The People's Cube - Political Satire

Comrades, meet New Paradigm. I nominate him/her/it as the successor to the late, great Mime, the King of Trolls of the People's Cube.

Listen to his/her/its sweet, sweet sound bites, and be amazed!

But don't you americans want to fly in safety? You don't like being treated the way you treating the people you murder and steal oil from?

So do the rich and powerful. Many people who live oil rich nations are poor because their rich powerful leaders need palaces and foreign zionists invade and steal their natural resources to fund their infliction of misery and exploitation of the "poor, innocent, and the weak".

Keep "foreign zionists" in mind, then look at some of his/her/its royal tenets:

8. RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY

All the while blasting the Jewish people! That's right! Führer Neue Paradigma wants all of us guilty Amerikkkans to embrace all except for the most oppressed religious group in human history. A true prog, for he/she/it knows all about the Marxist Laws of Contradiction!

New Paradigm wrote:No interest in conspiracy theories either.

link to quote

Everything this person believes is conspiracy theory. The bankers and the Zionists and the rich powerful leaders are all part of a big conspiracy to invade and steal from other countries and inflict misery and exploitation on the poor, innocent, and weak.

I know where I've heard all of that before. It isn't anything new as far as grand conspiracy theories go.

But I come here not to bury New Paradigm but to praise him! The noble New Paradigm has told you that he has no interest in conspiracy theories. ... and New Paradigm is an honorable man. Wherein does the real conspiracy lie? From all of those rich fat-cat bankers and Jews! This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the actual state of affairs. How do we know? Because New Paradigm is an honorable man who tells us he isn't interested in conspiracy theories. New Paradigm is an honorable man. New Paradigm has no interest in conspiracy theories.

Lenin, Stalin, Hitler etc, etc, etc agree. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is the actual state of affairs. And they too were honorable men.

/sarc

All of the Left's political ideas boil down to rationalizing why we can't afford freedom and liberty and why they need to force us to do what they think we should do. And these grand conspiracy theories are part of that rationalizing.

Kim Jong-Un wrote:Comrades, meet New Paradigm. I nominate him/her/it as the successor to the late, great Mime, the King of Trolls of the People's Cube.

Listen to his/her/its sweet, sweet sound bites, and be amazed!

But don't you americans want to fly in safety? You don't like being treated the way you treating the people you murder and steal oil from?

So do the rich and powerful. Many people who live oil rich nations are poor because their rich powerful leaders need palaces and foreign zionists invade and steal their natural resources to fund their infliction of misery and exploitation of the "poor, innocent, and the weak".

Keep "foreign zionists" in mind, then look at some of his/her/its royal tenets:

8. RESPECT FOR DIVERSITY

All the while blasting the Jewish people! That's right! Führer Neue Paradigma wants all of us guilty Amerikkkans to embrace all except for the most oppressed religious group in human history. A true prog, for he/she/it knows all about the Marxist Laws of Contradiction!

I did not blast Jewish people. Many I know are progressive and share the same views. I mentioned a group of fascists that happen to be Jewish. They don't represent all Jewish people. They might represent the "good" Jewish people to some who also believe that Muslim people are all terrorists.

No contradiction. Simply able to note the difference between those that head a terrorist state and those that don't. To generalize that all Jewish people are Zionists is unfortunate. A healthy respect for diversity might help that.

Margaret wrote:

New Paradigm wrote:No interest in conspiracy theories either.

link to quote

Everything this person believes is conspiracy theory. The bankers and the Zionists and the rich powerful leaders are all part of a big conspiracy to invade and steal from other countries and inflict misery and exploitation on the poor, innocent, and weak.

I know where I've heard all of that before. It isn't anything new as far as grand conspiracy theories go.

But I come here not to bury New Paradigm but to praise him! The noble New Paradigm has told you that he has no interest in conspiracy theories. ... and New Paradigm is an honorable man. Wherein does the real conspiracy lie? From all of those rich fat-cat bankers and Jews! This is not a conspiracy theory. This is the actual state of affairs. How do we know? Because New Paradigm is an honorable man who tells us he isn't interested in conspiracy theories. New Paradigm is an honorable man. New Paradigm has no interest in conspiracy theories.

