Dear Comrades,

I hope that this missive finds you well and reveling in the wonderfulness that is the progressive Marxist world of today.

Recent events in the Southeast Asia sphere of influence have me puzzled.

It seems like the wonderful people's paradise of China is quarreling with the wonderful people's paradise of Vietnam, and thus it makes one confront a historical conundrum of a most perplexing nature.

Reuters: Vietnam, China trade barbs after Vietnamese fishing boat sinks
Vietnam and China traded accusations on Tuesday over the sinking of a Vietnamese fishing boat not far from where China has parked an oil rig in the disputed South China Sea, as tensions fester between the two countries over the giant drilling platform.

According to lore from our comrades of the National Socialist Media [NSM] and other sources, a certain Socialist Worker' Party [NAZI] in the Germanic National realm of the 1930's and 1940's couldn't possible be socialist because they fought with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics [USSR] (Never mind that they took cues and ideas from each other and together started WWII)

In other words, the enlightened betters of socialist national elite insist that one group of socialist having at it with another group of socialists somehow means that one of them can't be socialist…..

Thus we arrive at the quandary that is the subject of this inquiry.

The puzzle at hand – which one of those commie comrades became imposters the moment they came into conflict? And will that imposter go back to really being Communist if and when their quarrel is resolved?

Comrades, if you can please try to help me out on this most diabolical dilemma of the day.


Or, Perhaps it could be that organized evil always fights organized evil in order to enslave more people….

Perhaps is it could be that evil doers simply compete to enslave others and fight over who can excel to victimize the people more efficiently. It could be that the one can't be socialist is simply just another lie from history designed to confuse the masses as to who is whom?

Ahh...you have let the Current Truth outpace you a little on this issue Sterpin. The National Capitalist German Employers Party was Right wing and the Bolsheviks were left wing not because they fought each other, but because the Germans were...RACIST!

Oh, wait a second...

Thought Sheriff wrote:Ahh...you have let the Current Truth outpace you a little on this issue Sterpin. The National Capitalist German Employers Party was Right wing and the Bolsheviks were left wing not because they fought each other, but because the Germans were...RACIST!

Ah yes, the left does seem to follow the same form of circular logic with regard to race as well.

Truthfully Sterpin, the real relationship between the left and the right is
Left≠Right
Right=Bad
Left=Good
These are always as true, and all other actualities adapt to fit these Parameters. Therefore,
if NASDAP=Bad then NASDAP=right and if USSR=Good then USSR=Left. However, If Ussr ≠ good, then USSR equals false, Fascist communsim.

Thought Sheriff wrote:Truthfully Sterpin, the real relationship between the left and the right is
Left≠Right
Right=Bad
Left=Good
These are always as true, and all other actualities adapt to fit these Parameters. Therefore,
if NASDAP=Bad then NASDAP=right and if USSR=Good then USSR=Left. However, If Ussr ≠ good, then USSR equals false, Fascist communsim.

Hahahaha!

Comrade Sterpin, I agree with your premise that they can both can't be socialist. The digital brownshirts at CNN need a new story to confuse the massescapture another fist full of Golden Globes for Best Documentary as the missing plane seems to have run its course.

Thought Sheriff wrote:

220px-PolPot.jpg

Oh, wait a second...

You rang?

Enlighten us with your progressive, most tolerant and illuminated outlook on Racial Equality Comrade Pot.

Thought Sheriff wrote:Enlighten us with your progressive, most tolerant and illuminated outlook on Racial Equality Comrade Pot.

The very notion of "race" is a capitalist construct, Comrade Sheriff. After all, the term "race" implies a winner and loser - and since "we" are by nature always winners, everyone else must be losers. Therefore, there is no actual "race" to concern us. I hope that clarifies things.

In my experience there is no such thing as race.