I admit I was wrong about ObamaCare – to a point. You see, I knew it would be bad, but I underestimated just how bad. My prediction, and those of so many others, was hardly anything that bordered on the prescient or prophetic. Just like any meteorologist can tell you that a cold front will bring cooler temperatures, so anybody who has studied history, government, and economics, even superficially, could tell you what government intrusion into health care would mean. Thomas Sowell, the King of Clarity, pointed out the obvious when he said, “It is amazing that people who think we cannot afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, and medication somehow think that we can afford to pay for doctors, hospitals, medication and a government bureaucracy to administer it.” Is anyone surprised at the increased costs or the number of those being denied care because of a 2,000 page bill implemented by who knows how many pages of administrative manuals? I'm not surprised that any of this happened, not even at the backward technology in the failed government website, but I am surprised at how fast and how extensively it has impacted the lives of vulnerable Americans.

A few of us took warning at the flippant comment to a woman in regard to her elderly mother, "…at least we can let doctors know and your mom know that, you know what? Maybe this isn't going to help. Maybe you're better off not having the surgery, but taking the painkiller." Did you notice the pronouns? Not you, your mother, your doctor, but we can let your doctors know. Still, some starry eyed devotees of government hoped that this president would be the one to make it work even if such a system has either produced even worse waiting lines, denials of service, diminished quality of care, or gone bankrupt everywhere it has been tried. No, not this time. This president sends thrills up people's legs, sunlight glints off his chiseled pectorals, and his trousers have a genuine crease in them! But he is man, and not a god. In fact, he's a pretty poor president, and more and more we see evidence of a self-centered and cold disregard for others.

Is liar too strong of a word? When we learn, "That means that no matter how we reform health care, we will keep this promise to the American people: If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health-care plan, you'll be able to keep your health-care plan, period. No one will take it away, no matter what,” really meant if we don't like your health care plan, we'll demand it be changed even if it drives up the cost out of reach for “only” millions of Americans. I think if I said something like that, and explained what I “really” meant in a similar manner, someone just might call me a liar.

Is theft too strong of a word? Policies of the Affordable Care Act forcibly regulate how insurance companies may spend their money. You are required to buy a policy you otherwise wouldn't purchase or pay a progressively increasing fine to the government. If I forcibly regulated how somebody else spent their money, it would look a lot like theft, wouldn't it? The trend for governments that run out of money is to resort to confiscation. It was true of ancient Rome and modern day Greece and France, and it could become true for us as bureaucrats hungrily eye the savings accounts of those who have been responsible with their money. We see Europe as a warning; they see it as a precedent.

Ah yes, our very own Prezzy Pants On Fire, doing drive by country killing on his 2-Speed...

Remember, he's only doing what he promised BEFORE his first election - a fundamental transformation of America. And the LIVs voted for him twice.