Image

I am giddy with glee, Hate Crimes Bill out of Committee!

User avatar
Comrades!

I am thrilled to report we might finally have the support to muzzle the first amendment to the constitution and stop the hate language from capitalist running dogs directed at Dear Leader!

With passage of this bill our Gulags will soon be overflowing with capitalist filth!

The Hate Crimes Bill (HB1913) has left committee and is now on the House floor. I hope you all contacted your Congressmen and urged them to vote "no" on that bill. If it passes into law, web sites such as this would be considered a "hate crime".

The "information highway"(among other things) will be reduced to sterile (politically correct) jokes and cartoons, leaving us with no alternative to the liberal media.

But of course we are free to legally insult white males, veterans and Christians.

- https://thebulletin.us/articles/2009/04 ... 739466.txt

“This is not progress; it is political correctness. In other nations and states, the adoption of hate crimes legislation has been the first step toward widespread suppression of speech and ideas critical of homosexuality.”

User avatar
Comrade, as long as I retain my First Amendment Right to criticize whites, males, Christians, Conservatives, veterans, heterosexuals and gun owners I see no problem at all with this legislation. And neither does the ACLU.

User avatar
Image
I am against all sorts of hate-crimes legislation even though I'm gay. If I get murdered is it somehow worse than my brother, who is not gay? No. Murder is murder. And political correctness is intellectual fascism.

Also, if that passes, does it mean that I cannot make cracks about silly queens? I have scars on my back. Would I get an exemption?

It's rubbish.

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote:Image
I am against all sorts of hate-crimes legislation even though I'm gay. If I get murdered is it somehow worse than my brother, who is not gay? No. Murder is murder. And political correctness is intellectual fascism.

Also, if that passes, does it mean that I cannot make cracks about silly queens? I have scars on my back. Would I get an exemption?

It's rubbish.

Image
Well, you would obviously be exempted from the "protected" status for refusing to be ideologically correct. This is why liberals can call black conservatives things like "chicken and biscuit eating uncle tom" and not be accused of racism. And if we are going to talk about ideologically motivated murders, why not point out the the Koran specifically tells Muslims to kill gays, Jews, women who refuse to wear veils, and people who convert from that horrible death cult?

User avatar
More garbage legislation to destory the conservatives once and for all.

OneWorld
We're almost there Comrades - hang in.



User avatar
Gun owners aren't popular. Can I be a protected group too?

User avatar
No, 7.62, you can't. Owning a gun means that you are taking control of your life and that must never be. You must employ <i>professionals</i> to do that. If you are burgled, don't defend yourself. Call 911 and wait. Or suggest that the robber and you adjourn to the coffee shop or the police station. Owning a gun is a hideous act of defiant self-definition.

[ off ]In Texas it's considered just normal. When I was in high school, in the early 70s, lots of boys had pick-ups with headache racks with rifles in the back and no one thought anything of it. And no one was hurt, killed, or even threatened.

User avatar
Commissar Theo, so my only hope is to become extremely wealthy and powerful, thus exempt from the regular rules, or become a member of The Inner Circle(TM) and make the regular rules that wouldn't apply to me?

User avatar
Of course, 7.62. Whenever you find yourself chafing against the rules, kicking against the pricks, and take that anyway that you want to, just think of the Goracle. His house uses five times the normal energy while the Bu$hitler's Crawford ranch uses only a fraction. His yacht Bio-Solar One uses biodiesel, which isn't available on the lake. And people pointed out that the yacht had no solar power, and he put up some solar cells. When the Goracle gives a speech he insists that the limo be kept running so he's comfortable getting back into it.

"The internal-combustion engine is the worst invention in the world," or something in that price range. But he has no objections to using them.

And of course dear Teddy K., the moral conscience of the Senate. Did he find it at the bottom of the creek at Chappaquiddick?

So the best way to make rules that you don't have to follow is to be a Senator.

Remember that Caligula made his horse a Senator. Today that horse would be the sharpest mind <i>in</i> the Senate. One mind, 101 horse's asses.

