Allred All Ready for SCOTUS Pick


Attorney to the Stars Gloria Allred has scheduled a press conference for Monday evening following President Donald Trump's announcement of his latest Supreme Court nominee.
"I have seven women prepared to swear in court that the nominee - whoever he or she is - sexually assaulted them," the prim counselor stated. "Some of these allegations stretch all the way back into the 1970s, including one instance of unwanted touching on a kindergarten playground."
In this most shocking of incidents, "Ms X," as the victim chooses to be identified, was subjected to a wanton touch during a game of tag, despite her repeated requests that the nominee - whoever he or she may be - stop chasing her. There is also a possibility that the nominee - whoever he or she may be - violated the "no tag backs" rule in the process.










Commissarka Pinkie
After the SCOTUS pick is announced, who wants to go rioting with me? We'll tip over and torch a few cars, poop on police cruisers, smash windows, and do some looting. It's the only way to get free stuff anymore since Trump stole the election.Does this include box lunches, t-shirts, and a bus ride?

Groucho Marxist
Commissarka Pinkie
After the SCOTUS pick is announced, who wants to go rioting with me? We'll tip over and torch a few cars, poop on police cruisers, smash windows, and do some looting. It's the only way to get free stuff anymore since Trump stole the election.Does this include box lunches, t-shirts, and a bus ride?Add extra rubles and beet rations, why not.




My contribution: Kavanaugh's cat has retained Stormy Daniels' lawyer to pursue charges for "inappropriate touching."


It would be a shame if Trump's diaper leaked!
.

.
You know you want a 'Baby Trump' balloon...
.

.





Trolling level: EXPERT
.



#SaveSCOTUS!

Women's March imitated the People's Cube, unless Ivan Betinov has infiltrated their ranks and wrote their statement. Which, knowing him, he is well capable of. His brain in the jar shows no visible primary sexual characteristics. How convenient.




(hijacks this thread with Comrade Putout to post Baby Trump Balloons everywhere)


Red Square
Last night, after Trump announced the name of the nominee, Women's March released a statement. They were so upset with Trump's choice that they even forgot to insert "Brett Kavanaugh" into the blank space marked by XX. This is how Brett Kavanaugh has already affected the progressive mind, even before assuming his post.This is the best thing since the Party invented sliced bread! Soon we will have computers just randomly filling in the "XX"-es, and we can turn CNN and WAPO journalists into Soylent Green to feed the immigrant masses.
"We were very offended by XX. Since Donald Trump did XX, we feel we are being XX. This is an XX to all XX. We should resist by throwing stuff at Trump supporters!"


And isn't it glorious, Comrades, that our party immediately printed professional signs and redistributed them to the protesting
They even had a domain stopkavanaugh.com registered. Imagine, Comrades, if the next time there is a shortlist, our glorious People's Cube just happened to grab the Stop<name>.com domains? The Cube could lead the opposition to Trump's third nominee and provide much better content than any other prog source.





Minitrue
Red Square
Last night, after Trump announced the name of the nominee, Women's March released a statement. They were so upset with Trump's choice that they even forgot to insert "Brett Kavanaugh" into the blank space marked by XX. This is how Brett Kavanaugh has already affected the progressive mind, even before assuming his post.This is the best thing since the Party invented sliced bread! Soon we will have computers just randomly filling in the "XX"-es, and we can turn CNN and WAPO journalists into Soylent Green to feed the immigrant masses.
"We were very offended by XX. Since Donald Trump did XX, we feel we are being XX. This is an XX to all XX. We should resist by throwing stuff at Trump supporters!"
Oh, we’ve been doing that with climate change like, forever. For nigh on five decades now, we’ve been running the same articles on climate change, changing only the year by which the world will come to an end if we don’t act within the next ten.
At first it was 1980. Then it was 2000. Then it was 2020. Then 2050.
Now, according to this link, it’s 2070:
Antarctica ice melting faster than we knew
But don’t worry—the amount of time we have to avert catastrophe is still the same—only ten years!
Quote:
But we do need to act very soon because if we continue along the present trajectory of relatively high greenhouse gas emissions, within 10 years or less it becomes impossible to get back to that low-emissions scenario.And then there’s this:
Quote:
The causes for optimism, and there are some, are that some groups in nations, industries, communities and regions are starting to take this seriously. They’re taking it seriously both because they appreciate the consequences of not acting but also that they see opportunities in a low-carbon economy. It means we don't have to wait for the political system at the national level to reach agreement that we're going to get serious about action. We can do it in smaller steps taken by many individuals and groups around the world.As has been the case for almost half a century now, no one has acted. No one is getting serious about acting. No one has even agreed to get serious about acting. We don’t have to wait, but as long as we do and keep adding more verbs to our argument—and keep changing the Year of the Climate Apocalypse—the more funding we get.




