Paul/Kucinich 2008

10/19/2007, 7:26 am

I was bantering that about with my friends in both parties and it always gets a laugh.
Both surrender monkeys, both insane.

Co-Presidents? The Moonbat Party?

I really hate these aggressive Ron Paul supporters. Every single one I've come across should be certified mentally unstable. They're like Krishnas or Moonies. Annoying as shit.

"George Washington said we shouldn't get involved in foreign entanglements!" Ummmm....the world is a lot smaller now than 1796. It hasn't been that way in a hundred years.

Do I have to say anything about Dopey Dennis?

Moron Ron and Dopey Dennis, more proof that any nutjob can grow up and run for president in this great country of ours.

Any ideas or is this too damn stupid to do a story?

10/19/2007, 12:10 pm

Laika the Space Dog wrote:...any nutjob can grow up and run for president in this great country of ours...

Sob... that brings a tear to this old Pup's eye! It is truly a great country we live in that no lack of common sense, there is no idea too out there, no statement slandering the US or it's soldiers that is too low to preclude someone from holding office.

10/19/2007, 4:54 pm

I don't know about other places in the country but here in Seattle we've got a lot of these Ron Paul idiots out with signs on street corners and out in the streets buttonholing people. My own theory is that the Democratic Party or the Hillary Campaign wants Ron Paul to run as an independent in an effort to do what Ross Perot did for Bill Clinton. So they've hired some Ron Paul support. I find it very hard to believe that real actual Republicans would side with Ron Paul and go out in the streets like some kind of young starry-eyed McGovernites from 1972. That's just my theory, I don't know anything and it's very important to know what you know and know what you don't know or else you become a conspiracy fruitcake like The Mime. But there's something fishy going on here.

10/19/2007, 5:40 pm

I think the evangelicals breaking ranks is the scariest possibility. That would surely give Hillary the White House <shudders>. Other than that I too could see Paul becoming the "Ross Perot factor" in '08. I heard he was doing pretty good as far as campaign cash is concerned... which makes you kind of wonder where he is getting it from? But then again maybe it's folks like Blue Bell and other tards who will vote for him if he goes Indie which could hurt Hill too. I could see some in the Anti-War camp voting for Paul in protest since Hill is still wishy-washy over staying or going in Iraq. OK, I'm done thinking out loud for the moment.

10/19/2007, 6:31 pm

"George Washington said we shouldn't get involved in foreign entanglements!"

Plus, every time we avoid getting involved, the world seems to get itself in a real mess and we have to clean up all the shit.

10/19/2007, 6:44 pm

Margaret hit the nail on the head with the hammer.

If it's going on here in Pittsburgh, it has to be everywhere else too.....the same thing...more like McCarthy '68.

Freakin' zombies...speaking of zombies, did you check out Zombietime's latest?....there's all the Ron Paul freaks in San Francisco 9/11 Truth and Peaceful Festival working the commie crowd....and their tent....and who else/...the Cuckoo Kucinich Freaks too....

He does seem to be spending an awful lot of money, and where is it coming from?

10/20/2007, 12:19 am

Egads!!! There is something going on indeed! I myself saw some old van riding around with Ron Paul painted all over it like some hippie dippie van... but being in Louisiana and he being in Texas, I just assumed it was some more or less local lunacy, until hearing these stories from other states.

10/20/2007, 9:57 am

My Lenin! But if they investigate 9-11 more, that could expose yet more complicity of the Bill's administration as well!

10/25/2007, 9:24 am

Ron Paul was piloting the craft:

Vote Moonbatocratlican in 2008.

10/25/2007, 9:49 am

Of course Kucinich is in good company

Carter Linky stinky

10/25/2007, 7:05 pm

Laika the Space Dog wrote:Of course Kucinich is in good company
Carter Linky stinky

<br>That was just you and Kenneth messing with the frequency, wasn't it?... Come on... own up... it's been.. what... 38 years?... and it's not like the man's not got himself into enough crap of his own since then... Lust in his heart... Habitat for Humanity... Aligning himself with Roger Waters... The Presidency... Proofless claims to advancing human rights and alleviating suffering, not to mention the blatant use of such phrases as "waging peace"... Where's my fork?... Now, where's my eye?...

