Image

Young Sour on Obama - Obama suffers from Empty Nest Syndrome

User avatar
Image
Comrades,

It is with much distress that I must report that Papa Obama is losing the "youth vote"
Indeed, according to the report:

A recent informal survey of 500 post-grads primarily between the ages of 22 and 28 — 83 percent of whom voted for President Barack Obama in 2008 — found just 27 percent of Obama's previous youth supporters plan to vote for him again, The Daily Caller reports. That's a drop of almost 60 points.

An 80 percent majority of those newly disillusioned by Obama said they would consider voting for a Republican in 2012, too.


I dare say the young proletariat are of the most ungrateful type!!


How can this be? Do the young not remember that Papa Obama is all for them? All his plans to create a new Progressive Utopia are for them.

Do we need to remind the young that PapaObama Care is for them!
Do we need to remind them that Papa Obama and the Democrats in Congress paid a big price to get them more healthcare by taking it from the seniors? (after all, seniors' usefulness to the state is very limited)



The good news is that Papa Obama in all his greatness is not to be outdone. The word in the collective is that the Administration will be using the open ended laws in PapaObama Care to push our message and remind the youth to "come home".

Beginning immediately under the direction of the Secretary of HHS all High Schools, Colleges and any group that has accepted a PapaObama Care waiver will remove all drink choices from cafeterias, drink machines and offer only the following:


Image

We can claim it is for health care costs to the state and of course, it is for the children that we must do this.........

Wonderful is it not- Statism in the proper hands is a beautiful thing

User avatar
It is clear the youth do not understand our message or have not heard our message. We must silence all competing voices and replace them with our own.

User avatar
ThePeoplesComrade wrote:It is clear the youth do not understand our message or have not heard our message. We must silence all competing voices and replace them with our own.


Very good comrade- we have not have a good old fashion purge for some time..

As for replacing, this could conflict with our pro-children policies on abortion....hmmm,
what to do ?


Of course, we just use illegal immigrants undocumented workers to replace them -

Demand the Dream Act NOW!

User avatar
I fear thought-crimes are breaking out among the young voters who supported Our Leader in 2008 but who have libertarian tendencies and a fascination with Vulcans, whose focus on the need to "Prosper" may delude such young voters into thinking that Cain is Able.

Image


--KOOK

User avatar
KOOK wrote:I fear thought-crimes are breaking out among the young voters who supported Our Leader in 2008 but who have libertarian tendencies and a fascination with Vulcans, whose focus on the need to "Prosper" may delude such young voters into thinking that Cain is Able.




--KOOK


Agree comrade.

Perhaps their inexperience does not allow them to appreciate the systems we have in place now.

What is their concern with finding a job? This is idea is so non-progressive. The state is their to take care of you.

Since we have the greatest number of people ever on food-stamps, they should just join the ranks and get their "fair share".

User avatar
I say we lower the voting age to 0...wait...I just had an epihany...Lower the voting age to - 9 (negative 9) months. That way even the unborn could vote!

Obviously our Institutions of learning are failing us. That will need to be addressed, but in the meantime, lowering the voting age will tap in to the sweet untainted minds of those who really adore Dear Leader: the very, very young.

fetus_for_obama.jpg

User avatar
Grigori E.R. wrote:I say we lower the voting age to 0...wait...I just had an epihany...Lower the voting age to - 9 (negative 9) months. That way even the unborn could vote!

Obviously our Institutions of learning are failing us. That will need to be addressed, but in the meantime, lowering the voting age will tap in to the sweet untainted minds of those who really adore Dear Leader: the very, very young.

fetus_for_obama.jpg

Yes, one never knows what the unborn could turn out to be


User avatar
Neotrotsky wrote:As for replacing, this could conflict with our pro-children policies on abortion....hmmm,
what to do ?

Of course, we just use illegal immigrants undocumented workers to replace them -

Demand the Dream Act NOW!

Comrade Neo,

Our pro-children policies on abortion must showcase adopting other people's children living in squalor and poverty the glorious dictatorial socialist Utopias in the 3rd World. Angela Jolie and Brad Pittz can be used as ambassadors for such policies, followed by other korrekt-thinking Hollywierd comrades.

Illegal aliens immigrants are the key to our eternal success in being in power for good. One of our exemplary states, IL., has passed their own state version of the DREAM Act. Such manuevering may be just what's needed to bypass the Reichwing-controlled House and show the illegals that we care about their Children™ more than they do. Afterall, we will be needing more illegals graduating law schools to reinterpret immigration laws to pave the way for future illegal democrat voters.

