The People's Cube - Political Satire

Despite claims by Democrat women (Lucy Flores, Amy Lappos, Caitlyn Caruso, D.J. Hill, Vail Kohnert-Yount, Kohnert-Yount, Sofie Karasek, Ally Coll, etc.) that Joe Biden "touched" them inappropriately, those women are cool, if not opposed, to his candidacy. But the really cool women (or should we say the really "hot" women) are reaching-out to Joe Biden because they know he's bound to win in 2020.



Indeed, he's now become a fashion trend-setter for males who are "woke" and want to make sure they would never inadvertently enter the "space" of any woman but want to invite women to enter their space. Beta Males (i.e., Beto Males) Unite! If you behave well, hot women will invade your space in ways that will be thrilling beyond your wildest dreams. Just look at Joe and how the really hot babes are on the verge of succumbing to the irresistible temptation to invade his private space.

But, having been similarly "bound" for years, I've never experienced such alleged benefits of such fashion trend. Probably because the women in my gulag are also similarly bound. When will I get out and become unbound or at least be permitted to get close to some unbound women while remaining bound?

--KOOK

Kook, are you confessing to the unwarranted desire to be equal as our betters??? To dare to aspire to the exhilaration like hooking a marlin by draggin' a dollar bill through a trailer park as you troll through in your astro-turfed el camino??? Praise Stalin and Big Brother that you are currently BOUND, brother. Equal to your betters??? Like man....what were you thinking??? I fear for you, comrade Kook. To go from BOUND to even worse punishment??? Get your head STRAIGHT!!

Jackalopelipsky
#BR 549

Comrades,

rules need not apply to our most glorious leaders
after all they work so hard for us ....

There was a time when Joe would reach around to the other side.

Must be a déjà vu.
Or: good ol' dialectics :

jackalopelipsky wrote:Kook, are you confessing to the unwarranted desire to be equal as our betters??? To dare to aspire to the exhilaration like hooking a marlin by draggin' a dollar bill through a trailer park as you troll through in your astro-turfed el camino??? Praise Stalin and Big Brother that you are currently BOUND, brother. Equal to your betters??? Like man....what were you thinking??? I fear for you, comrade Kook. To go from BOUND to even worse punishment??? Get your head STRAIGHT!!

Jackalopelipsky
#BR 549

You are right. I confess I am guilty. I failed to realize that my desire for adoration reserved for our leaders makes me a selfish hog in contrast to the noble pigs who run this farm. I hereby resolve to be content in my bound status and being attended-to by heavy-handed cretins rather than by lovely socialism-groupies. I think my expressing these thoughts will make me safe. At least for a while.

--KOOK

Neotrotsky wrote:Comrades,

rules need not apply to our most glorious leaders
after all they work so hard for us ....

Soon after Joe gets his campaign into high gear, we'll see ads featuring each of those former gropees playing the role of affectionate gropors of Joe. Joe's first accuser, Lucy Flores, has already committed herself to becoming a gropor of Joe if he were to win the nomination. (But fear that the prospect of the stern-looking Flores becoming his gropor might scare Biden out of the race.)

--KOOK

Soviet Mike Komsomolets wrote:There was a time when Joe would reach around to the other side. [image omitted]

I think you meant to say there was a time when Joe would reach around to the front, but the only picture of him doing so was a photo-shop (plainly identified as such by the vodka-bottle photo-shopped into Joe's pocket). Of course, on the typical assumption by people who rely upon Snopes, the photo-shopped insertion of the vodka-bottle into Joes pocket was insufficient to enable them to understand on their own that the photo-shopped picture was satire/parody.

What we on the left need to fear, however, is that the frequency of our clever media's justifiably manipulated "news" about cretins on the Right may soon begin to be perceived by independents as "fake" news so that independents begin recognizing their logos (MSNBC, CNN, WaPo, NYT, etc.) as the equivalents of the vodka bottle and thereby enable them to understand our media propaganda as propaganda rather than accepting it as "news."

