The People's Cube - Political Satire

Out they go!


And the tears are flowing...


Kinda make you thirsty, doesn't it? Well, here's some good news:


It's a great deal, and it's keeping our Director of Soft Drinks very busy! He's due for a big promotion.

That's odd. Personally, I feel great. In fact more than great. Walking on sunshine. Wonderfully relaxed. Kicking down the cobble  stones and feeling groovy great. I'm even starting to get my sense of humor back.

My liberal tears tumbler doth runneth over. Tasty!
 

Supersize your TDS Tears with lots of ICE, comrades!

You’re going to miss us when we’re gone.

America isn’t good enough for the Kookamala and Tim Playhouse show.

Ingrates.

Can anyone here spare 20 million bucks so we can get the creditors off our backs?

They're also withholding sex from husbands who voted for Trump, an idea probably derived from the 2,400-year-old Aristophanes comedy, Lysistrata, wherein Greek women pledge to deny sex to their husbands until they bring a peaceful end to one of the Peloponnesian Wars.

In the case of protesting Trump's reelection, the Lysistrata Ploy does not work to two reasons.

First, the only thing Greek women shaved was their genitals (reference Lysitrata's "well-trimmed garden" euphemism). Democrat women—especially feminists—are unlikely to shave anything below their necks.

Second, America's testosterone-challenged Democrat husbands are not in the midst of an endless war and probably don't have sex with their fembecile Democrat-wives anyway. Even if they did want sex, sex is like beef: if a man can't get it at home, he'll go out looking for it.

 

This is for my left-leaning friends who were skeptical when I told them that Scientific American magazine had become a woke rag. 


Here are the rants she posted at X.


Long ago, Scientific American published one of my graphics and I felt honored. It was one of several places I'd hoped to contribute to. No more. Scientific American may as well be titled Woke American.   

Comrades, a tragic new strain of TDS has emerged: self-sterilization by liberal women.

Mega-liberal Newsweek conducted an extensive survey of five whole liberal women, and based on this reliably large random sampling came to the shocking conclusion that liberal women across the nation are undergoing surgery to remove their fallopian tubes to avoid pregnancy in case:

1. Trump bans abortion and they are then impregnated by a rapist, or

2. Trump bans birth control devices or infanticide drugs, or

3. The vasectomies of their cuckhold husbands fail.

All this because—as we know and have seen again and again—Trump is determined to establish a Department of The Handmaid's Tale and force women everywhere to submit to impregnation by wealthy elitists of The Evil Male Patriarchy.™

There are benefits, of course, to this new strain of TDS:

1. Fewer (at least five fewer) liberal women will reproduce.

2. Fewer (at least five fewer) cases of feminist PMS (which I think is pre-menstrual syndrome but may be post-menstrual syndrome, although in the case of liberal women it's most likely perpetual-menstrual syndrome).

3. Wine and kitty litter sales will increase. 

4. Newsweek subscriptions will tank. 

In advance of such eventualities, new cards are now being issued issued:


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/1 ... hemselves/
https://www.newsweek.com/women-steriliz ... on-1993261

Be on the lookout for new strains of TDS as one one new strain has already emerged among Feminists and this one looks suspiciously fembecilic:

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/1 ... it-at-bay/

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

12/1/2024, 9:51 am

Be on the lookout for new strains of TDS as one one new strain has already emerged among Feminists and this one looks suspiciously fembecilic:

https://www.breitbart.com/europe/2024/1 ... it-at-bay/

Eating bananas is what patriarchy is all about and these feminists have a rational fear.

jackalopelipsky wrote: ↑

12/2/2024, 9:20 am

Eating bananas is what patriarchy is all about and these feminists have a rational fear.

At that price, I hoped he ate the duct tape, too.


 

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

12/2/2024, 11:35 am

jackalopelipsky wrote: ↑

12/2/2024, 9:20 am

Eating bananas is what patriarchy is all about and these feminists have a rational fear.

At that price, I hoped he ate the duct tape, too.



 

Are you deliberately unwinding these feminists on purpose by mentioning the patriarchal invention of duct tape. It’s rumored that duct tape can do anything but seal ducts. Duct Tape manspreading into the shave heads of such fembeciles right now. Joe rogan, those things to do with duct tape that don’t involve eating or sex. There is no safe place from duct tape.

jackalopelipsky wrote: ↑

12/2/2024, 3:23 pm

Are you deliberately unwinding these feminists on purpose by mentioning the patriarchal invention of duct tape. It’s rumored that duct tape can do anything but seal ducts. Duct Tape manspreading into the shave heads of such fembeciles right now. Joe rogan, those things to do with duct tape that don’t involve eating or sex. There is no safe place from duct tape.

Comrade, the real War on Women has nothing to do with bananas or duct tape. Rather, it has everything to do with marginalizing biological women in favor of bestowing a more-than-equal status to transgenders.

A good example is the New York Times' recent article referring to women as "non-transgender women" as if transgendered sexual dysphorics were unquestionably entitled to the same status as real women.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/ny-times- ... nder-women

This isn't even the worst of woke pro-trans terms for real women. Look at the term that this freak uses:


Sad and real? More like repugnant and revolting.
 

Yes. Duct tape can not address this situation.

Most Equally Esteemed Comrade Colonel,

The image you posted demands inspires so many questions. 

Foremost: Why is John Q Adams wearing lipstick?

Red Salmon

 

Red Salmon wrote: ↑

12/3/2024, 12:03 pm

The image you posted demands inspires so many questions.Foremost: Why is John Q Adams wearing lipstick?\

First, he's John Mincy Adams (no relation to Quincy).

Second, he's trying to draw attention away from his sparse, less than glorious forelock.