Today our Dear Leader spoke of the atrocity committed at the Emanuel African Episcopal Methodist Church in Charleston, South Carolina. In solemn and reverent tones, he flung the glorious cleaver of divisiveness and claimed that Amerika was not merely the only country left where such shootings occur, but that our armed citizenry are responsible for them. The call was made, once again, to disarm the lowly Kulaks so as to keep them from injuring one another...

Properly unanswered remained the question of how being disarmed would have helped the victims in that church, nor how adding more gun laws to those already on the books would have stopped a hideous miscreant who had apparently violated a dozen or more with ease.

Liberalism 101 Lesson 133:

As Liberalism 101 Lesson 2 states in part:

Liberalism 101 Lesson (amended) 2B:

Government is here to help us.

If government, either local, state, or federal, heaps burdensome regulation on businesses with consumers paying the extra costs and the economy taking a hit on account of that, then that is to be corrected by government heaping even more burdensome regulation on businesses because:

Government is here to help us.

This lesson goes double for the peasant rubes' precious, mythical "right" to bear arms: when given the opportunity, progressives must make the call for more gun laws and regulation.

Whenever some deranged person murders dozens in one of our "gun-free safe zones," it is a prime opportunity to clamor for piling on more government regulations as a pretense for keeping the simpleton masses from injuring each other.

Our primary motivation is, however, to keep the rustic rubes in fly-over country from being an armed mob opposed to the ever benevolent State because, once again, Government is here to help us.

Agreed comrade Kommisar.
While listening to callers this morning on C-SPAN's Washington Journal, I was enlightened by one progressive caller who said that "the Second Amendment is only ink on paper." His point, comrades, was that we should not allow such things to stand in the way of forward progress. It seems so simple a concept. I am surprised that I hadn't thought of it myself. The caller is right. In fact, the entire Constitution is merely ink on paper. Why should we allow an inanimate object to rule over us in this manner? I began to think that we should start a petition to urge our representatives in The Party to ignore the ink and paper that governs us, but then I realized that such a petition would also be just ink on paper. Perhaps it is time that we return to clay tablets, and stamp out the oppressive ink and paper industrial complex. But then we would become a nation ruled by reed and clay. Who can solve this riddle? Perhaps only the good Commissarka and her shovel! Yes comrades, we should allow the shovel to rule over us... although the hammer and sickle also have an equally enticing allure.
HEIL HILLARY!

One of our comrades did speak out against oppressors.

Konservative_Punk wrote:Agreed comrade Kommisar.
While listening to callers this morning on C-SPAN's Washington Journal, I was enlightened by one progressive caller who said that "the Second Amendment is only ink on paper." His point, comrades, was that we should not allow such things to stand in the way of forward progress. It seems so simple a concept. I am surprised that I hadn't thought of it myself. The caller is right. In fact, the entire Constitution is merely ink on paper. Why should we allow an inanimate object to rule over us in this manner? I began to think that we should start a petition to urge our representatives in The Party to ignore the ink and paper that governs us, but then I realized that such a petition would also be just ink on paper. Perhaps it is time that we return to clay tablets, and stamp out the oppressive ink and paper industrial complex. But then we would become a nation ruled by reed and clay. Who can solve this riddle? Perhaps only the good Commissarka and her shovel! Yes comrades, we should allow the shovel to rule over us... although the hammer and sickle also have an equally enticing allure.
HEIL HILLARY!

Tovarisch Punk!


The Komrade you mentioned has truly discovered the way to press progress forward!

I have encountered such forward thinking comrades myself. Our Fire Arms Restrictions Ministry Bureaucrats work tirelessly to keep the peasant rube Kulaks confused. I have seen where some demand to know who is taking whose guns while at the same time others clamor for the Marines to come and seize weaponry, shouting that that other piece of paper (Posse Coitatus) is also just ink on paper.

But Dear Departed Komrade Lenin lectured long ago that liberty is so precious it must be carefully rationed. Enlightened leaders in our modern world such as Tovarsch Dolezal have demonstrated how the "Just Make Sh#t Up" ploy can be universally effective. Once we have fully implemented JMSU, any list of negative rights on paper and ink becomes irrelevant!

