Fellow Comrades and Comradess -

I am so very pleased with our SocialistDemocratics in Congress and for all the hard work they do to "change" Amerika into the image of dearest Leader. No wonder they need to make so much monies. And it is no wonder glorious Comardsky Nanski Pelosky needs that much bigger jet to travel herself in style - so she can find some respite for her toiling weariness . . . but I digress. . . .

Thursday Congress passed the Disclosure Act bill (don't you love when they call these little bills, what they are not! So sly are they). What these glorious comrades will be doing, is making a new law (to dis the Supreme Courts ruling) that will be are anti-Rethuglicans! Unions and big soci.... Democratic donors and supports will be "exempted" from this bill, while those wicked conservative, Rethuglican donors will be punished with tons of 'red tape' (it should be called blue tape, should it not? Why are they always soiling the color red?)! Is it not grand!?

I give you Warning - reichwingers and teabaggers types are saying this is stomping freedom of speech and is unconstitutional (like anyone cares. ha ha!) but do not listen to their empty rambling!

Unfortunately as with most well laid plans, the murderous NRA got the exemption too, so I am thinking money or secrets changed hands, like in Chicago, but I haven't the knowledge as of yet... so we will slander them for now. Down with the NRA.

I have little to little doubtage, that our socila . . . DARN.... Democratics will win reelection. We will have all the glorious cards stacked in the corner, so Rethuglicans can't win. Long live our Moolsimdear Leader,Barry Barack Hussein Obamer and Comrades Pelosky!

Fraulein, you have put me at much confusion!!! In head line I to be reading that Peloski is to be going after my Mooslim peoples of the Big Oil? Have progressives been of forgetting how much my peoples to be of the struggling kind and now they want to make for more difficulties? Did not Dear Leader bow to great Mooslim king so king to be knowing Dear leader is of many sympathies to my peoples?

If I to be of misreading then I to return all I said. But if not then I to be needing of explanation.

Everything ought to be disclosed. This is good. Is it not? I've been wanting to know what color Comrade Michelle Bachman's has been wearing the most frequently (so that I may copy her because, really she is just as pretty as Sarah Palin.is in style among the political set this year is. Is it the burnt dark orange that fashionistas are attempting to thrust on us? Or is it simply the red ink Dear Leader is prescribing as a moxa cautary for the entire nation in order to purge the lowest of us from the ranks of the gainfully employed.

Mrs. Al, you are of forgetfulness. We must determine truth of political speak, by understanding the Current Truth ™ , not what we know of the 'previous truth' or 'last weeks truth'. Truth is always 'current' and we must be keeping our fingers turning pages to currentness.

Comradess Leninka, I have been seeking a big puffy white dress as Mama Mo wore last year. It would be most lovely for Gulag Celebratory PreElection Dinner.

Fraulein Pulloskies wrote:Fellow Comrades and Comradess -

I am so very pleased with our SocialistDemocratics in Congress and for all the hard work they do to "change" Amerika into the image of dearest Leader. No wonder they need to make so much monies. And it is no wonder glorious Comardsky Nanski Pelosky needs that much bigger jet to travel herself in style - so she can find some respite for her toiling weariness . . . but I digress. . . .
Thursday Congress passed the Disclosure Act bill (don't you love when they call these little bills, what they are not! So sly are they). What these glorious comrades will be doing, is making a new law (to dis the Supreme Courts ruling) that will be are anti-Rethuglicans! Unions and big soci.... Democratic donors and supports will be "exempted" from this bill, while those wicked conservative, Rethuglican donors will be punished with tons of 'red tape' (it should be called blue tape, should it not? Why are they always soiling the color red?)! Is it not grand!?
I give you Warning - reichwingers and teabaggers types are saying this is stomping freedom of speech and is unconstitutional (like anyone cares. ha ha!) but do not listen to their empty rambling!

Unfortunately as with most well laid plans, the murderous NRA got the exemption too, so I am thinking money or secrets changed hands, like in Chicago, but I haven't the knowledge as of yet... so we will slander them for now. Down with the NRA.

I have little to little doubtage, that our socila . . . DARN.... Democratics will win reelection. We will have all the glorious cards stacked in the corner, so Rethuglicans can't win. Long live our Moolsimdear Leader,Barry Barack Hussein Obamer and Comrades Pelosky!

Yes indeed Frau !

Thank goodness the unions will not be hurt by this bill. Our progressive leaders made sure of this


HotAir:

Corporations, unions, non-profits and 527 groups will, for the first time, be required to report donors who give more than $600 if they engage in “express” advocacy — urging voters to support one candidate or another by name.

Conveniently, as Republican staff on the House Administration Committee point out, average union dues in 2004 were $377 – below the $600 threshold. Since unions get the vast majority of their funds from member dues, “the new threshold for reporting is likely to have little effect on unions … but a huge effect on associations and advocacy groups,” a GOP summary of the bill says.

Government contractors with contracts of more than $7 million are not permitted to engage in express advocacy. Unions that receive their dues from the taxpayer-funded salaries of public sector employees face no such restriction. Neither do recipients of grants.
Conveniently, as Republican staff on the House Administration Committee point out, average union dues in 2004 were $377 – below the $600 threshold. Since unions get the vast majority of their funds from member dues, “the new threshold for reporting is likely to have little effect on unions … but a huge effect on associations and advocacy groups,” a GOP summary of the bill says.
Government contractors with contracts of more than $7 million are not permitted to engage in express advocacy. Unions that receive their dues from the taxpayer-funded salaries of public sector employees face no such restriction. Neither do recipients of grants.

Frau, please to be sending back Misha with the most current of the truth when you are finished with needing him for the helping in the beet field. I am not for the forgetting but Misha is to be of the forgetting to be bringing back so many of the memos from you. Frau, Misha is being like the bad little boy and maybe you should be of making korrektions on him if you to be liking?

But I am not liking to be of the disclosing. As good Mooslim womens I am to be wearing the modesty veils all over my body and if I am to be of disclosing then I would not be for setting the good example to the underwives and then maybe the husband might be of making for displeasure all over me. Any time the husband if all over me there is cause for much displeasure.

Mrs Al Czarweary,

I think if you surprised your husband by coating yourself with capsaicin arthritis cream (tell him you are in pain all over), then he will find that your body is a little too hot to touch. That might just send him to the under wives to do his business.

Mrs. Al, dear Misha is on his way back to the cave with the most recent upgraded/updated version of the Current Truth 4.0. Please be well informed that this version is subject to change without notice, so it is best to check for Memo's every day, twice a day, to keep abreast. (please note: I do not mean you will be keeping a "breast" but keeping up with most current changes!)

Dear Leninka, what a glorious and suggestive suggestion you make! I think all of womanly wives should seriously consider underwives.