--KOOK

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:


Must be a déjà vu.
Or: good ol' dialectics [hidden items omitted] :

My Dear Comrade Genosse Dummkopf:

Perhaps "déjà vu dialectics." They shared the same first name (and the same fantasies), but we know that Stalin, unlike Biden, never showed the weakness of character by apologizing for anything -- not even the non-aggression pact with Hitler. But Biden has already apologized for his non-aggressive language about Pence (same as Hitler, of course). That's why AOC has such an enormous advantage over all the rest because she never apologizes for anything and never concedes any of the stupidity she feeds the hungry Millennials, who, fortunately for our side, are like puppies with their eyes still closed who will nurse on anything (except, perhaps, the MTE*, who is now way too old -- by the way, my use of "too old" is not bigoted ageism since I'm a geezer and thus have the privilege of practicing ageism on fellow geezers such as the MTE).

Perhaps AOC will seek (and actually win) the nomination on the theory that her being nominated would be the equivalent of the Constitution being amended to lower the age-requirement for being President. It is, after all, a "living" constitution which "listens" to the "will of the people" expressed in the form of popular culture. It makes everything so easy that via electing AOC we would solidify popular culture as the sole lens through which we view and interpret the Constitution -- Quite modern, isn't it? Suitable revenge against those old geezers who wrote the Constitution centuries before the Twitterverse Enlightenment, is it not?

*Out-of-Character Note to Red Square-- please substitute the Cube's url for this image of the MTE -- I couldn't find it, so I duplicated it elsewhere to be available on this thread until you can make the substitution and then delete this request. Note-- I think I couldn't find it because Google's interloping within TPC apparently blocks some of the functionality of my browser due to countermeasures against Google I've superimposed on my browser functionality.

--KOOK

dup

KOOK wrote:... old geezers who wrote the Constitution centuries before the Twitterverse ...

Komrade KOOK, you of course meant "imperialisticating contranormativeously heteropatriarchinomous genderorejective fascistoidly suprematorial intersectionalizing cisgendero-speciesist hegemonially islamophobocentric [that Jefferson! may Allah (PBUH) give him psoriasis] slave-owning phallogocentrifugalistically manspreading sexistively toximasculinous old whitey geezers", ja?

(Komradette RedD can possibly put her paw under that nondiscombobulative counterconfusatorious list to certify its completeness and up-to-dateness.)

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:

KOOK wrote:... old geezers who wrote the Constitution centuries before the Twitterverse ...

Komrade KOOK, you of course meant "imperialisticating contranormativeously heteropatriarchinomous genderorejective fascistoidly suprematorial intersectionalizing cisgendero-speciesist hegemonially islamophobocentric [that Jefferson! may Allah (PBUH) give him psoriasis] slave-owning phallogocentrifugalistically manspreading sexistively toximasculinous old whitey geezers", ja?

(Komradette RedD can possibly put her paw under that nondiscombobulative counterconfusatorious list to certify its completeness and up-to-dateness.)

(oh, well, hitleroaffirmativity isn't there)
(um, nobody is perfect, RedD)

I tug my forelock to you, dearest Genosse. Such comprehensive politicocorrectivity. But ... should we now not add whitesupremacistical to the list? (Or perhaps candidosupremacistical?)

RedDiaperette wrote:[..]
But ... should we now not add whitesupremacistical to the list? (Or perhaps candidosupremacistical?)

Absolutely.
Papakha tip, Komradette Meow.

Just "suprematorial...whitey" doesn't quite get it.

When they shlep me to GULAG (ve haf vays, ve gif yu lesson, yu make lists komplett),
I vill rezist, I vill squeal yu candidowhiteysupremacistical kolymators yu!

RedDiaperette wrote:I tug my forelock to you...

I've noticed this newest trend in the kollective, to tug on one's own forelock as a sign of equal respect. I wish I could do the same, but where my forelock once was, now there's only skin. What do you suggest I tug on to you now?

