KOMRADES!!!!

We at the Joeseph Gobbels School of Philosophy are at a quandry. We are hoping you are able to help us devise a sophisticated rhetorical device to fill in a "TRUTH GAP"

As Kom. Ratskins recently blogged:

"Nobody can match a socialist for loving compassionate intentions towards our nations youth. That is why we collectively fund indoctrination centers schools... it shows how much we care for the little dears. And we must also show that we support women's rights... unless they are tiny helpless little women.

That is why I predict the popularity of the new thinking person's bumper sticker recently spotted in front of the Gosnell mansion, as shown below.

Keep abortion legal....for the children!!"

Indeed! NO ONE can match our compassionate intentions!

As per Kom. Melissa Harris-Perry -- we have a VESTED INTEREST in "The Children"

EMBEDDED VIDEO NO LONGER AVAILABLE

INDEED! How can individual parents -- especially MOTHERS -- be so selfish as to believe that their childern actually BELONG to them and that they may make "personal" decisions regarding the disposition of what actually belongs to the collective society???

This, however, leaves us a serious gap in our CurrenTruth which exposes us to RethugliKKKan War on Womyn propaganda:

IF THE CHILDERN BELONG TO THE COLLECTIVE SOCIETY, THEN WE CAN NO LONGER ALLOW SELFISH, INDIVIDUALIST, WOMYN THE "RIGHT" TO ABORT PRACTICE KONTRASEPTION ON THEIR FETUSES OUR CHILDERN!

Can you perhaps help us to solve this paradox???

Thank you.

FORWARD!!!

Comrade Goldstein, this is really not a problem - have you forgotten the dialectic? In the progressive world of NextTuesday™, a thing can be simultaneously both this and that - both hot and cold - both here and there - and, in this case, both a fetus AND a child! Truth is all relative, it fluctuates from moment to moment and from value to value, depending upon what a Prog is trying to accomplish (or defend).

Are you behind on your Jiffy-Lobos™?

Definitions, Comrade Goldstein. Definitions.

In the case of material goods, workers are said to own the means of production. The products of their labor result from the shaping of raw materials drawn from the Earth - materials that are the communal wealth. The Party guides and regulates this production in the name of the workers and for the betterment of the Collective. Since the workers, and ultimately the Collective, are best served by producing the most equal products, and the most equal products can only arise from the most equal raw materials, the Party has wisely recognized that only the workers themselves can select the raw materials for production. Thus, the machinist selects the most equal steel from which to fashion his parts.

Likewise, in the case of population units, breeders are said to own the means of re-production. The products of their mating result from the biology of genetic materials drawn from the Collective - genetic materials that are the communal wealth. The Party guides and regulates this re-production in the name of the breeders and for the betterment of the Collective. Since the breeders, and ultimately the Collective, are best served by producing the most equal population units, and the most equal population units can only arise from the most equal genetic materials, the Party has wisely recognized that only the breeders themselves can select the raw genetic materials for re-production. Thus, the breeder selects the most equal genetic material from which to fashion her population unit.

Children are the raw material of The Glorious World of Next Tuesday.™

What are we, our brother's keeper or something? And if we fill up the country with our own offspring, where will all the undocumented Democrats go? Every time a baby dies a bell rings across the Rio Grande. Why risk giving birth to a Republican when a sure thing ballot can pack across the border and start collecting government assistance.

I.M. Craptek wrote:... workers are said to own the means of production...

Likewise, in the case of population units, breeders are said to own the means of re-production.

Kom. I.M. Y

ou are only making the problem WORSE! Now...WHO owns the BREEDERS? Your attempt to re-define the definitions now implies that the WOMYN are property? To WHOM do they now belong? Their HUSBANDS??!!

That will set the Progressive Womyn's Movement (which I enjoy watching by the way) back generateions!!!

Comrade Goldstein,

For the answer to THAT question, see:

R.O.C.K. in the USSA wrote:Comrade Goldstein, this is really not a problem - have you forgotten the dialectic? In the progressive world of NextTuesday™, a thing can be simultaneously both this and that - both hot and cold - both here and there - and, in this case, both a fetus AND a child! Truth is all relative, it fluctuates from moment to moment and from value to value, depending upon what a Prog is trying to accomplish (or defend).

