5/27/2015, 4:06 am
[img]/images/Poster_Bedtime_Stories.jpg[/img]
We should salute the United Kingdom for its timely and apt discussion about how the typical Capitalistic, non-single-parented, heterosexist and overly-wealth family DESTROYS the IQ and PUTS POOR CHILDREN AT A DISADVANTAGE, particularly their attachment to that vile accoutrement of the pre-pre-pre college preparatory kind, THE BEDTIME STORY.
Yes, while Junior and Little Emma are spellbound hearing the adventures of Mowgli or Robinson Crusoe or the Pokey Little Puppy on your knee, poor children just miles away have to go to sleep with the sound of police killing black youths and mom turning tricks in the other room. What chance, I ask you, do THEY have for a head start on their education???? After all, surely the only literature in each little hovel there is Marx's "Das Kapital" and Penthouse....neither of which makes great reading to kids.
What can we do to SAVE THE POOR AND UN-READ-TO CHILDREN???? The answer is simple, Comrades. The rich and well-to-do have to stop telling their children bedtime stories. Then, and only then, will the playing field be equal.
I know what you're going to say. I can predict your argument, which no doubt is, "Don't the 1 percent-ers have enough time to go down to the less genteel neighborhoods and read to the poor children?" Well, of course they do! But those less genteel neighborhoods are now being run by important Democrat politicians! What if the 1 per-cent came to read stories, and told the children of their ability to achieve some of the goals that the bold characters of the story have? How unfair to put nonsensical dreams in their head....and threaten to rid the neighborhood, 18 or 19 years from now, of Democrat voters?????
In fact, eradicating bedtime stories for ALL children is just a starting point. Wealthy children...or even those less poor than others...have SO many advantages, and by taking away each of them we can ensure poor children stay poor, and that the next generation of these book-mad families will become poor...hopefully, even more Democrat voters, faithful to their government and content to be dependent on them for their very welfare.
What about...vacations, for example? How many poor children have been outside the city, ever? Why not trap ALL children into nondescript hovels for two weeks in lieu of traveling to Mt. Rushmore, grandma's place in Upper Michigan, or - Lenin forbid - Disney World! While they're there they can get lectures from SEIU about how the rich are at fault for their being stuck there.
And helping mom and dad in the kitchen and around the house? Studies show the little piggy children of the middle and upper classes benefit in development by being able to mimic what mom and dad are doing. Although in fact, it really breeds INDEPENDENCE and BONDING within the family, both of which clearly threaten the road to next Tuesday.
Britain takes the lead in denouncing the bedtime story, but it's not too late for those of us across the pond to take it upon ourselves to tear the advantaged down.
We should salute the United Kingdom for its timely and apt discussion about how the typical Capitalistic, non-single-parented, heterosexist and overly-wealth family DESTROYS the IQ and PUTS POOR CHILDREN AT A DISADVANTAGE, particularly their attachment to that vile accoutrement of the pre-pre-pre college preparatory kind, THE BEDTIME STORY.
Yes, while Junior and Little Emma are spellbound hearing the adventures of Mowgli or Robinson Crusoe or the Pokey Little Puppy on your knee, poor children just miles away have to go to sleep with the sound of police killing black youths and mom turning tricks in the other room. What chance, I ask you, do THEY have for a head start on their education???? After all, surely the only literature in each little hovel there is Marx's "Das Kapital" and Penthouse....neither of which makes great reading to kids.
What can we do to SAVE THE POOR AND UN-READ-TO CHILDREN???? The answer is simple, Comrades. The rich and well-to-do have to stop telling their children bedtime stories. Then, and only then, will the playing field be equal.
I know what you're going to say. I can predict your argument, which no doubt is, "Don't the 1 percent-ers have enough time to go down to the less genteel neighborhoods and read to the poor children?" Well, of course they do! But those less genteel neighborhoods are now being run by important Democrat politicians! What if the 1 per-cent came to read stories, and told the children of their ability to achieve some of the goals that the bold characters of the story have? How unfair to put nonsensical dreams in their head....and threaten to rid the neighborhood, 18 or 19 years from now, of Democrat voters?????
In fact, eradicating bedtime stories for ALL children is just a starting point. Wealthy children...or even those less poor than others...have SO many advantages, and by taking away each of them we can ensure poor children stay poor, and that the next generation of these book-mad families will become poor...hopefully, even more Democrat voters, faithful to their government and content to be dependent on them for their very welfare.
What about...vacations, for example? How many poor children have been outside the city, ever? Why not trap ALL children into nondescript hovels for two weeks in lieu of traveling to Mt. Rushmore, grandma's place in Upper Michigan, or - Lenin forbid - Disney World! While they're there they can get lectures from SEIU about how the rich are at fault for their being stuck there.
And helping mom and dad in the kitchen and around the house? Studies show the little piggy children of the middle and upper classes benefit in development by being able to mimic what mom and dad are doing. Although in fact, it really breeds INDEPENDENCE and BONDING within the family, both of which clearly threaten the road to next Tuesday.
Britain takes the lead in denouncing the bedtime story, but it's not too late for those of us across the pond to take it upon ourselves to tear the advantaged down.

