Image

When Liberals Attack

User avatar
terrorist.jpg
The signs of fascist stormtrooper activities on the left, as well as murderous aspirations and terrorist leanings are getting more numerous by the day.

Some of it was covered here: The Mental Illness Of Useful Idiots

The general idea behind it is, "if our cause is so good, what does it matter if I get a little violent? Why do I have to stick to rational behavior if it won't let me bend the rules to achieve the Greater Good sooner? The Greater Good will justify anything. Which is another way of saying that the end justifies the means.

LETHAL PEACENIKS

MEET THE ANTI-WAR TERRORISTS

Michelle Malkin:
AIRMAN Jonathan Schrie ken, USAF, is fighting for his life in Camden, N.J. He was shot on Independence Day by a crazed gunman who reportedly had a beef with the military and the U.S. government and "wanted to make a statement" on the Fourth of July. Have you heard about the plight of the 22-year-old McGuire Air Force Base loadmaster? Probably not.

The Schrieken shooting got no mention in The New York Times - not even a squib in a back section...

... PhillyBurbs.com reported that a relative said Marren was "angry at the government and wanted to make a statement" on Independence Day. Authorities found two suicide notes that "were indicative of an individual suffering from mental-health problems."

I wonder what kind of violent, hate-filled rhetoric had he been listening to on the radio. Air America perhaps, with its apocalyptic predictions and desperate calls for action? What newspapers did he read and what internet sites did he visit that he had become so disproportionately angry at the military and this country in general? Could it be Kos and DU? Could he be soaking in the far left hate speech delivered daily from TV screens by the likes of Keith Olbermann, Bill Mahr, and the likes?

All very likely scenarios.

Will anyone point fingers and take responsibility for messing up with the kid's mind? Say, on the front page of the NY Times?

A very unlikely scenario.

Then there's Reynolds who is accused of plotting bombings in bid to end Iraq War.

"A man who once tried to blow up his parents' house went on trial Monday on federal charges alleging he offered to help al-Qaida destroy pipelines and refineries to help end the war in Iraq.... Michael Reynolds' plan was to help al-Qaida cells that he believed existed in Canada and the United States," Assistant U.S. Attorney John C. Gurganus Jr. said in his opening statement.

Note that this anti-war activist, or should we say "progressive terrorist," did not deny the existence of al-Qaeda or claim that the War on Terror is a bumper sticker and an invention of the Bush Administration, as many of his anti-war comrades are prone to do. Not only did he know the Islamofascists existed, he also believed their terrorism was justified by the right cause, by the higher morality of fighting for the Greater Good, against this "accursed country" which is the US. Just like the Nazis and the Bolsheviks before him.

Then there are also the eco-terrorists and others. Please post your examples here. Names, quotes, and links to articles.

Let's make a dossier under the name "When Liberals Attack" and perhaps write a new story that will include all these examples. It will be, of course, about the face of true fascism as it exists today.

User avatar
Michael Reynolds' plan was to help al-Qaida cells that he believed existed in Canada and the United States," Assistant U.S. Attorney John C. Gurganus Jr. said in his opening statement.

What an idiot. He participates in terrorist bombing without even knowing if the terrorists even exist, let alone want him to do what he did.

User avatar
Let's not forget that Lee Harvey Oswald wanted to become a Soviet--and they wouldn't have him.

Betty, I don't know that he's an idiot. I'm not religious in the slightest but I do believe in evil, although I disagree with the Christians that it has a supernatural source. But there is no question evil. We think of child murderers as evil and they are, and even some leftists would, if pressed, say that murdering innocent people by terrorism is evil, although the DKos, when exercised, openly calls for insurrection, but fomenting murder is evil too.

Shakespeare gave us Iago just to prove that point quite eloquently.

User avatar
Let's not forget that Lee Harvey Oswald wanted to become a Soviet--and they wouldn't have him.

He tried several times before they finally accepted him, and when he returned to the U.S., he was confused why there wasn't a big group of people and media reporters there to "welcome" him back.

Another example of a pre-Shehag media whore... without the media.

User avatar
All pathetic people treating the world as a stage for their psychodramas. The world is run by drama queens and wannabe drama queens.

User avatar
Leftist RAGE!!!

I was over at BlameBush and scrolling through their comment section when I happened upon a nice little rant by some Progressive trolls there:

Sonetlumiere wrote:I'd like to see you scream for "appeasement" if some of Osama's henchmen had a blade to your throat and you were going to lose your head.
Not so much big talk then, macho-man ...!
You think you're impressive, but you're a psycho. And so are many of your troops in Iraq. Ignorant butchers.


I'm providing a link below to the particular article which featured this comment (there are many more like it worth reading).

Ugh, why can't we pull in trolls like this?? Why!?

https://blamebush.typepad.com/blamebush ... l#comments

User avatar
Perhaps because this is a shrine to mockery. I admire your cast-iron stomach, being able read all that. I can't stick it too long for it's tearing the lid off hell and peering in.

User avatar
There is a difference these days? Well, yes. The liberals dress better.

User avatar
BlameBush, if you don't know, is also a satire site, Theocritus. So "peering" in isn't at all that hard until some progressive comes along to blow everyone's buzz.

