[img]/images/various_uploads/Light_of_Socialism.jpg[/img]

[W]hat??? no [W]??? Ho[w] [w]e supposed to save the [W]orld ifn's we k'nt use no [W]?

Has the Superior Council thought this through before passing directifff???

All Jackalopelipsky knows is that [w]e need a proper title as G.W.O.T. is closer than [w] even imagine in our Big Brother prayers. Iffin's [w]e don't have a name...ho[w] [w]e gonna get recognized for achievement upon its arrival??

Jackalopelipsky
#BR 549

Most Equal Kommrade Komissar al-Blogunov,

I had a thought feeling on this subject. How about United Soviets Making Change? Oh, I think that one has already been taken. It also sounds like our function could include the phrase “Do you want fries with that?”.

Drinking in the Current Truth ™,

Red Salmon

Would it be more progressive to identify as LGBTQGWONT+?

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:Would it be more progressive to identify as LGBTQGWONT+?

Jackalopelipsky doesn't know....but [w]e need name identifier quick because G.[W].O. N. T. is coming quick. See https://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog ... 20640.html

[W]ho are [w]e?? Equality is coming up real fast and gonna chainsa[w] some CNN equality in some G.[W].O.N.T..
.

The Politicians Expecting New Informed Socialism have been pondering the same conundrum, they can't rise to the challenge or get a grip on the problem either.

(THAT acronym is not going on anyone's resume...)

Ivan the Stakhanovets wrote:The Politicians Expecting New Informed Socialism ...

sheez, where is Putout when we need her visualizing wizardry?!!

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:
...GWONTniks?
...Gwontniks?
...GWONTniki?

just for completeness: GWONTchiki (sing. GWONTchik).

jackalopelipsky wrote:[W]hat??? no [W]??? ...

Sure.

21st century here! not 'WORLD' anymore, now it's ... 'PLANET'! and GPONT! GPONT!! GPONT!!!

It seems that GWONTanamera is a girl from GWONTanamo, or GWONT for short. It was a song of the 1960s peace movement, inasmuch as "peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:
...GWONTniks?
...Gwontniks?
...GWONTniki?

just for completeness: GWONTchiki (sing. GWONTchik).

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:... a GWONT ЧК ...

ha!
must be tyelyepatiya!
Bavarian Kubicle had in the pipeline: ГВОНТchiki.


Also:

KUBINTsy (..NT for you-know-what ; ..sy like in Komsomoltsy Ukraintsy etc.)

KUBIGWONTsy (aka KUBIГВОНТsy)

and, in SovProgSpeak:

SvetMirSledVtorKUBISTy (from: Svetlyi Mir Sleduyushchyego Vtornika ; ..y for plural)

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:... a GWONT ЧК ...

ha!
must be tyelyepatiya!
Bavarian Kubicle had in the pipeline: ГВОНТchiki.


Also:

KUBINTsy (..NT for you-know-what ; ..sy like in Komsomoltsy Ukraintsy etc.)

KUBIGWONTsy (aka KUBIГВОНТsy)

and, in SovProgSpeak:

SvetMirSledVtorKUBISTy (from: Svetlyi Mir Sleduyushchyego Vtornika ; ..y for plural)

Therefore, ГВОНТ = СМСВ (QED)

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:

Random Thought: If, hypothetically, there was a Party Bunker, shouldn't it be relocated to Guantanamo Bay?

It would be most equal. I suppose we can learn even more about making Next Tuesday™ greater from the locals.

The People's Anthony Sullivan wrote:

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:

Random Thought: If, hypothetically, there was a Party Bunker, shouldn't it be relocated to Guantanamo Bay?

It would be most equal. I suppose we can learn even more about making Next Tuesday™ greater from the locals.

Good point! Next Tuesday seems to involve a lot of old Chevys.

Red Square wrote:It seems that GWONTanamera is a girl from GWONTanamo, or GWONT for short. It was a song of the 1960s peace movement, inasmuch as "peace is the absence of opposition to socialism."

It's easy to imagine all the happy socialist workers of Cuba after toiling in the Castro sugarcane fields all the hot day gathering together in the evenings to sing and dance their happy music. The socialist workers are such a very musical race, happy to sing and dance the time away, possessed of a wonderful natural sense of musical rhythm.

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:... If, hypothetically, there was a Party Bunker, shouldn't it be relocated to Guantanamo Bay?

Nope.
Umiat, AK.

Keep your friends close [Fidel 2.0, Cuba], and your enemies closer [TPC-PB*, Alaska].
SunTzu—MikeCorleone—BarackBarakovich



* if–if–if–if there ever was a PB, of course.

There is no party bunker. There is no bunker. Anyone who believes there is a bunker (there isn't) is a misogynist racist and a dissident homophobic Rethuglikkkan bedwetter, and will find themselves in a gulag so fast....there is no bunker.

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:... Therefore, ГВОНТ = СМСВ (QED)

da! What QED-strength! Lobachevsky ROFLHAO in delight. oy!


(...what? ...comrade Newbie? ...never heard of Lobachevsky? ..... nu, report at Mystery No. 1!)

Ivan the Stakhanovets wrote:There is no party bunker. There is no bunker. Anyone who believes there is a bunker (there isn't) is a misogynist racist and a dissident homophobic Rethuglikkkan bedwetter, and will find themselves in a gulag so fast....there is no bunker.

