7/12/2023, 11:27 am
Times change but liberals don’t.
The same lame ivory-tower thinking used by social reformers of the early 18th Century still manifests today in the urban socialist enclaves of the U.S. and Europe, but even more so at the globalist, China-subordinate United Nations.
On July 11, the U.N. marked World Population Day with a grim malthusian forecast that Earth’s population will reach 9.7 billion by 2050…and that there are too many babies being born to the poor people of Africa and India—a burden to Earth in the form of more and bigger “carbon footprints.”
Considering that the current world population of 7 billion would—if placed shoulder to shoulder—fit neatly on the island of Hawaii, it’s apparent that there’s plenty of land mass available for a few billion more people.
But the climate alarmism grifters at the U.N. don’t see the Earth’s whole population standing on a tiny island, the U.N. sees devils dancing on the head of a carbon-footprint pin.
In its headlong rush to implement The Great Reset by 2030—justified by a fake struggle against the contrived “crisis” of man-made climate change—the U.N’s suggested social-engineering solutions are just as witless as those of it’s social-reformer counterparts 300 years ago, complete with political arithmetic, selective statistics, absurd beliefs and the soulless objectification of people as carbon emitters. For example:
• Demonize carbon dioxide as a deadly, noxious gas (theoretically) causing a “greenhouse effect” rather than a naturally occurring atmospheric component that would have to increase by magnitudes of hundreds of parts per million before anything close to a greenhouse effect could begin to take place. (JUNK SCIENCE™)
• Promulgate affluence-guilt among richer nations by accusing their higher standard of living of emitting more carbon than poorer nations. (ANTI-CAPITALISM)
• Blame consumerism for allegedly higher carbon emissions in developed nations and compel developed nations to reduce their carbon footprints (standard of living) to sub-Saharan levels. (SOCIALIST EQUALITY OF MISERY)
• Export to Africa the same cultural and political factors that put developed nations into population death-spirals. Specifically: gender equity (feminism, contraceptives, abortion, erosion of marriage and families); transsexuality (no reproduction); and population replacement in Europe and America to increase fertility rates, which ironically is antithetical to population reduction and belies the true U.N. goal of eliminating Western people, culture and problematic concepts like uncontrollable democratic governance. (AUTHORITARIAN SUBVERSION)
Irish satirist Jonathan Swift saw through the lunacy of of his elitist, virtue-signaling, social-reformer contemporaries when he published “A Modest Proposal” in 1729. It sarcastically suggested that to prevent the children of poor people from being a burden to their parents or country, and to make them beneficial to the public, they should be eaten.
Swift’s proposal would not only feed the poor and slow their population growth, it would reduce the pitter-patter of little carbon footprints.
"A young healthy child well nursed, is, at a year old, a most delicious nourishing and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee, or a ragout."
—Jonathan Swift
Is the U.N. so ambivalent toward Western literature that it’s ignoring Swift’s proposal? or is the U.N. just waiting for when resistance becomes futile—after The Great Reset and Agenda 2030 kick in—before it places babies on the menu?