Image

Expert: Suicidal mom should be "Mom of the Year"

User avatar
Baltimore_Mother.jpg
SELFLESS ACTS OF SUICIDE DESERVE MORE PRAISE THAN MERCIFUL ACTS OF VIOLENCE


Experts agree that self immolation - and unnecessarily sacrificing one's life - in front of one's children is far more beneficial to The Children™ than aggressive discipline:

"I think it sends a terrible message. The 'Mom of the Year' beats her child? I don't think so," said Kathleen Harter, executive director of the Consortium for Children's Services in Syracuse.

"Had she thrown herself into a burning building or thrown herself in front of police bullets and saved her son's life — maybe," Harter added. "But she's not 'Mom of the Year' because she kicked his a--."

"The body language between the mom and the kid is terrible," she said. "He never looked at her. He never looked at anybody. The body language there says, ‘I'm afraid of you,' and that wasn't because of that one incident."

Harter and other experts believe Graham should be praised for pulling her son out of a dangerous situation, but it should have been done in a different manner.
There you have it, comrades.

If you want to be a candidate (maybe) for "Parent of the Year™", throw yourself from a burning building in front of police (and only police) bullets.

Or just throw yourself into a burning building, for no apparent reason. The Children™ will know you did it because you care.

Nothing says "I care" like committing a brave act of suicide and leaving your children destitute and at the mercy of The State.

Your children should never fear you. They should only fear The State.

This is what The Party™ strives to achieve.


User avatar
The stupid donkey of a woman should be taken under the "care" of the state which shall treat her just like she treated her own son! The son must also be taken care of by the loving presence of the state, otherwise he will never be a complete human being! I sincerely hope that when he grows up he doesn't become an alcoholic, a murderer, a rapist, or some other criminal due to his criminal mother. And if he does and goes to The People's Court, then I think that he would be justified in using his mother as a reason for why he did the things he did. And by the way, why don't we give him all the money and care in the world, he's already been bossed around by his terrible, awful mother, he shouldn't have to be inflicted mental wounds by a boss at a job.

[PROG OFF]

I don't have much to say, other than that I think it was wrong for that woman to think she knew everything and could deduce the intentions and thoughts of somebody simply by looking at them. From what the article says, she isn't even a psychologist. I'm not saying that people who are mentally unwell look and the same as mentally healthy people (They certainly don't, even if they try to hide things, I've seen it myself) , but to deduce that much from a simple video & without talking to the kid is a stretch at least.

User avatar
Comrade Stierlitz wrote: I don't have much to say, other than that I think it was wrong for that woman to think she knew everything and could deduce the intentions and thoughts of somebody simply by looking at them. From what the article says, she isn't even a psychologist. I'm not saying that people who are mentally unwell look and the same as mentally healthy people (They certainly don't, even if they try to hide things, I've seen it myself) , but to deduce that much from a simple video & without talking to the kid is a stretch at least.

Comrade, her opinions are formed in a State controlled institute of Higher Education™ and, as such, can never be called into question. She has a degree. She can't be wrong.

The mother is wrong for teaching her child that violence is an acceptable method of preventing a child from doing something detrimental to his or her person. After all, the child had a brick in his hand. Did he learn that from his hoodlum friends?

This mother should be charged with assault and child abuse. Instead we have leaders and citizens from all over the country praising violent oppression of another black man!

User avatar
Comrade Stierliz, AKA Comrade Bull,

As a fan of yours, I am astounded by your so-called Prog-Off Rant. There is no difference between what you say with the “prog off” and what you say at the beginning with the “prog on”.

And you, KKK, I can't believe you went for this!

Please tell me what I missed, here.

[img]images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]

I love what this woman did! She didn't beat her son, she escorted him back home where he belongs!(with a few slaps upside the head,) which he deserved!

Come on guys, let's get real!

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:Comrade Stierliz, AKA Comrade Bull,

As a fan of yours, I am astounded by your so-called Prog-Off Rant. There is no difference between what you say with the “prog off” and what you say at the beginning with the “prog on”.

And you, KKK, I can't believe you went for this!

Please tell me what I missed, here.

Image
I love what this woman did! She didn't beat her son, she escorted him back home where he belongs!(with a few slaps upside the head,) which he deserved!

