Image

The Who Boy Knows Who Will Protect Him

User avatar
A picture is worth a thousand words. To counter damage caused by this particular image on the unwashed masses, the progressive media will have to write a hundred million words.

Image

I have received this sample of imperialist enemy propaganda in the mail. While such stories are being usually filtered out by our subservient media, they are being spread freely over the Internet by amateurs with access to PowerPoint. This will stop once we introduce the Fairness Doctrine on the Internet - but in the meantime we must increase efforts to control all of mass media.

This is the anonymous PowerPoint presentation from which the image was extracted, with all the criminal points and analysis including this line:

Anonymous thoughtcriminal wrote:That kid just did a virtual essay on "WHAT AMERICA MEANS TO ME."

User avatar
It is just like imperialist warmongers to try and slant the truth. Clearly, if you analyze the power point, the freedom fighter kid was pushing this cowardly soldier into the line of fire of the other freedom fighters.

User avatar
I think that some Photoshop is in order. Maybe there is a way to flip the solider to that it looks as if the boy is ducking and soldier is firing. You would then have a perfect picture for your MSN Breaking News Story.

User avatar
On the other hand, if you flipped the soldier as you suggested Commissar Fox, well then it would just look sort of gay... not that there is anything wrong with that.

User avatar
Now taking another look at it Commissar Pup, you are right. Never mind! But I still feel that the picture should be Photoshopped some way to fit our own cause.

User avatar
When will these filthy non-truths stop... when will they stop!

User avatar
Wait a minute! Why mess with the picture at all? Isn't it obvious that the warmonger soldier has arrested this young freedom fighter and has chained the kid by the neck to his belt and leading him to his headquarters where they will waterboard him? Look at the kid! He is obviously trying to loosen something around his neck that is choking him!

User avatar
You're right! We don't need to "fix" this picture at all, we can just make up our own version of what happened just like the rape stories!

User avatar
Yea, I can see it.

Headline:

WARMONGERING SOLIDER LEADS POOR DEFENLESS BOY BY CHAINS

-MSN, CNN, AP.......

User avatar
Nothing wrong with the picture at all, just the headline that was in error, and that is easily changed to our truth!

User avatar
My heart bleeds for that poor child as he tries to reason with the warmonger not to slaughter the entire city. Someday, someday soon I hope, we can watch this intolerant imperial soldier be brought to justice - along with Bush/Cheney and all registered or thinking about registering Republicans - on live international television via the Hague. I'm sure Comrade Blue Bell (on a no wine day) would agree with me on that.

User avatar
//Of Character Note: This picture adorns my office area and is the first thing people see as they walk up to me. Underneath the saying "US Army, 'Not on My Watch'" meaning no harm will come if we can help it./////

My Apologies Comrades, the flight last week of the Bear Bombers took a LOT of effort to achieve and those damned British Imperialist jet fighters just HAD to take off and ruin it. All that maintenance, new parts, fuel, praying to Stalin that the weather would hold for next to nothing!! Ok, the parts were not "new", they were stripped off 20 other bombers to get those few flying, but still!!

As for the obviously mis-titled and oviosuly photoshopped picture of the imperialist, crusader 'baby killer'; there HAS to be the original somewhere. This will be the one that shows the boy hiding behind his mother as the soldier shoots him in the leg. If we can not find the original, I am sure AP/Reuters can assist in "recreating" it.

///Again out of character: During Saddam's 'election' in the mid 1990s where he 'won' 99% of the vote, one of our translators (a young teen at the time) was shot in the leg by an Iraqi soldier when his father refused to vote for Saddam. The teen was trying to protect his mother by standing in front of her. When Saddam held his 're-election' after 9-11 where he 'won' 100% of the vote, the Iraqis did not even bother with voting booths. That translator was VERY happy the day Saddam swung. Ok, MANY in Iraq were very happy!!////

User avatar
Ugh....the sight of that murdering war pig elbowing that child in the head is revolting!

But not all soldiers are war pigs, some are very brave.
Here's a brave one, Jesse MacBeth (al-Zaid)
Image
<off character>
Look who got suckered by this idiot....dear Gloria!
https://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=n ... ment-56449

Scroll down to this Jody F@#k's Military.com membership.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jesse_Macbeth

What a prick.
3 Jump Stars 2 CIBs, Purple Heart, Bronze Star, a CAB.......arrrrrghhh!
I just want to beat the crap out of him.
I'm no hero and I don't have any of those awards, but my dad does. Why Macbeth thought nobody would ever call him on this crap, I have no idea.....but there are tons of phoney libsh!t make believes out there. I busted one at a local watering hole 9 years ago....said he was a LRRP in 'Nam....he was a high school teacher and a raving moonbat to boot.
I just kept on making mental notes and writing them down later when he started bullsh!tting. Nothing added up. Then one day I just laid it out during happy hour with a packed bar. He just sat there in stunned silence.
He never came back to that bar. He'd been going there for 20 years and making the crap up for as long as he was going there. People bought him drinks "for his service".

