Image

Kennedy link uncovered!!

User avatar
Comrades,

It seems someone has been digging around the basement of the Kremlin and unearth something that may shake the foundations of the revolution.

The Kennedy KGB Letter Updated With Info About The NIE Leak


There's a new book on Ronald Reagan making the rounds, The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism. Its author, Paul Kengor, unearthed a sensational document from the Soviet archives. That document is a memo regarding an offer made by Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts via former Senator John Tunney, both Democrats, to the General Secretary of the Communist Party, USSR, Yuri Andropov, in 1983. The offer was to help the Soviet leadership, military and civilian, conduct a PR campaign in the United States as President Ronald Reagan sought re-election. The goal of the PR campaign would be to cast President Reagan as a warmonger, the Soviets as willing to peacefully co-exist, and thereby turn the electorate away from Reagan. It was a plan to enlist Soviet help, and use the American press, in unseating an American president.

Think about that.

I received a review copy of The Crusader on Wednesday. The book first references the Kennedy plan on page 206, and includes the complete Soviet memo, dated May 14, 1983, in the Appendix. It's an eye opener.

If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y. V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and the television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.

Just, not the senator himself. Because collaborating with the leadership of a foreign state to unseat an American president, by whatever means, could be seen by Americans as treasonous. No fingerprints, that's the rule. Who knew Reagan would win and then defeat the USSR, so this document could see the light of day?

The Kennedy KGB memo runs about four pages. If there's an honest liberal left in the country, it would be nice to have their take on this revelation.

It being early and I'm a little woozy from a night of Victory Gin, I'm a little verclempt...talk amnogst yourselves.

O'Brien

WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

User avatar
a memo regarding an offer made by Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts via former Senator John Tunney, both Democrats, to the General Secretary of the Communist Party, USSR, Yuri Andropov, in 1983. The offer was to help the Soviet leadership, military and civilian, conduct a PR campaign in the United States as President Ronald Reagan sought re-election. The goal of the PR campaign would be to cast President Reagan as a warmonger, the Soviets as willing to peacefully co-exist, and thereby turn the electorate away from Reagan. It was a plan to enlist Soviet help, and use the American press, in unseating an American president.

If the proposal is recognized as worthy, then Kennedy and his friends will bring about suitable steps to have representatives of the largest television companies in the USA contact Y. V. Andropov for an invitation to Moscow for the interview. Specifically, the board of directors of ABC, Elton Raul and the television columnists Walter Cronkite or Barbara Walters could visit Moscow. The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side.

1. Did Kremlin act on it?
2. If it didn't, was it because they thought Ted Kennedy was too sleazy even for the KGB?
3. What other great media campaigns inside the US can you name as an example of possible cooperation with foreign agents of progress?

Such cooperation is an honored tradition among the Leftist politicians. Thus, Palmiro Togliatti, leader of Iralian Communists who had spent WWII in Moscow, later wrote a letter to Stalin, suggesting that Stalin kills off all Italian POWs in Soviet custody in order to increase body count that would greatly help Italian Communists to rally their supporters and win the elections. Later they did win seats in the government and Togliattti himself became Italy's Minister of Justice. (This information comes from a Soviet newspaper article about unearthing Stalin's archives in the early 1990s, hence no link. But I'm sure a thorough search would produce it).

Asking a foreign entity to increase body count among your own troops to help you win local elections does sound familiar. There seems to exist some sort of cooperation to increase body count among US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, to help Democrats to win the majority in the House and the Senate. And the subservient US media makes sure the information is delivered in full (including showing such footage TV by CNN).

Can anyone remind me who of the Democrats went to Baghdad before the war? Who of the big media personalities? Who of the British or EU politicians and media bigs? We all remember how powerful, how organized, and how coordinated the media campaign was worldwide, against Bush and his plans.

We know Sean Penn went to Iraq and then to Iran. What exactly was his mission there and who in the Politburo had authorized it?


User avatar
murderer. drunkard and now traitor!? I hope Her Excellency has something to counter these claims, he could be the front runner in 08' if this leaks out.

User avatar
This just in!

Still no word from the major news outlets on this story. For Google News search of the name "Kennedy":

Link - Google News search for name "Kennedy."

