Awwww......Just post your Moonbat links in this thread.

It was ten minutes after I first heard the news at work this morning when a libtard blamed Bush.

By the way, it was the perfect crime. Bush sent the Jew, Arlen Specter, to oversee the mission.


And pigs are going to fly out of Mohammad's ass.


Yeah...outta character,

Laika

And a Kennedy was there.

Coincidence?
I think not!

https://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,318611,00.html

WASHINGTON — Two U.S. lawmakers scheduled to meet Thursday with former Pakastani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto and President Pervez Musharraf were advised to leave the country after Bhutto's assassination.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said in a telephone interview from his Islamabad hotel room that he and Rep. Patrick Kennedy, D-R.I., were to dine with Musharraf and meet later in the night with Bhutto.

He said he heard about the attack on Bhutto as he was dressing for the dinner with Musharraf.
"Our foreign policy had relied on her presence as a stabilizing force," Specter said, emotionally describing her death as "a real, real, real shock."

"I knew her personally. ... She was, as you know, glamorous, beautiful smart," he said. "Her loss is a setback. But you have to face what is. And now, without her, we have to regroup."
Bhutto was shot to death Thursday in a suicide attack that also killed at least 20 others during a campaign rally in Rawalpindi. She served twice as Pakistan's prime minister between 1988 and 1996 and had returned to Pakistan from an eight-year exile Oct. 18 to seek the office again.

After learning that she was dead, Specter, Kennedy and Anne Patterson, the U.S. ambassador to Pakistan, went to Bhutto's campaign headquarters, and laid flowers there under her photo.

"They were crying and they were sobbing," Specter said, describing the people there. "It's a night reminiscent of Kennedy, Robert Kennedy's assassination."
Specter described the atmosphere in Islamabad as unsettling, saying he felt apprehensive about being an American there out at night. He said he and Kennedy were cutting short their trip by a day on the advice of the State Department.

I haven't seen any blaming Bush yet, but then I haven't been looking. After seeing this, I went to Daily Kos and read briefly their first post. The clown thinks he is so smart. He wrote:

"It was the creation of those forces for the Afghan war that eventually led to the rise of the Taliban, the creation of al Qaeda, and the radicalization of the mostly Pashtun peoples in the "tribal areas" of Pakistan, where Bin Laden is widely believed to have found a safe haven, most likely with the tacit acceptance of Pakistan's intelligence service, which is believed to be sympathetic to, and probably actively supporting the religious extremists who seek to overturn Pakistan's government. These are the proximate roots of the current struggles in Pakistan.

The real brains behind Al Queda is Zwahiri, and his roots goes back to the Egyptian Brotherhood. He was actually jailed as an accomplice to the assassination of President Sadat. Zwahiri and this group's aims have not changed, and the creation of Al Queda flows from him, and his joining up with Bin Laden, who had but a fledgling operation and little clue how to run such an operation, but had money. As we know, Bin Laden really didn't have that much to do with the war in Afghanistan, he was more a rich kid who went there for an adventure. The Taliban were actually used to protect cargo trucks from looting by the mujaheddin, which UBL was a part.

The main point I am trying to make is that all of those clowns seem to think that these Islamo fascist murderers come from the Afghan war with Russia, and therefore the indirect creation of the US and it simply is not the truth. They go way back, even before Anwar Sadat's untimely demise.

Why go anywhere else for news?
I will use the Cube to tell me when to plant my beets in spring.

Why did Bush do it?

Of course Iraq was for Big Oil and Afghanistan was for control of the poppy trade so he could destroy the inner cities of the US with cheap heroin!

Pakistan? For Big Cotton Textiles! For an unlimited supply of NYC taxi cab drivers! And most importantly, control of 7-11 Mini-Marts! Bush is a Slushee addict!

Arlen Specter has already "proved" it was a single bullet shot by a lone Al Qaeda gunman/suicide bomber. It was Specter who phoned in the claim by Al Qaeda! Yes...Bush is trying to pin it on Al Qaeda again. This time we won't let him get away with it!
Bush will stop at nothing for control of the Universe!

OK Pup...here's a fresh one from the Kos......



Maintaining chaos (1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:codigo rojo
is how they maintain control. Look at Iraq. Now Pakistan with chaos reigning. Does this give Bush the excuse he needs to maintain power in the US? You bet.