Are you behind on your Jiffy-Lobos™?

I.M. Craptek wrote:Comrade Goldstein,

For the answer to THAT question, see:

R.O.C.K. in the USSA wrote:Are you behind on your Jiffy-Lobos™?

I am a MADE PROG.... I do not do Jiffy-Lobos™

I have others do them for me!

Mmm hmm.

I believe we've found the root of the problem.

Comrade, we ALL need an occasional Jiffy-Lobo™. Even the founder of Jiffy-Lobo™, our own dear Comrade Father Prog Theocritus will tell you that (if he ever shows up again - anybody seen Father Theo lately?).

Don't take it personally. For your convenience, I've included a photograph of your nearest Jiffy-Lobo™, which is right down your street and to the left.

Run, don't walk, Comrade; they're waiting for you.

Some things other can't do for you - death, Jiffy-Lobo, and ....

Raum Emmanual Goldstein wrote:

I.M. Craptek wrote:Comrade Goldstein,

For the answer to THAT question, see:

R.O.C.K. in the USSA wrote:Are you behind on your Jiffy-Lobos™?

I am a MADE PROG.... I do not do Jiffy-Lobos™

I have others do them for me!

Comrade Goldstein,

Thank you. I have now been denounced, or at the very least admonished, by no less than 4 senior members of The People's Cube. I am truly blessed and most humbled by this necessary scrutiny.

I.M. Craptek wrote: Comrade Goldstein,

Thank you. I have now been denounced, or at the very least admonished, by no less than 4 senior members of The People's Cube. I am truly blessed and most humbled by this necessary scrutiny.

You were saying?

Comrade Raum wrote:IF THE CHILDERN BELONG TO THE COLLECTIVE SOCIETY, THEN WE CAN NO LONGER ALLOW SELFISH, INDIVIDUALIST, WOMYN THE "RIGHT" TO ABORT PRACTICE KONTRASEPTION ON THEIR FETUSES OUR CHILDERN!

Comrade Raum,

The Children — meaning the children born from KKKonservatives who are still bearing children — belong to the Kollektive Society because they are the ones so desperately needing to be saved from their outdated morality, traditions and values given to them by their outdated, moral and traditional parental units.

Wymyn — especially those who look like Karen "Jabba" Lewis and Rosie O'Donnell — will always be allowed to abort their babies because it is the sacrament to the 'god' of Liberalism. Selfish personal convenience will always triumph over unwanted and unintended "mistakes".

The rhetorical device I believe you're looking for here is something similar to a failed vaginal mesh that remains the hero of greedy trial lawyers.

R.O.C.K. in the USSA wrote:In the progressive world of NextTuesday™, a thing can be simultaneously both this and that - both hot and cold - both here and there…

Dear Kommrades;

The solution to our dilemma is simple: by aborting the product(s) of her reproduction, the New Soviet Womyn©®™ is simultaneously a) exercising her Right to Choose©®™, and b) selflessly contributing to the fulfillment of the population control quotas of the current Five Year Plan©®™. It is of vital importance that production units be fooled into believing feel that they are contributing actively and voluntarily to the fulfillment of the current Plan, and thus to the advancement of International Socialism©®™ itself.

Comrade Goldstein of Assumed Collective Prowess,

Ahem... it has been lightly referenced that a good Jiffy Lobo does a comrade good... I must most certainly agree... for if it weren't for my endless Intellectual™ conversations with Bruno I would not be the Rooster I am today.

The answer to your query has been stated above in numerous ways in order to grow your post-modern understanding of the direction we would like to take...


now let me state it another way....



You see them vimpira teeth my sista is exposing?... Are you that damn blind? We are HUNGARY dammit... (not the eastern European country fool...) we want innocent flesh dammit... (take it from a chicken, unless your one of those evil cow connoisseurs that just don't get it)... let me make this perfectly clear.... Transylvania style...