8/28/2005, 12:05 pm
From the New York Times "Public Editor" (the readers' "advocate"):
"A Conversation With the Standards Editor"
[Public Editor]: How have reader expectations about the paper's standards changed over the past few years?
[Standards Editor]: It's a very hard question to answer because with the blogs out there drumming up opposition to the "mainstream media," and with the Bush administration and some of its most fervent supporters drumming up contempt for the news media - for the Eastern liberal news media, so called - it's very hard to tell which expressions of reader sentiment are genuine. You obviously pay more attention to a one-of-a-kind letter than you do to one that comes in all full of phrases repeated off some pressure group's Web site.
Wow! That guy really has his finger on the pulse of the average reader! Here's a "one-of-a-kind" letter for ya:
Dear NY Times,
You are a liberal shit-rag unsuitable for fish-wrapping. BLOGGERS RULE!
[Public Editor]: How have reader expectations about the paper's standards changed over the past few years?
[Standards Editor]: It's a very hard question to answer because with the blogs out there drumming up opposition to the "mainstream media," and with the Bush administration and some of its most fervent supporters drumming up contempt for the news media - for the Eastern liberal news media, so called - it's very hard to tell which expressions of reader sentiment are genuine. You obviously pay more attention to a one-of-a-kind letter than you do to one that comes in all full of phrases repeated off some pressure group's Web site.
Wow! That guy really has his finger on the pulse of the average reader! Here's a "one-of-a-kind" letter for ya:
Dear NY Times,
You are a liberal shit-rag unsuitable for fish-wrapping. BLOGGERS RULE!