You can admit you were hitting the VV a little hard that night... or that you sent Ros the wrong instructions for folding his tinhat... and that you included the joke about chewing on the left-over bits, even though you knew she was overly earnest at times... heheheh... and he had a lot of filllings before he got dentures... ow ow ow ow ow... heheheheh... ow... had to have caramelized his brain a little...

10/25/2007, 9:15 pm

I guess I'm busted.
The Housekeeper knows everything.

OK, It was Kenneth and me hovering over the steps of The Peachtree State's Capitol in 1969 and Shirley MacLaine's balcony a few years back. I freely admit it.

<whisper>
You did find this while cleaning some files on Lubiyanka Street? You know...the harmless de-classified "perestroika/glasnost" stuff. I don't want this to lead to the Warren Beatty Mind Control Machine. That is still classified.
MacLaine is still an operative.

10/25/2007, 9:34 pm

<shhh... she's just over, cleansing my aura... it's not often that housekeeping gets housekept... nanananananananana ohm ina whoopa whoopa whoopa... nanananananananana... ohwha-tana-siam... ohwha-tana-siam... ohwha-tana-siam...>

Ahhh!... much better....

Yeah... Jimmy Carter's a real dick...

10/25/2007, 9:46 pm

I'm very disappointed that we are talking about Laika's covert "monitoring" activities... very disappointed indeed. However, since the Joan Rivers Project is still underwraps, well, I guess I can let Laika peeping into Shirley's windows thing go for now.

(You know where to send the photos, Laika, and make sure SMERSH doesn't get them... can't have my Shirley pictures getting soiled again.)

10/26/2007, 12:53 pm

OK....

How about Paul/Paul 2008?

11/2/2007, 11:19 pm

Ah Laika... did you catch the true progressive truth in what he said?

KUCINICH: Uh, I did. And the rest of the account. It was an unidentified flying object, OK? It's like, it's unidentified. I saw something. Now, to answer your question. I'm moving my, and I'm also going to move my campaign office to Roswell, New Mexico, and another one in Exeter, New Hampshire, OK? And also, you have to keep in mind that Jimmy Carter saw a UFO, and also that more people in this country have seen UFOs than I think approve of George Bush's presidency.

RUSSERT: Actually, four ...

KUCINICH: And so, wait. We're just getting started here.

RUSSERT: No, no. We have about 14 percent of Americans who say they've seen UFOs. I'm going to move ...

KUCINICH: What was the percentage?

RUSSERT: Fourteen percent.

KUCINICH: What was that percentage?

RUSSERT: Fourteen.

KUCINICH: Thank you.

Now, this may seem innocent enough, but remember, Bushitler's supposed popularity is about 34%, but it is only about 12-13% among registered democrats. So Kucinich is right, but of course you have to understand that only democrats are considered "people."

11/11/2007, 8:48 pm

OK...Trevor Lyman....Ron Paul's bag man...is a "Rap" promoter from Florida.

And a big fan of "V for Vendetta"
Does that tell you anything?

And this ad he did for Paul raised $4.2M
Try not to puke.

WTF is "The goal is too reach...."
Fucker can't even spell. You'd think they'd edit it.

11/11/2007, 9:14 pm

Out of Character

I swear, I don't even understand this Ron Paul thing. He hasn't a chance in hell, and why are so many young people apparently enthralled with him? What's he doing with all this money? All I have seen from him was one worn out looking van with his name plastered all over the side. I would worry about him as a third party candidate, but then again, that would probably hurt the demoncrats as much as anyone.

11/11/2007, 11:15 pm

and why are so many young people apparently enthralled with him?

