This is what happens when women are denied reproductive justice. Male oppression results in female victims giving birth to internal parasites. Without government-funded contraception this could happen to you, too!
Of course, the PROG-OFF faction of the People's Cube had to prepare this image:
And a more progressively radical version of the above:
Special thanks to General Secretary for the idea!
And for playing that Mother card:
Commissarka PinkieThe fish on the bicycle is what clinched this for you:
I agree with Commissarka beet lady - the whole thing is brilliant, but the fish is the clincher. I love this almost nearly a fraction as much as stimulus money - and for a hard(ly) working Crony Capitalist that's really saying something!
Anyone wanna buy some rope?
Commissarka PinkieI've said it before, and like any Progressive platitude or leftwing talking point, I'll say it again and again--a mother's love is no substitute for a government program.
I will engrave these words on my
We've long known the "Like a Fish Needs a Bicycle" Current Truth, but now we must be prepared to recognize fishy evidence recently exposed by Sandra Fluke warranting revison of the Current Truth because Fluke on a Bike disproves that evolutionary maxim about fishy things. Thus, the New Current Truth obliges us to hail Fluke on a Bike as Fish on a Bike. The Science of the Current Truth marches steadily onward.
Thank you. And I will never forget your advice to oppressed women everywhere, to ask their oppressor to remove his yoke for the night, so it doesn't keep banging against the headboard and waking up the neighbors.
On a related note, some ads from our Personals archives:
Victim Seeking Male Oppressor
A weak oppressed female seeking
a strong male oppressor who
isn't averse to unaborted fetuses.
Oppressor Looking for a Victim
A seasoned male oppressor seeking
a female to oppress and keep under
a glass ceiling. Handy with the yoke.
Please report any unprotected procreation activities you observe when peeping in your neighbors window to the NOWOW (The National Organization of War on Women)
If I may rewrite a line from the Christofascist movie Ben-Hur: One-party government--that I understand! But to have only one baby daddy--that's not civilized.
It's not fair.
Ban Ki-moonbeam finds Romney proliferation deplorable. Calls for Sandra Fluke resolution on
population monitoring and unprotected sex.
OK I keep seeing this on TPC's homepage, so I have to ask....how old IS that picture of the Romneys? It looks like it's out of the 70s or 80s o_O [/random]
All these boys are grown now and have their own kids:
The evil decade of greed was just beginning, but by then the Romneys must've been millions of dollars ahead already for her to be able to stay at home doing absolutely nothing.
At least welfare moms collect a check for doing the same thing--which in turn gives them something to spend and thus help the economy!
But considering the proliferation of stay-at-home moms back in those days, there must've been a lot more Americans living in the lap of luxury than do today. Of course, that was before Reagan and the Republicans came along to totally destroy the economy and drive it into the ditch.
Also, they weren't driving an economy that was "built to last" as Obama would say.
Vrag NarodaWhat happened to the Dems' "for the children" line?
Good progressives know that only properly evolved progressives may be permitted the privilege of reproducing. All reactionaries are sent to gulags under state controlled health programs to have their organs harvested & transferred to the properly progressive 99%. It's unfair for greedy capitalists to hoard their internal organs when there are needy members of the proletariat who need extra kidneys & livers from vodka rations. Obviously, once the 1%'s organs have all be properly redistributed to the truly deserving members of society, they'll physically be unable to have children, but their remaining organic matter can still be recycled in the state funded bio-diesel program for a greener tomorrow.
Perhaps someone else will have a deeper insight.
David AndersonYour posting on "Romney Family: a Reproductive Disaster" is a bit too harsh against humanity. I agree that people should have freedom of speech and you don't have to take down your posting. I am not angry at you, I was concerned about our own humanity. I see the Syrian president killing innocent children and yet he has children of his own. We have to look into ourselves and we need to question our own ideas and actions. You may not agree with Romney's ideas because they are cruel and inhumane, but we need to not do as others do because we become what they are. Romeny has wonderful children and they are not a burden to humanity because they are humanity. I am not asking anyone to do anything, just to use logic to follow your heart.
If a LGBTNSU couple - or the Obamas, for that matter - wanted to have 125 children, that would be fine; nothing wrong with being fruitful and multiplying and filling the world with good, progressive progeny.
But the Romneys are white. And rich. And capitalists. And RETHUGGLIKKKAN TEABAGGERS!!! They should be limited by the government to not more than one child.
I hope that explains it sufficiently, but I severely doubt that it will.
Next Tuesday will be here soon, worry not!
And since all hospitals will be government run hospitals, the
Incidentally, there is no truth to the rumor that FLATUS eats babies at birth.