Lenin, Stalin, Hitler etc, etc, etc agree. This is not a conspiracy theory. It is the actual state of affairs. And they too were honorable men.

/sarc

All of the Left's political ideas boil down to rationalizing why we can't afford freedom and liberty and why they need to force us to do what they think we should do. And these grand conspiracy theories are part of that rationalizing.

I did not mention Jews, I mentioned bankers. I do not stereotype. It's part of what makes me so honorable.

An example of a conspiracy theory would be telling people that a oil rich nation that has no weapons of mass destruction (unless you count the ones given to them by America, used and then later demonized for doing what they were encouraged to do by America) and then trying to convince everyone they where given to a neighbor. When this fails to work on anyone who doesn't fall for conspiracy theories so easily they quickly revised history to say it was all about bringing democracy!

New Paradigm wrote:An example of a conspiracy theory would be telling people that a oil rich nation that has no weapons of mass destruction (unless you count the ones given to them by America, used and then later demonized for doing what they were encouraged to do by America) and then trying to convince everyone they where given to a neighbor. When this fails to work on anyone who doesn't fall for conspiracy theories so easily they quickly revised history to say it was all about bringing democracy!

Actually, the invasion of Iraq was about Saddam Hussein violating the cease-fire agreement that suspended the hostilities of the Gulf War; these violations producing many UN resolutions and finally culminating in UN resolution 1441. The military build-up prior to invasion took about a year if I remember correctly during which time Saddam Hussein was given every opportunity to comply with the UN resolutions. And, as Bush said: we have to give the UN teeth. In the end Saddam Hussein was given, what?, was it three days to step down as head of State or the invasion would commence? This was a war for regime change, an Iraq policy first put in place by the Clinton administration.

The emphasis by the Left on weapons of mass destruction to the exclusion of every other aspect is part of a campaign by the Left to rewrite recent history for it's own ends.

New Paradigm wrote:I did not mention Jews, I mentioned bankers. I do not stereotype.

New Paradigm wrote:So do the rich and powerful. Many people who live oil rich nations are poor because their rich powerful leaders need palaces and foreign zionists invade and steal their natural resources to fund their infliction of misery and exploitation of the "poor, innocent, and the weak".

Okay, just those darn foreign Zionists. Jeepers, the troll got me.

Margaret wrote:
Actually, the invasion of Iraq was about Saddam Hussein violating the cease-fire agreement that suspended the hostilities of the Gulf War; these violations producing many UN resolutions and finally culminating in UN resolution 1441. The military build-up prior to invasion took about a year if I remember correctly during which time Saddam Hussein was given every opportunity to comply with the UN resolutions. And, as Bush said: we have to give the UN teeth. In the end Saddam Hussein was given, what?, was it three days to step down as head of State or the invasion would commence? This was a war for regime change, an Iraq policy first put in place by the Clinton administration.

The emphasis by the Left on weapons of mass destruction to the exclusion of every other aspect is part of a campaign by the Left to rewrite recent history for it's own ends.

Israel has violated how many UN resolutions? I'm glad Bush feels that the UN must be taken seriously subject to America's discretion.

New Paradigm wrote:I did not mention Jews, I mentioned bankers. I do not stereotype.

New Paradigm wrote:So do the rich and powerful. Many people who live oil rich nations are poor because their rich powerful leaders need palaces and foreign zionists invade and steal their natural resources to fund their infliction of misery and exploitation of the "poor, innocent, and the weak".

Margaret wrote:Okay, just those darn foreign Zionists. Jeepers, the troll person who knows the difference got me.

I respect that you are the first person here to admit that.

Israel has violated how many UN resolutions? I'm glad Bush feels that the UN must be taken seriously subject to America's discretion.

I perfectly tolerate opposing viewpoints, but not hypocrisy. Haven't you condescended to some of my peers with your "I've seen this tactic before" and "You're just steering the argument" rants. It seems to me that you play the role of debate moderator to your own pathetic ends.