He's telling them he's going to give them a revolution. It's the old "you can have your cake and eat it too".
"Hey, I'll give you capitalism, hedonism, libertarianism, and nobody will have to defend it....I'll bring all the troops home and Kim Jong Il, Ahmadinejad, Chavez, etc...etc...will all disappear."
It perfectly appeals to college kids.
Why go to college? To get an education for a future job, right?
The military? Well, that just fucks up all their perfect little plans after graduation.
Who wants to defend freedom and fight the ROP if Ron said we don't have to?
Ron will be able to negotiate with the Wahabbis....they want peace too, right?

Ron Paul is the grandfatherly nice version "Alice of Malice" in our time. I'm referring to Alice Roosevelt Longworth.

It would be nice to put up a "No Tresspassing" sign along our borders, bring all the troops home, and screw foreign trade and embargo everything so we can have a "pure" Republic, but the world we live in is 2007, not 1907 or even 1807. I, for one, don't want to turn the clocks back to 632 A.D.
We're stuck "policing" the world, because we must and it's not all about oil, but shit, even France is coming over to our side....and now we're winning in Iraq....so, Duh, let's quit...it makes no goddamn sense. It's treason and an insult to our troops.

11/11/2007, 11:38 pm

Laika the Space Dog wrote:[ but the world we live in is 2007, not 1907 or even 1807. I, for one, don't want to turn the clocks back to 632 A.D.

Don't have to go back too far.... America's isolationism failed to keep us out of WWI and WWII, and in fact, left us ill prepared for both as well. That was one lesson I thought we had finally learned, but apparently there are still those who believe it will work this time. I get so sick of these idiots crying about bringing the troops home. Why? So they can sit around their base and paint rocks? It's like I have a little talent at database work... so then we get some clowns saying "We support you all the way, and to show how much we support you, we are going to bring you home so you don't have to do what you are trained to do."

11/12/2007, 1:23 am

Ron Paul is no Ross Perot (financially, at least) and in my opinion not a viable third party candidate that would drain votes from the GOP. If anything he would drain votes from the Dems by pulling away those college turds that do vote Democrat (which, if Hillary gets the nomination, they won't vote for her for obvious reasons). Hmmm... maybe a Paul/Nader ticket would be good? Maybe we should test the possibility of such a ticket on Mulva and see what he says?

Pup -- If anything a Evangelical third party would worry me and it is crucial - no matter who gets the GOP nomination - that we vote GOP and not opt to stay at home on election day. I really don't want our party to be split in two and for Hillary to waltz right into the White House.

11/12/2007, 1:37 am

Off Character

I haven't heard of any Evangelical third party possibility, have you? I am not a big Rudy fan, but I could even live with him if he was truthful in his comments about the type of judge he would choose. LOL! To tell the truth, and this one I really hate to tell, McCain gained a lot of points in my eyes when he made that comment about Hillary and the Woodstock museum, when he said he was "tied up at the time." Great line.

11/12/2007, 7:33 am

Paul is saying that he'll promise not to run as a 3rd party. To me, that pretty much guarentees it.
"Ron, you promised us revolution, you must still run!"
"But I promised not to run as a 3rd party."
"But we need you...what about the revolution? What about all the money we raised?"
"Oh...OK. Alright, I'll run."
"Hooray!"

The Clinton's are behind Paul's candidacy. I smell a rat. Lyman is no "libertarian" or "conservative". Libertine maybe...not a libertarian.
Paul didn't even ask this mole to raise cash...He just "showed up" on the scene. If Paul had any brains he'd do a background check.
Now Lyman is moving to NH from Florida to set up camp there.
This is all so suspicious.

11/12/2007, 10:29 am

I guess I need to pay more attention to this, I had to Google Lymon to find out who you were talking about. I just thought of Paul as being some odd ball. which of course he is, but he is the sort of idiot that can change the results of an election. I see he is another of those who want to go back to a gold standard, I know a lot of people who are absolutely convinced this is the problem, as if we never had economic down times when on gold.

