Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

1/23/2024, 7:39 am

Stomach-turning assholery by Joy:
https://www.westernjournal.com/msnbcs-j ... air-guest/
 

There is a global groundswell of Indigenous-led research on stewardship of lands and waters, providing opportunities for Indigenous and Western knowledges to flourish together. A major step in this direction was announced last September by the US National Science Foundation, in its establishment of the Center for Braiding Indigenous Knowledges and Science (CBIKS).

This braiding science is the place to get rematriated, because repatriated science isn’t run by women. What does braided science do?

They might support local governance sovereignty, the return of expropriated land, and the rematriation of ancestral remains and cultural treasures held in museums, universities, or private collections.

https://vdare.com/posts/science-magazin ... us-science

Braiding is the future of science, so maybe this explains Abbott’s leadership that’s catching on in the Big House.

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

1/25/2024, 11:21 am

https://thehill.com/changing-america/re ... hairstyle/

Update:

A quick look through that most untrustworthy of references, Wikipedia, yields this (im)pertinent article:

https:/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discrimination_based_on_hair_texture_in_the_United_States

It's ethos is unashamedly racialist, painting this absurd issue as serious and omitting criticism or the general fact that many politicians, businesses and people—shivering with White Guilt–rushed to bow to the race grifters after the 2020 BLM riots, hence the 25 or so States that passed CROWN Act legislation (mostly blue States and mostly without practical limitations or other considerations).

Further, the article's historical citations are largely outdated and irrelevant or mostly anecdotal, briefly touching on the 1964 Civil Rights Act's prohibition on employment discrimination by race but straining to offer current examples of widespread discrimination based on racial, ethnic or cultural hairstyles—to do so would leave readers questioning whether the CROWN Act addresses a problem of such magnitude as to require a remedial Act of Congress (and Wikipedia can't have that)

Then we come to the assertion, "African American workers and students across the U.S. were subjected to punishment due to their hair," which cites as its source none other than NBC's Jenelle Griffith, who shares with Joy Reid (and BLM) the distinction of being focused on race and policing.

https://www.nbcnews.com/author/janelle- ... ncpn924481

Nowhere does Griffith present evidence for her assertion that African-Americans "across the U.S." were subjected to punishment due to their hair. Even Griffith's paltry handful of examples fail to indicate a credible problem but speaks more to an earlier assertion in the article that "the Black Pride movement of the 1960s and 1970s made the Afro a popular hairstyle among African Americans and [sic] considered a symbol of resistance," cited from a 2018 Vice article by race-focused Jameelah Nasheed, who now writes for far-left Teen Vogue.

https://muckrack.com/jameelah-nasheed

The CROWN Act solves no problem and serves no purpose except to the race grifters who still believe their hair can be a "symbol of resistance" to the "injustices imposed by systemic racism" that they need to fan the flames of racial anger and resentment that keep the CRT game vital—they are laughing their asses off to see their baseless agitprop has intimidated spineless politicians into writing an Act of Congress to appease them.



The only good news here is that the Senate has yet to consider it. 

Note: In a previous, now deleted post, I pointed out that the CROWN Act does nothing to help Joy Reid since her hairstyle is appropriated from a race other than her own.
    

Nowhere does Griffith present evidence for her assertion that African-Americans "across the U.S." were subjected to punishment due to their hair.

The CROWN Act solves no problem and serves no purpose except to the race grifters who still believe their hair can be a "symbol of resistance" to the "injustices imposed by systemic racism"

Griffith's paltry handful of examples fail to indicate a credible problem but speaks more to an earlier assertion in the article that "the Black Pride movement of the 1960s and 1970s made the Afro a popular hairstyle among African Americans and [sic] considered a symbol of resistance," cited from a 2018 Vice article by race-focused Jameelah Nasheed, who now writes for far-left Teen Vogue.

...the CROWN Act addresses a problem of such magnitude as to require a remedial Act of Congress

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

1/26/2024, 6:13 pm

jackalopelipsky wrote: ↑

1/26/2024, 3:12 pm

Dress Codes in People's Public School is the punishment connection, because teaching kids that their hair is the definition of resistance to authority of the People's Public School in the mission to teach students to read, write, and cipher ain’t happening because the war about your hair's culture is racism, man.

Teen Vogue says so.

And the DEICRT Curriculum practically left's itself, don't it? The Hair-Doo plays, like a fake nose on Matt Damon as The Collective get's some ShakeDown Socialism problems in the People's Public School's Dress Code Degenda. Make a problem to be a problem so the Hair-Doo Revolution prevents learning to read, write, and cipher. That’s what Patriarchal “THE MAN” wants children to do, and that's against my rematriarchal Science.

But, philatey as this subject is, the same time the FREEDOM of HAIR ACT is being legislatively Decreed, the entire Collective is under invasion by indigenous rematriated to The MotherLand's People's personal property through the work of the Womenz at the Science of Braiding, as a Wokademic Career. The DEICRT Beat Goes On.

I think you're splitting hares hairs.