User avatar
With a name like "BlameBush", and the desperateness of the hippies, you can never really tell....

User avatar
Ugh, why can't we pull in trolls like this?? Why!?
Because it's cheating Meow. We play fair and (Red) Square.
Using a site name like "BlameBush" is like putting jelly donuts out in a state park hoping to bag a bear. It's just not kosher and not fair to the bears.
We, on the other hand, use more subtle means.....appealing to the troll's more nuturing, socialistic side, then we club them over the head.

User avatar
Sorry, Meow; my gorge rose before I could spot the satire.

But let us consider the impossibility of a troll actually having a sense of humor for it would then either laugh itself to death or wink out of existence.

User avatar
You are indeed wise, Laika. <sigh> Maybe someday, someday soon, Gaia will send us a Fellow Traveler that we can save through the power and compassion of the Holy Algore. Until then I will wait and continue to cry myself to sleep at night.

User avatar
Meow, we need to talk. I have no trouble with Algore being the earthly incarnation of Gaia--it's useful birdlime for fools. But have you stopped to think how much money can be got by auctioning off places in the College of Spotted Owls? And also it's a good place to put loud-mouthed shrieking bitches, er, activist progressives like Laurie David and Cindy Sheeyit who can spend their time talking about the wonders of their own tender consciences, er, the problems facing humankind in the world today.

User avatar
Chairman M. S. Punchenko wrote: Ugh, why can't we pull in trolls like this?? Why!?

Sings: Send in the Trolls! Laika, if you please!!!!

--

User avatar
Commissar Theocritus wrote: But let us consider the impossibility of a troll actually having a sense of humor for it would then either laugh itself to death or wink out of existence.

Like Blue Hell ... er ... I mean ... Bell?

--

User avatar
This is from a NY Times Blog "Bush: 'I Was Unprepared for War' By Kate Phillips

https://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/200 ... d-for-war/

US Citizen wrote:"Now that Mr. Bush and his team is leaving, I ask that all of them serve combat duty in Iraq and Afghanistan. Unless they are Chicken Hawks who only know sending loved ones of others to fight their war, here is their opportunity to show their patriotism (They questioned all others who oppsed the war). They could be on night patrol duty. Their family members-wives, children- show also go. They bankrupted the country to the tune of 3 trillion dollars. Now they should commit their current resources and future earnings to pay for their war."

TheChaplain wrote:"President Bush, you have disgraced your country and your office, and even if you don't care to pay attention to history, history will certainly pay attention to you, and judge you very, very harshly."

Larry Templeton wrote:"LIAR!
He and his cabal planned it all!
From 9/11 on!
Bush and his final presidental portrait should be his toe's twitching 12 inches off the floor!"



It seems every quote is anti-Bush....for as far as I read.

User avatar
here is another good one, not really an offensive attack though

Buck Batard wrote:George Bush proves that this nation is capable of electing a Hitler. George came awfully close, but he didn't kill as many people. Something like a million Iraqui's and thousands of Americans.

But so many Americans voted for McCain who was “with the President” during most of his tenure that I'm sad to say that we could end up with another monster in the White House in a few years. And the next one could be far, far worse.

But so far, George Bush is the most vile monster we have ever elected . If the Republican ideology continues as it presently exists, I will leave the country if one of them is elected, or appears about to be, as President again. And I used to like some of the Republican ideology. Like Joe Bageant, if it means taking a bicycle to China, that's where it will have to be."

there is a lot like these here.

User avatar
here is more from that YouTube video "Bush Comes Under Shoe Attack In Baghdad"

esoberanis1 wrote: "he doesn't deserve that? hahahaha
just for feeding us lies to go into a unnecessary war(iraq) he deserves to be hanged.

a shoe... he doesn't deserve that...HAHAHAHA"

SazzloPeaco
"Should of put bombs in the shoes,
Do the job properly or not at all! lol"
Hejhvordanhardudet
"dayum, of course. shouldve"

LightMyFire99 wrote:"What comes around - goes around, bitch. This mother fucker deserves ahell of a lot more then a shoe. Throw him a fookin BOMB and blow hishead off !! CRIMINAL and ASSASSIN !Responseble for thousands ofpeople's death's !!!"


REEDSBUD wrote:"Best video of the month!! Too bad he did not throw a grenade!!"

[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/Bajaur888]Bajaur888 wrote:[/url]...Bush is criminal and should be brought to justice andgive him the Capital Punishment.

barontomcat wrote:"...I am just sorry the reporterdid'nt kill the idiot douchebag ("W")"
<br>
[url=http://www.youtube.com/user/ste4test]ste4test wrote:[/url]"Needs to have a bullet in him not a shoe."

User avatar
Walmarteer wrote: I wonder if he was throwing shoes at Saddam while he terrorized the nation for a few decades.....Where was he then? Oh wait, Saddam woulda had him decapitated and family killed. How quickly people forget...

Classic case of misplaced anger.
We gave the Iraqis a shot at freedom after Saddam and they blew it. Time to come home.

That one was marked as spam. I see the Obama truth squads are already hard at work to preserve the Current Truth.


 
POST REPLY