11/12/2007, 12:14 pm

This is interesting:
https://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthrea ... 323&page=6

Look at all the websites at the end of the thread.

11/12/2007, 5:37 pm

You know, I can go for the libertarian view other than their foreign policy, and this hang up on gold standard. The fortress America stance has been shown historically to be a failure, and it only becomes less valid with every year. In some things, I agree with Ron, especially with the idea of govt being the nanny state.

11/12/2007, 7:35 pm

I am no big fan of the Evangelical Fascists, but it they broke ranks with the Republican Party ... Hillary will take over White House. That is an even more frightening thought than a pro-choice President. I think the E.F.'s are well aware of this. This means they have to decide which devil they can stomach. Guliani and his pro-choice stand or four years of Hillary and Bill's Soviet style of Socialism.

Ron Paul is an even worse 3rd party candidate than Perot was. At least Perot had a dash of charisma. Ron Paul is a gnat on the presidential landscape. If the Dems are funding him... the thought of that makes me want to roll on the floor and die laughing... then having them poor money down the toilet is a good thing for the Republicans. Right? So who is funding Ron Paul? Blue Bell? No!!!! Better yet..... The Mime! That would be a hoot!!!

--
Blokhayev

11/12/2007, 8:06 pm

I frankly don't think there is a whole lot a president can do about some issues regardless, and abortion is one of them. I dare say about as much as a president can do has been done. The Supreme Court is where it is all at, that is what is important, and Rudi says he believes in a constructionist court. That is all I ask. The main thing I look at in a president is as Commander in Chief. All the other things a president can say he is for is fine, but what he wants is limited by the Congress, It is only as the role of Commander in Chief that a president has broad power, These idiots can say what they want, but only a president can order troops into the field within minutes of a phone call. Heck, I loved the Social Security plan that Bush put forward, but the Congress beat it down. Presidents propose, Congress disposes, But the president can send us to war with a nod of his head, That is what I look for, who do I trust to protect this country....and frankly, the only woman I trust with that sort of power is black and her name is part of a popular cereal name.

11/12/2007, 8:20 pm

Commissar Pupovich wrote:I frankly don't think there is a whole lot a president can do about some issues regardless, and abortion is one of them. I dare say about as much as a president can do has been done. The Supreme Court is where it is all at, that is what is important, and Rudi says he believes in a constructionist court. That is all I ask. The main thing I look at in a president is as Commander in Chief. All the other things a president can say he is for is fine, but what he wants is limited by the Congress, It is only as the role of Commander in Chief that a president has broad power, These idiots can say what they want, but only a president can order troops into the field within minutes of a phone call. Heck, I loved the Social Security plan that Bush put forward, but the Congress beat it down. Presidents propose, Congress disposes, But the president can send us to war with a nod of his head, That is what I look for, who do I trust to protect this country....and frankly, the only woman I trust with that sort of power is black and her name is part of a popular cereal name.

She will not run. Period. And there is no changing her mind. And that is the sad part.

--

11/12/2007, 10:30 pm

Oh, I know that. Actually, one of my other best choices wouldn't run either, I would have loved to see Newt Gingrich in a debate against any of the dems.

11/12/2007, 11:18 pm

I wonder what Gloria is up to these days, Laika?

11/13/2007, 4:21 am

I wonder what Gloria is up to these days, Laika?

Waxing the UFO, and giving it a lube job. What else?....Oh, and keeping the rest of the campaign staff stocked with hallucinogens.

I wonder if Gloria is related to an Ole Virginny family that produced a US Senator?
Great Grandpa Swanson, maybe?

