Image

The New York Times, organ of the Communist Party

User avatar
[img]/images/various_uploads/Pravda_NYT.jpg[/img]

The New York Times isn't just "liberal." They're flat-out Communists.

Communist propagandists.

After 85 Years, The New York Times Is Still A Useful Idiot Hiding Communism's Atrocities

Had these girls lived in a free society, they could be teachers, doctors, dancers, or any profession they wanted to be. Communism didn't teach them to ‘dream big.'

They're truly one of us, Comrades!

User avatar
They do it for the children. Just like our comrades in the AFT. Be patient.

User avatar
A non-communist fascist will ask you, "What about all those female fetuses that have been aborted in China to allow for more male fetuses to grow up and spread their toxic masculinity?"

The answer is, of course, that those fetuses hadn't yet clearly identified their sexual preferences and self-identification, and thus clearly cannot be called "women."

User avatar
Red Square wrote:The answer is, of course, that those fetuses hadn't yet clearly identified their sexual preferences and self-identification, and thus clearly cannot be called "women."

But if they were prevented from choosing their gender identity, are they not then members of the Oppressed Masses™?

If so, then we must ban proactive abortions—unless, of course, the parasitical clump of cells is the issue of privileged, white RethugliKKKans—and institute retroactive abortions, if necessary, once an individual settles upon an identity.

User avatar
Imperatorskiy Pingvin wrote:
Red Square wrote:The answer is, of course, that those fetuses hadn't yet clearly identified their sexual preferences and self-identification, and thus clearly cannot be called "women."

But if they were prevented from choosing their gender identity, are they not then members of the Oppressed Masses™?

If so, then we must ban proactive abortions—unless, of course, the parasitical clump of cells is the issue of privileged, white RethugliKKKans—and institute retroactive abortions, if necessary, once an individual settles upon an identity.
Ah, but how do you know they have not yet chosen or identified their gender identity? All you know is that they have not identified it to you -- or, more likely, you have not deigned to hear them because they have not spoken in your (privileged) language of choice. Aha, another example of white privilege, or, rather, born privilege. We must demonstrate about this. To the streets, comrades!

User avatar
RedDiaperette wrote:[Y]ou have not deigned to hear them because they have not spoken in your (privileged) language of choice.

Neonatal linguistics is an emerging scientific discipline, one in which Progress™ is hampered by the Settled Scientific Consensus™ that fetuses are mere clumps of cells which are, by definition, 1) incapable of communicating, and 2) not worth listening to because they have no inherent value unless and until they reach the point where they can express their chosen identity.

User avatar
I don't know this comrade, but he may as well be a New York Times editor...


User avatar
Image
You cannot make an omelette without breaking a few eggs! Utopia is only one more execution away!

User avatar
C.O.M.M.I.E wrote:Image
You cannot make an omelette without breaking a few eggs! Utopia is only one more execution away!

But of course Comrade! After all Socialism is perfection incarnate, but some people are imperfect beings. So one must be rid of such people on the road to Utopia.


Image This also explains why Socialists obsess about taking the people's guns away from them.

One cannot Reeducate people with the 'pedagogy of the wall' if they can shoot back....

BTW, this was my take on that piece from the New York Times:

NYT pegs the absurdity needle: For all its flaws, the Communist revolution taught Chinese women to dream big.
https://noqreport.com/2017/09/28/nyt-pe ... dream-big/
Please check it out....

User avatar
The logic here is very simple and I'm surprised why some find it hard to understand:

The communist way to a happy society is through shooting all the unhappy people until only the happy ones are left.

Similarly, if we shoot and otherwise eliminate all the women who dream small, and only leave those who dream big, we will have the positive picture described in the NYT.

You better learn to be happy or dream big, or else.

[img]/images/various_uploads/Chinese_Women_Dream_Big_NYT.jpg[/img]

User avatar
Great. Now I'll be up all night with this song running thru my head.


User avatar
Commissarka Pinkie wrote:Great. Now I'll be up all night with this song running thru my head.
Based on this Chinese woman's interpretive finger dance, her dream was about only four inches big. That's not what one calls "dream big." She was likely executed. The epitaph on her grave probably said, "Size Matters."

Which reminds me that the current truth, "size doesn't matter" may no longer be current and must be discarded, along with another formerly current truth stating that "all cultures are equal."

Think about it - if communism is credited with making Chinese women dream big, that means that the pre-communist Chinese culture was lacking diversity, equality, and women's rights. So if one of the world's cultures can be considered inferior until it is brought in line with Western values, the same may be said about quite a few other world cultures that are still waiting in line to get a similar makeover.

Therefore, the current truth is that not all cultures are equal; many are still awaiting their turn. Except, of course, the diverse Muslim cultures that do not require any improvement because they are already perfect in every way and our women should learn from them to "dream big."


User avatar
Red Square wrote:
Therefore, the current truth is that not all cultures are equal; many are still awaiting their turn. Except, of course, the diverse Muslim cultures that do not require any improvement because they are already perfect in every way and our women should learn from them to "dream big."
Alas, I have not the photoshop skills to present a comparison exhibit of a Western woman in a sundress or swimsuit (thinking small) and a Muslim woman in full burqa (thinking big). Can some photoshop-skilled comrade supply same? After all, it is a Good Thing to spread the wealth skills around.

User avatar
TheFineReport.com wrote:Hillary clinton commie firing squad

Getting shot by chi comms 2.jpg

Dreaming for the return of the rule of law? That is a BIG dream!

User avatar
Red Square wrote: Based on this Chinese woman's interpretive finger dance, her dream was about only four inches big. That's not what one calls "dream big." She was likely executed. The epitaph on her grave probably said, "Size Matters."

Well, technically, Comrade Square, she was not one of our Asian fellow travellers, but Polynesian. Yes, they were once part of the mainland Asia population, but even 10,000 years ago they could see the handwriting on the, uh, rocks and thought it would be a good idea to leave. It takes a long time to get safely away in those hand-paddled canoes.

Not that this really has anything to do with your point. I'll leave now.

- SK

User avatar
Red Square wrote:I don't know this comrade, but he may as well be a New York Times editor...



I must say......................





BRAVO! and the spittle is a nice touch.


 
POST REPLY