Always remember the way the left likes to operate in the realm of our common sense civil rights such as the defending of ourselves.

It's 2 step process for them and it works thusly:

Step 1: Whenever a incident like this occurs the common theme will be the ‘easy accessibility to guns'

Never mind how many hoops one has to jump through to buy and carry a gun, never mind the thousands of laws on the books and whole agencies tasked to enforce and expand those laws.
[That would be the Moonshine, Cigarettes and Guns monstrosity, BTW]

Never mind that guns are demonized whenever possible and persona non grata except in Hollywood – when they use them to the extreme.

Never mind that ‘zero tolerance' polices make it a crime to even mention the word or make a shape the vaguely resembles a.. OMG! A Gun!

Whenever the leftist have the opportunity as in the present example speak with one voice about easy access to guns – to the point of comparing that it's easier to get a lethal weapon than getting something to eat!

Step 2: Downplay the value in any new laws passed as only a first step. After which the passage of time will see them to step 1 for the next time around.

Rinse, lather, repeat until the Constitution is wiped clean of any civil rights.

FORWARD!

Comrade Šterpin wrote: [highlight=#ffffff]
[/highlight]Never mind how many hoops one has to jump through to buy and carry a gun, never mind the thousands of laws on the books and whole agencies tasked to enforce and expand those laws.
[That would be the Moonshine, Cigarettes and Guns monstrosity, BTW]

Never mind that guns are demonized whenever possible and persona non grata except in Hollywood – when they use them to the extreme.

Never mind that ‘zero tolerance' polices make it a crime to even mention the word or make a shape the vaguely resembles a.. OMG! A Gun!

FORWARD!

I would only add:

NEVER MIND that legislation proposed by the Left to address the issue at hand would not have prevented the tragedy that the legislation purports to address.

Comrades! Comrades! The deaths in the church (ptui!) structure are irrelevant in the great scheme of things! Nine deaths? That's a slow Saturday night in Chicago. What is important is the fact that this incident allows the Propaganda Outlets to keep the proles focused on the true villans: white males.

Ever notice that whenever Muslim extremists do something violent, the media frets and wrings its collective hands over the possibility of "backlash" against Muslims in general by "Islamophobes", and they crank out articles about nice Muslims who condemn the incident and are nothing like the extremists, etc.?

Ever notice that whenever some lone white punk does something violent, that same media is quick to blame gun-toting conservatives and right wing rhetoric, and there are no articles about nice conservatives or responsible gun owners who condemn the incident and are nothing like the lone white punk, etc.?

Commissarka Pinkie wrote:Ever notice that whenever Muslim extremists do something violent, the media frets and wrings its collective hands over the possibility of "backlash" against Muslims in general by "Islamophobes", and they crank out articles about nice Muslims who condemn the incident and are nothing like the extremists, etc.?

Ever notice that whenever some lone white punk does something violent, that same media is quick to blame gun-toting conservatives and right wing rhetoric, and there are no articles about nice conservatives or responsible gun owners who condemn the incident and are nothing like the lone white punk, etc.?

But are not all conservatives and gun owners un-nice, irresponsible, and punkish by definition? Would you wish the media to (gasp) LIE?

RedDiaperette wrote:

Commissarka Pinkie wrote:Ever notice that whenever Muslim extremists do something violent, the media frets and wrings its collective hands over the possibility of "backlash" against Muslims in general by "Islamophobes", and they crank out articles about nice Muslims who condemn the incident and are nothing like the extremists, etc.?

Ever notice that whenever some lone white punk does something violent, that same media is quick to blame gun-toting conservatives and right wing rhetoric, and there are no articles about nice conservatives or responsible gun owners who condemn the incident and are nothing like the lone white punk, etc.?

But are not all conservatives and gun owners un-nice, irresponsible, and punkish by definition? Would you wish the media to (gasp) LIE?

