5/13/2013, 1:24 pm
Some traitor, Rightwinger, Richard Grenell (so called Foreign Policy expert and media critic), has revealed what he thinks is "big news". He is saying that both ABC and CBS presidents have siblings (that would be 'children' for low informative Rethugians) work for Obama at the White House on his National Security Council. Grenell is saying that the lack of coverage on the Benghazi hearings can be directly attributed to this pure coincidence.
Comrades, I am here to denounce and renounce all such unsubstantiated claims!! As dear leader says, "There is no there, there". And besides, dear leader is free to employee or dis-employee any and all of whom he chooses, is he not -- that is to the importance here and not who has a job!
If by pure chance, a loyal comrade is working with dear leaders regime, why is that a problem? What good loyal Amerikan would not want to be working for dear leader, I ask???!!
I am submitting accurate White House photo of employees and personnel to Obama in top secret meeting, which was not Open to Public. As you see, loyal everyday persons, who may or may not have associations to News Media, may or may not be working for dear leader and so, "There is no there, there"!! . . . but, even if there is a "there, there" -- WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE??!!
Comrades, I am here to denounce and renounce all such unsubstantiated claims!! As dear leader says, "There is no there, there". And besides, dear leader is free to employee or dis-employee any and all of whom he chooses, is he not -- that is to the importance here and not who has a job!
If by pure chance, a loyal comrade is working with dear leaders regime, why is that a problem? What good loyal Amerikan would not want to be working for dear leader, I ask???!!
I am submitting accurate White House photo of employees and personnel to Obama in top secret meeting, which was not Open to Public. As you see, loyal everyday persons, who may or may not have associations to News Media, may or may not be working for dear leader and so, "There is no there, there"!! . . . but, even if there is a "there, there" -- WHAT DIFFERENCE AT THIS POINT, DOES IT MAKE??!!