11/13/2007, 3:57 pm

Speaking as an evangelical fascist, I must disagree with Obergruppenführer Dobson precisely because I agree with him so often on moral and ethical issues. Ever since John Adams we've had a two party system that has become standard in American politics, which is very unlike the multi party systems found in other parliamentary governments. In America, one party has to go into extinction in order for another party to have a chance at competing such as with the emergence of the Republican Party after the demise of the Whigs. The best a third party candidate has been able to do is torpedo a major party candidate such as what TR did to Taft in 1912, Perot in '92 and '96, and thankfully, Ralph Nader in Florida in 2000 (imagine Algore as president on September 11, 2001 – that's the stuff nightmares are made of).

In the possible case of Rudy vs Hillary, I would vote for Rudy. I think if Hillary became president, and I don't think I'm being excessively paranoid, she would do all she could to amass absolute power and an indefinite term as “president” for more than four or eight years. As for the abortion issue, imagine it being cynically promoted “for the children” with a passion not known outside of China. Our government is no better than the people we vote for, and it's not hard to imagine her wanting the Constitution revised here and there (say, scrapping Amendment XXII by executive order, for example) in the spirit of Hugo. Give Bill an intern, a basketball game, and some sycophantic adulation, and he's happy. Hill wants power and she would mean to keep it. With a population as ignorant of and as dependent on government as ours is, she would have a chance. Obviously, a lot has to converge in her favor to make my grim scenario here possible, but we know she's willing to avail herself of any and all opportunities.

So, how about HILL NO! as a new Party slogan?

11/13/2007, 7:38 pm

I personally am for returning to the original Constitution other than of course the amendments that eliminated slavery, I think the way the founders intended was best, and since that is not likely in the US, I favor secession! LOL

11/13/2007, 11:00 pm

I agree with Reichsleiter Blogunov 110%: Rudy is not that bad in my book when compared to Hillary -- and I don't see him the lesser of the two evils either as a Christian conservative. Personally, I would actually like to have Rudy as President so long as he holds up his promise of sending strict constructionist judges to the bench (let us not forget that GWB -- who did play up the Christian conservative credentials -- tried to pawn off Harriet Myers on us... that was, of course, until the base said otherwise). Rudy's stance on guns is questionable, but all in all I'm sure that was just to get elected in an extremely liberal town (among other positions he has). It's not like he is going to switch his rhetoric like Romney and let the media -- you tube in particular -- have fun by reminding us that he is flip-flopping.

As for Dobson, he needs to get off his high horse long enough to realize what is at stake here. Electing a pro-abortion President who can be swayed by the staunch conservative base isn't half as bad as letting a staunch pro-abortion dyke -- who would expand WOMYN'S CHOICE! further, mind you -- become POTUS to do irreversible damage to everything we hold dear. I really don't want to see the ATF rummaging about my folk's home looking for firearms. The bitch has got to go and Rudy can send her packing by picking off moderates who lean Democrat.

Let's show the Dems we mean business by snatching up some of their moderate voters. I want Kos to shit a brick when he wakes up and sees another Republican as POTUS.

Rudy/Thompson '08!

11/13/2007, 11:02 pm

Commissar Pupovich wrote:I personally am for returning to the original Constitution other than of course the amendments that eliminated slavery, I think the way the founders intended was best, and since that is not likely in the US, I favor secession! LOL

Yeeeeeee-haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhh!!!!

BTW, I take it you would keep amendments XIII and XV? I thought so. Good!

XIV and XVI are the Stalinist amendments. They never should have been there in the first place.

11/14/2007, 12:17 am

Oh, you can be sure they would be gone!

11/14/2007, 8:43 pm

Chairman M. S. Punchenko wrote: The bitch has got to go and Rudy can send her packing by picking off moderates who lean Democrat. .... Let's show the Dems we mean business by snatching up some of their moderate voters.

I am tremendously disappointed in Fred Thompson. I really did think that he could have pulled the Republican Party together because he had mass appeal coupled with an impressive resume' to stomp the shit out of Comrade Hillary and The Socialist Party (used to be called the Democratic Party). But he has been so damned dull.