Curious his "tense look" in his "presser". Cheney's having a field day...oh goody,more chaos, more war, more power, more profits.

I agree with Kucinich: this is a very dangerous moment for the world.

RIP, Benazir Bhutto. Another brave woman is killed. How many more?

sign the petition at https://www.impeachbush.org

by DrKate on Thu Dec 27, 2007 at 11:16:33 PM PST

It didn't take the Paulapaloser long, did it? He's such a moRON.

http://sayanythingblog.com/entry/ron_pa ... icas_fault



Yes! Neutrality worked in 1917! It worked in 1941! No reason it shouldn't work in 2008!
Genius!

Navigator wrote:Why go anywhere else for news?
I will use the Cube to tell me when to plant my beets in spring.

An excellent response Comrade Navigator!! That is the spirit we need, along with our vodka spirit of course. In recognition of your progressive attitude, I am authorizing a brand new, sharpened shovel to help you plant your beets!

Laika the Space Dog wrote:OK Pup...here's a fresh one from the Kos......

Maintaining chaos (1+ / 0-)
Recommended by:codigo rojo
is how they maintain control. Look at Iraq. Now Pakistan with chaos reigning. Does this give Bush the excuse he needs to maintain power in the US? You bet.

It is amazing the sheer ignorance of our citizenry and many of our "leaders." You hit the nincompoop on the head with a collective rubber hammer with your comment about Paul. Did you know that one of the 9/11 terrorists noted one of his reasons for hating the west was the modern buildings in Egypt had obstructed the skyline view of the pyramids? These people don't just hate the west for the "puppets" we support, they hate us for our ideas, our culture, every thing about us. How do you turn the world back 9 centuries or so? Hmmmm, well, we could do that with our nukes I suppose if that is what they wish.

Comrade Space Dog Laika, have you lost total contact with the Chairman? Have all tin foil hat messages to him been returned?

Laika the Space Dog wrote:It didn't take the Paulapaloser long, did it? He's such a moRON.

I thought it was just me.
Listen to him whine and snivel for four years would drive me to the grave.
He has some great ideas but he sells them like Pee Wee Herman

I don't see Paul with a lot of good ideas at all. Sure, some are fairly mainstream conservative, but in many ways, he is just a throwback to the early 20th century and William Jennings Bryant. His foreign policy is as Laika pointed out, the same failed policies that did not keep us out of either world war and left us quite unprepared militarily when we did go in.

No disagreement.
I like sticking to the basics and a constitutional approach.

Off Character

I love the Constitutional basics, but that does not necessarily translate into Paul's gold standard argument. I have been hearing it all from the hard metal crowd and those who claim the Federal Reserve is unconstitutional. How many years do we have to go rehash the same arguments that go back to Andrew Jackson?

The corn standard makes more sense to me.
If the big one ever hits, I'd rather be surrounded in wagons of food and humble tools and supplies that a chest of gold. I'd rather not exchange my neighbors gold for my wagon load of beets.

A dollar really represents faith. Iranians, then are losing faith hence, inflation.

Constitutional basics really means saying no to Entitlement Mentality. (Health care?)

What's the penalty for the crime of talking with the mask off?

The way I see it, money basically boils down to what you are willing to exchange for someone else's work. Gold in itself has little to offer outside jewelry and some electronics. In todays world, money is electrons being passed back and forth. If you are willing to give me beets for electrons my bank passes to yours, and I am willing to give you shovels for the electrons your bank passed to mine, then everything works fine. It's all a matter of exchange. People cry out about what happens when there is a economic breakdown. Well, what are you going to do with gold? Eat it? Drink it? From that point of view, your corn as a standard makes more sense. Some talk about the Fed being unConstitutional because some semi private banks make up part of the system and the Constitution states that only the Fed can do this. Way I see it is simple. Congress passed the legislation, the president signed the legislation, and the Supreme Court has approved it, so therefore it is Constitutional period.

There is no penalty for talking with your mask off....unless we of course decide there is a penalty. The Party makes the rules as we go as you know.

How's that new sharp shovel I presented you doing?

Commissar Pupovich wrote:Comrade Space Dog Laika, have you lost total contact with the Chairman? Have all tin foil hat messages to him been returned?