In other news - the New York Times would like everyone to go to YouTube and enjoy all the great entertainment at "Cute Kitty Cats on Video Parade" and let the newspaper-of-record know which video is the cutest. (Pinch loves the one where the cat keeps flushing the toilet over and over and over.)

User avatar
Comrade Otis wrote:And your point is?
You and I, without access to the archives, can neither prove nor disprove the fact of Kennedy's offer. What we can do, though, is establish a likelihood of such offer, as well as the Politburo's welcoming acceptance of it based on historical background.

During the Vietnam war, for instance, the US media was a willing accomplice in the anti-US propaganda war engineered by the Politburo and carried out by its subservient intelligence services of the Soviet bloc countries, in which Vietnam itself played a relatively minor role. It would be interesting to find out who of the Americans besides Jane Fonda and John Kerry were involved in it directly - "out of patriotism," of course.

Today it isn't called "propaganda" - the correct Party-approved term is "to raise awareness." Who of the comrades, again, is keeping track of the home-grown activists that together with the "terrorists" help to raise awareness among Americans about the need to overthrow the oppressive Bush regime?

I'm only asking all these questions because we need to know who to reward after the Revolution for such selfless acts of patriotism.

User avatar
Red Square wrote: Can anyone remind me who of the Democrats went to Baghdad before the war? Who of the big media personalities? Who of the British or EU politicians and media bigs? We all remember how powerful, how organized, and how coordinated the media campaign was worldwide, against Bush and his plans.

We know Sean Penn went to Iraq and then to Iran. What exactly was his mission there and who in the Politburo had authorized it?

I recall that Congressman Jim McDermott from Washington State went there, and maybe Ramsey Clark as well. I'm not to sure of Clark, though. He may have still been busy defending Milosevic or some Nazi war criminal or Muslim terror... uh freedom fighter at the time.

Actually Comrade Red Square, aren't we supposed to publically deny the pre-war media campaign against the war? Of course we remember that the war became a "quagmire" about the time the first American boot touched Iraqi soil. We remember that the body count started right away and the (damned near gleeful) predictions of tens of thousands of US deaths to follow. We remember the "Vietnam" comparisons that were already in full swing before the first bullet was even fired. Of course, we can't admit that the full script for the media's and and western left's reaction to the war was utterly transparent at least 4 years ago. This would only confirm the belief on the right that this has all been a big P.R. "rope-a-dope" from day one. And Lenin help us if any of these useful idiots on our side actually discover that one of the most compelling pro-Iraq war books was written in 2002 by Ken Pollack, a former Clinton era NSC staffer and a CNN consultant.

Remember comrades, history is malleable in the eyes of The Party!

User avatar
I fucking hate the Kennedys...sleazebuckets all.

User avatar
Red Square wrote:I'm only asking all these questions because we need to know who to reward after the Revolution for such selfless acts of patriotism.

May I suggest Anderson Pooper and the brave heroic acts commited in the guilded halls of Communist Network News. My goodness, they did air a freedom fighter "public awareness" video.

User avatar
Ah, comrade Anderson Cooper! Yes, yes... a true master of The People's agitprop. Unfortunately for comrade Cooper, your humble servant of The People and The Party here (as in moi) is a former resident of the great socialist utopia that was New Orleans. Your humble commissar still lives in the general area and rode out Bush's evil, caused-by-human-created-global-warming hurricane Katrina only 70 miles from the coast (NOTE: When the hurricane force wind field is 200 miles in diameter, 70 miles isn't far enough away. ;) ). Yes, comrade Cooper holds a special place in my heart.... I need say no more.

User avatar
Hard proof means a lot.

This insufferable Ann Coulter woman wrote a whole book "Treason" deriding our selfless patriotism, but apparently she coudn't cover it all - so expansive it is!

Sure thing, the Party has turned her into a punching bag and called her a liar just for talking about it. Imagine what would happen if we were able to find one single REAL lie in her book! Thousands of activists have surely sifted through every word, footnote, and reference - nothing! Why couldn't she have been a good sport and used at least one unsupported allegation? We would've staged such a grotesque and visually stunning public trial and execution, the memory of it would've lasted for centuries to come!

