and that you will one day be united in the cause of kollektivism.

User avatar
I doubt Hector will require your services Commissarka Pinkie. You see, Hector and his party propagate through the process of binary fission, or division; i.e., they multiply by dividing.

User avatar
[highlight=#ffff00]they multiply by dividing.[/highlight]
Captain, is that Kommon Korps™, or PeopleMath™? The propagation process for them is the exakt opposite of our division by multiplication. We rely on the multiplication of kultural differences to divide the klass strukture of the kollektive into special interest groups that can be purchased through halal spending.

User avatar
Konservative_Punk wrote:
[highlight=#ffff00]they multiply by dividing.[/highlight]
Captain, is that Kommon Korps™, or PeopleMath™? The propagation process for them is the exakt opposite of our division by multiplication. We rely on the multiplication of kultural differences to divide the klass strukture of the kollektive into special interest groups that can be purchased through halal spending.

You are close to korrekt, latest best friend Komrade Punk. Although, according to the Mathematical Division of The People's™ Division of Division, the more precise answer is:

TheAnswer.jpg

User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie wrote:
Pamalinsky! You met the love of your life here at The People's Cube! Well, believe it or not, I just met the love of my life today while listening to the radio, though he sounded a lot like someone that I, too, could've met at the Cube. Anyway, I was forced to drive around with another freaking person who wanted me to listen to Rush Limbaugh. It would've been hell on earth if not for a wonderful progressive dreamboat named Hector who really told him off!

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2015 ... neutrality

RUSH: Here is Hector, San Antonio, Texas. It's great to have you on the program, Hector. Hello.
CALLER: Hey, how you doing? I want to know why you have to lie to all these great people out there about net neutrality.
RUSH: Why am I lying about net neutrality?
CALLER: You know it's not gonna do anything to hurt anybody's ISPs or anything. It's gonna actually help people.
RUSH: (laughing) Ah, Hector, I love calls like this.
CALLER: Why are you laughing, it's true.
RUSH: No, no, Hector, what point, what objective could I possibly have? How would I gain anything by lying to anybody about this?
CALLER: You're just doing it to try to get Obama -- people upset about Obama and the FCC.
RUSH: People already are upset about Obama. I don't have to do anything --
CALLER: I'm not upset with him. I'm somebody.
RUSH: Well, you should be. It's exactly people like you who are being played for suckers and fools. You need to wise up, Hector.
CALLER: Me wise up? You're the one that's telling people, "Oh, my God, you're gonna lose your ISP. You're gonna lose everything. These tech blogs are just making me crazy." The tech blog people are trying to put people at ease.
RUSH: (laughing) Hector, are you pretending to be Brian Williams today, by any chance?
CALLER: No, I'm not Brian Williams. Why do you think I'm Brian Williams? I'm trying to make sure that people understand that they have a right to free Internet and the fastest Internet possible, and the best way to do it is let the government get involved in it.
RUSH: You want people to understand they have a right to free Internet and the fastest Internet possible and the fastest way is to let the government get involved in it?
CALLER: Yes.
RUSH: (laughing) You know what's happened here, folks? He's lying. He's lying. He's trying to sell me on the lie. I offered this to callers two weeks ago, in honor of Brian Williams. See if you can do it, call here and sell a lie, tell me something that's not true, see if you can sell it, get away with it. Hector, I have to applaud you. You are sticking with it.
CALLER: What do you mean, I'm sticking with what? [highlight=#ffff00][highlight=#FFFF00]I have to drive around in a freaking car with another person to try to tell me that this is what I need to listen to? [/highlight][/highlight]
RUSH: Hector, you're great. I appreciate the call. Mission accomplished.
And just like that, I'm in love with Hector. As you can see by the transcript, he's sweet and sensitive, and I know he must, like, totally understand me, because he uses the same talking points I do! Why, I love him so much that I'm ready to conceive his child and then abort it.

Like him, [highlight=#ffff00]I'm not upset with Obama, because I'm somebody[/highlight]. And like Hector, I believe the best way to do anything is to let the government get involved in it.

I trust the government.

I'm a Democrat.
Pinkie, That was hilarious! I heard that call, too! I'm sure, if you try hard enough, you will find a way to meet Hector and hector the living crap out of him. Here's hopin'.But, of course, there are so many Hectors to choose from. I know you will make the right choice.I am truly honored that you chose to respond to my post.

User avatar
Comrade Šterpin wrote: Image If you study history (so you don't repeat the same freaking mistakes) you will see certain events that take place that in retrospect are turning points but are not recognized to be so at the time.

July 1863 is a good example – two events took place that chanced history but for those living through those tumultuous times it wasn't as evident.
Comrade, I suppose you mean the Glorious Victories of the Forces of Progressivism over the infidel secessionists at Gettysburg and Vicksburg? Brian Williams tells me he remembers it all in great detail, but was still critical of George ibn-Meade for not following his advice to finish Lee's army. But how does this connect with Dear Leader's benevolent plan to protect us from making wrong choices on the internet?

User avatar
Bill G., Duly noted and respected.

Captain Craptek,
They multiply by dividing = UTOPIA? I'm stealing this and offering it to others as a Universal Truth.™ (because that's what it is!) I showed this to an engineering friend of mine and he absolutely cracked up laughing.

Miss.USSA,
But, to them, if they choose, we are the dreaded "extremists."

User avatar
Comrade Šterpin wrote:Image If you study history (so you don't repeat the same freaking mistakes) you will see certain events that take place that in retrospect are turning points but are not recognized to be so at the time.


Those who don't study history are condemned to repeat it.

Those who do are condemned to stand helplessly by, while everyone else repeats it.

User avatar
Kelly Ivanovna/келя ивановна wrote:
Comrade Šterpin wrote:Image If you study history (so you don't repeat the same freaking mistakes) you will see certain events that take place that in retrospect are turning points but are not recognized to be so at the time.


[highlight=#FFFF00]Those who don't study history are condemned to repeat it.

Those who do are condemned to stand helplessly by, while everyone else repeats it.[/highlight]

Truest, most insightful statement ever made in the history of mankind.


User avatar
Captain Craptek wrote:
Konservative_Punk wrote:
[highlight=#ffff00]they multiply by dividing.[/highlight]
Captain, is that Kommon Korps™, or PeopleMath™? The propagation process for them is the exakt opposite of our division by multiplication. We rely on the multiplication of kultural differences to divide the klass strukture of the kollektive into special interest groups that can be purchased through halal spending.

You are close to korrekt, latest best friend Komrade Punk. Although, according to the Mathematical Division of The People's™ Division of Division, the more precise answer is:

TheAnswer.jpg
Utopia. Greek for "no place"

So, according to your vast mathematical calculations, the solution = 0!

Q.E.D.

My friend has a t-shirt that shows a professor writing a lengthy mathematical problem on a blackboard. In the middle of it, the words "then a miracle happened" appear and he proceeds to the solution.

Somehow I think that applies here. Somehow.

User avatar
[highlight=#ffff00]My friend has a t-shirt that shows a professor writing a lengthy mathematical problem on a blackboard. In the middle of it, the words "then a miracle happened" appear and he proceeds to the solution.
[/highlight]
I forgot to mention that his solution was, wait for it........ZERO!


 
POST REPLY