Image

Pay No Attention To That Man Hiding Behind His Wife's Skirt!

User avatar
My fellow comrades:

I'm very concerned about something.

Sometime after Dear Leader made his glorious ascension to power, Ms. Magazine ran a picture of him on their cover, showing him in a phone booth or broom closet, or maybe it was the lavatory on Air Force One, as he tore his shirt off (be still, my shuddering womb), to reveal the superhero beneath:

Image
This is what a feminist president looks like.

And after this past week, we saw how a feminist president acts—especially when he's a man.

It all started last Friday, when he met with our previous feminist (not to mention first black) president, Bill Clinton, behind closed doors to discuss how to appease The Party in the wake of his cave-in to the evil Republicans. Comrades, I'm quite sure no tears were shed if only because cry-baby John Boehner wasn't there. But Obama had a very valid concern. Pro-Progs have been saying he has no balls, no nuts, no stones. Clearly his manhood was brought into question, and he was in dire need of a virility restorative.

Hence he and Clinton appeared at a press conference shortly therafter, where he spent most of the time off to the side, checking his wristwatch, shuffling his feet restlessly, until he was quite in danger of soiling himself in fear of . . . his wife.

Indeed, Michelle was holding a party and she was waiting—size 14EEE foot tapping, or at least flapping—for him to show up and do his duty as host. Bill told him he'd better go, as he, for one, didn't want to make her mad. Since Bill knows a lot about the dire consequences of pissing off one's wife, whether she's his own or someone else's, Obama knew this was one nugget of elder statesman advice he'd better heed.

And so, like a Looney Tunes character sputtering, “I gotta go now, my judge is burning, fudge, I mean my fudge is burning, judge,” he ducked out of there.

I thought, “Now there's a real man.”

Unfortunately, the man I was looking at when I had that thought was Jake Tapper of ABC News, sitting in the front row.

Fast forward to yesterday, when Obama signed the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act that guarantees the government will make damn sure my children will always have plenty of fresh celery sticks to eat:

https://my.barackobama.com/page/communi ... OFA/gGMKhD
(Click to see photos of Barack and Michelle doing kissy-face!)

In signing a new law today to improve the quality of school lunches, President Obama paid joking tribute to its most prominent supporter: first lady Michelle Obama.
“Had I not been able to get this bill passed, I would be sleeping on the couch,” the president said.
Mrs. Obama, whose major issues include fighting childhood obesity, laughed and said, “let's just say it got done, so we don't have to go down that road.”
The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010, a $4.5 billion measure, provides more free school meals to the pool, and gives the government more power to decide what foods can offered in those meals, as well as in school vending machines and fundraisers during school hours.
Meanwhile, Sarah Palin is on TV every week shooting caribou, facing down bears, building fires, gutting fish, and always, always, it seems, wielding a gun. I'm starting to get this terribly cold, sick feeling that if she ever managed to steal a presidential election, that we'd never see her duck out in the middle of a press conference because it's Todd's poker night with his fishing and dogsled buddies, and he's waiting for her to make sandwiches and tear open a bag of trail mix for them.

Or if she were ever President and signed a piece of legislation, she would never say something like, “Had I not been able to get this bill passed, Todd wouldn't come home and instead stay out all night at a strip club.”

For that matter, she wouldn't even sign something like The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act, now would she? Barack Obama sees hungry kids and signs a piece of paper mandating billions of dollars for programs that dictate what they can eat and when and where, and maybe by the middle of this century we'll start seeing results, but only as long as we keep throwing money at it.

Sarah Palin, on the other hand, sees hungry kids, and all she does is grab a gun to shoot something and they're happily scarfing it down that same night.

Comrades, there's something very wrong here, and I'm not sure what it is. But I am so dismayed and disenchanted that I don't know what else to do except just stand here in the freezing cold and be miserable about it until someone else comes along to make it all better for me. I used to think that someone was Barack Obama. But while I shiver out here, waiting for my free mortgage and gas and Obama money from his stash, there he is, cowering huddled behind his wife.

I think I'd like to join him. Certainly there should be plenty of room.

User avatar
Indeed, these are the times that try The Party ™ Image soul.

The famous slogan says that, "the problem with socialism is that you run out of other people's money." Well when you set up a pretend messiah you can run out of 'ability' very early on. It is really a shame that Michelle is so scary as she would have been a better choice as front-runner but she scares little children... too bad.