Of course we know what she wrote is true, we can use her book as a reference to distribute orders, awards, prizes, and dedications after the Revolution. But for now we must maintain that it's all a lie and keep kicking her! Like so:

Image
Image
Image

User avatar
So does Susan Estrich ever write anything original or is she strictly The Party's attack dog of refutation? And look, while "tall, skinny, blonde, Sagitarian lawyer" may not be on my list of desirable features in a woman, I would MUCH rather look at Coulter's photo on the cover of "Godless" than Estrich's re-do on the cover of "Soulless". When I first saw Estrich's cover photo in the book store a couple weeks ago, man talk about a "Gitmo moment". I swear, if our Demokrat friends fail to retake the legislature in two weeks, we may want to consider Estrich's role in the failure. That cover may have set the Revolution back several years!

User avatar
Commissar M wrote:That cover may have set the Revolution back several years!

Wha??? you don't think Estrich is a hottie? Are your eyes broken?

;)

User avatar
Susan Estrich looks a lot like my alcoholic aunt. It's the eyes. They look alcoholated. Whew. I can smell her breath from here.

If you want to hand out medals and citations to Heros of the Revolution a good place to start is at the NSA's Venona Project website (just click the image below):

<img src=https://www.nsa.gov/images/image00001.gif width=550>

Unfortunately, when Kim Philby let the USSR know about the Venona Project the Soviets changed their message codes so it's hard to know who to hand out awards to past 1946. But I'm certain the '50's, '60's, '70's and '80's had their share of Heros of the Revolution right here in the United States helping the Soviet Union spread International Socialism. The Soviets probably helped a few young up-and-comers get into politics and stuff. They could be very nice that way.

User avatar
I once had a customer who ordered a website and logo design but she stiffed me when the time came to pay for it. It turned out she did it to all her contacts, lying about checks being in the mail and stuff. She was an alcoholic and a compulsive liar (the latter often follows from the former).

My point? She looked exactly like Susan Estrich in this picture.

User avatar
This is all quite pointless. I thought I'd put all the wacko conspiracy thinking to bed when I wrote at CFK:

Arafat is Dead but in Stable Condition 11/11/04 (CFK archives) wrote:By Comrade Otis
11/14/04 - 9:47 pm

Comrade Bensnooty,
That is a most interesting Jimmy Carter quote. I'd always thought him to be just another useful idiot who didn't understand what the Party was all about. He's actually been a good Communist all his life, hasn't he.
Now let's see, didn't Bill Clinton not only organize Party approved anti-war demonstrations in England and go on a "vacation" to Warsaw Pact countries while in college? Didn't Comrade Hillary go to Cuba to "see the future" while she was in college? And then there was that guy, what the hell was his name?, that went to Paris to talk to Madame Binh and became a hero of the Vietnamese Communist Party for his good loyal Party work here in the United States? And then there are some of the Democrats in the Congress....
Is there a pattern here? You may well ask.
No.
There is no pattern here.
That is only in your imaginations. You cannot prove anything.
Being a good socialist is normal. Sometimes we all get together on like minded projects. Is normal. Like a bookgroup or scout troop.
As an honorable man of revolutionary medicine I assure the world: the forces of International Socialism have not now nor ever had any interest in politics and would certainly never ever do anything to groom and nurture young useful idiots for future Party approved use in American politics. The forces of International Socialism have nothing but the deepest respect for the sovereignty, integrity and freedom of all countries to be free from outside forces - no matter what. You have my word.
If you believe otherwise you are sick. If you are sick give me a call at the Karl Marx Treatment Center. Please.

Comrade Otis
Doctor of Dictatorship


Our friendly staff is standing by for you!

User avatar
Conspiracy, conspiracy and conspiracy. Thats all I hear these days, whos in bed with who, whos plotting what with who and who is that guy in the corner with the video camera. Its all a bunch of whacko clap trap planted by the Plantation House. You should all be ashamed to suggest poor little Susie has a problem, I know, I know she has raspy voice, so what? It doesnt mean anything you hear me! It means nothing. And and and, there is no proof to suggest that Her Excellencies friend who has the same last name as Her ever went behind the glorious Iron Curtain to stay with a family of commited communist ideologues who groomed him to work the red art. Lies and more lies, what would Sandy Berger do? Huh, what would he do. Stuff his pants with these lies, thats what he would do!