But yeah.... Given that the majority of voters are moderates and many of the moderate Dems also cannot stand Ice Queen Hillary, Rudy could be the one that could pull that off. But he has to come around on firearms. Without them, how the hell are we going to overthrow the government when Her Majesty Ice Queen Hillary subverts it into something evil along the lines of the Gestapo or the KGB.

Chairman M. S. Punchenko wrote: I want Kos to shit a brick when he wakes up and sees another Republican as POTUS.

Oooooooo..... Meow! Just thinking about that makes me drool all over my shirt!!! I can't wait to see the temper tantrum he is going throw!!!

--Blokhayev

11/15/2007, 1:51 pm

How about Paul/Paulsen 2008?
They even kinda resemble each other.

At least I could respect Pat Paulsen and he'd still be a better candidate than moRON even if Pat has been voting Democrat since 1997.

How about those stupid t-shirts and signs with LOVE spelled backwards?
Oh...how hip and subliminal! I feel like eating some granola! Where's my patchouli?

And let's throw a Che Beret on the doofus.

And here's censored Paulsen on Merv 1974....you should see all the outraged liberal comments in You Tube. Does anybody remember all the Larry Wilde double books?
<object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/04BhAxBNWIo&r ... ram><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object>

11/15/2007, 8:18 pm

Rudy Guliani is probably the best candidate to take down Hillary. His view on abortion really isn't a problem because it shouldn't be up to the feds. Abortion wasn't included in the constitution so it should go to the states to decide on it. The most appealing thing to me about Guliani is his stand on the economy. With all these commucrats running around talking about national health care (because it works SO well in Canada) Guliani has taken a strong stance against welfare and his record shows he is not afraid to lower taxes alot.

11/15/2007, 8:30 pm

Speaking of taxes, they're alive and well here in Wisconsinistan. Some of you may or may not have heard that our state passed a budget a few months ago (not without much bloodshed and several casualties though) and not ONE, not a single one, of our politicians suggested lowering taxes. The left, they wanted to raise taxes. The right, although substantially less wanted to raise taxes. Since head magistrate Doyle is going to be with us till 2010 this trend should only continue. I am firmly convinced you could get a politician in Madison to tear out his own heart and eat it before you could get him to lower one tax. Thank you for bearing my rant, I know it doesn't effect alot of you but I needed to vent.

11/16/2007, 5:12 pm

Hooray for Redstate!

Good! Ron Paul supporters are nothing but liberals in libertarian clothing.
I'd vote for Joe Lieberman before I'd vote for Paul. At least Joe gets it when it comes to defending this country.
Lyman is also one of those idiotic 9/11 "Truthers".

This has to be one of the dumbest quotes in the campaign arena:
We just marched in, we can just march out...Ron Paul

It would make sense if it added "after we're victorious" but no....<br>they're Paulapalosers
Way to go! Let's dishonor all those who served!

What's that stench? Paulchouli?

11/17/2007, 9:25 am

Here's some proof what a bunch of idiots Ron Paul supportere are:

Ron Paul Sucks
<br>Ron Paul Troll-bots

Notice the total lack of humor and the inability to understand satire.

11/18/2007, 6:16 pm

Space Dog,

Just how do the Ron Paul morons, who make Zippy the Pinhead look like Werner von Braun, think that these "blog bots" (for lack of a better term) are going drum up support for Ron Paul? If anything, "bots" of any type just piss people off.

--
ZB

11/18/2007, 8:51 pm

If anything, "bots" of any type just piss people off.

