Slapstick Politics Blogspot wrote:Anti-Obama Shirt Leads To Suspension For Aurora, CO Fifth Grader

An Aurora 11-year-old says his first amendment rights are being trampled after he was suspended for wearing a homemade shirt that reads "Obama is a terrorist's best friend."

The fifth grader wore it on a day when students were asked to wear red, white and blue to show their patriotism.

The boy's father Dann Dalton describes himself as a "proud conservtive" who has taken part in some controversial anti-abortion protests. Dalton says the school made a major mistake by suspending his son for wearing the shirt.

"It's the public school system," Dalton says, "let's be honest, it's full of liberal loons."

The school district told Daxx Dalton that he had the choice of changing his shirt, turing his shirt inside out or being suspended.

Daxx chose suspension.

http://slapstickpolitics.blogspot.com/2 ... nsion.html

Comrades, these are indeed perilous times. The forces of evil have landed in this peaceful hamlet and begun poisoning the minds of the people there. I'm not referring to this child, I'm referring to the SCHOOL SYSTEM! Why would they perceive a shirt bearing the slogan "Obama is a terrorist's best friend" as ANTI-OBAMA??? Obama IS a friend to the downtrodden and oppressed people throughout the world, especially the ones who employ suicidal violence to express their displeasure. Obama has stated many times he wants to talk with these people and give them lots of money and many carrots but no sticks but a few choruses of Kumbaya are OK. So what's the problem here, Aurora School System? Are you ashamed of this wonderful child who loves Obama and wants to share his truth with the world? Or are you simply so naive to actually think Obama is NOT a terrorist's best friend? Hmmm?

Camp Green Lake for the kid. Disobedience must have prior approval by the party.
It could have been worse, though.

Children who oppose The Party in skool are the enemy of the State people! Think about it, if they are RethugliKKKans, their parents are RethugliKKKans too! If we can re-educate the child, we can eliminate re-educate the parents too!

Yes it is true! Especially when RethugliKKKans are multiplying more than the glorious left.

Why? The "tolerant" ideology of the left believes that a woman's right to "not want to be inconvenienced by a human being (even though it could be passed on to thousands of people wanting to adopt)" supersedes that of the human being's "right to live."

Therefore, our numbers are less, so we must re-educate them!

Politilemologist wrote:Yes it is true! Especially when RethugliKKKans are multiplying more than the glorious left.

Why? The "tolerant" ideology of the left believes that a woman's right to "not want to be inconvenienced by a human being (even though it could be passed on to thousands of people wanting to adopt)" supersedes that of the human being's "right to live."

Therefore, our numbers are less, so we must re-educate them!

MmmHmm. . . See, we don't punish our daughters with pregnancy, and even if they do get pregnant, we can save the womyn from the inconvenience that is the child. This way, the womyn stays connected to The Party for life! We create more proles who vote for The Party.

This is where imPaili'n is so messed up on. Why have a Down Syndrom kid when there's Party approved abortion? She punished her daughter by keeping her pregnant, instead of letting her get a Party approved abortion. Of course, all those rednecks, hicks, RethugliKKKan chIIldren, don't vote, so we have an advantage, also, don't forget how we count the votes.