User avatar
OFF CHARACTER

I also had a similar experience, and I never once spent a day in uniform. For awhile I believed this guy and his Nam stories, even liked him. But as I got to know him better, things just didn't seem to add up. I discovered he was but a month or so older than I, which meant he turned 18 in late 1973. Now I suppose technically, he could have volunteered at age 17, but even had he tried, I was finding it hard to imagine how he got to Nam at a time we were pulling out or pulling down. But the final blow was when I asked where he was based, and he said Germany. Now again, I am no expert, but it would have been a bit more believable had he said the Phillipines, Guam or something. All I know is I never saw him again.


User avatar
What member of the Press Core took this pictures. I thought they were on our side? He needs to be re-educated.

Inter Party Memo
New counter revolutionaries send to Gulag now forced to shovel Laika feces instead of dirt.

<img src="https://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumb ... dscape.jpg">

User avatar
If only that little boy was in the paradise of the DPRK. There he would not witness the brutalities and horrors caused by that selfish kkkapitalist amerikkkan soldier.

<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>

User avatar
Merciful Kim Jong-II, I wish to thank you for that inspiring video and the others it leads to. I can see that it is truly a people's paradise in N Korea. The shame of the liars here in the west! I want to go there where the food is so plentiful, the women so beautiful and happy! From what I saw of the other videos, it looks like you have the traffic problem licked as well! And I didn't see even one obese person there! I can't wait till our Many Titted Empress brings about such joy and productivity here as well! May I ask though, what brand cigarettes do you smoke? Why, we can't even be seen with one here without being attacked.

BTW, I would point out one teensy error in that video. Right at the beginning when that happy, blessed girl said that babies are not born selfish... Well Premier, I beg to differ. An infant is the most selfish egotistical creature ever evolved on this planet. But then that is part of evolution and helping it to survive. But with proper progressive training, yes, those babies will develop into the free thinking, productive citizens such as you are surrounded by.

User avatar
Commissar Pupovich wrote: BTW, I would point out one teensy error in that video. Right at the beginning when that happy, blessed girl said that babies are not born selfish... Well Premier, I beg to differ. An infant is the most selfish egotistical creature ever evolved on this planet. But then that is part of evolution and helping it to survive. But with proper progressive training, yes, those babies will develop into the free thinking, productive citizens such as you are surrounded by.

Ah, now I must respectfully beg to differ, Comrade Pup. Are babies not born expecting to have all their needs provided for them, from one end to the other, if you will? Do they not scream and rant until you give them what they want? Why, it seems to me that babies are natural born progressives, Lenin bless 'em!

And I daresay they'd grow up and stay that way, too, if it weren't for talk radio.

User avatar
Is that not what I said Pinkie? I said an infant thought only about themself. But they need proper progressive training to focus this Me Thought *patent applied for* to be effective. Even when a progressive claims to wish to do something for others, it is so the progressive will feel good about themselves. You were right on about the radio, we must shut it down!

User avatar
Ah, I see that now, Commissar Pupovich, but I also think I was confused by your word choices of "selfish" and "egotistical", for those are words this humble prole has always associated with the evil Republican Party. They think the babies should have to go out and work for their food, and without union benefits! And then the evilRepublicans want to take that food away from the babies--right out of their mouths, using stomach pumps if they have to--so they can pay for evilBush's war for oil, and give tax cuts to their filthy rich evilRepublican donors who already have more money than they know what to do with, and oh, it just isn't fair!

And not only that, but the selfish evilRepublicans don't think the babies should have health care! Why, just yesterday, evil Bush vetoed the SCHIP bill, thus sentencing millions and millions of babies to certain death! The evilRepublicans force these babies to be born, and then deny them health care! I ask you, how selfish is that?

Then they want to give "vouchers" to the babies so they can go to private schools and be indoctrinated in evilRepublican ways--using tax dollars they generated by taking food and health care from those same babies in the first place.

Then they send military recruiters to stalk the babies wherever they go, and con them into enlisting so they'll be sent to Iraq, only to be killed . . . all to satisfy the EGOTISTICAL Bush's SELFISH thirst for oil!

Babies have every right to think about themselves, and well they should--but that's not selfishness and egotism, that's merely a matter of survival in these dark, oppressed times in which we live under the evil Bush regime.

User avatar
Well, it is probably true that a baby without proper training would grow up to be a Republican. I did mean a baby is egotistical in the sense of only thinking of themselves. All one need do to think of this is ask a young child to share their favorite toy with another. Eventually they generally do learn to do so, and it makes them feel good when they give things away. These children will of course become progressives with training. They are still egotistical and selfish, it is just the thing that gives them pleasure has changed, The Republican will still value the object or oil field above all else, while the progressive liberal will value the good feeling he gets when he helps his fellow human being, regardless of the fact that his "help" may be quite odious to those he comes to rescue, but his intention was good, and so he feels all warm and cozy.


 
POST REPLY