Commissar Theocritus wrote:
[ off ]In Texas it's considered just normal. When I was in high school, in the early 70s, lots of boys had pick-ups with headache racks with rifles in the back and no one thought anything of it. And no one was hurt, killed, or even threatened.

off/ Growing up in rural Georgia my experience was much the same.

Guns were in cars and trucks all of the time. Those weapons were always well behaved as were the owners.

Guys had trucks, trucks had gun. It was expected.

Sad what we've come to.

User avatar
[ off ]Now a girl is strip-searched because someone said she had Ibuprofen on her.

A cousin of 10 was expelled for, inter alia, aiming a carrot at a child and saying, "Bang."

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote:[ off ]Now a girl is strip-searched because someone said she had Ibuprofen on her.

A cousin of 10 was expelled for, inter alia, aiming a carrot at a child and saying, "Bang."
That's just sad, but then again, this is the sad state of so many liberal institutions.

User avatar
Liberal institutions aren't. UNLV tried to instigate a speech code. A friend of mine, who is a professor there, is also a member of the Nevada ACLU. (I promise you. In Nevada they mostly do good work. Really. I swear.) He told the ACLU and FIRE about it, which got all over UNLV which killed it.

It was a leftist's wet dream. Here's one part of it:
<blockquote>verbal, written, or physical acts of intimidation, coercion, interference, frivolous claims, discrimination, and sexual or other harassment motivated, in whole or in part, by bias based on actual or <b>perceived</b> race, ethnicity, color, religion, creed, sex (including gender identity or expression, or a pregnancy related condition), sexual orientation, national origin, military status or military obligations, disability (including veterans with service-connected disabilities), age, marital status, physical appearance, political affiliation, or on the basis of exercise of rights secured by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution.</blockquote>
Emphasis mine. The "perceived" is the loophole. "He's a bigot! I feel it!" Whether what he said is bigoted or not, or whether or not you can say what you want to.

Suppression of dissent is one of the signs of fascism.

User avatar
Comrades, this is why I'm building my Dascha in Alaska. It's the furthest away from all this stuff I can think of.

User avatar
I have heard that Alaska is like Texas some 30 years ago before all the growth. Appealing.

I live in an isolated part of Texas, and <a href="https://gallery.mac.com/daustins#100378">this is my dacha</a>. Apologies to comrades who think that I am pretending to be more equal than others or repetitive, to which charge I plead guilty.

One virtue of isolation is that it is cheap.

I understand entirely the urge to build a fortress and have managed to do as well as I can here, by becoming an institution in a very small, very poor, very unimportant town where I am useful. And since I am neutral I miss the factional wars.

The sane man, if he can, on viewing harpies like Nansky and power-mad totalitarians like Bonnie Frank and puppets like the TelePrompTer, in conjunction with the climate of entitlement and self-righteous self-absorption and unearned desires will distance himself from all this. Alaska sounds good. So does the Rancho de Rio Grande. Which is not, as a matter of fact, infected with Bruno, but only the ghost of one.

User avatar
Commissar Theo, you have a most equal dacha. Also is that Meow I see in the last picture, or General Mousey-Tongue?

You have an enviable position in a small town. I could have gone that route to a degree in Olympia, already being a useful aparatchik to a local media outlet, (sales) which requires getting to know and work with a lot of different businesses and events. Sadly I got caught up in the faction battles among the proles, and have succeeded in confusing some, alienating others, and having allies with the rest. Some hate me because I openly wear a gun and don't like Obama, others don't know what to think as I took on the local PD and beat them at their own game when they tried to harass me for the legal wearing of arms (I got street cred with the local "activist" community over that one. Apparently few have tried the idea of not only doing something legal, but also working with the city and PD on a professional, one on one basis and treating them like equals. Also having a very good lawyer helped too :D) So I have a love hate relationship with the Olympia Collective...

I do believe building in the Alaska woods (and I would share pictures except I lost them all through two hard drive failures) will not only give me my "fortress of solitude" but is also fairly cheap as you point out. I bought 4.7 acres for only $2800 from the state. My hope is not only can I get up there "in time" but also find a way to quickly become useful up there. Fortunately merchants and those who can bring in, sell and trade goods have always thrived in Alaska and other isolated/frontier places. Perhaps I will find a niche to trade in, and maybe take up Progressive Holistic Gunsmithing.

