Image

Party Official Announcement

User avatar
TO: ALL
FROM: The Party
RE: Massachusetts Senate Contest

First, the Party wishes to make it known that the special election in Massachusetts revolved around local issues and is not a reflection on our great leader Obama or his wildly popular healthcare reform plan.

Second, the Party wishes to make it known that if Marcia Coakley loses (the absentee ballot counting is not expected to be completed until June) the reason for this loss is that she is the worst, terriblest, most incompetent and stupid candidate this side of George Bush and it is all her fault.

In light of those facts, the Party wishes to announce a series of lawsuits, orchestrated spontaneous demonstrations and media hate campaigns against an enemy of the people, one Scott Brown. The grounds for these are the inherently vicious, likely illegal, absolutely hateful and thoroughly underhanded campaign conducted on behalf of Brown. In support of this contention, the Party cites the following facts:

1. The Party believes the Brown campaign along with third parties illegally and unfairly conspired to select the insipid clueless idiot Marcia Coakley as the Party nominee. They did this by bribing voters, ballot box stuffing and after-the-fact tampering with the vote counts in the December Party primary. It would have been easy for Brown and his co-conspirators George Bush, Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin to do in this heavily Rethuglican state.

2. The Brown team utilized grossly unfair tactics. As an example, the Brown side played possum for most of the campaign, lulling Marcia Coakley into a false sense of entitlement. Only when it appeared that Brown was going to lose by 15-20 points did he unveil his true campaign. By sandbagging in this manner, the Brown campaign denied the Party sufficient time to mobilize ACORN its voter registration drive. In addition, the Party did not have any laundered cash on hand fundraisers scheduled and had to scramble at the last minute to put one together. Due to the late date, the Party could not get all its favorite big-money fat cats the roast chicken it needed and had to settle for small donations hot dogs. The campaign tactics utilized by Brown are blatantly unfair in light of the serious disadvantages the Party operates under in the state of Massachusetts.

3. The Party believes the Brown campaign unfairly took advantage of the stupidity and ineptness of Marcia Coakley and will be filing suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

4. The Party wishes to point out the following acts committed by the Brown campaign which we believe to be illegal:

  • Brown failed to inform the Party that he was actually going to contest the election.
  • On several occasions, Brown informed voters that he planned to vote against ObamaCare should he be elected. The Party deems it a gross violation of federal election law to inform voters as to what the candidate's plans are once in office. Voters must be told as little as possible in order to allow them to make the correct choice. Revealing this information in public is a conflict of interest and a betrayal of the politician-voter privledge.
  • The Party believes Brown personally violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by making an issue out of Marcia Coakley's attempt to turn a Martin Luther King Day memorial service into a Coakley rally. Brown's aim was discourage black voter turnout by making it appear Coakley's campaigning was unseemly and lacked grace. Which it did. But it is illegal for him to say so in front of the Party's most loyal voting bloc.
  • The Brown campaign knowingly and with malice aforethought solicited the votes of registered Democrats. Those are OUR votes, they BELONG TO US!

Finally, the Party wishes to express its disgust at the Brown campaign for constant use of the childish tactic of calling Marcia Coakley by the wrong name, Martha. The Party wishes the Brown campaign would grow up.

The Brown campaign will be hearing from our lawyers. All 10 million or so of them.

User avatar
Comrade Opiate,

There is still hope. You will be most proud to see this video. It is of a woman named Isabella, who is showing a complete stranger how to fill out an absentee ballot, and she makes sure to point out that he needs to vote for Dear Marcia, or in her words "de second name." Note her nails, and how she adamantly bangs her hand down onto the ballot. Comrade Isabella is one of those Undercover Operations Comrades who work tirelessly to make sure we get enough votes.


User avatar
"is not a reflection on our great leader Obama "

OH! Parish the gedanke!! (that's "thought" for the less alta-vista coherent). Never a negative thought, or idea, shall be pass on to the great Fuhrer, Obamski.

"Hope" and change ARE Hussein! His magnificence will push the dull, dreary and stupid Marcia, over the finish line!(and if not, never forget, HE has OBAMACORN and SEIU in place)

User avatar
Leninka, the Central Committe is, of course, gladdened by the never-say-brown attitude of our loyal termites soldiers of the revolution. There is, however, an acknowledgement that not enough was done to prepare for this disaster bizarre accident. For example, we should have prepared absentee ballots pre-marked for Martha Marcia Coakley with signatures of comatose and dead voters already filled in instead of having this idiot brave soul pushing unmarked ones in broad daylight and full public view.

The situation is summed up by a propagandist for the Capitalist Pig Journal:
John Fund in the Wall St. Journal wrote: Mr. Brown's surge was so sudden that many of the usual accoutrements of closely-contested elections are missing in the Bay State.
~
Another casualty of the expectation that the race would be a cakewalk for the Democrat will be an absence of absentee ballot fraud, the preferred method of putting an illegal thumb on the scale in a close race. Applications for absentee ballots had to be submitted by last Friday, providing little opportunity for those with ill intent to organize such an effort once they realized the race had tightened up.
~
Both parties have concerns about vote fraud or intimidation in today's election. Hundreds of lawyers and observers have been deployed at key polling places. But it's likely to be a relatively quiet election from a litigation angle unless the final margin is razor-thin. The Brown surge came so suddenly there was no time to plan anything devious beyond the usual negative commercials -- which in this race ran everywhere, including, for the first time in anyone's memory, The Weather Channel.

