Page 1 of 1
3/24/2024, 8:45 am
Colonel Obyezyana
It promotes a culture of informing on fellow citizens.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/0 ... operation/
It can be abused by bad actors, including government.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024 ... flag-laws/
It's hosted by the 2nd Amendment-hating
Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Violence Solutions at
The Bloomberg School of Public Health.
https://erpo.org/
Which is associated with former New York City Mayor and billionaire publisher's Biden-backing philanthropy,
Everytown for Gun Safety (formerly called
Mayors Against Illegal Guns and includes
Moms Demand Action).
https://www.bloomberg.org/founders-proj ... un-safety/
Which spends mountains of cash to influence election outcomes.
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2023032 ... ead-voters
But not to worry, Comrades, the thousands of Americans shitting on the sidewalks and shambling around with needles in their arms and killed by fentanyl each year are not a problem—the relatively few mass shootings (usually by left-leaners) is the problem and must be remedied by a program that threatens citizens' Constitutional protections
3/24/2024, 10:14 am
jackalopelipsky
The Cube on fire really works, Colonel O.
Mr. J volunteered to begin security for our church so the rest of the flock can worship in safety from left leaning gun shooters who are angry with God.
3/24/2024, 10:38 am
Reiuxcat
"It promotes a culture of informing on fellow citizens."
The Neo Stasi Libs are most pleased.
3/24/2024, 11:22 am
Duke of URL
Justice Department Launches the
National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center Department of Precrime
corrected...
3/24/2024, 11:29 am
Colonel Obyezyana
Duke of URL wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 11:22 am
Justice Department Launches the
National Extreme Risk Protection Order Resource Center Department of Precrime.
Exactly. PRECRIME.
3/24/2024, 12:47 pm
trashmouth
While channeling the whole idea of pre-crime, and the use of assertions by government entities, does it not affirm that gun violence, independent of thought, perception, or conception, is generally critical in the sense of acknowledging the difficulties in confirming the knowing that the relation of crime is not the objective distinguished from naive or uncritical realism but begs for the elimination of the weapon bearer from a perceptional viewpoint. Thus, the Second Amendment’s empirical laws, with their domain limited to qualitative differences with comparative jurisprudence, sociology of law, and under the relation of events, must be forfeited to reclaim the moral obligations previously existing but unknown by varying concomitants.
3/24/2024, 2:00 pm
Colonel Obyezyana
trashmouth wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 12:47 pm
While channeling the whole idea of pre-crime, and the use of assertions
by government entities, does it not affirm that gun violence, independent of thought, perception, or conception, is generally critical in the sense of acknowledging the difficulties in confirming the knowing that the relation of crime is not the objective distinguished from naive or uncritical realism but begs for the elimination of the weapon bearer from a perceptional
Please,
please tell us that the above post is an actual excerpt from a university professor or a real midterm essay by a shitty liberal arts student.
(Include citation for extra credit.)
3/24/2024, 3:31 pm
jackalopelipsky
Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 2:00 pm
trashmouth wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 12:47 pm
While channeling the whole idea of pre-crime, and the use of assertions
by government entities, does it not affirm that gun violence, independent of thought, perception, or conception, is generally critical in the sense of acknowledging the difficulties in confirming the knowing that the relation of crime is not the objective distinguished from naive or uncritical realism but begs for the elimination of the weapon bearer from a perceptional
Please,
please tell us that the above post is an actual excerpt from a university professor or a real midterm essay by a shitty liberal arts student.
(Include citation for extra credit.)
To confiscate from Red Square, the only difference between this Liberal Arts Journalism guy and Trashmouth is that Trashmouth harms no one.
Professors can harm others, Trashmouth was simply plagiarizing Marianne Williamson.
3/24/2024, 3:46 pm
Ellsworth Toohey
Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 2:00 pm
trashmouth wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 12:47 pm
While channeling the whole idea of pre-crime, and the use of assertions
by government entities, does it not affirm that gun violence, independent of thought, perception, or conception, is generally critical in the sense of acknowledging the difficulties in confirming the knowing that the relation of crime is not the objective distinguished from naive or uncritical realism but begs for the elimination of the weapon bearer from a perceptional
Please,
please tell us that the above post is an actual excerpt from a university professor or a real midterm essay by a shitty liberal arts student.
(Include citation for extra credit.)
My money was on second idiot Kommie-lah-ti-dah Harris. But it can't be. Words aren't repeated 16 times a paragraph.
3/24/2024, 6:40 pm
Dimitri Kissov
Comrades!
The Glorious World of Next Tuesday is almost here! I'm told next Tuesday.
3/25/2024, 9:55 am
trashmouth
Comrades, all of this comes from years, almost eighty, of reading and digesting years of progressive past life dysteleology. The word salad stands as evidence that anyone can use the same gibberish practiced by those distinguished University intelligentsia prostitutes who come off as some benign paternal authority and expect it to solve all problems. The key to understanding gun control is that the suffering of another must already be given in some form before it is possible for anyone to become a fellow sufferer.
4/19/2024, 11:21 am
Duke of URL
Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 2:00 pm
trashmouth wrote: ↑3/24/2024, 12:47 pm
While channeling the whole idea of pre-crime, and the use of assertions
by government entities, does it not affirm that gun violence, independent of thought, perception, or conception, is generally critical in the sense of acknowledging the difficulties in confirming the knowing that the relation of crime is not the objective distinguished from naive or uncritical realism but begs for the elimination of the weapon bearer from a perceptional
Please,
please tell us that the above post is an actual excerpt from a university professor or a real midterm essay by a shitty liberal arts student.
(Include citation for extra credit.)
BIDEN: "Are you ready to choose freedom over democracy? Because that's America!"