They're worse live and face to face. It's like talking to a Moonie or a Hare Krishna.
No sense of humor and they take great offense if you poke fun at them or Ron Paul.
It's a shame. When I first heard about Ron Paul, I thought he had a lot of good things to say. Then I listened some more and I couldn't believe it....9/11 was inside job...surrender....bring the troops home. (and don't get confused moRon Paulapalosers...if you're reading this, we don't equivocate when we're off character here. Bringing the troops home without victory IS SURRENDER and bad for this country and the planet)
Then seeing all these Paulchouli hippies everywhere. WTF? WTF?
Now the money laundering and wire fraud....He knew these coins and funny paper money were out there with HIS image on them! What did he do? Plausible deniability. If he had any brains he would have put a stop to that day one. Period.
Campaign buttons are one thing, but funny "alternative " money is quite something different. That's pretty creepy for somebody who calls himself a Christian and allowing that. Render unto Caesar, you Ron Paul idiots.
If I was to profile him, I'd say schizophrenic and narcissistic. How else can you explain his split platform and allowing his image to be put on "alternative" coinage?
Cuckoo like Kucinich.

11/19/2007, 12:50 am

Laika the Space Dog wrote:
If anything, "bots" of any type just piss people off.

... I'd say schizophrenic and narcissistic. ....

Laika,

I'd say those two words sum up the entire political Left-wing here in the U.S. It's all about them making themselves feel good. An intellectual and psychological form of masturbation. They believe that they are "compassionate", which makes them feel morally superior. Like masturbation it feels good, but does nothing.

However,

Ron Paul the Pinhead and his Pinhead-ites go waaaaaaaaaaaaaay beyond this mental jacking off. What's next with these kooks? UFOs from another planet are going to land on Earth to lead us stupid humans to "enlightenment"?

I have the perfect VP running mate for Ron Paul. Zippy the Pinhead! The problem is figuring out which Pinhead makes the the most sense. My money's on Zippy.

--
ZB

1/31/2008, 8:20 am

Glorious news Comrades!

A Paul/Kucinich ticket is still possible!
What, you say Dennis dropped out?

We don't need no stinking Dennis!

We want Elizabeth!

1/31/2008, 1:06 pm

Kucinich claims he cares about the potato-eating worker-and-peasant ass - but he's got himself a tall, slim British aristocratic ass for personal enjoyment. Does that mean he's a hypocrite like Al Gore who asks us to take public transportation while he himself rides a luxurious private jet?

And what about her? In Kucinich's care it's difficult to call her a gold digger, although her shovel may be indeed made of gold.

Pinkie? I need your help and digging experience. A digger of WHAT is Kucinich's 27-year-old wife?

And is there a word in the English language that describes the process of digging into crap with a golden shovel?

1/31/2008, 7:53 pm

(Pinkie off)

I don't see her as a digger of anything in particular; rather, I see her and her husband as a very poor, very cheap, bargain basement store brand tenth generation copy of Prince Charles and the late Diana.

Compare pictures of Kucinich to Charles--especially photos of when Charles was younger and wed to Diana. Interesting resemblance, now that I think about it.

(Pinkie on)

Digging crap with a golden shovel = well funded politician making campaign promises.

1/31/2008, 10:44 pm

I agree.

Some what.

But Prince Charles was and still is a "Prince" and is taller than 4'11". There is no "copy".

Elizabeth is hot but she is still kissing a frog.

Oh...and she is a "mature 30" now. That clip was from 3 years ago.

2/1/2008, 10:15 am

I don't see her as a digger of anything in particular

I don't know...seems like she digs a very poor, very cheap, bargain basement store brand tenth generation copy of Prince Charles. (Great turn of phrase, by the way.)

2/1/2008, 10:25 am

Thanks, Comrade Betinov, I think you just nailed it. But I suspect, from the little reading I've been able to find on her, that she fancies herself as a sort of "Diana wannabe" and Kucinich--seemingly--is the best she can do toward that end.

2/3/2008, 4:52 pm

How tall is she?

2/3/2008, 5:03 pm

Probably about 5'2" judging by Kucinich's current stature.

-Mikhail

2/3/2008, 5:11 pm

She's 5'10"
He's 1/4 Hobbit 3/4 Gollum

2/3/2008, 5:26 pm

Hey Pinkie...how about a cheaper version of Edie Brickell?
Edie went for a little dude that was twice as old as her also.

I was going to post The New Bohemians "What I Am" video here, but the better angels of my nature hogtied my nasty conscience and made me stop and save all of your eyeballs and eardrums.

