5/14/2015, 11:26 pm
Who can replace George Stephanopoulos as a fair and impartial moderator of the February 2016 GOP Debate?
The shocking revelation that ABC Chief Political Correspondent George Stephanopoulos accidentally forgot to remember to disclose the fact that he contributed $50,000 $75,000 to the Clinton Foundation has unfortunately caused him to recuse himself from moderating the GOP debate to be held next February on ABC. Apparently some highfalutin folks in the media don't think that a left-wing communist sympathizer fair and impartial journalist has a right to monetarily contribute to a charity run by a corrupt liar his former boss.
The most stunning part of this revelation is that anyone is surprised, considering that George worked for the Clinton campaign in 1992 and then in the Clinton Administration as the White House communications director from 1993 to 1996. Stephanopoulos, as a card-carrying member of the Left-Wing media fair and impartial journalist who hosts ABC's This Week, single-handedly gifted the Obama Campaign with it's War on Women™ narrative against Mitt Romney in 2012, leaving little doubt that he is a good comrade as to his political leanings.
One might think that it would be difficult to fathom a more partisan non-partisan moderator for a political debate than Stephanopoulos, but surprisingly, there are several contenders for the job that could fill his shoes without losing much in the left-wing ideology objective fairness department.
-Candy Crowley is well-remembered for the way she came to Dear Leader's defense when his Current Truth™ came under attack by Republican Nominee Mitt Romney.
-Chris Matthews is known to have had a thrill up his leg for Barack Obama, and would slobber at the chance to bring his brand of Hardball to the GOP debate.
-Brian Williams could make a brilliant comeback as a debate moderator, misremembering comments and actions by the Republican candidates that never actually happened.
-Bob Schieffer could make a splash for his final farewell to his tens of adoring fans who share his status as centenarians.
-Jon Stewart would give his millenial parrots young fans a refresher course on why they prefer the security of enslavement to The Party™ over the frightful idea of individual liberty.
Not to worry comrades, the fact is that The Party has a DEEEEEEEP bench of 'independent non-partisan journalists' (wink, wink) that would be able to induce awkward moments and inject confusion into a debate that will make excellent sound-bytes in negative ads for our presumptive empress elect.
The most stunning part of this revelation is that anyone is surprised, considering that George worked for the Clinton campaign in 1992 and then in the Clinton Administration as the White House communications director from 1993 to 1996. Stephanopoulos, as a card-carrying member of the Left-Wing media fair and impartial journalist who hosts ABC's This Week, single-handedly gifted the Obama Campaign with it's War on Women™ narrative against Mitt Romney in 2012, leaving little doubt that he is a good comrade as to his political leanings.
One might think that it would be difficult to fathom a more partisan non-partisan moderator for a political debate than Stephanopoulos, but surprisingly, there are several contenders for the job that could fill his shoes without losing much in the left-wing ideology objective fairness department.
-Chris Matthews is known to have had a thrill up his leg for Barack Obama, and would slobber at the chance to bring his brand of Hardball to the GOP debate.
-Brian Williams could make a brilliant comeback as a debate moderator, misremembering comments and actions by the Republican candidates that never actually happened.
-Bob Schieffer could make a splash for his final farewell to his tens of adoring fans who share his status as centenarians.
-Jon Stewart would give his millenial parrots young fans a refresher course on why they prefer the security of enslavement to The Party™ over the frightful idea of individual liberty.
Not to worry comrades, the fact is that The Party has a DEEEEEEEP bench of 'independent non-partisan journalists' (wink, wink) that would be able to induce awkward moments and inject confusion into a debate that will make excellent sound-bytes in negative ads for our presumptive empress elect.
