Image

Headlines 2022 02 01-06


User avatar
Colonel Obyezyana wrote:Image

An unstoppable force meets an immovable object.

User avatar
Whether Biden disclosed his credit card information to the caller is still classified.

User avatar
When conversing with Biden on the telephone it's better to ask him direct questions like "Is your refrigerator running?"

User avatar
$.$. Halliburton wrote:When conversing with Biden on the telephone it's better to ask him direct questions like "Is your refrigerator running?"
If his refrigerator is running, vote for it—it would certainly be a better President.



User avatar
Ellsworth Toohey wrote:How did this not make the cut?
A great question, and in answer to it I present a brief history of the Washington team's name and logo...
SKINS1.jpg
SKINS2.jpg
SKINS3.jpg
SKINS4.jpg
MyThe final logo (above) is a brave colonial sea captain wielding a cutlass and a football-shaped buckler from the prow of a ship shaped like a "W" for Washington (or for "Whatever") (or for "Win") (or for "Camel Toe").


User avatar
Image
“Weapon of war”

There is no limiting principle to that. Anything can be used as a weapon of war.

Information is a weapon of war.


User avatar
Margaret wrote: “Weapon of war” There is no limiting principle to that. Anything can be used as a weapon of war. Information is a weapon of war.
Ivan the Stakhanovets wrote: Armed to the teeth...


WHILE PHILOSOPHICALLY TRUE...
I wrote specifically about why outsized magazines in pistols in direct combat are not used in war, leaving no margin to speculate over the many things that might be considered a "weapon of war."

There are indeed limiting principles in modern warfare, and one of them is to use weapons chosen and issued for reliability, practicality and usefulness. Clearly, there are weapons designed for modern warfare and they should not be grouped with accessories made for recreation or sport.

Democrats are more than liberal when tagging as "weapons of war" things they don't understand, don't like or never used. They habitually use frightening terminology as a scare tactic to speed their unconstitutional anti-gun agenda. Disarming the population is one of their goals just as it was a goal realized by Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union.




 
POST REPLY