Image

The Evolution of a Letter to Obama

User avatar
[img]/images/Obama_Writes_Letter_Climate_Change.jpg[/img]

An important letter to Obama begins life as a simple idea meant to express a political need that the president should address:

Oval office, President Obama: "There's a lot of people that don't think climate change is something I should do anything about. You know what would be good is if a bunch of climate experts sent me a letter demanding action. As a community organizer you know what that means?"

Yes-man flunky: "Yes, sir! You're going to write another letter to yourself and have other people sign it. Good idea, sir!"

Obama writes the letter but the people he wants to sign it send it back. "It needs work," they explain. "This letter reads like it was written by a twelve-year-old girl."

Obama re-writes the letter and sends it to the people he wants to sign it. But it comes back too. "You've got to tone down all the praise of Obama. Most of that doesn't have anything to do with the actual purpose of the letter," the intended signatories say.

So Obama re-writes the letter to himself. It comes back. "We can't sign this letter. We know you want more power but just refer to your power as "tools," not as "dynamite to the system." Also, no Bush. Nobody cares about Bush anymore. Blaming Bush for "the end of the world in flames" is a little over the top. We can't sign that."

Another rewrite. Another rejection: "Mr President, we're not going to sign a letter that calls for the immediate execution of all climate deniers. Can't you come up with some other way to silence climate change deniers?"

Finally after many many rewrites Obama gets it right. The call for action is complete. The presidential prop is signed.


The finished letter:

Dear President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, and OSTP Director Holdren,

As you know, an overwhelming majority of climate scientists are convinced about the potentially serious adverse effects of human-induced climate change on human health, agriculture, and biodiversity. We applaud your efforts to regulate emissions and the other steps you are taking. Nonetheless, as climate scientists we are exceedingly concerned that America's response to climate change – indeed, the world's response to climate change – is insufficient. The risks posed by climate change, including increasing extreme weather events, rising sea levels, and increasing ocean acidity – and potential strategies for addressing them – are detailed in the Third National Climate Assessment (2014), Climate Change Impacts in the United States. The stability of the Earth's climate over the past ten thousand years contributed to the growth of agriculture and therefore, a thriving human civilization. We are now at high risk of seriously destabilizing the Earth's climate and irreparably harming people around the world, especially the world's poorest people.

We appreciate that you are making aggressive and imaginative use of the limited tools available to you in the face of a recalcitrant Congress. One additional tool – recently proposed by Senator Sheldon Whitehouse – is a RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) investigation of corporations and other organizations that have knowingly deceived the American people about the risks of climate change, as a means to forestall America's response to climate change. The actions of these organizations have been extensively documented in peer reviewed academic research (Brulle, 2013) and in recent books including: Doubt is their Product (Michaels, 2008), Climate Cover-Up (Hoggan & Littlemore, 2009), Merchants of Doubt (Oreskes & Conway, 2010), The Climate War (Pooley, 2010), and in The Climate Deception Dossiers (Union of Concerned Scientists, 2015). We strongly endorse Senator Whitehouse's call for a RICO investigation.

The methods of these organizations are quite similar to those used earlier by the tobacco industry. A RICO investigation (1999 to 2006) played an important role in stopping the tobacco industry from continuing to deceive the American people about the dangers of smoking. If corporations in the fossil fuel industry and their supporters are guilty of the misdeeds that have been documented in books and journal articles, it is imperative that these misdeeds be stopped as soon as possible so that America and the world can get on with the critically important business of finding effective ways to restabilize the Earth's climate, before even more lasting damage is done.

Sincerely,

Jagadish Shukla, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Edward Maibach, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Paul Dirmeyer, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Barry Klinger, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Paul Schopf, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA

David Straus, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA
Edward Sarachik, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Michael Wallace, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Alan Robock, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
Eugenia Kalnay, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
William Lau, University of Maryland, College Park, MD
Kevin Trenberth, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO
T.N. Krishnamurti, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Vasu Misra, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL
Ben Kirtman, University of Miami, Miami, FL
Robert Dickinson, University of Texas, Austin, TX
Michela Biasutti, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
Mark Cane, Columbia University, New York, NY
Lisa Goddard, Earth Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY
Alan Betts, Atmospheric Research, Pittsford, VT

User avatar
[img]images/clipart/Prog_Off.gif[/img]Has RICO ever been used to investigate/prosecute actual racketeers?Never mind, I just realized I already asked that on another thread. It still confuses me, though.

User avatar
It's a pity you didn't have the original draft written by a 12 year old girl. I think that would have been more powerful as a propaganda tool. Who doesn't like puppies?


 
POST REPLY