(off)
My fellow comrades,
With Obama talking about taxing only the upper-class (cough)everyone(cough), I thought I'd give everyone a good idea about what the consequences of doing that would be. The following is an e-mail.

"Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten
comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something
like this The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every
day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the
owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers,' he
said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. 'Drinks
for the ten now cost just $80.The group still wanted to pay their bill
the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They
would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the
paying customers?

How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his
'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if
they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the
sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar
owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by
roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each
should pay.

And so the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100%
savings).

The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).

The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).

The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).

The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 ( 22% savings).

The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).


Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued
to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to
compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20,'declared the sixth man.

He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!''Yeah, that's right,'
exclaimed
the fifth man.

'I only saved a dollar, too.. It's unfair that he got ten times more
than I!
''That's true!!' shouted the seventh man.

'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two?

The wealthy get all the breaks!

''Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get
anything at all. The system exploits the poor!

'The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up. The next night the
tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers
without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered
something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them
for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our
tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most
benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.


David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.Professor of Economics University of Georgia"

Obviously, the restaurant will need a government bailout, the 9 remaining drinkers will need stimulus checks and the tenth guy will have to have his taxes raised.

Anonymous wrote:Obviously, the restaurant will need a government bailout, the 9 remaining drinkers will need stimulus checks and the tenth guy will have to have his taxes raised.

MmmHmm. . .

Tax them too much, attack them for being
wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might
start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

No, no, no, the tenth guy will be in gulag breakin rocks for stealing and exploiting the poor and most likely owning property! There, problem solved.

Economics? Bah! Social justice demands that the poorest riot, burn down the bar, kill the owner and the richest patrons, make Obama presidente-for-life and spend the rest of their days drinking anti-freeze and complaining about how there is no beer. For social justice demands equality of outcomes and since the only economic status within reach of absolutely EVERYONE is being dead broke, that is what we must become in order to achieve fairness. But meanwhile, Obama is eating lobster and drinking champagne. Utopia!

What the f**k are they complaining about? They're getting free beer!

This man understands the tax situation and can convey it in a simple and elegant manner.

Clearly he is a thoughtcriminal and must be arrested and sent to the gulag for showing that the upper class somehow deserve to keep their own money. This upsets our glorious people's revolutionary concepts of unfair taxation and we cannot allow this man to remain where he can educate the fools- I mean, masses.

Comrades, this is unacceptable! I thought we had completely taken over academia. Obviously, the Ministry of Education has been lax in their screening process for teachers. This slug, Kamerschen, claims to have a PhD. Dr. Dr. Dr. Kurgman has three! So who is more correct when making pronouncements on the facts reality perception of economics? Kamerschen? I think not, comrades.

This fool Kamerschen even uses that capitalist beverage, beer, to make his point. The proletariat knows that vodka is the only beverage of choice. That's because socialism only gives you one choice. But never mind that! This "academic" imposter must be silenced. To Lubyanka with him for some re-education of ours!

Premier Betty wrote:What the f**k are they complaining about? They're getting free beer!

You'd think. I guess they want free beer and free money too. Come to think of it. . . Isn't that what everyone wants (at least the menfolk anyway).

Comrade_Elliott wrote:

Premier Betty wrote:What the f**k are they complaining about? They're getting free beer!

You'd think. I guess they want free beer and free money too. Come to think of it. . . Isn't that what everyone wants (at least the menfolk anyway).

Comrade, you are also missing the desire for free sex, too. Although, I took a poll of men in a bar once:
Q. If you had to loose one thing forever--sex or beer--which would it be?
A. Unanimous--sex.

Tiglath-Pileser wrote:

Comrade_Elliott wrote:

Premier Betty wrote:What the f**k are they complaining about? They're getting free beer!

You'd think. I guess they want free beer and free money too. Come to think of it. . . Isn't that what everyone wants (at least the menfolk anyway).

Comrade, you are also missing the desire for free sex, too. Although, I took a poll of men in a bar once:
Q. If you had to loose one thing forever--sex or beer--which would it be?
A. Unanimous--sex.

That is an interesting question comrade. If this is the case, The Party can easily conquer the men by offering free beer instead of free prostitutes women who will give their bodies to Bill ClintonParty Members and other proles for money otherwise. We must use this to our advantage for the World of Next Tuesday.