2/3/2008, 5:50 pm

I tried googling Edie to check her height and photo, but came up empty on both counts. The only pictures I could get were children's drawings. That's never a good sign.

2/3/2008, 6:10 pm

Hey, it could be worse... a lot worse....

2/3/2008, 6:12 pm

Commissarka Pinkie wrote:I tried googling Edie to check her height and photo, but came up empty on both counts. The only pictures I could get were children's drawings. That's never a good sign.

Here's a shot of Edie at an (I think) 2006 NYC Central Park Concert:

And here is the rest of the Bohemians...

Code: Select all

What Would You Do

Barely old enough to legally drive.
She took off in her stepmothers van.
A restlessness that blew her over the line.
Like the wind inside an aluminum can.
At a pay phone in a donut shop.
She called a friend back home.
Were all worried theyve called the cops.
Are you crazy? Where have you gone?
She said what would you do if you were me?
When its suicide to stay, and murder to leave.
She ran out of gas down in New Mexico.
And got a job at a local cafe.
Friday nights they featured live rock and roll.
She fell in love with a boy who played.
He had soulful eyes and indian blood.
No intention of staying around.
All he took was his harmonica and her heart when he left town.
He said what would you do if you were me?
When its suicide to stay, and murder to leave?
She never married but she did have a child.
A sweet young girl by the name of Sioux.
She had spirit and a heart breaking smile.
And some beat up moccasin boots.
Anf they had nothing but each others love.
An apartment by the tracks.
And when the day came that Sioux grew up. She said someday Ill be back.
Oh now.
What would you do, if you were me?
When its suicide to stay, and murder to leave?

-Mikhail

2/3/2008, 10:48 pm

I didn't know Paul Simon was still active.

Wikipedia wrote:Brickell married singer-songwriter Paul Simon on May 30, 1992. They live in New Canaan, Connecticut.[3] Brickell was performing What I Am on NBC's Saturday Night Live when she noticed Simon standing in front of the cameraman. "He made me mess the song up when I looked at him", she said with a smile. "We can show the kids the tape and say, 'Look, that's when we first laid eyes on each other.'" They have three children: Adrian Edward (born December 1992), Lulu (born April 1995) and Gabriel Elijah (born May 1998).[4]

2/5/2008, 3:30 pm

Red Square wrote:I didn't know Paul Simon was still active.

Wikipedia wrote:Brickell married singer-songwriter Paul Simon on May 30, 1992. They live in New Canaan, Connecticut.[3] Brickell was performing What I Am on NBC's Saturday Night Live when she noticed Simon standing in front of the cameraman. "He made me mess the song up when I looked at him", she said with a smile. "We can show the kids the tape and say, 'Look, that's when we first laid eyes on each other.'" They have three children: Adrian Edward (born December 1992), Lulu (born April 1995) and Gabriel Elijah (born May 1998).[4]

That Viagra must be some amazing stuff!!!!

"Hello, doc? Can't you hook a brother up with some Blue Happy Pills? What? THEY'RE FREE!!!! THANK YOU HILLARYCARE!!!"

Yes, Hillarycare. Because .... she cares™ And Don't forget!!! Vote Hillary '08. Do it Today and you will receive the new and improved Hildo Hydra 7.8 at NO EXTRA CHARGE!!! (While supplies last. The H08 campaign is not responsible for any personal injuries or damage to the local power grid. Use of a 500 volt power outlet installed by a licensed electrician is strongly recommnded.)

--
ZB

A ONE-TIME DONATION

Click, then choose the amount

A MONTHLY DONATION

select a level of your attachment

Get in line at our People's State-Run Dry Goods Store #86

The People's Cube

Guaranteed equality of results for only $10 capitalist exploitation units

Hotel USSR

Shakedown Socialism

You've been counted, Thought Criminal #

A ONE-TIME
DONATION

A MONTHLY
DONATION