And speaking of UN resolutions... In 1948, the UN held a vote on a partition plan that would divide Palestine into two virtually equal parts, one Jewish and one Arab. The big, bad Jews, with their big, bad bulldozers and their big, bad Holohoax scheme, actually were gracious enough to accept this plan. How about the poor, oppressed Palestinean people, who only want a wee little home for themselves? Not only have they rejected this plan, they actually called upon other Arab nations to rise up and extinguish the Jewish race once and for all.

The leader who instigate it all was none other than His Holiness, Mohammad Amin al-Husayni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He's the Arab equivalent of Mohandas Gandhi, but instead of the traditional Hindu non-violence, al-Husayni has his usual rabid, Muslim anti-Semitism and goals to exterminate the Zionist settlers from their new homesteads. He even allied with a certain German socialist leader during the Second World War, working as a chaplain for the Muslim Handschar division of the SS. Is this the diversity you wished for?

Whatever "crimes" Israel may be responsible for, they paled in the sheer magnitude of depravity and barbarism committed by Palestinean terrorists throughout the decades. From senselessly murdering Israeli athletes who have done nothing to deserve their horrible deaths, to lobbing thousands of rockets on Israeli civilians as up-yours statements against innumerable ceasefire agreements, Hamas and its predecessors are the true aggressors of this conflict, with Israel stuck between a rock and a hard, stinky turd.

Yet you have the galls to side with such thugs? A progressive dedicated to spreading tolerance and egalitarianism throughout the world, yet lending support to the most insensitive, barbaric ideology in the modern world? Can you truly stand this debased logic here?

My apologies. I was assuming that as a decent human being, you would be able to see through leftist doublethink and actually make an independent stand based on your own observations of the world. Well, that was a haste, wasn't it?

Kim Jong-Un wrote:
I perfectly tolerate opposing viewpoints, but not hypocrisy. Haven't you condescended to some of my peers with your "I've seen this tactic before" and "You're just steering the argument" rants. It seems to me that you play the role of debate moderator to your own pathetic ends.

No, actually I have seen those tactics. All the time. Go back and look. You will see my original post was my first impression of comparing health care with massacres. When I recieved insults or attacks to the people I stated again that I have seen that tactic before as well. When the issue of Pelosi having a jet was mentioned (I assume to illustrate how hypocritical she was to lecture about global warming) I asked if there was opposition to her having a jet or the office she holds having a jet. No answers. That shows a tactic is being used- no desire to have an honest debate, just to degrade the opposition. I have no interest in that. When I see it I will say it.

"Condescended"? How? Was it by writing what I think? Or by pointing out when they avoided points or dropped something when I answered in a way they weren't expecting? Or was it simply because you imagine Kieth Olberman's voice when reading my comments?
Some of your peers wrote stuff that could qualify as far more condescending than anything I wrote. Did you notice that or is it only obvious when you disagree? I never mind it. I only point out when blog tactics to avoid a real debate are used.

Some looked to engage in an intelligent debate. I answered them, no mention of tactics. Some were playing characters and were funny, no mention of tactics.

And what are my "pathetic ends" (note the personal attack- it's a tactic)? Health care? American obligation to treaties to fight the cold war? To protect nations that have clearly shown to be quite ungrateful for American protection?

Kim Jong-Un wrote: And speaking of UN resolutions... In 1948, the UN held a vote on a partition plan that would divide Palestine into two virtually equal parts, one Jewish and one Arab. The big, bad Jews, with their big, bad bulldozers and their big, bad Holohoax scheme, actually were gracious enough to accept this plan. How about the poor, oppressed Palestinean people, who only want a wee little home for themselves? Not only have they rejected this plan, they actually called upon other Arab nations to rise up and extinguish the Jewish race once and for all.

Both England and France had stakes in it. It was the spoils of the Ottoman Empire. They couldn't hold it with the ease to make it worth their efforts. The Europeans didn't want the Jews so they gave it to them. The Jews hold it, the Europeans controlled them and soon after America inherited their dealings. Europeans knew it could be overrun. That was the point. They didn't want the Jews back.