Ah...Ivan..thank you for remaining firm GWONT 4Knik military commander reminding the rest of equal GWONT 4Kniks that there IS no Party Bunker because until death is only resolve in advance of GWONT. Without your firm authoritative leadership in this matter who knows what kind of infiltration in Party Bunker with THIS bunch of GWONT 4Kniks.

But, as we were told, "We go to war with the army we have." May Stalin make your forehead like flint in dealing with thumbless, and possibly invisible aliens out to cross pollinate GWONT 4Kniks looking for a PARTY Bunker...when all they really mean is what DOESN'T happen behind Tractor Barn #2.

THERE IS NO PARTY BUNKER.

Forehead like flint, Ivan, forehead like flint.

and of course forelock tug salute,
Jackalopelipsky
#BR 549

jackalopelipsky wrote:#BR 549

Ivan the Stakhanovets wrote:There is no party bunker... ....there is no bunker.

But, but, Herr Acosta from Central National Nitwits, he was at the bunker.
O nein, wait, it was Hitler, Hitler's Bunker.
Actually, pardon, not bunker - a border it was.
A totally open unsecured border, a neat barrier there, Acosta in its shade, head bunkered in butt.

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:

The People's Anthony Sullivan wrote:

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:

Random Thought: If, hypothetically, there was a Party Bunker, shouldn't it be relocated to Guantanamo Bay?

It would be most equal. I suppose we can learn even more about making Next Tuesday™ greater from the locals.

Good point! Next Tuesday seems to involve a lot of old Chevys.

Essentially

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote:

jackalopelipsky wrote:#BR 549

Well done, comrade. Nothing says "I identify with the partially toothless proletarian toiling masses" like BR 549.

Forelock tug to you. The most equal deplorable prison number in all gulag. Despised by Leftist and Rethuglicans both. The number that says: Vote this creature off island FIRST! It's like it's a whole mythology and legend...just like mythological horned rodent.

Very old Chevy nomenclature...so Jackalopelipsky is living GWONT like it's the following Friday.

Also, thanks for identifier of GWONT 4Kniks. It really works!!

Extreme equal forelock tug dear Komissar al-Blogunov,
Jackalopelipsky
#BR 549

Furthering
Real
Economic
Equality for

Socially
Transformational
Universal
Freedom and
Fairness

FREE STUFF FOR ALL!!!

No Party Bunker?!? Oh Dear Stalin!

Commissar Kindly Uncle Unkulturny will have to halt the stocking of his bunker underground work area with the sirloin freezers only 98% full! Thank Lenin that the other meat freezers are completely full! And that the power and back-up power and backup-backup power are fully installed and functional!

Sadly, it also appears that we will also have to dismiss some of the less attractive discreet enjoyable personal attendants knowledgeable Situation Analysts back to the beet fields. (But rest assured that they will all get an extra potato every Saturday...)

Apparatchik Unkulturny wrote:No Party Bunker?!? Oh Dear Stalin!

... appears that we will also have to dismiss some of the less attractive discreet enjoyable personal attendants knowledgeable Situation Analysts back to the beet fields ...

Don't despair, Unkulturny. Nye byespakoysya. We Apparatchiki, vee haf our ways, don't we?
Biznyes as usual, vee reapparat them to our side-kollektive of JUICY OPERETTE ARTISTS.

[img]/images/various_uploads/Mao_Lmao.jpg[/img]

"History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce."
- Karl Marx

[img]/images/various_uploads/Mao_Lmao.jpg[/img]

MTCA

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:

Apparatchik Unkulturny wrote:No Party Bunker?!? Oh Dear Stalin!

... appears that we will also have to dismiss some of the less attractive discreet enjoyable personal attendants knowledgeable Situation Analysts back to the beet fields ...

Don't despair, Unkulturny. Nye byespakoysya. We Apparatchiki, vee haf our ways, don't we?
Biznyes as usual, vee reapparat them to our side-kollektive of JUICY OPERETTE ARTISTS.

schleck, schmatz, mmm.....

Ahh, Comrade Genosse Dummkopf, your observation is Totally (and Politically!) Korrect! However, since computers have yet to be monitoring the administration of our beet collective - except, of course, for Kindly Uncle Unkulturny's personal porn email desktop! So certain personnel matters of our collective are usually settled in person, one-on-one, with no pesky saved record of the proceedings (if you know what I mean, and I think you do...)

Red Square wrote:"History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce."
- Karl Marx

[img]/images/various_uploads/Mao_Lmao.jpg[/img]

Red Square.. [angry face Marx is never wrong. [angry face So, my question is about korrect response being laughter [angry face [EXTREME ANGRY FACE] All comrades know Marx NEVER LAUGHED....like how could he??? Living as he did in oppressive, rigid, backwards class structured oppression that needed to be upended and tossed on the trash heap of any previously existing norms? EXTREME ANGRY FACE [EXTREME ANGRY FACE] Marx did not laugh...like...e.v.e.r. Marx knew he was going to die before those oppressive structures and those constraining RULES and the people enslaved by such tyranny was going to change. EXTREME ANGRY FACE!!

But, lmao means...Well this just...EXTREME ANGRY FACE EXPLOSION

Does anyone around here know if Marx ever laughed??

Jackalopelipsky
#BR 549