Experts: Lack of Social Progress Caused by Shortage of Pushy NYT Headlines

GENERATE A NEW YORK TIMES HEADLINE

1. Robust economy, high employment detrimental to the environment
   
2. Iraq: Quagmire or Morass?
   
3. America: Decadent or Effete?
   
4. Is Owning a Business Criminal? Many Think So
   
5. ISIS dilemma: not enough abortion clinics
   
6. Rebuilding of roads in Afghanistan leads to more traffic accidents
   
7. Can Losing a War be Good? Many Think So
   
8. Open political debate triggers widespread laryngitis epidemic. Who will foot the bill?
   
9. Are All Americans Fat, Insensitive, Gun-Toting Morons? Many Think So
   
10. Syrian gays and lesbians critical of US Army over "transgender ban" policy
    
11. The US Space Force may preempt alien invasion, but their uniforms still don't look hot
    
12. Refugee parents: US-built schools cause child obesity

Rich333 wrote:No Treason
Lysander Spooner, 1867, Part I

---

INTRODUCTORY.

The question of treason is distinct from that of slavery; and is the same that it would have been, if free States, instead of slave States, had seceded. ...

.


What was true of our ancestors, is true of revolutionists in general. The monarchs and governments, from whom they choose to separate, attempt to stigmatize them as traitors. But they are not traitors in fact; in-much they betray, and break faith with, no one. Having pledged no faith, they break none. They are simply men, who, for reasons of their own --- whether good or bad, wise or unwise, is immaterial --- choose to exercise their natural right of dissolving their connexion with the governments under which they have lived. In doing this, they no more commit the crime of treason --- which necessarily implies treachery, deceit, breach of faith --- than a man commits treason when he chooses to leave a church, or any other voluntary association, with which he has been connected.

This principle was a true one in 1776. It is a true one now. It is the only one on which any rightful government can rest. It is the one on which the Constitution itself professes to rest. If it does not really rest on that basis, it has no right to exist; and it is the duty of every man to raise his hand against it.

If the men of the Revolution designed to incorporate in the Constitution the absurd ideas of allegiance and treason, which they had once repudiated, against which they had fought, and by which the world had been enslaved, they thereby established for themselves an indisputable claim to the disgust and detestation of all mankind.

---

In subsequent numbers, the author hopes to show that, under the principle of individual consent, the little government that mankind need, is not only practicable, but natural and easy; and that the Constitution of the United States authorizes no government, except one depending wholly on voluntary support.

---

For the remaining parts, check out lysanderspooner.com

New York Times wrote:

Because they championed sexual equality — at work, at home and in the bedroom — and were willing to enforce it, Communist women who occupied positions in the state apparatus could be called cultural imperialists. But the liberation they imposed radically transformed millions of lives across the globe, including those of many women who still walk among us as the mothers and grandmothers of adults in the now democratic member states of the European Union. Those comrades' insistence on government intervention may seem heavy-handed to our postmodern sensibilities, but sometimes necessary social change — which soon comes to be seen as the natural order of things — needs an emancipation proclamation from above.