(Shut up, Ivan-1 and Ivan-2).

I'm not going to touch that one.

Wait, that's not what I...no, wait, yes. Yes that still works. Not mine, not touching it.

I didn't say anything.

Red Square wrote:

RedDiaperette wrote:I tug my forelock to you...

I've noticed this newest trend in the kollective, to tug on one's own forelock as a sign of equal respect. I wish I could do the same, but where my forelock once was, now there's only skin. What do you suggest I tug on to you now?

(Shut up, Ivan-1 and Ivan-2).

In the G.W.O.N.T., forelocks will be provided for one and all. Meanwhile, one tugs a metaphorical forelock if necessary, bearing in mind that one after all constructs one's own reality, is it not so?

(Tsk, Ivan, the word is forelock.)

Red Square wrote:... What do you suggest I tug on to you now?

(Shut up, Ivan-1 and Ivan-2).

oh, where is Komrade Craptek when we need him?

... and his companion-in-arts, Komradette Putout?

Get in touch with Biden

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:

KOOK wrote:... old geezers who wrote the Constitution centuries before the Twitterverse ...

Komrade KOOK, you of course meant "imperialisticating contranormativeously heteropatriarchinomous genderorejective fascistoidly suprematorial intersectionalizing cisgendero-speciesist hegemonially islamophobocentric [that Jefferson! may Allah (PBUH) give him psoriasis] slave-owning phallogocentrifugalistically manspreading sexistively toximasculinous old whitey geezers", ja?

(Komradette RedD can possibly put her paw under that nondiscombobulative counterconfusatorious list to certify its completeness and up-to-dateness.)

(oh, well, hitleroaffirmativity isn't there)
(um, nobody is perfect, RedD)

Comrade Dummkopf,

You said it far better than I did.

--KOOK

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:

Red Square wrote:... What do you suggest I tug on to you now?

(Shut up, Ivan-1 and Ivan-2).

oh, where is Komrade Craptek when we need him?

Comrade Dummkopf,

Captain Craptek is in the hot-tub with Comrade Putout and with the Comrade formerly known as Tovarichi, who always salutes just before tugging his forelock. To see, go here or see immediately below:



Craptek and el Presidente are not tugging forelocks, but el Presidente could be tugging the long, curly locks flowing down GAIA Minister Neytiri's back. What does it mean if someone tugs someone else's locks? Surely it's harmless, but is it a form of touching that we now must condemn to conform to the standard being set by our most-progressive comrades? Is el Presidente smiling merely because he has not yet become WOKE regarding all forms of touching? On the other hand, perhaps he's just smiling and not touching any of GAIA Minister Neytiri's locks. Perhaps he's smiling only because he knows he's WOKE and therefore never touches anyone without first obtaining specific permission.

Craptek is surely conforming to the WOKE standard because he's keeping his paws in plain sight of everyone. But wait -- closer inspection may indicate that perhaps the right-hand side of Craptek's right-hand paw may be contravening WOKE standards. Absent the availability of instant-replay analysis, however, the evidence is insufficient to overturn the initial call that Craptek is behaving in a WOKE fashion. Unlike el Presidente, Craptek is not smiling. That may be strong evidence that he is WOKE.

On the other hand, unlike humans' abilities to recognize a dog's "expressions," I think it more likely that the nature of a squirrel's smile is probably far too subtle to be recognized by humans. Maybe other squirrels would know that Craptek has an even bigger smile than el Presidente. To solve that mystery one would have to be Columbo, no?

Comrade Putout and GAIA Minister Neytiri ?? Are they WOKE? The water is too murky to know.

--KOOK

Ivan the Stakhanovets wrote:I'm not going to touch that one.

Wait, that's not what I...no, wait, yes. Yes that still works. Not mine, not touching it.

I didn't say anything.

But we know you are a touchey/feely kind of guy but who has enormous powers of self-restraint. --KOOK

Genosse Dummkopf wrote:... and his companion-in-arts, Komradette Putout?