User avatar
As you know, 7.62, that the people who got rich in the '49 gold rush were not the miners but the people who had the general store.

In <i>Stranger in a Strange Land</i> Jubal Harshaw talks to a police goon and humiliates him. Julal knew, it goes, people who have toes that needed stepping on.

Just so.

I consider it a failure of will not to harass, worry, wart, and humiliate all the little wannabe tyrants and other petty bureaucrats. Gentlemen and ladies with innate power do not throw it around to be bullies. People who acquire power by bureaucratic means and who are difficult or arrogant with it have toes that need to be stepped on.

The thrust of the left is to unlink consequences from actions. My thrust is to link them back up again. The problem with slavery is the loss of personal agency. Liberalism, with consequences determined by a third party, is the new plantation. Because they intend to be the third party, the master. And when I can step on their toes, I do it.

Oh, that is not Meow. That is Calvin. His brother is Hobbes.

User avatar
Commissar Theo, I have not read Stranger in a Strange Land yet. I have just finished Atlas Shrugged and The Fountainhead and have been casting about for a new book to read. I've actually considered reading Chairman Obama's works simply to get an understanding of what his minions are excited over, but I can't bring myself to immerse myself in that cesspool.

The trick is getting liberals to understand how they have allowed themselves to be enslaved as you point out. They really don't like hearing it.

Indeed I know it is always more profitable to sell to the gold seekers than to seek gold. Yes, I'm going to try my hand gold seeking in the nearby river, but I would be foolish not to at least make the attempt to check a known gold bearing river in a couple of likely spots. I'm not going to get wrapped up in it though. My first year plans are to simply put up and equip a basic cabin. If I can somehow extract a few thousand dollars through useful activities like placer mining, or gathering valuable raw materials, I will. If I can bring up extra goods that I can sell in the nearby villages, I'll do that as well. A little bit here, a little bit there and sooner or later I'll fall into my niche market.

After that, I wish to add a study, done up in a nice comfortable Victorian style, complete with roll top desk, bookshelves on the wall, an overstuffed leather chair with a reading table next to it, fancy rugs, and an ornate gun cabinet or rack. My bedroom will end up being done in classic woods cabin, skins on the walls, a small book rack, etc... The cooking/dining/common area will be who knows what. Not as important as my study/den and bedroom will be the most important rooms to me. The common area will probably be a hodgepodge of different things that please me.

User avatar
Yo, Yo, Yo HATE SPEECH CODE! Comrades, this news is the shizzle! One more thorn in the side of the beast... some thugs in the hood gonna come clean on this. mmmmmmHHHHmmmm... yep this shite and the anti-organic farming legislation that recently was going through... which makes my HOLISTIC sisters dance, dance, dance. Ah yeah! Keep it coming... keep it coming!
Make me proud O! Make me proud!

Theo, that's a nice crib. Props to ya. But I suggest you put that away soon. Or lock and load. Word to the wise, when it get's nasty, nasty people will be searching for some shite... if you know what I mean. Entitlement drilled in for twenty ought some years is Ayerskis wet dream. And when he releases his "White Supremacy" book of lies facts soon he plans on setting off some of that anarchy he so adores.

Yes Comrades in the 70's we fished, we gunned, we lived and let live. Today we play moral superior and tell everyone how to live. We incite riot and neglect law. When this generation of misfits and hypocrites falls by the wayside and into their egalitarian utopia abyss, the world will be our oyster once again. FIRE up the torch we're coming home!

User avatar
Red Rooster wrote:
Yes Comrades in the 70's we fished, we gunned, we lived and let live. Today we play moral superior and tell everyone how to live. We incite riot and neglect law. When this generation of misfits and hypocrites falls by the wayside and into their egalitarian utopia abyss, the world will be our oyster once again. FIRE up the torch we're coming home!