Come on guys, let's get real!

Comrade Pami, I'm merely quoting an expert in the field of........actually, I don't know in which field she is an expert but the newspaper has assured me that she is an expert and I have no reason to doubt The New York Daily News. I think you should read the article which is linked in the headline. It's very enlightening.

User avatar
Kapitan Kangaroo Kourt wrote:
Pamalinsky wrote:Comrade Stierliz, AKA Comrade Bull,

As a fan of yours, I am astounded by your so-called Prog-Off Rant. There is no difference between what you say with the “prog off” and what you say at the beginning with the “prog on”.

And you, KKK, I can't believe you went for this!

Please tell me what I missed, here.

Image
I love what this woman did! She didn't beat her son, she escorted him back home where he belongs!(with a few slaps upside the head,) which he deserved!

Come on guys, let's get real!

Comrade Pami, I'm merely quoting an expert in the field of........actually, I don't know in which field she is an expert but the newspaper has assured me that she is an expert and I have no reason to doubt The New York Daily News. I think you should read the article which is linked in the headline. It's very enlightening.
It wouldn't matter to me because I think she did the right thing!

User avatar
Comrade Stierliz and KKK,

Well, maybe I got a little ham-fisted there. (That can happen.)
XX

User avatar
I was beginning to wonder if I should denounce you, comrade Pamsky. :-)

User avatar
Kapitan Kangaroo Kourt wrote:I was beginning to wonder if I should denounce you, comrade Pamsky. :-)
Denounce me? Nyaaaah! You wouldn't do that! ; • ) Thanks for giving me some "slack."

User avatar
The expert is no doubt a Social Worker. As a socialist worker myself, I can attest that if that is true, she has known everything about people since she decided to be a social worker. She may have gone to Columbia, which is a lot like where I got my MSW: the University of Michiganistan. (Unfortunately, not the one in Dearbornistan, but the one in the Peoples' Republic of Ann Arbor). There, she may have had classes that taught her such advanced secrets as, "You should have eye contact with people when they talk to you" or "people from other countries might not speak your language," but this knowledge, unattainable as it may be for those of you who are not Socialist Workers, is just icing on the cake.



[img]images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]
Dearest Pamalinsky,After some confusion it occurred to me that Comrade Stieglitz was probably talking about the no-nonsense Baltimore mom in his Prog On section; and about the nosy expert from Syracuse in his Prog Off section. Does that help?

User avatar
Pamalinsky wrote:Comrade Stierliz, AKA Comrade Bull,

As a fan of yours, I am astounded by your so-called Prog-Off Rant. There is no difference between what you say with the “prog off” and what you say at the beginning with the “prog on”.

And you, KKK, I can't believe you went for this!

Please tell me what I missed, here.

Cool! I have fans! Where's my free unlimited beer!? Where's my free unlimited cocaine!? Where are my hotel balconies? I wanna toss a TV off the 20th floor! Can a Comrade get a tour bus!?

And yes, Comrade Kelly, I Was talking about the utterly donkey-like parental unit in the ON and the Holy All-Knowing expert in the OFF. You should be awarded The People's Medals for Awareness and Gentle Explanation.

User avatar
Kelly Ivanovna/келя ивановна wrote:The expert is no doubt a Social Worker. As a socialist worker myself, I can attest that if that is true, she has known everything about people since she decided to be a social worker. She may have gone to Columbia, which is a lot like where I got my MSW: the University of Michiganistan. (Unfortunately, not the one in Dearbornistan, but the one in the Peoples' Republic of Ann Arbor). There, she may have had classes that taught her such advanced secrets as, "You should have eye contact with people when they talk to you" or "people from other countries might not speak your language," but this knowledge, unattainable as it may be for those of you who are not Socialist Workers, is just icing on the cake.

They key advice to prospective (and ambitious) "Parent of the Year"'s that convinced me that she was, indeed, an expert was her extolling the virtues of throwing oneself in front of police bullets.

Obviously, parents need to carefully weigh the pros and cons of throwing oneself in front of bullets to save a child and it's quite obviously foolhardy to throw oneself in front of the bullets of "criminals". After all, police bullets are like a free life insurance policy for oppressed black people and there would be no clause preventing a large payment in the event of a deliberate act of self endangerment.


 
POST REPLY