User avatar
I think it's a good thing for Obama to have something as wide as Michelle to hide behind. In fact, even Santa could take cover behind her ample hips.

21-500x335.jpg
And I don't care how many tons of State mandated celery sticks wind up in dumpster's behind McDonald's because the kids won't eat them. The fact that they were provided by law is all that matters. It shows we care.

User avatar
Darski,
Once again, the visage of your avatar captivates the imagination of those who behold it.
Words are useless to describe the visceral recoil.

User avatar
B1KerpenLG_s408x676.jpg

Big Brother O watches benevolently over us.

KERPEN: Silencing voices of Internet dissent
FCC's 'net neutrality' puts new Congress to the test

By Phil Kerpen
The Washington Times
6:33 p.m., Tuesday, December 14, 2010

User avatar
Krasnodar wrote:Darski,
Once again, the visage of your avatar captivates the imagination of those who behold it.
Words are useless to describe the visceral recoil.
I agree with what I thought he meant without referring to a word encyclopedia.CT

User avatar
This is not good Comrades. When the Commissarka is this upset it's like a fracture in the space/time continuum and with the arctic cold spell in Florida she really is standing in the cold. Be afraid Comrades. Be very afraid.

I've been saying for over two years that these pretenders are merely pseudo socialists. It takes a real man/woman to wield the Iron Fist of Social Justice and I'm not seeing anyone in sight.

This photo says it all:
omo.jpg

Comrades Krasnodar and Tooorisky,
I've got some visceral recoil right here and it's not a pretend avatar:
dynduo.jpg

User avatar
Krasnodar wrote:Darski,
Once again, the visage of your avatar captivates the imagination of those who behold it.
Words are useless to describe the visceral recoil.

Fine... most Civ addicts have the same reaction to Cathy. I'll go find a better one... <<<sigh>>>

User avatar
Don't listen those armchair critics darski. Where would the Frau or Mrs. Al be today if they tried to please all the carping proles?

User avatar
Darski, I'm only going to say this once: I don't trust people who keep changing their avatars. It makes them look shady and unreliable. I also think they do it so they won't get shovel-whacked so often, thinking, "If I get shovel-whacked, I'll be on Pinkie's poop list forevermore, and she'll always be giving me the stinkeye and looking for excuses to whack me again. But if I change my avatar, she might think I'm someone new and different and I can start fresh with her," not realizing that only good-looking guys can start fresh with me--and you've surely noticed already how few of those are hanging around here. I honestly don't know why I keep coming back.

Obviously, Krasnodar doesn't know any of this, but if you've ever seen the dent in the side of his head, you'll agree it's too late for him now.

User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie wrote:Darski, I'm only going to say this once: I don't trust people who keep changing their avatars. It makes them look shady and unreliable. I also think they do it so they won't get shovel-whacked so often, thinking, "If I get shovel-whacked, I'll be on Pinkie's poop list forevermore, and she'll always be giving me the stinkeye and looking for excuses to whack me again. But if I change my avatar, she might think I'm someone new and different and I can start fresh with her," not realizing that only good-looking guys can start fresh with me--and you've surely noticed already how few of those are hanging around here. I honestly don't know why I keep coming back.

Obviously, Krasnodar doesn't know any of this, but if you've ever seen the dent in the side of his head, you'll agree it's too late for him now.

I am sure glad I ain't good looking.

User avatar
Scratchanitch, if you would put on a Red hat, you might perform well as Uncle Stalinclaus this MarXmas!

User avatar
Czar Czar wrote:Scratchanitch, if you would put on a Red hat, you might perform well as Uncle Stalinclaus this MarXmas!

That might be true if that picture really was me. Unfortunately it is merely my avatar. In real life, I am much uglier.

That avatar is to trick a Russian bride into coming and cook for me.

User avatar
This avatar is actually a truly scary one. The sad (but not current) truth is that this new pic is the real face of The Party ™ Image . It's been 50 years since the 60's so all those radicals are boring, white-haired, old people who need glasses to read the latest manifesto.

Dear Leader will need to keep well behind those broad skirts or face a 1,000 papercuts of "BO who?" from the dementia crowd. Did you see comrade Ayers last vid... the man is desperate to be thought scary. No, we whacky old (really old) proles are the best the Revolution can expect.
[highlight=#ff0000]
Nevermind![/highlight]

User avatar
"Pro-Progs have been saying he has no balls, no nuts, no stones. Clearly his manhood was brought into question, and he was in dire need of a virility restorative...."