Pupovich:

Perhaps the Chairman is in Pakistan, forasmuch as there was also a Kennedy there on that fateful day?

Perhaps he's now in hiding from the Empress, because the information he gathered for her--designed to help boost the value of Her Excellency's Mommy Card--turned out to be a tad inaccurate.

I hope--if only for the sake of the Chairman's remaining Hummels--it was someone else who betrayed the Empress.

In the meantime, I propose we attribute the remarks in question to Bush. What an idiot, that Bush! Doesn't even know how many children Bhutto had! And he calls himself a mother!

Commissarka Pinkie wrote:

Commissar Pupovich wrote:Comrade Space Dog Laika, have you lost total contact with the Chairman? Have all tin foil hat messages to him been returned?

Pupovich:

Perhaps the Chairman is in Pakistan, forasmuch as there was also a Kennedy there on that fateful day?

Perhaps he's now in hiding from the Empress, because the information he gathered for her--designed to help boost the value of Her Excellency's Mommy Card--turned out to be a tad inaccurate.

Commissarka, can there be any doubt that will be where the Chairman will claim he has been now that you have suggested such? You know, there comes a time when we need to stop enabling the Chairman to continue his ways. We need to show the Chairman tough love. Now do not let the fact that I have graciously volunteered my valuable time to act as Vice Chairman for when the Chairman falls off the People's Wagon™ as being contradictory to showing tough love or a bid for power behind the Chairman's back. Lenin forbid!

The Empress and the recently departed Bhutto do have much in common.... both strong fighters for "democratic socialism," both famous money launderers, both loved and adored by ignorant poverty stricken voters, both vilified by insane "god" believers.... Great Stalin's Ghost! Have we stepped up the guard around the Empress?

Commissar Pupovich wrote: These people don't just hate the west for the "puppets" we support, they hate us for our ideas, our culture, every thing about us. How do you turn the world back 9 centuries or so? Hmmmm, well, we could do that with our nukes I suppose if that is what they wish.

I agree, Commissar. I have never accepted the silly argument that they hate us for our foreign policy or whatever. Why else would bin Laden and company be offering to stop attacking us if we only converted to Islam? To me, it seems they attack us because we're not an islamic theocracy.

Branish wrote:I agree, Commissar. I have never accepted the silly argument that they hate us for our foreign policy or whatever. Why else would bin Laden and company be offering to stop attacking us if we only converted to Islam? To me, it seems they attack us because we're not an islamic theocracy.

They have openly stated this many times. Yet we have those "brilliant" talking heads, congressional leaders, presidential candidates et al, that continue to blame it on our support of Israel, policies, etc. We would be their enemy regardless because of our culture and ideas that have spread world wide, even if we were to pull out of the Middle East for good, and let Israel be destroyed. Sure, that would probably leave us at a semi peace for a time as they consolidated the Caliphate, but their religion as they use it, commands them to make the world subservient to Allah. For that matter, we would also have to pull out of Spain as well since they see that as part of their former realm. You know, for all the talk you hear from Al Queda about Israel and the Palestinians, that is of fairly recent origin. They rarely talked about that until they felt it was to their advantage to do so. They also point back to Bin Laden and his anger at the Saudis for turning his offer down to drive Saddam out and allowing the west to come in, as I pointed out earlier, the brains, Zwahirri, and the Egyptian brotherhood was created long before.

Ron Paul on the video from Laika's Dec. 28 post wrote:I'm offering something different, something the founding fathers offered and that is neutrality. Talk to people and trade with people and negotiate with people but not to have these two choices of either subsidizing them with foreign aid or threatening them with violence if they don't do as we tell them.

I see Ron Paul is going for the wet behind the ears college kid vote. America just pushes other countries around. America is the bully of the world. All we do is prop up bad guys or threaten to bomb them if they don't obey! Well, he's got a lot of competition from the Democrat side of the race.

Paul also seems to forget that the US was an extremely weak country on the world stage at the time. Who do we threaten with violence? Those that support those who attack us.

I am astonished at the number of grown people who just want to be hugged and wuved. These people hate us because of who we are--period. If we converted to the totalitarian form of Islam that they want, we would cease being who we are, and it would be utter death without the bullet or the bomb.