Image
Hot Damn Red! I like the way you think, and I missed the 70's by some years being born in 1980. There is a place for those who think like you at my fire any day of the week, and twice on Zombie Invasion day. Really, you have no idea how good it was to read those words of common sense. I hope I can still find a place to live that life.

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote: I consider it a failure of will not to harass, worry, wart, and humiliate all the little wannabe tyrants and other petty bureaucrats. Gentlemen and ladies with innate power do not throw it around to be bullies. People who acquire power by bureaucratic means and who are difficult or arrogant with it have toes that need to be stepped on.

The thrust of the left is to unlink consequences from actions. My thrust is to link them back up again. The problem with slavery is the loss of personal agency. Liberalism, with consequences determined by a third party, is the new plantation. Because they intend to be the third party, the master. And when I can step on their toes, I do it.

Commisar, very wise words. You share wonderful wisdom. Thank you so much. :-)

Yes, I've ridden the train 7.62. I've ridden the train and worked the tracks.

Comrades, it is an honor to know you.

User avatar
Perhaps there is still hope for this country Comrades, perhaps there is still hope.

We just have to hold our ground for a while. The historical dialectic shows that the socialists will fall, and the world will belong to us again until we screw up and lose it again...

User avatar
Oh, Comrade Rooster, I redistributed your quote about the 70's for a sig line for a bit. At the moment it is attributed to "found on an internet message board", would you prefer a proper attribution. It was just too perfect to pass out and not spread around. I hope you don't mind.

User avatar
Enjoy 7.62... credit enough is your response to it. Now if I did not scare off the Commissar, I will feel even better. Enjoy. Gentlemen, sorry for the interruption, proceed please...

User avatar
7.62 wrote:The trick is getting liberals to understand how they have allowed themselves to be enslaved as you point out.
That's why they get angry. They don't <i>want</i> to know. These are not secular people; they are religious people looking for a secular redemption. Religion is an attempt to find order in the world, to find meaning. Islam talks about the perfect freedom of Allah, but that is not my definition of freedom. You have to obey endless strictures. Again, not my definition of freedom. But Muslims feel that there is some supreme being which loves them uniquely, to whom they are very important, and most of all, that no matter what happens, they'll wind up in the hands of Allah. In other words, there is the freedom of ever having to stand on the edge of the cliff of existence and say, "Here I stand, and I am alone. I know I will fail for that is life. I know that I will die, for that's the end of life."

All religions with an afterlife believe that way. Some, at least since the Reformation, are no longer toxic.

The left believes in a redemption by the state. Notice how everything is put on the state, regardless of whether or not it's the state's venue. Mussolini: "Everything for the state, nothing outside the state." A perfect encapsulation of totalitarianism.

Because the left believes in secular redemption--unlinking actions from consequences is their view of the love of a supreme being--the rules can change in a heart beat. The powers that be can have a putsch and all of a sudden everything is different. And we'll be swamped with a new smelly little orthodoxy, which is just the second verse of an old song.

"X is going to happen. The sky is falling!

"Y are the bums who are doing that. They have designs on your freedom, and you have the <i>right</i> [this is being used even in credit-card-debt-avoidance scams now] to do Z

"I know how to fight Y so that Y won't do Z

"Help me, completely without considering my own interest, of course, fight Y. Because I'm your only hope.

"Send me money."

It's been used by the first shaman on earth to Charlie Manson to even the Heritage Foundation, generally a good organization. And it's being used by the enviroloonies, the socialists, and all the other nasty little wannabe Stalins.

<b>The left wants to submit to save itself the trouble of standing up.</b>

User avatar
Well said Commissar Theo. Secular redemption, I like that. Or rather I don't but it helps in understanding the left.

User avatar
Comrades, this is rich. My redistribution of Comrade Rooster's quote as a sig line has struck a nerve with the left! https://www.everydayolympia.com/forum/v ... =10&t=1915 start at the bottom and work your way up to the angry liberal...

User avatar
An angry liberal is a good liberal, but the best liberal is a dead liberal. I do not mean dead between the ears.

User avatar
Red Rooster, I think that I shall also steal your comment about the 70s.