"Lone white PUNK"??"Punkish by definition"???Just what are the two of you implying here? How would you like it if folks went around saying that right-wing psychopaths who go on killing sprees are "Lone white Diaparettes" and "Pinkish by definition"??? I demand an apology. And I hereby petition The Party to ban the use of any part of my moniker as a negative slur in any way by anyone (except by punks like me).

[color=#C0392B]Konservative_Punk[/color] stretched my credulousness beyond it's breaking point when he wrote:
"Lone white PUNK"??"Punkish by definition"???Just what are the two of you implying here? How would you like it if folks went around saying that right-wing psychopaths who go on killing sprees are "Lone white Diaparettes" and "Pinkish by definition"??? I demand an apology. And I hereby petition The Party to ban the use of any part of my moniker as a negative slur in any way by anyone (except by punks like me).

Mister Puиk - So you don't know Dylann?

He seems to know you!!
.

Comrade Putout left me in yet another apoplectic fit of rage and admiration when she wrote:

[color=#C0392B]Konservative_Punk[/color] stretched my credulousness beyond it's breaking point when he wrote:
"Lone white PUNK"??"Punkish by definition"???Just what are the two of you implying here? How would you like it if folks went around saying that right-wing psychopaths who go on killing sprees are "Lone white Diaparettes" and "Pinkish by definition"??? I demand an apology. And I hereby petition The Party to ban the use of any part of my moniker as a negative slur in any way by anyone (except by punks like me).

Mister Puиk - So you don't know Dylann?

He seems to know you!!

Look here Comradess M. Putout, as a self-identified punk, I have lots of fans from all over the globe, as i have no doubt you have as well (count me among them!). Lenin forbid that one of them should wear a patch on their jacket depicting my comely likeness before engaging in such a heinous act as this. The boy has some serious issues, most of which can be blamed on Reich-Wing talk radio and FauxNews. He was obviously confused about me, because as everyone knows, I never met a minority I didn't like. Remember that it was FauxNews who kept saying that all races are equal, infuriating this wayward youth. So don't try to cast me as a modern incarnation of Jodie Foster. Aside from that, I am flattered by your concern. Too bad that my desktop has cut and pasted it's last cutout, or I would be obliged to respond with a visual graphics duel. As it stands, this mobile message will have to suffice for now.

Konservative_Punk wrote:Agreed comrade Kommisar.
While listening to callers this morning on C-SPAN's Washington Journal, I was enlightened by one progressive caller who said that "the Second Amendment is only ink on paper." His point, comrades, was that we should not allow such things to stand in the way of forward progress. It seems so simple a concept. I am surprised that I hadn't thought of it myself. The caller is right. In fact, the entire Constitution is merely ink on paper. Why should we allow an inanimate object to rule over us in this manner? I began to think that we should start a petition to urge our representatives in The Party to ignore the ink and paper that governs us, but then I realized that such a petition would also be just ink on paper. Perhaps it is time that we return to clay tablets, and stamp out the oppressive ink and paper industrial complex. But then we would become a nation ruled by reed and clay. Who can solve this riddle? Perhaps only the good Commissarka and her shovel! Yes comrades, we should allow the shovel to rule over us... although the hammer and sickle also have an equally enticing allure.
HEIL HILLARY!

Comrade, Deer Leader has a pen and a phone. That's all it takes to rule. Do not be disheartened.

Kapitan Kangaroo Kourt wrote: Comrade, Deer Leader has a pen and a phone. That's all it takes to rule. Do not be disheartened.

My Lenin how things change. It used to require a crown, a scepter, and a throne to rule. It's not really fair to His O'liness that he doesn't get to experience lording it over his kingdom from a plush throne while being entertained by court jesters and attended to by eunuchs. Michelle could even wear a codpiece like 'ol Henry VIII.

.Dylann tried to fit in - but just did not have the necessary social skills..
.
.
July 4th is coming up... you might need this guy!
.