Grown people should be able to take being disliked. But there is something particularly vile about some of these people. Notice the objects of their hatred. The more vicious the bully or the tyrant--Mao, Castro, Che, Stalin--the more obsequious they are. The more the person helps--Reagan, the military--the more they try to get in the knife. The only possible psychological explanation I can come up with is pure self-hatred.

Who our enemies are speaks even more loudly than who loves us. We have made good enemies.

Hmmm you sure KEnedy wasnt driving?

Oh Comrade Red Star....I just realized where you were bestowed your avitar! LOL

Yes this is my evil side coming out. no more hello kitty.

<ok>
My kids love achbar the dead terrorist. And I think He is oddly appropriate for here

That is spelled.... A C phelgm.....

I'll keeeeeeel you!

"It was the creation of those forces for the Afghan war that eventually led to the rise of the Taliban, the creation of al Qaeda, and the radicalization of the mostly Pashtun peoples in the "tribal areas" of Pakistan...."

Of course, the Pashtun were merely peace-loving pastoralists until the Bushitler turned them into the Taliban.

//Character Off//
Kiddies, in real life yer ol' Uncle Ivan here is a history professor who just happens to specialize in British Imperial History. Wrote my master's thesis on British Military Effectiveness on the Northwest Frontier at the turn of the 20th Century. The Pathans (a term encompassing the soft-dialect Pashtuns and hard-dialect Pakhtuns) have been a proud, volatile and easily excited group of tribes from their very origin. Their history is one of constant warfare among themselves, raiding the caravans that pass through the Hindu Kush, and raiding the settled lowlands of the Indus River valley. Occaisionally some of the tribes and Khels (clan subdivisions within a tribe) would be united by a charismatic mullah and declare jihad on whoever controlled the Vale of Peshawar at the time. That being said, there are some admirable traits to their society as well...don't get the impression that I am simply Pathan-bashing with the above assessment. The point is, the Pashtuns were "radicalized" a long time before the area became a Cold War proxy fight. If anybody's interested in reading something on the Pathans that predates political correctness, I suggest "Lords of the Khyber" and "The Way of the Pathan."
//Character On//

Yet another light tragically snuffed out by the evil Amerikkkans....

One thing I know is that Al Queda's creation had nothing whatsoever to do with the Taliban. The idiot that wrote that doesn't even qualify as being a useful idiot.

I have mentioned this before, but I don't believe it is still available from the New Yorker unless you pay for it. But I found some web sites that copied the article. This should be required reading for EVERYONE, moonbat to Party member, to every high school student in this country.

The Man Behind Bin Laden

To give you an idea of just how dangerous these "people" are and how pointless it is to talk about how if only we could understand them better and how if we just sing kumbayah with them....

In Egypt, the Islamic Group launched a campaign against tourism and Western culture in general, burning and bombing theatres, bookstores, and banks, and killing Christians. "We believe in the principle of establishing Sharia, even if this means the death of all mankind," one of the Group's leaders later explained. And the war in Afghanistan continued, only now it was Muslims fighting Muslims for political control.

You may also find it interesting that the most dangerous person in the world, Zwahiri, was actually arrested and jailed by the Russians on his way into Afghanistan, but they never realized who it was they had. Damn that Bush!

Commissar Pupovich wrote: how pointless it is to talk about how if only we could understand them better

Yes, but our understanding would go much farther than just making it mandatory to study their "good" religion, and "peaceful" history, in school, but also converting large populations of cities to Islam to show how we want them to feel at home here.

Well, as I have said many times, I see no need to accommodate the "religion of peace" in any matter as they accomplish our needs regardless of our support. They are merely a drain on precious money that could be better spent on the empress.

True, but me must appear that we are doing something to appease them before the liquidation.

Isn't the fact that we have not liquidated them yet serve as showing we have appeased them?

No, they will demand more of our blood if we do anything short of dropping dead for them, so we must appear that we are working ourselves up to killing ourselves in attempt to delay until the election of teh Lizard Queen when we will be able to liquidate them without worrying about any re-election campaigns.

Comrades, we could merely throw a campaign contribution in a mosque and point it out to Our Many Titted Empress. Her sharp elbows would solve the problem.

Eggselent plan Commissar! Er....that will be your campaign contribution that will be used?

Hahahahah! Oops. Wet 'em.