User avatar
Comrades, we have neglected for far too long a most excellent source of votes. Comrade Grigori has stumbled upon a glorious concept - the pre-aborted would certainly vote for Dear Leader, since they are still innocent and pure and not yet corrupted by ever-present Rethuglian thought crime. It's true that they are only blobs of non-human fetal tissue, yet for the purpose of voting I don't see that as an issue.

fetus.JPG
Plus, think of all the pre-aborted fetuses world-wide that would, without a doubt, sneak over the border into immigrate to the USSA at their earliest possible convenience, SHOULD they be allowed to be born. ALL of them would undoubtedly vote for Dear Leader, should the voting age be lowered to -9 months.

Much like the USSA military's participating in kinetic non-kinetic wars international assistance, it should not require congressional approval to lower the voting age. Make it so, Dear Leader!

User avatar
So when Planned Parenthood issues voter registration cards to the necro-pending fetus, does it require parental consent of the non-birth mother, or the parents of the non-birth mother? What level of Parental Consent will we bypass?

Comrades, we MUST HAVE POLICY! This must be overseen by the Government, or its extention of authority as ACORN.

User avatar
Tovarichi wrote:Comrades, we MUST HAVE POLICY!
Exactly. And I mean Policy such as only Dear Leader with his adoring crowd of teleprompters asshats followers can provide!

User avatar
Well then, maybe it's a good thing that the highly touted "yute vote" never turns out on election day.

I've always said we waste our time trying to motivate these slackers. Sure they'll show up at a globalization rally to throw stones, but they won't stand in line with a bunch of old folks to cast their vote. Their value to the movement is in the streets, not at the polls.

User avatar
Comrade Whoopie wrote:Well then, maybe it's a good thing that the highly touted "yute vote" never turns out on election day.

I've always said we waste our time trying to motivate these slackers. Sure they'll show up at a globalization rally to throw stones, but they won't stand in line with a bunch of old folks to cast their vote. [highlight=#ffff00]Their value to the movement is in the streets[/highlight], not at the polls.


I guess maybe all that "community organiz'n" might be showing signs of backfiring in that case. When some of these 'youtz' can be seperated from their iPods for one brief moment of doing a "man on the street" interview, they can't even identify who the VP is—not that I can blame them, but that should be common knowledge.

Make the ballots resemble protest signs with slogans identifying the candidates, and offer free iPods, and they will come.

User avatar
Comrade Corporeal Whinny is on to something here. "[highlight=#ffff99]But they won't stand in line with a bunch of old folks to cast their vote.[/highlight]" Of course not, the youth of today will not stand in lines to vote. They do not have to stand in lines. Every entitlement they want or need is now available on the Internet and easily accessible by an Internet capable cell phone.

Comrades, this is a golden opportunity for the Kollective. All we have to do is create an App. for texting your vote in and we can charge a tiny, small fee for each text. It's a win win for everyone.

User avatar
A brilliant idea Grigori...text your vote:

text "gimme a free Sony Playstation" to vote Democrat or
text "I want more homework and broccoli" to vote Republican

Now here's the best part, it costs $3.95 (payable to the Collective) to cast your vote (other charges may apply).

User avatar
Well, If these stoopid 'utes youngsters refuse to cannot totally Fall Into Line BehindOur Obammunist Master Dear Leader, well, it's time that all their heads should be severed (in accordance with Islamic Law) any of their "outliers" should be severely disciplined in principle!

But has not anyone heard the INCREDIBLE RECEPTION of Our Dear O'Bama among the incredibly brilliant students of Eire? How can anyone doubt that "He" Is The Next Emperor Of The World? Does our 24/7 "News" "Media" not "work" into the dawning day, or what?

User avatar
I agree with Comrade Unkulturny. There is a need for some serious disciplining, but we are not at that point yet. We still need every single vote to insure Dear Leader's re-anointment to the Presidency. After that we can get down to the real business at hand, that being the installment of Dear Leader as President of the World. The Emperor part is still a way off. We come so far Comrades, we cannot rush things now that we're so close.

User avatar
My Gosh, the unborn voter base/block. I am uncertain how to exactly take advantage of this un-utilized resource but it has the right (I mean left) feel to it.


 
POST REPLY