7/23/2016, 2:47 am
[img]/images/Diversity_DNC_Hate_GOP.jpg[/img]
Comrades, didn't the Current Truth™ say there were at least 50 genders, while gender itself was fluid? Meaning that you could identify as a pansexual non-binary genderqueer zhe-zir one day and the next day a womyn (because mentioning men is sexist and patriarchal)?
Then why is the DNC removing two male Bernie delegates from Vermont and requiring they be replaced with womyn in order to have gender quotas?
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that these two are Bernie delegates elected by The People™ and probably didn't want to vote for glorious Hillary. Shame on those patriarchal typical male delegates who wanted a 74-year-old man over Hillary, of course. I'm sure the DNC is truly trying to achieve korrekt gender quotas, just like they say. Yeah, sure.
The problem is that according to the Current Truth gender is fluid. How do we know if these two non-womyn haven't decided to IDENTIFY as womyn for the duration of the convention?
Furthermore, since there are more than two genders, wouldn't truly progressive quotas require representation of all 50 gender types, even if that increases the total number of delegates (who will naturally vote for Hillary), including more Vermont delegates reassigned from other states?
Then there is the issue of race. Doesn't DIVERSITY also require that every possible race be represented by all the 50+ gender types?
And what about sexual orientation? Those who identify with the lesser known genders may go full LGBTQABCCBSNBC, preferring to date members of the same lesser known gender, while others would rather date persons of the opposite 50+ genders.
Thus, korrekt quotas would require representation of "straight" versions of each gender in every race, as well as LGBTQIA++--&$^#((%)#&$# versions of each gender type (who prefer to date their own gender) in every race.
Then there is age. You might need one of each of the above possibilities in the 18-34 demographic (most attractive to advertisers), the 35-49 demographic, the 50-70 demographic, and the.... actually, the Comparative Effectiveness Panels make 70+ irrelevant, soon to be followed by 55+, so never mind.
But then it would be speciesist to limit its quotas to humans only. Truly, the USSA is the great melting pot and our Party is the universal party, speaking for our entire Universe, as well as any other parallel ones that might exist. That means we need to put a call out to the whole universe and invite everyone to come and participate in our democratic process. Let them fly here at light speed in their advanced ships, so the people of the USSA, who haven't yet sent a human to Mars, can provide them with welfare.
With that in mind, we need quotas from every species in the universe too, including aliens of different age groups, gender types, sexual orientations, and races/ethnicities if any.
Given the circumstances, the Party Convention may need to be relocated to Alaska, which has just enough landmass to accommodate the adequate number delegates required by the korrekt quotas.
Comrades, didn't the Current Truth™ say there were at least 50 genders, while gender itself was fluid? Meaning that you could identify as a pansexual non-binary genderqueer zhe-zir one day and the next day a womyn (because mentioning men is sexist and patriarchal)?
Then why is the DNC removing two male Bernie delegates from Vermont and requiring they be replaced with womyn in order to have gender quotas?
I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that these two are Bernie delegates elected by The People™ and probably didn't want to vote for glorious Hillary. Shame on those patriarchal typical male delegates who wanted a 74-year-old man over Hillary, of course. I'm sure the DNC is truly trying to achieve korrekt gender quotas, just like they say. Yeah, sure.
The problem is that according to the Current Truth gender is fluid. How do we know if these two non-womyn haven't decided to IDENTIFY as womyn for the duration of the convention?
Furthermore, since there are more than two genders, wouldn't truly progressive quotas require representation of all 50 gender types, even if that increases the total number of delegates (who will naturally vote for Hillary), including more Vermont delegates reassigned from other states?
Then there is the issue of race. Doesn't DIVERSITY also require that every possible race be represented by all the 50+ gender types?
And what about sexual orientation? Those who identify with the lesser known genders may go full LGBTQABCCBSNBC, preferring to date members of the same lesser known gender, while others would rather date persons of the opposite 50+ genders.
Thus, korrekt quotas would require representation of "straight" versions of each gender in every race, as well as LGBTQIA++--&$^#((%)#&$# versions of each gender type (who prefer to date their own gender) in every race.
Then there is age. You might need one of each of the above possibilities in the 18-34 demographic (most attractive to advertisers), the 35-49 demographic, the 50-70 demographic, and the.... actually, the Comparative Effectiveness Panels make 70+ irrelevant, soon to be followed by 55+, so never mind.
But then it would be speciesist to limit its quotas to humans only. Truly, the USSA is the great melting pot and our Party is the universal party, speaking for our entire Universe, as well as any other parallel ones that might exist. That means we need to put a call out to the whole universe and invite everyone to come and participate in our democratic process. Let them fly here at light speed in their advanced ships, so the people of the USSA, who haven't yet sent a human to Mars, can provide them with welfare.
With that in mind, we need quotas from every species in the universe too, including aliens of different age groups, gender types, sexual orientations, and races/ethnicities if any.
Given the circumstances, the Party Convention may need to be relocated to Alaska, which has just enough landmass to accommodate the adequate number delegates required by the korrekt quotas.