I recall how innocent things were then. Everything wasn't politicized. What kind of sick bastard do you have to be to politicize the food that you eat? The B-52s had an album and on it was a list of "approved" businesses. Eat this happy-clappy vegan fair-trade crap and you'll become one of the anointed. Rubbish.

Interesting fact of the day: organic produce has ten times the e. coli that normal produce does. And sometimes you can't wash it all off. It's safer to buy the stuff with pesticides.

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote:An angry liberal is a good liberal, but the best liberal is a dead liberal. I do not mean dead between the ears.

My dear commissar, I do not wish them dead, or even angry. Like Comrade Rooster, I simply wish for them to live and let live.

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote:
Suppression of dissent is one of the signs of fascism.
How many more signs does the American public need?

User avatar
7.62 wrote:Like Comrade Rooster, I simply wish for them to live and let live.
You, and Red Rooster, are generous. And that is a weakness.

They cannot live and let live--you are projecting your own virtues on them. Virtues which they will use, perhaps without knowing it, against you. A judo master uses his opponent's weight against him; the liberal uses his opponent's virtue against him.

The point of all this howling about "you're a bigot" and "you're insensitive" is to wrong-foot you. Twenty-five years ago I was involved with someone who accused me of being mean and always wanting my own way. I realized that he was saying that he was pissed because <i>he</i> wasn't getting his way, and I determined that by ticking off the various incidents on my fingers. He knew, without being able to verbalize it, for he's not evil, that I was susceptible to his solipsistic view of the world. What had I done, I wondered. Was I wrong? No. Not a bit of it.

If you are of a laissez-faire disposition then you are vulnerable to attacks. "Does he have a point?" you might wonder. Your self-examination is entirely laudable and necessary for a good life, but is also a weakness for the opportunistic infection of leftism.

Stand your ground. I grew heartily sick of being manipulated by other people projecting their own problems onto me. And if there's one thing that I'm sure of, the left, the rancorous, controlling, hate-filled left, will project its own problems onto <i>you</i> for you to solve them, and try to make you feel guilty about their own problems.

David Horowitz, a very brave man, was a man of the left--Black Panthers, killing cops &c., but the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 80s cured him. Now he's perhaps the best of the warriors against the left. Traditional right-wingers show mercy. Horowitz, no. "I know these people. When they're down, kick them and kick them again."

I just took delivery of Jamie Glaznov's book <a href=" in Hate</a>. It explains, from what I've read, the hatred of the left. There is no middle ground with these people. They will <i>not</i> let you live as you want because free living and free thought are a reproach to them.

Is there anything that they don't want to control? They hate freedom.

User avatar
I hadn't seen it that way before Theo. The projection of problems onto another. It's quite true of course. The left is so keen on "tolerance" and "understanding" and "embracing diversity." As long as it is something they approve of. Then they try to destroy it, but not with bombs or bullets, but through sneaky and backhanded measures.

User avatar
Yes, they try to destroy anything that is not on their approved list. Oh, you're allowed eccentricities, especially sexual ones, but if you refuse to bow to their ideology they'll try to destroy you.

They save their greatest hatred for people who ought to be in on the con with them: conservative blacks, gays, whatever. The things that were said about Clarence Thomas were vicious. But all of it is.

There is a website called Mannet, which I've never been. It's for gay men, usually young ones, to hook up. I'm told it's very successful. Well, young men in rut with a computer? A cash cow no doubt. But one of the founders came out for McCain and the howling was deafening. He was forced out, and for that.

During the ramping up of the Clinton era, Harry Thomason and his wife Cousin It were producing <i>Designing Women</i>. It was said on the set that you <i>had</i> to contribute to the Clinton campaign.

There is a line in the Bible in which Jesus says, I would rather you be hot or cold; if you are lukewarm I will spew you out of my mouth.

People know that they can work with anger, and don't have to work with love. It's the indifference which they know is fatal, and that is, I think, the reason that everything is politicized. A libertarian is a threat to controlling people because they know they don't have a handle on him. The libertarian doesn't understand why someone would <i>want</i> a handle.