Regarding Comrade Putout, see my response above to your asking "Where is ... Craptek"
--KOOK

Red Square wrote:

RedDiaperette wrote:I tug my forelock to you...

I've noticed this newest trend in the kollective, to tug on one's own forelock as a sign of equal respect. I wish I could do the same, but where my forelock once was, now there's only skin. What do you suggest I tug on to you now?

(Shut up, Ivan-1 and Ivan-2).

Comrade Red Square:

Did you miss seeing my special note to you at the end of one of my earlier responses to Dummkopf, which I quote below:

... That's why AOC has such an enormous advantage over all the rest because she never apologizes for anything and never concedes any of the stupidity she feeds the hungry Millennials, who, fortunately for our side, are like puppies with their eyes still closed who will nurse on anything (except, perhaps, the MTE*, who is now way too old -- by the way, my use of "too old" is not bigoted ageism since I'm a geezer and thus have the privilege of practicing ageism on fellow geezers such as the MTE).

***

*Out-of-Character Note to Red Square-- please substitute the Cube's url for this image of the MTE -- I couldn't find it, so I duplicated it elsewhere to be available on this thread until you can make the substitution and then delete this request. Note-- I think I couldn't find it because Google's interloping within TPC apparently blocks some of the functionality of my browser due to countermeasures against Google I've superimposed on my browser functionality.

Just asking. Is it possible that the no-evil-doers at Google have banned the MTE image??

--KOOK

RedDiaperette wrote:

Red Square wrote:

RedDiaperette wrote:I tug my forelock to you...

I've noticed this newest trend in the kollective, to tug on one's own forelock as a sign of equal respect. I wish I could do the same, but where my forelock once was, now there's only skin. What do you suggest I tug on to you now?

(Shut up, Ivan-1 and Ivan-2).

In the G.W.O.N.T., forelocks will be provided for one and all. Meanwhile, one tugs a metaphorical forelock if necessary, bearing in mind that one after all constructs one's own reality, is it not so?

(Tsk, Ivan, the word is forelock.)

Dear Comrade Red Diaperette,

So often you remind me of my wife's calico. I understand the calico far better than I understand my wife, and since I don't understand the calico at all, you can sensibly deduce that I don't understand my wife at all, but what is most important is that she understands me. Thus, your insights about others who don't understand you are what it is about you that reminds me of my wife.

Almost like Comrade Red Square, I have almost no forelock to tug, but fortunately for me, my wife had always let me tug her forelocks, but now she tells me she's WOKE and that henceforth I also must become WOKE and cease tugging her forelocks.

So, I'm seeking your insight. How does someone awaken someone from being WOKE (my humble understanding is that one cannot un-WOKE someone by trying to make them sleep but rather one must somehow awaken such person into an UN-WOKE state -- or perhaps a DE-WOKEd state) of WOKENESS.) I don't know about other progressive Comrades, but I often need SLEEP, but if I'm constantly WOKE, I can't sleep. What is the solution to my problem??

I fear that being constantly WOKE may be akin to being on opioids. Some WOKE people are advocating legalization of opioids but other WOKE people are condemning opioids as part of a plot hatched by Trump in league with "Big Pharma," and since both can't be right, I don't know which conspiracy theory is correct. I hope you can also give me your insights on that dilemma. I've often needed to resort to an opioid (such as Percocet) to alleviate having to deal with so many WOKE comrades who are pains in the ass.

Also, can (may?) one take a siesta while remaining in a WOKE state? If so, would it be an un-WOKE form of cultural appropriation if I were to try to take a siesta as a temporary respite from being WOKE?

--KOOK

KOOK wrote: Dear Comrade Red Diaperette,

So often you remind me of my wife's calico. I understand the calico far better than I understand my wife, and since I don't understand the calico at all, you can sensibly deduce that I don't understand my wife at all, but what is most important is that she understands me. Thus, your insights about others who don't understand you are what it is about you that reminds me of my wife.

