Image

Republicans Do Not Want To Pay Women Equally

User avatar
women pay.jpg

We all know that Republicans refuse to pay women equally. Many Republicans are business people and one would think that they would be concerned about "getting the job done", but no, instead of being practical, they are willing to shoot their own feet and cut off their noses in spite of their faces by ideologically punishing their female employees through low pay.

Such truth is being highlighted by our eminently practical Harry Reid, champion of females everywhere.

This is a Current Truth you can trust.

User avatar
According to our progressive leadership women workers earn .70 to the dollar than that of men. Yet, corporate sexism is so entrenched and runs so deep within their sexist veins that the "greedy profit driven capitalist" are willing to have a payroll that is 30% higher. One would think the profit driven evil corporations would see the opportunity to cut their payroll and increase their profits by simply hiring women for .70 on the $. Apparently their hatred for women workers is greater than their desire to earn profit. Right?

User avatar
Comrade Harry Reid is truly a champion of females everywhere. That is why he won't allow the Rethuglican monsters in the Senate to pass a budget. He knows Womyn HATE Budgets!

User avatar
Comrade Opiate, that's only because they have those number thingies in them.

User avatar
Did I miss something? When did the male chauvinist boss in the movie "9 to 5" become campaign manager for Dear Leader?
pm7wde59e5ppdw5p.jpg
Image


Comrades, there is report circulating that Comrade Nanski Piglosi is closet Republican. Report indicates she does not pay her womyn staffers as much as she pays her male chauvinsit pig staffers. With this report in mind, I have to ask if Comrade Comrade's photo above shows reason why Nanski pays male staffers more.

User avatar
Comrades, we should instantly pass that bill and insure that the average female salary is grossed up to be the same as the average male salary. This means of course that women will still not gravitate to dangerous jobs such as derrick hand on an oil rig, but will be paid the same for being a division-order clerk. One can lose a hand on an oil rig; one can get a paper cut in an office. Sounds like parity to me. And those 12 hour days? Gross up the salary for a six-hour day, so that she can be at home when the children come home from State Indoctrination. I.e., school.

Then when companies decide that women's salaries are just too expensive and start refusing to hire them, we pass a law which states that you have to hire as many women as men, adjusting for the percentage in the populace, and multiplying by a factor of how much the women think that they're discriminated against.

The important thing, comrades, is that it's all perception. We think in images. There may be no crime here, but there are certainly criminals, and that's all we need.

Criminals.

User avatar
As we speak, the Eurocrats are handily ignoring the headlight of the oncoming train of financial collapse and are working on a uniform definition of homophobia--SO much more important than, oh, eating--and insuring that there is equal female representation on company boards. Private company boards.

Next. We remove every urinal in America.

Then we sew up the flap of all the men's boxer shorts. This is a tip from Pamalinsky.


 
POST REPLY