User avatar
Chairman Meow S. Pun wrote:Lies and more lies, what would Sandy Berger do? Huh, what would he do. Stuff his pants with these lies, thats what he would do!

Hmmm....there might be a slogan here somewhere.

"Stuff your pants for the Revolution!!"
or
"The Party Wants You!!
To stuff your pants with the lies of capitalists!!"
or
"Sandy Berger stuffed his pants for the revolution! Would you?"

O'Brien

WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

User avatar
Hmmm... what about "A Glorious pant load of Revolution"?

User avatar
I'd like to find pink panties with a cute secret document print.

User avatar
Commissar M wrote:Hmmm... what about "A Glorious pant load of Revolution"?
Can you give us an example of how this may be used in a conversation?

User avatar
This comment has been inspired by the recent People's headline - Doctors: Dead Castro to vote Democrat in the November elections

But it's also relevant to this thread. In fact, why don't we introduce another new idiom?

Instead of saying "He kicked the bucket" or "He bought the farm" or "He's pushing daisies" we may as well say "He's voting Democrat."

Example:

Kennedy: "Would you give my regards to Andropov?"
Pelosi: "Haven't you heard? He's been voting Democrat for a few years now."
Kennedy: (drops his glass) "Oh my, was he ill?"
Pelosi: "The rumor says he was shot by Brezhnev's daughter Galina who was upset with the KGB taking away her dacha and other free government stuff. The poor bastard lasted only a couple of months after that."
Kennedy: "Couldn't she take him for a night ride over a bridge? Works instantly and leaves no mess. In a way I'm glad the old rascal is voting Democrat, although you must admit he would've been more useful to us alive."

User avatar
Brilliant idea, Comrade Red! A new idiom to add to our ever-evolving Newspeak lexicon.

Newspapers must change the Obituaries to the "Now Voting Democrat" section.

User avatar
Red Square wrote:
Commissar M wrote:Hmmm... what about "A Glorious pant load of Revolution"?
Can you give us an example of how this may be used in a conversation?

Ivan: Hello Igor!! How are you this glorious day?
Igor: I am outstanding! How could I not be living in the wonderful workers paradise of Amerika?
Ivan: Of course comrade! Are you coming to the anti-Amerika rally tonight at the Peoples Stadium?
Igor: Most definately comrade!! I have A Glorious Pant Load of Revolution that I need to share with everyone!


O'Brien

WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH

User avatar
O'Brien wrote:
Red Square wrote:
Commissar M wrote:Hmmm... what about "A Glorious pant load of Revolution"?
Can you give us an example of how this may be used in a conversation?

Or, one might use it in this manner:

Margaret: Ugh! What's that smell?

Me: I don't know. I don't smell anything.

Margaret: Uncle Cha-Ching! Don't you know when you've got gas like that it means you've got to do your duty?

Me: Okay, okay, all ready. I've got a glorious pant load of revolution to get rid of. If you need me I'll be on the crapper...


A half hour later...

Me: Oh, Margaret would you check and see if I left my notes in the bathroom, please? Gee, I'd lose my head if it weren't stitched on.

Margaret: Gahh! It smells like somebody voted Democrat in here! You bastard!

Me: Ha, ha, ha.

User avatar
Red Square wrote:
Commissar M wrote:Hmmm... what about "A Glorious pant load of Revolution"?
Can you give us an example of how this may be used in a conversation?

Sure! For example:

"Man, that new Green Day CD is a Glorious pant-load of Revolution!"

or....

"Senator Kennedy's speech on ethics was a Glorious pant-load of Revolution!"

The same phrase could be used to describe Nancy Pelosi's interview on 60 Minutes this past Sunday or just about anything ever written by comrade Markos Moulitsas Zuniga.


User avatar
Maybe a section devoted to Party Approved idioms is needed to go along with the Party Approved FAQ.