Almost like Comrade Red Square, I have almost no forelock to tug, but fortunately for me, my wife had always let me tug her forelocks, but now she tells me she's WOKE and that henceforth I also must become WOKE and cease tugging her forelocks.

So, I'm seeking your insight. How does someone awaken someone from being WOKE (my humble understanding is that one cannot un-WOKE someone by trying to make them sleep but rather one must somehow awaken such person into an UN-WOKE state -- or perhaps a DE-WOKEd state) of WOKENESS.) I don't know about other progressive Comrades, but I often need SLEEP, but if I'm constantly WOKE, I can't sleep. What is the solution to my problem??

I fear that being constantly WOKE may be akin to being on opioids. Some WOKE people are advocating legalization of opioids but other WOKE people are condemning opioids as part of a plot hatched by Trump in league with "Big Pharma," and since both can't be right, I don't know which conspiracy theory is correct. I hope you can also give me your insights on that dilemma. I've often needed to resort to an opioid (such as Percocet) to alleviate having to deal with so many WOKE comrades who are pains in the ass.

Also, can (may?) one take a siesta while remaining in a WOKE state? If so, would it be an un-WOKE form of cultural appropriation if I were to try to take a siesta as a temporary respite from being WOKE?

--KOOK

It is better not to ponder such things. In fact, it is better not to ponder at all, since pondering is a form of thought, which is a Bad Thing. It may be time for a Jiffi-Lobe™ booster treatment. Then you will find that Woke is Sleep and Sleep is Woke and whatever the Party tells you is so at the moment. This is not cognitive dissonance. It is the Current Truth.

Do you feel better now?

RedDiaperette wrote: ... It is better not to ponder such things. In fact, it is better not to ponder at all, since pondering is a form of thought, which is a Bad Thing. It may be time for a Jiffi-Lobe™ booster treatment. Then you will find that Woke is Sleep and Sleep is Woke and whatever the Party tells you is so at the moment. This is not cognitive dissonance. It is the Current Truth.

Do you feel better now?

Much better except that I still don't know whether I'm allowed a siesta from being WOKE without being deemed guilty of cultural misappropriation. --KOOK

Groucho Marxist wrote:Get in touch with Biden

With Biden, I prefer touché. I learned that fancy word from Comrade Kerry, who had to say it often and who enjoys saying it on behalf of America even more than did Obama in his many teaching moments to teach the world that no good things come from the so-full-of-faults USA.

--KOOK

I thought it meant "Get in touch with your inner Biden."

KOOK wrote:... in the hot-tub ...

just à propos GAIA Minister Neytiri's locks... _ (they are most gropefully cared for)

Red Square wrote:

RedDiaperette wrote:I tug my forelock to you...

I've noticed this newest trend in the kollective, to tug on one's own forelock as a sign of equal respect. I wish I could do the same, but where my forelock once was, now there's only skin. What do you suggest I tug on to you now?

(Shut up, Ivan-1 and Ivan-2).

Look, Komrade Red, I am old enough to remember when our dear Comrade Putout posted a thing where the three of us, posted together, with all of her Photoshop silliness, displayed you with a furry hat on. I, wanting to be "politically correct" did not mention that I didn't recognize you with your hair on. I was so scared you would not see the humor in this. I was wrong!

In light of the recent uptick in fingering one's own forelock in public, I'm going to state the obvious.

In my photo, I'm not tugging anything, That's a salute, and what's different about it? That's right friends and neighbors, it's being done with the left hand. Anyone with an afternoon of military training will tell you that it's a sign of disrespect.

Am I sure the photo is not reversed? In fact I am, as the lettering on the shirt is correct. So, who is this directed toward? None other than those who occupied the White House before and after His O'liness, Dear Leader Barack Hussein Obama (PBUH).

Have a purpose and stick to it. And please don't forelock in the open where the children™ can watch.

What with all the settled proof that white men are actually enfeebled, what's a red-blooded white woman to do? Or, any other woman of color?