Well if someone is dead set on killin' then remove all knives and anything that can be used as a bomb. Granddad had issues so I learned at an early age how to make bombs out of household materials. Also, if gun laws are gonna make things right, why are there still so many shootings in Chicago? Lastly mohawks are my weakness. Seriously. Please don't ruin them for me by posting pictures of that douche with one. (Not you KonservativePunk, the asshat that shot up a church)

OksanaTheTerrible made my hair stand at attention when she wrote:...mohawks are my weakness. Seriously. Please don't ruin them for me by posting pictures of that douche with one. (Not you KonservativePunk, the asshat that shot up a church)

[highlight=#ffffff]
[/highlight]You are not alone Comradess Oksana. Womyn cannot resist the seductive power of my erect coiffure. I wish I could deny it, but it's true. It causes me a great deal of hardship, breaking hearts belonging to throngs of adoring female fans on a regular basis. I have laboured in vain to find a solution to this most disturbing situation. I often find myself reminding womyn with whom I converse that "my eyes are down here", all to no avail. It can be very distracting for them to stay focused and to love me for my intellect rather than being starstruck by my mesmerizing haircut. HEIL HILLARY!

[color=#C0392B]OksanaTheTerrible[/color], the Mohawk haircut lover, wrote:...mohawks are my weakness. Seriously. Please don't ruin them for me by posting pictures of that douche with one. (Not you Konservative_Punk, the asshat that shot up a church)

They make stuff to fix that, elmers glue, Got2bGlued, Viagra. NO EXCUSE for a droopy mohawk. Like, ever. I had one back in the 80s and if I could get away with one now I would! But I must exist in this semi capitalistic (spit) society....so I must compensate by listening to The Dead Kennedys and gazing upon Konservative Punks hair. My dog does have a mohawk, and it's currently green. Side note, my kids grew up.listening to punk which is why they are so awesome. (Plus they are my retirement strategy. I figure one of the 3 will be forced to take me in)

OksanaTheTerrible wrote:They make stuff to fix that, elmers glue, Got2bGlued, Viagra. NO EXCUSE for a droopy mohawk. Like, ever. I had one back in the 80s and if I could get away with one now I would! But I must exist in this semi capitalistic (spit) society....so I must compensate by listening to The Dead Kennedys and gazing upon Konservative Punks hair. My dog does have a mohawk, and it's currently green. Side note, my kids grew up.listening to punk which is why they are so awesome. (Plus they are my retirement strategy. I figure one of the 3 will be forced to take me in)

[highlight=#ffffff]
[/highlight][highlight=#ffffff]
[/highlight]《Cone of Silence》Yes Comradess the Terrible, we must find constructive ways to exploit the youth so that we may enjoy our sunset years on their backs like a papoose on a squaw.
I find that egg-white makes a great hair erection treatment. But seriously, there is a misconception about the punk culture. As I am sure you are aware, it began as a rebellion against conformity to the direction of popular culture and as a rejection of the over-commercialized music industry. There is and always was a very strong independent streak of liberty minded conservatives in the movement. For evidence, one need look no further than the Sex Pistols' anti-abortion anthem Bodies:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hfChDxrz4Ow

Comradess Putout put words in Lenin's mouth and a 'killer' bowl-cut toupé on his head and then wrote: How do you like me now Oksana?

[/size][/font][/color] I had forgotten how handsome I was before losing most of my hair by the stresses of ruining running the people's collective. Thank you for this warm reminder of the gaity of my thick-haired youth...
Great Stalin's Ghost Oksana! What mighty hands you possess. I'm quite certain they played some role in earning that handle of yours. I'd hate to partake of that knuckle sandwich!

I like to say I'm old ebough to remember the Beastie Boys as a punk band. Then license to ill came out and I was pissed! They even admit they sold out. I refuse to listen or allow it to be played in my presence (After Pauls Boutique all was forgiven). I only had a few ironclad rules for my kids. No Barney and No License to Ill. Ever. New York in the 80s was the place to be and I was in many a mosh pit at CBGB. I got kicked in the head pretty hard a few times. But I raised my kids right cause they know what comes after "All I wanted was a Pepsi.."

I did name my sisters betta Sid Fishous. Heh.