Kim Jong-Un wrote: The leader who instigate it all was none other than His Holiness, Mohammad Amin al-Husayni, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem. He's the Arab equivalent of Mohandas Gandhi, but instead of the traditional Hindu non-violence, al-Husayni has his usual rabid, Muslim anti-Semitism and goals to exterminate the Zionist settlers from their new homesteads. He even allied with a certain German socialist leader during the Second World War, working as a chaplain for the Muslim Handschar division of the SS. Is this the diversity you wished for?

Do you think that Europe was unaware of that? Or that they cared?

Kim Jong-Un wrote: Whatever "crimes" Israel may be responsible for, they paled in the sheer magnitude of depravity and barbarism committed by Palestinean terrorists throughout the decades. From senselessly murdering Israeli athletes who have done nothing to deserve their horrible deaths, to lobbing thousands of rockets on Israeli civilians as up-yours statements against innumerable ceasefire agreements, Hamas and its predecessors are the true aggressors of this conflict, with Israel stuck between a rock and a hard, stinky turd.

So a cynical person would say that it follows what some Europeans had hoped for and that the US would be the one to deal with it.

Zionists knew how this was going to be with the Palestinians. They signed up for it.

And Palestinians are dirt poor. They can't afford rockets. Nations around send in teams to do this and they know what will happen. Don't think the Palestinians are doing it alone.

Kim Jong-Un wrote: Yet you have the galls to side with such thugs? A progressive dedicated to spreading tolerance and egalitarianism throughout the world, yet lending support to the most insensitive, barbaric ideology in the modern world? Can you truly stand this debased logic here?

Silly me, I thought I was more concerned about the Muslims viewing any attack upon Mecca and Medina as automatic war with all Muslims (not just the radicals) and with Pakistan being a nuclear power...

Think Israel would hesitate to take out the holiest sites in Islam if they feel that their holiest site is going down? Think Pakistan or whatever new Islamic nuclear power that emerges next won't hold the US responsible?

Kim Jong-Un wrote: My apologies. I was assuming that as a decent human being, you would be able to see through leftist doublethink and actually make an independent stand based on your own observations of the world. Well, that was a haste, wasn't it?

Leftist doublethink?

How's this- Would you be willing to simply have it out to the death with the Muslim world? Nuclear war here. If you are willing to because you believe that much in your principles regarding this subject then I don't begrudge you for it.

The Muslims will NEVER give up. The rest of the world (for the most part) will NEVER like Jews. Certainly not enough to risk anything of their own. That's not political opinion, that's how it is.

The Europeans are cowering to Islam. China and Russia are arming them.

Jewish Zionists believe deeply in their faith or else they wouldn't go through this. That's why they risk it. Do you believe as deeply in your convictions? Maybe you do and that is admirable. Does enough of America though?

Apocalyptic war involving people that "know" they will upgrade their existence once dead is something you either settle quickly or steer clear of. You don't keep sitting on the fence.

1948? 62 years ago. That's a long time to put off a decision. The Palestinians and the Muslim world have made their decision. The poor have one thing that unites them and offers them a "dignified" way out, respect for their family, money for their family, and an instant upgrade of their existence (in their minds). What is everyone waiting for? For them to have ICBMs? For everyone to kiss and make up? For one to accept defeat and drop their grudge?

Defending them? Not exactly. Just not too clear on the "wait and see and further enrage" approach. I don't see that being good for the Kollective (that last part was a tactic).

The Europeans didn't want the Jews so they gave it to them.

You're assuming that back then, Jews were just passive sheeple who gratefully accepted the European leaders' offer of a Palestinean buffet. But there's just one word that would completely mess up this revisionist worldview: Holocaust. The Allies weren't just dealing with a dozen sleepy shtetls struck with a bad case of drought; They had to contend with the worst humanitarian crisis in history.