I find this most disturbing. Who are they, meaning anyone, to question dear Leaders balls, nuts or stones??? I mean beside Mama MO?? I realized Jesse Jackasson wanted to remove them (what is it that men are so consumed with other mens balls??!! What would he have done with them, I ask????) but I have not hear him doing so. His manly hood is of relative unimportance; using his feminist side is of importance because we know real men will use their feminine side to prove they are real men.

I am wondering if this is not a topic that should be moved along on. After all, we have concluded he is the First Feminist President™ and that is all that matters. And we have plenty of feminist men right here in our Cube to prove how grand and feminine, feminine men are, do we not? (do not be shy, glorious feminine men of the Cube. we know who you are and celebrate it!)

User avatar
A new classification may be in order among "homo" sapiens",
that could be "Shemale" or "Female man", similar to a "mail man".

Just a suggestion.

User avatar
The Most Glorious Commissarka wrote:
"It all started last Friday, when he met with our previous feminist (not to mention first black) president, Bill Clinton, behind closed doors to discuss how to appease The Party in the wake of his cave-in to the evil Republicans"


The Party™ makes no mistakes, tax deal distracts from outrageous Omnibus spending bill. Those who would have had the balls lack of good judgment to ask what Omnibus means are still covering the "cave-in".

User avatar
BREAKING NEWS...
The evil Republicans have succeeded in forcing Harry Reid to withdraw the 1.2 Trillion dollar budget. That means...GASP...the government will have to shut down.

That's right, the American government has collapsed. Expect widespread rioting and looting. People will suddenly be homeless. Children will starve in the streets. Thousands of SEIU government employees will be furloughed. Planes will fall from the sky. Tea Partiers will roam the streets like zombies.

EVERYONE HEAD FOR THE HILLS!!! IT'S THE END OF THE WORLD! Remember what happened the last time this occurred back 1995. Millions died, the cities burned. Every man for himself, women and children, run for your lives.

(This is Whoopie signing out, Marx have mercy on us)

User avatar
Comrade Whoopie wrote:BREAKING NEWS...
The evil Republicans have succeeded in forcing Harry Reid to withdraw the 1.2 Trillion dollar budget. That means...GASP...the government will have to shut down.

That's right, the American government has collapsed.

And then to add insult to injury, Mitch McConnell offers to replace the glorious Democratic Socialist 2000 page bill with ONE PAGE-

https://www.breitbart.tv/mcconnell-offe ... ding-bill/

User avatar
He dares to defy the halo headed holy man of DC?

May he be struck deaf and dumb for his impertinence! Already happened you say?

His life insurance must be paid up, and he wants to blame the voters?

How much more time and information and staff hours are needed for a 2000 odd page bill?

Duh Thugglicans could only come up with one page? Please! Did some one find out how a word processor works?

User avatar
It's even worse than I thought. The generous and compassionate spending bill that was rejected contained the funding to implement ObamaCare. This one page "continuing resolution" travesty only allows the SEIU members to keep their jobs until Feb. 28th, small comfort indeed.

If the incoming GOP congress doesn't write a new bill with money to fund ObamaCare, our dream of universal health coverage for all the little children is DEAD.

Ok, screw the little children, this is about Obama's legacy. Health care was his crowning achievement. Heck, it was his only achievement. It was intended to put America on an irreversible course toward Socialism. Now, the only thing Obama will be remembered for is helping preserve the Bush tax cuts for the rich...WTF????

User avatar
[img]/red/images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]
I believe I'll remember Obama in the same way that I remember getting food poisoning from some enchiladas forty years ago.

User avatar
Don't you just love Dear Leader and Comrade Mo-Shelle? Even your average Christmas hating family still gives in and purchases their children presents, but not them. They stick to their beliefs. And to couple their beliefs with Kate Goslin's, the progressive idea of torturing kids isn't to be a Grinch at Christmas, it's to allow them to go camping and teach them how to shoot a firearm. Of course, being a made progressive, I'm with Kate. I wouldn't even allow my child, if I had one, of course, to own a squirt gun lest he get any perverse ideas.



 
POST REPLY