My Attempt--

Chucky: My my Teddy, I thought you given up drinking.
Teddy: I did, I did, but now I am back on the Susan.
Chucky: Thats terrible! When did you go back on the Susan?
Teddy: Well, it was just a few days after Andropov started Voting Democrat.
Chucky: I am soo sorry for your lose, he did have a pant load of revolution, a great guy that Andropov.
Teddy: Yeah, he's sleeping with the Oldsmobile now, Voting Democrat.

User avatar
"Sleeping with the Oldsmobile"! Hahahaha... that's hilarious!

User avatar
$.$. Halliburton wrote:
Or, one might use it in this manner:

Margaret: Ugh! What's that smell?

Me: I don't know. I don't smell anything.

Margaret: Uncle Cha-Ching! Don't you know when you've got gas like that it means you've got to do your duty?

Me: Okay, okay, all ready. I've got a glorious pant load of revolution to get rid of. If you need me I'll be on the crapper...


A half hour later...

Me: Oh, Margaret would you check and see if I left my notes in the bathroom, please? Gee, I'd lose my head if it weren't stitched on.

Margaret: Gahh! It smells like somebody voted Democrat in here! You bastard!

Me: Ha, ha, ha.

Ponders *Man, am I actually related to this guy?*

That's pretty funny for a humorless, merchantilist enemy of the people, cousin $.$.

User avatar
Red Square wrote:This comment has been inspired by the recent People's headline - Doctors: Dead Castro to vote Democrat in the November elections

Damn Comrade, you had me worried for a moment. I was out of rum and would have been unable to make Cuba Libres to celebrate the Glorious passage of Beloved Leader Fidel Castro.

This is Jihad E,
Accept no substitution.
My rhymes are as heavy as
Pant loads of Revolution.

You Republikkkan chumps
Always talkin' that smack:
Get in my face
And you'll be Votin' Democrat.

Word to the Muthaland!

User avatar
Damn Comrade, you had me worried for a moment. I was out of rum and would have been unable to make Cuba Libres to celebrate the Glorious passage of Beloved Leader Fidel Castro.

Is he dead yet?

User avatar
Premier Betty wrote:Is he dead yet?

According to Brazil's leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, he is.
https://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/200 ... 5438.shtml

User avatar
I'm sure that if Beloved Leader Fidel Castro was "voting Democrat", International State Television (aka CNN) would be in full mourning mode by now. I believe that Fidel yet lives and is struggling to stay with us until after the mid term elections, so as not to disrupt the 24/7 Democrat Party political agitprop "news" in our more reliable broadcast and print sources.

User avatar
I agree, Castro will not vote democrat till after the elections. Our Media must focus on Foley,Foley,Foley and Foley. Oh, and also how we are going to win big with a "tidal wave" of support.

User avatar
Chairman Meow S. Pun wrote:I agree, Castro will not vote democrat till after the elections.
We're not saying Castro is alive, we're not saying Castro is dead, we're not saying Castro is in limbo. Only the Party knows his real status. Any speculations to the contrary shall be qualified as harmful seditious rumors punishable by 10 years of corrective labor.

Castro shall be dead and voting Democrat when and only when the Party makes such decision. This rule applies to everybody else regardless of Party rank.

And the Party knows best,
Red Square

User avatar
Yes, only the Party knows. Who are we to make such assumptions when the power of life and death is the exclusive right of the Party? We are mere mortals hurdling through the deep vast right-wing conspiracy in search of the glimmering light of Progress, we have no say in these matters.

User avatar
Dear Comrades, may I put your minds at ease.
I actually have had a sighting of comrade Kennedy just few days ago.
I recognised him by a walk (swaying side to side), smell (unforgettable Jin Tonic) and speach (Heavily slurred). May the spirits of Marx,Lenin and Engels
(who the F* is Engels anyway??)give him many more years so he can amuse us with his progressive wit.
I recommend the Politburo rename Bridge in Chappaquiddick to Kennedy Memorial Bridge. I hope Yo'all come to renaming ceremony. Or else.....
We are trully blessed to have such a Mind representing working "mens"and "womens" in Central Comedy of Unics Stale Congodress.
Did I just slurred my spelling?


Lovingly Yours,
Iron Felix


 
POST REPLY