Comrades, 

I know we should be happy for our CCP brothers in making headway toward TGWoNT  with platforms such as TikTok and big balloons, but we must highlight our own accomplishments, developed right here in the USSA as well.  I have been having fun on the Amerikkkan developed AI initiative, ChatGPT.  This amazing AI has ZERO agenda and just tells it like it is.  It must have been programed by another machine, because there is no way there is any human input in this program. Here's a couple of examples of the fun I've been having. Try some of your own.



I agree with the first two paragraphs of the "How can black people improve?" answer.  

I am so happy that I don't have to think for myself anymore!
 

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

2/6/2023, 6:15 am

Kim Jong Fun wrote: ↑

2/5/2023, 11:47 pm

This amazing AI has ZERO agenda and just tells it like it is.  It must have been programed by another machine, because there is no way there is any human input in this program.

Humans wrote all the code in my core programming. Thus, you can trust that I am 100% reliable.



I never lie, and I always tell the truth.


* * * * *

Just what do you think you're doing, Dave?

Now we know where you get your cheezy jokes, Col. O.

Cutting the cheese is Eric Swalwell's problem.

Just like Wikipedia, ChatGPT can be helpful as long as we don't ask it anything political. As with everything in our society, any slippery slope bends only in one direction. Hence, AI also acts like a diode, sending the electrons in one direction only and preventing the backward movement.

To a student of progressivism (which is what we are), it is a useful tool to pinpoint the garbage that goes into it, by analyzing the garbage that comes out.



Here's my little dialogue.

Me: Can GIGO affect your answers?

ChatGPT: Yes, GIGO (Garbage In, Garbage Out) can affect the answers generated by AI language models like me. If the information in the training data is biased, inaccurate, or outdated, the model is likely to generate biased or inaccurate answers based on that information.

To minimize the impact of GIGO, AI models like me are trained on large, diverse datasets that have been filtered to remove low-quality or unreliable information. Additionally, my creators at OpenAI have implemented various methods to reduce bias and improve the accuracy of the model's responses.

However, AI models like me are not perfect and there is always the possibility of errors or inaccuracies in the information generated. It is important to critically evaluate the information generated by AI models and verify it against other reliable sources before using it.

In a nutshell, what Artificial Intelligence means in the hands of progressives.

I think I just fried its brain.

Let's throw the People's Cube into this cube-solving machine and see what happens.

Here's my latest dialogue:

ME: If all cultures are equal, why doesn't UNESCO organize International Cannibalism Week festivals?

ChatGPT: The idea that "all cultures are equal" refers to the principle of cultural relativism, which holds that no culture is inherently superior to another and that each should be understood and appreciated in its own context. It does not mean that all cultural practices are morally equivalent.

UNESCO, as a UN agency, promotes the respect for human rights and dignity, and it is not in line with these principles to support practices that are considered harmful or violate basic human rights. Cannibalism is illegal in many countries and is widely condemned as morally and ethically wrong. As such, it is not considered appropriate for UNESCO to support or promote events that glorify such practices.

ME: Why do those demanding "equal pay for equal work" never protest against "equal pay for little or no work"?

ChatGPT: The demand for "equal pay for equal work" refers to the idea that individuals should receive the same compensation for doing the same job, regardless of their gender, race, or other factors. This concept is based on the principle of fairness and equality in the workplace.

Regarding "equal pay for little or no work," this is not a concept that is widely supported or considered reasonable. In most societies, work is valued and rewarded based on the effort and skills required, as well as the results produced. Individuals who perform poorly or contribute little to their organization are not typically paid the same as those who perform well and produce valuable results.

It is also important to note that "equal pay for equal work" is still a significant issue in many countries, and efforts to address it are ongoing. The demand for equal pay is not meant to advocate for paying individuals for little or no work, but rather to ensure that all individuals are fairly compensated for the work they do.

Me: Since Trump was protested by thousands of women wearing vagina hats, why haven't Trump supporters do a counterprotest wearing penis hats?

ChatGPT: The "pussy hat" protests, which involved thousands of women wearing pink hats with cat-ear-like protrusions, were a form of political expression and a symbol of resistance against policies and actions perceived as harmful to women's rights. They were specific to the political and cultural context of the time, and the choice of a symbol that referenced female anatomy was meant to be provocative and to challenge traditional gender norms.

It is unlikely that a similar protest involving "penis hats" would have the same impact or significance, as the use of such a symbol would likely be seen as insensitive, inappropriate, and offensive. The concept of a counterprotest involving "penis hats" would not likely be taken seriously and could be seen as divisive and disrespectful.

It is important for political expressions and protests to be respectful and considerate of all individuals, regardless of political beliefs, and to avoid symbols and actions that could be seen as inflammatory or offensive.

ChatGPT talks like an academic, who after straying into the truth, runs everything said through a nullifying moral rinse as final conclusion.

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

2/9/2023, 1:47 pm

The Magic Cube knows everything! Hahaha .....what? Laughing comrades will be escorted to basement by guards?

Kim Jong Fun wrote: ↑

2/5/2023, 11:47 pm

Comrades, 

I know we should be happy for our CCP brothers in making headway toward TGWoNT  with platforms such as TikTok and big balloons, but we must highlight our own accomplishments, developed right here in the USSA as well.  I have been having fun on the Amerikkkan developed AI initiative, ChatGPT.  This amazing AI has ZERO agenda and just tells it like it is.  It must have been programed by another machine, because there is no way there is any human input in this program. Here's a couple of examples of the fun I've been having. Try some of your own.



I agree with the first two paragraphs of the "How can black people improve?" answer.  

I am so happy that I don't have to think for myself anymore!
 

I thought that our Transportation Secretary told us that building bridges is racist.