It remains to be seen we have assembled enough soldiers of righteousness leftuousness to save Massachusetts from the forces of evil. Regardless, this is much closer than it should have been and cost the Party much of its reserve vodka fund. Heads must roll and the search for scapegoats those responsible has already begun. If they think it's cold in Boston, wait'll they get to Siberia.

User avatar
It's obvious that the voters are ANGRY. They're angry because of Bush and the vile Republican obstructionism.

But mostly they're angry because they realize that they're all a bunch of bitter clinger hicks and redneck white trash. They don't deserve to have the right to vote and as soon as we take full control that's the first thing we need to fix.

I'm just sad that Dear Leader had to witness such a sickening display of irresponsible voting. Shameful!

User avatar
WooHoo Boo-Hoo.

This is indeed a sad day for the Party. Marcia Moxley Coakley and she must offer herself up to The Holy One for sacrifice.

She must take the sword so all blame goes to her. If she DARES to blame the Great One, she must look in the mirror first.

Remember, Party before induhvidual.

User avatar
We must pass the torch of our hatred for the Bushitler from generation to generation. The flame is weakening, weakening. It cannot go out. It must be fueled again. The hatred must be fueled.

Why, oh, why did those Democrats in the Massachusetts senate vote to change the rule from the governor being able to appoint a senator when the swimmer died, to this, an election. An election!! How foolish they were.

We would have an appointed Democrat in the U.S. Senate right now, if they hadn't changed the rules. This is not how it was supposed to turn out. They changed the rule in order to prevent a Rethuglican governor from appointing a Rethuglican senator, and now, it backfired. Foiled! Foiled again!! They should have left things alone!

User avatar
Sorry to announce Comrades Brown has won.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100120/ap_ ... tts_senate

I'm a little late reporting as I was busy trolling gloating grieving with the leftists over at Think Progress,

Yes it's BusHitlers fault, that and Climate Change caused this.

User avatar
Leninka wrote:Why, oh, why did those Democrats in the Massachusetts senate vote to change the rule from the governor being able to appoint a senator when the swimmer died, to this, an election. An election!! How foolish they were.
Comrade, let me refresh your memory.

This "law" for "electing" senators came back in 2004, when it appeared that John "Effing" Kerry (who served in Vietnam) was going to beat the Evil One, Bushitler. Bushitler's right-hand man, Mitt Romney was Governor, and the Party (and most particularly, the Swimmer) deemed he shouldn't have the power to select a senator. So, the law was changed in 2004.

Before The Swimmer died (Peace be upon him), he passionately proclaimed that the voters shouldn't have the power (or the mental capacity) to select a senator, that the power of blessing one for the Party should rest with the Governor, Deval Patrick (D).

Fast forward to today, the Evil Mitt Romney caused Martha Moxley Coakley to lose the Swimmers' seat.

Darn him ... darn him to heck.

So, you can see, the Party is evolving the laws, but just aren't fast enough for those wily, cheating Rethuglicans.

User avatar
Thank you for the correction, Comrade Pewkov,

It was on account of Dear John Kerry vacating his seat, and here, I thought it was their anticipation of the swimmer taking his final dunk.

User avatar
Well, they did change the laws so that the Governor could appoint someone till the next special election, before the Swimmer took his last swim.

The Party just didn't go far enough, since everyone thought Healthcare would be a done deal back in August, not 5 months later (or never) ... damn those tea-baggers.

User avatar
Empirical proof of Hell. Can you imagine anything more tormenting for Edward T. Kennedy than to look back from the afterlife to see that a conservative Republican taking his seat by more than 5% of the vote? I can't. Is John Kerry (Vietnam Veteran) scared? I think he is.

RIK

User avatar
Leninka wrote:Thank you for the correction, Comrade Pewkov,

It was on account of [HIGHLIGHT=#ffff00]Dear John Kerry[/HIGHLIGHT] vacating his seat, and here, I thought it was their anticipation of the swimmer taking his final dunk.

Who is this John Kerry prole??

NEVER HEARD OF HIM!

http://communistsforkerry.com/GPU/viewtopic.php?t=198

User avatar
Rikalonius wrote:Empirical proof of Hell. Can you imagine anything more tormenting for Edward T. Kennedy than to look back from the afterlife to see that a conservative Republican taking his seat by more than 5% of the vote? I can't. Is John Kerry (Vietnam Veteran) scared? I think he is.

RIK

Image
The delicious irony in all this is that it's TED'S FAULT Scott Brown is now replacing him:

Erick Erickson at redstate.com wrote: In Massachusetts, Barack Obama's unicorn of hope and changed died under the weight of Ted Kennedy's ego. The left gets angry when it is pointed out, but it is an objective fact.

Once Kennedy's condition became terminal, he could have resigned his seat in favor of an appointment or special election. Instead, the Democrats and Kennedy decided he should martyr himself to advance socialized medicine in America. Had he resigned before the health care debate began, the Republican victory in Massachusetts would be a myth. Instead, it is now a reality. Yes, you can credit Ted Kennedy with killing health care, not just Mary Jo Kopechne.

It is long since past the time the Democrat Party changed its named; something like
"Hubris R Us" would be most fitting.

User avatar
I was up in distress all night ( a real Maalox moment); in a twitter that the obstructionist Republican (please pardon the language) cheated his way into the glorious Kennedy Senate seat. The peoples masses of Mass, should demand a massive recount.


 
POST REPLY