The Holocaust murdered 6 million Jews and displaced millions more. Those who survived were left penniless and psychologically traumatized. Survivors had to roam by foot for months to reach their hometowns, or whatever remained of them, only to discover that the Nazi gave away their confiscated homes to Gentiles. A wave of minor lynchings and pogroms actually swept Europe after the war, as these new Gentile tenants, reluctant to gave back their homes to their prewar owners, tried to drive away or even kill the Holocaust survivors who came for restitution.

Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, and western Russia were once home to a significant presence of Jewish population and culture. The Holocaust snuffed this flame out for good. This sort of demographic shift was unprecedented in human history in terms of sheer speed and scale of destruction. What the Nazis invented was the horrific art of mechanized genocide, one which not only razed entire villages and created ethnic dead zones over cities and regions, but also recorded the entire act of barbarism in lurid detail. The Jews, having the worst luck possible, were the first test subjects.

Equating Israel, the new nation formed to ensure the horrors never happen again, with Nazi Germany is not only ignorant, but morally bankrupt. Even the worst crime that Israel might have ever possibly committed is a midget compared to just one of the mass shootings perpetrated by the Einsatzgruppen, which itself is dwarfed by the machinations of Auschwitz and Treblinka. If you, as a progressive, really want to side with the oppressed against the aggressors, Zionism, that sole flame that lit the hearts of millions of Jews during their worst ordeals, hardly qualifies as your punching bag.

Kim Jong-Un wrote:
You're assuming that back then, Jews were just passive sheeple who gratefully accepted the European leaders' offer of a Palestinean buffet. But there's just one word that would completely mess up this revisionist worldview: Holocaust. The Allies weren't just dealing with a dozen sleepy shtetls struck with a bad case of drought; They had to contend with the worst humanitarian crisis in history.

I didn't assume that. Even if none of those reasons existed they would want Israel. It's central to their faith. The other reasons were going to force it from a wish to a course of action to peruse. What I stated was that Europeans weren't into taking them back at all.

This is my personal cynicism- Europeans automatically equated Bush with Hitler. I got the feeling that was because they view Hitler as a war bringing conqueror and they viewed Bush as the same. The genocide part they don't pay attention to so they don't differentiate between the two. I think it's because they really don't care deep down.

Europeans wanted "Jews to Palestine". They knew what would happen and they were free of any responsibility.

Kim Jong-Un wrote: The Holocaust murdered 6 million Jews and displaced millions more. Those who survived were left penniless and psychologically traumatized. Survivors had to roam by foot for months to reach their hometowns, or whatever remained of them, only to discover that the Nazi gave away their confiscated homes to Gentiles. A wave of minor lynchings and pogroms actually swept Europe after the war, as these new Gentile tenants, reluctant to gave back their homes to their prewar owners, tried to drive away or even kill the Holocaust survivors who came for restitution.

I am aware of this. It reinforces my feeling that Europe was playing them. Give them what they want most and get them out so they won't hold Europeans responsible. And they get rid of a colony that was too much trouble for them. It was win-win for Europe.

Kim Jong-Un wrote: Poland, Belarus, Ukraine, and western Russia were once home to a significant presence of Jewish population and culture. The Holocaust snuffed this flame out for good. This sort of demographic shift was unprecedented in human history in terms of sheer speed and scale of destruction. What the Nazis invented was the horrific art of mechanized genocide, one which not only razed entire villages and created ethnic dead zones over cities and regions, but also recorded the entire act of barbarism in lurid detail. The Jews, having the worst luck possible, were the first test subjects.

I disagree about it being a matter of luck. Granted, nobody can predict anything like that but one should have seen the mood. Everyone I have spoken too from those areas has told me it is very hateful towards Jews. I have the advantage of hindsight but the feelings of the mob are always a moment away from becoming policy.

Kim Jong-Un wrote: Equating Israel, the new nation formed to ensure the horrors never happen again, with Nazi Germany is not only ignorant, but morally bankrupt. Even the worst crime that Israel might have ever possibly committed is a midget compared to just one of the mass shootings perpetrated by the Einsatzgruppen, which itself is dwarfed by the machinations of Auschwitz and Treblinka. If you, as a progressive, really want to side with the oppressed against the aggressors, Zionism, that sole flame that lit the hearts of millions of Jews during their worst ordeals, hardly qualifies as your punching bag.

