Comrades, multiculturalism requires a celebration of our differences. The Karens of liberalism
love that idea—
unless those differences are irreconcilable with current liberal orthodoxy, in which case a shrieking, dopey, hypocritical stand must be taken.
This time the wagons must be circled around an innocuous TV commercial featuring a beautiful (White) woman rocking jeans. What other conclusion can be derived from this atrocity except that White Supremacy and genetic superiority are the intended messages?
The commercial has to be labeled as nazism and condemned because it conflicts with the liberal sacred cow of “body positivity” (the beauty of morbid obesity) and promotes the shocking exploitation of a woman not “of color” to slyly tweet a dog whistle about “good jeans”
(White genes) to embolden the right-wing White nationalist nazi terrroists who relentlessly force systemic racism on the marginalized, disadvantaged and under-represented.
Let’s step back for a broader view.
Eugenics became a trendy topic
decades before the era of nazism, leading at first to forced sterilizations in the UK and moving to ghastly human experimentation in the nazi concentration camps and to selective breeding to create a perfect “Aryan Race.”
Eugenics
(like communism) has been woven into popular culture since the 19th Century. It appeared in Nietzsche’s
Übermench (Superman); H.G. Welles’
The Island of Doctor Moreau; the 1920s public fascination with the idea of breeding women with apes (influencing Soviet studies to create super soldiers); comic book hero Captain America (a super soldier created as an antithesis to Nazi Aryan ideology)
; and Star Trek’s long-running side-theme of a 20th Century
Eugenics War that results in centuries of conflict with remnant genetically improved “Augments.”
Eugenics had a basis in thousands of years of successful animal breeding, so it seemed plausible to some that it might work to improve the human stock. But the dark side is that it also made the case for the elimination of “undesirable traits” such as alcoholism, idiocy, vagrancy, poverty, perversion and “inferior” ethnicities or races.
The leading proponent of American eugenics was none other than the the darling of liberals and feminists, the sainted Margaret Sanger—mother of Planned Parenthood and friend of the Ku Klux Klan (effectively the militant arm of the Democrat party from the end of the Civil War through the 1960s).
Why is Sanger such a monumental figure for liberals, feminists, globalists and other leftists? Because she was a champion of two tools of eugenics: contraceptives and abortion. Feminists say she empowered women by winning the “right” to choose not to be pregnant (by having someone else legally murder their babies). Others adored Sanger because she normalized a means of population control (depopulative genocide). Still others were pleased that Sanger’s original intent to eliminate Blacks was being carried out in America by Planned Parenthood (keeping the U.S. Black population at or near 10% for over a century).
But Democrats loved her the most for giving birth to Planned Parenthood, because Democrats (founding fathers of the Ku Klux Klan) could funnel taxpayer funds into support for Planned Parenthood, who would in turn lavish abundant financial donations (of taxpayer money) on Democrats running for public office. What a racket.
So, while we watch a TV commercial and see an attractive blonde woman who has good jeans, liberals see an opportunity to frantically react by projecting their own sordid history of racism and eugenics onto a conservative opposition that is
not racially obsessed—the same opposition that finally ended Black slavery via Constitutional Amendment.
Note: a simple reference here: Sanger's Accomplishments