Actress Amber Heard has been charged with bringing two of her dogs into Australia without permission. These foreign terriers present a massive threat to Australia's national identity. Amber is pleading not guilty, as she should, because it's not her fault that Australia discriminates against refugee dogs.

We should be asking Australia why they are rejecting these canine refugees. Australia is clearly a racist country, who don't want unfamiliar dogs crossing their borders. They need to “get off their high horse,” like Obama says. Does Australia think their native-born dogs are better than foreign?

Here's what Doge has to say on the matter:

In addition to unhindered entry, the refugee dogs should be given EBT cards for organic chow (canned food, not pellets), and be provided free veterinary ER visits for any health issues they may suffer from. It's only right that the wealthier nations share their resources with the foreign dogs of the world, no matter what laws those dogs break.

The refugee dog should then be bred to produce multiple puppies, who would obtain Australian birthright citizenship. The puppies should also be granted free puppy training and doghousing. The parent dog should never be forced to flee the country and take their pups back to where they came from (that would be inhumane treatment of animals.)

Let's paws to think about this. Perhaps the Australian government is xenophobic towards foreign pooches, or maybe they confused “terrorist” with “terrier.” Regardless, the refugee dogs have a universal canine right to enter any country and practice their religion (dogma.) How could you look into those big, pleading eyes and deny Man's best friend?

Please contact the Australian embassy today! Hound them repeatedly until they accept these dog refugees. Together, let's sit down and roll over, as citizens of the world.