I don't equate the two. Terrorism is a war tactic. I don't believe the Jews want genocide of the Palestinians simply because they have the capabilities to do it and haven't even attempted it. I do feel Israel wants to make them hurt. I can't remember who or what the exact quote was (I'll have to find it somewhere). Something along the lines of "making them demoralized so they surrender" (not a real quote-just the idea of it). It's not working.

The surrounding nations all want Israel. They play the Palestinians to their own ends. Had the other nations cared for real they would have built an infrastructure for them, taken refugees, etc etc. This is where they are succeeding. The Palestinians are very useful as victims to the other Arab nations. Israel however plays right into that tactic.

Zionists are willing to go through this. America is the one on the line for it. There is a never ending "management" of the problem but no real practical notion on how to resolve it and get America off the hook. Europeans weren't as interested in dying as Muslims are and Europeans have proven they would bring a world war to kill Jews. I am convinced the Muslims will do so. I really think they are waiting to build strength (get nuclear weapons). They aren't assured of it never happening again.

Who was the one who said something about getting all the Jews into one place so they wouldn't have to hunt them around the world? Point being is so many Muslims feel that way and they have no problems taking the world down if need be.

Eat kookies... Comrade Che Gourmet has prepared them especially for you...

I like the New ParaMime™. A psychological Tower of Babel who wants it's prog cake and definitely wants to eat it too. No slippery slope like the Mime™. Just total confusion and a pathetic lack of historical insight.

Laika the Space Dog wrote:I like the New ParaMime™. A psychological Tower of Babel who wants it's prog cake and definitely wants to eat it too. No slippery slope like the Mime™. Just total confusion and a pathetic lack of historical insight.

Of course you do. What's not to like?

Naturally I don't expect you point out everything I am "wrong" about (some just rely on evasion and joking-I know you must be better than that!) but if you would be so good to find one thing stated above that you can korrect that would be appreciated.

Who's Mime?

Who's Mime?

The Mime was a troll. He was one of the founders of Impeach For Peace, an anti-Bush website and a professional Mime. Real name: Mikael Rudolph. He and his fellow founder of Impeach For Peace came here to try and win us over:

Do it yourself impeachment, no joke

He was a very ugly character and he died of cancer a while back. If you glance through that linked thread you get sort of a taste of the Mime. Unfortunately, he deleted most of his own posts and replaced them with the message:

(This post deleted because there is no point continuing to post to a site where the moderator enjoys making up entries in my name, editing and changing my entries at his pathetic, spineless, cowardly whim)

I can assure you, his vicious antagonistic malevolence literally screeched from each and every one of his posts. The Mime hated us because we are on the Right. I mean, he hated us.

I wish I'd copied what he said about my sex life. It appeared to him my sex life was negatively affected by puss, scabs, smell, and lots of ugly.

He flung doo.

hahahaha

I read some of it but I couldn't tell what crime he was basing it on.

Was he a conspiracy theorist or did he just hate Bush?

The Bushilter?!? #&%* BUSH!!!!

I believe Chris Muir captured the spirit of New Paradigm in this cartoon panel...

NP doesn't like to be labeled. NP has opinions without convictions. NP doesn't take sides and thinks that's the mark of intellect.

NP, if you say you resent being cast in the same lot as the radical progressives who've taken over the Democrat Party, what have you done about it? Calling yourself a moderate or centrist or independent while still reflexively voting Democrat does nothing to rid the Party of these Marxists.

In fact, the only way to redeem the Party is to vote Republican or not at all. If you can't bring yourself to do that, then like it or not, you have made yourself an accomplice and no better than the Marxists you say you disagree with. There is no third way, no new paradigm. Sometimes life only gives you two choices. You either stand up and make a choice or one will be given you by default.

Comrade Whoopie wrote:I believe Chris Muir captured the spirit of New Paradigm in this cartoon panel...

new paradigm.jpg

NP doesn't like to be labeled. NP has opinions without convictions. NP doesn't take sides and thinks that's the mark of intellect.