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote:I live in an isolated part of Texas, and <a href="https://gallery.mac.com/daustins#100378">this is my dacha</a>. Apologies to comrades who think that I am pretending to be more equal than others or repetitive, to which charge I plead guilty.

Not a peoples dacha and obviously something you got from the ill gotten gains of hard work and labor!

Give me your Dacha now or I will denounce you!

User avatar
Nihilism is the common bond between the radical left and radical Islam, in this Commissar Theocritus you are correct. They do not want 'tolerance', they do not want a 'colorblind' society, they do not want 'diversity', they do not want to 'live and let live', rather live and let die. They want compliance, they want submission, they want nothing less than the death of 30 million 'right wingers' as Ayeriski proposed so many years ago.

New 'Hate Speech' laws and recruitment for Aacorn, a paradox made in heaven. Why you may ask? Just ask Dave Chappelle:


User avatar
Comrades, do pardon me dragging out the photos of my dacha--it is sentimental. I signed the contract for the house a year after parole from Club Med(ical), and took a year to redo it.

Poor Dave Chappelle. Would he had the ability to steal the scene like Chris Tucker:
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/PSFg3pAprdg&h ... ram><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

User avatar
No problem Commissar, to share our trophies and pride in them is the most profound of human sharing. I too have quit the dacha that I have personally carved out of an old rusty shack which I am quite proud of. However in today's world of the envy bound, I do not dare share my pride. I have met more odd scorn for my talents and work, than admiration. I for one think your dacha is quite beautiful, and you deserve all the praise in the world for a wonderful accomplishment.

Yes, Chris Tucker ran quite the show. And Some Like It Hot! I think it's genuine and hilarious when genders and sexual orientations can meet in a spirit of openess. However, the suspicion in Chappelle's stance holds 'good to go' in the ghetto and makes utter sense in today's PC'd climate. And they wonder why the agenda brings forth tyrants? Ideologies based on race, class, gender and hate, fear and guilt tend to have that effect.

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote: Interesting fact of the day: organic produce has ten times the e. coli that normal produce does. And sometimes you can't wash it all off. It's safer to buy the stuff with pesticides.

Ahhhh Damn! I LOVE E.COLI!But comrade, what of the WTO and GMF of Next Next Next Tuesday? This HR 875 is just the ASS-fixiation Comrade Whoopie precribed:




Oh and nice on the eyes...

User avatar
Red Rooster wrote: However in today's world of the envy bound, I do not dare share my pride. I have met more odd scorn for my talents and work, than admiration.
RR, that is why we Progressives are always setting people against other because envy is so corrosive. If I can tell one group that another group is getting goodies just because, that's power for me. The old propose an apocalypse, say you're the solution, and get money/power routine.

And envy is a habit like drinking or gambling. Once you teach people to envy you can use the anger. And since so much envy is directed against people who are more talented or more industrious, then the enviers must think of ways that let them hold themselves in high esteem while trashing worthier people. Any blow to truth is a Good Thing for a Progressive.

User avatar
Well Commissar, I could say we will meet in the gulags, however I understand that you are far more equal than I. Being a 'breeder' is, I believe, the most 'envied' positional of all. Nihilism tends to have that effect. However, not to brag, but in my days at the uni I had quite the appeal to many beautiful men. Yes, comrade, those were the days.

Now as I watch many relationships fall apart and MGTOW and 'Feminysts' choose sides it becomes even more apparent what is corrosive about collectivism in general.

Our gray lives in the Borg will provide for many an equality and little a difference to celebrate.

User avatar
Ah, RR, you have come out of your own closet. Here in the Collective so many of the Comrades were born male that that is the presumption; I welcome another Comrade from the distaff side. By nature I will always walk a slightly different path and be less subject, I hope, to the rant and cant of manipulative people intent on using me for their own access to power, and in these days by one of the most powerful tools in the world: victimology.

I recall being made aware of the terms "victimology" and "passive-aggressive" at about the same time. It was about the time that "pride" became a passive quality: you could be proud of what you were completely without volition.

Yes, it just occurs to me that so much of today's politics is passive-aggression and its first cousin projection.


 
POST REPLY