NP, if you say you resent being cast in the same lot as the radical progressives who've taken over the Democrat Party, what have you done about it? Calling yourself a moderate or centrist or independent while still reflexively voting Democrat does nothing to rid the Party of these Marxists.

In fact, the only way to redeem the Party is to vote Republican or not at all. If you can't bring yourself to do that, then like it or not, you have made yourself an accomplice and no better than the Marxists you say you disagree with. There is no third way, no new paradigm. Sometimes life only gives you two choices. You either stand up and make a choice or one will be given you by default.

I haven't called myself a moderate or anything else. I am a liberal.

Thanks for the tip! I would add that moving to swing state is even more effective if one wants to take a stand through voting.

If one lives in NYC then it's best to be registered as a Democrat if one wants to vote in the party's primaries. Come election day one may vote as they wish via a secret ballot.

I don't mind the "this is what you think, this is what you do, etc etc" stuff. It's online venting. Some of the jokes are funny.

You have had some points I agree with. On other things we won't agree. I'll enjoy jousting when it happens. But I don't tell people what they think, nor attempt to get personal with them so you should know that cartoon is very offensive...LIBERAL CHICKS DON'T COOK.

Don't try to deflect what I said.
I repeat, you either stand up and make a choice or one will be given to you by default.

If you are a liberal Democrat then you are as responsible for the radical Marxist direction of the Democrat Party as someone like Van Jones, Anita Dunn or Bill Ayers. You can not divorce yourself from their radical ideology while supporting what they represent with your vote.

Why exactly do you come here to the Cube? Do you seek absolution for your sins? Do you want our understanding? Surely you don't think you'll fool us into seeing your side of the argument.

Here at the Cube we have a saying: "Strong Communism will cure weak liberalism"
By your own self description, you are the weakest of liberals.

We are the ultimate and final incarnation of what weak liberalism leads to. We do not debate, we dictate. We are not tolerant, comply or be purged, those are your choices comrade.

Are you beginning to see the dangerous path that so-called liberalism represents?

Comrade Whoopie wrote:Don't try to deflect what I said.

I didn't actually, I politely said you were wrong.

Comrade Whoopie wrote: I repeat, you either stand up and make a choice or one will be given to you by default.

Yes sir!

Comrade Whoopie wrote: If you are a liberal Democrat then you are as responsible for the radical Marxist direction the Democrat Party as someone like Van Jones, Anita Dunn or Bill Ayers. You can not divorce yourself from their radical ideology while supporting what they represent with your vote.

Wrong. And be "wrong" I mean you're factually incorrect. I am not responsible for the Marxist direction despite your need to believe that. If you prefer to live without any cities that's your choice. I like NYC. It requires tax dollars. If I was a commie I wouldn't have a problem with it being pushed on kids. Associating me with a terrorist who has the president's ear is silly.

As far as "supporting what they represent with your my vote"...how do you know? Do really read what I write? The sales pitch for the vote needs some improvement though. Just my opinion.

Comrade Whoopie wrote:
Why exactly do you come here to the Cube? Do you seek absolution for your sins? Do you want our understanding? Surely you don't think you'll fool us into seeing your side of the argument.

I come here because there are some who can toss out some ideas and will engage me intelligently. Sometimes it's just funny venting. Sometimes it's me explaining the obvious.

Comrade Whoopie wrote: Here at the Cube we have a saying: "Strong Communism will cure weak liberalism"
By your own self description, you are the weakest of liberals.

By my own description I would say I'm quite awesome. If you knew me you would agree or suffer from individual envy ™.

This one is more fun than the last one. He/She/It has atleast a semblance of a sense of humour. And lots of big juicy words.

Lenin 'n' Things wrote:This one is more fun than the last one.

Thanks. Being alive has it's advantages.

Lenin 'n' Things wrote:This one is more fun than the last one. He/She/It has atleast a semblance of a sense of humour. And lots of big juicy words.

You referring to Gollum?