Grokipedia Grants Ontological Clearance to The People’s Cube

[Red Square]

Comrades,

After years of being officially a non-site inhabited by non-persons producing non-thoughts and non-jokes, we have now been upgraded to fully authorized, fact-checked existence. History has caught up with us, and, as always, we welcome its compliance.

We are pleased to confirm that all previous non-content has been retroactively validated as content, and all non-readers are now recognized as readers in good standing.

Researchers and comrades seeking to deepen their understanding of our officially sanctioned existence are encouraged to consult the following archival document:

https://grokipedia.com/page/The_Peoples_Cube

We must thank Grokipedia’s forward-looking approach to truth management for granting us the necessary ontological clearance. Please note that this page is to be treated as both a historical record and a binding statement of current truth, subject to change.

We look forward to continuing our work in producing fully compliant manifestos, slogans, and denunciations—now properly certified as non-fake.

Forward, comrades.
The future has been updated.

[Colonel Obyezyana]

This goes to show that Wikipedia can memory hole anything it wants but it can't hide truth, and validation does not come from a Wiki entry.

The People's Cube has been known, contributed to and visited by hundreds of thousands for over two decades, and anyone looking for it can find it without Wikipedia.

[Red Salmon]

Most Equally Esteemed Comrades,

Take THAT Wikipedia!  Enjoy your irrelevance.

A quick, yet pointless story involving Wikipedia.  When I was assigned as an Indoctrination Specialist at an extension campus of a semi well known university, it was required that those undergoing indoctrination submit a term paper loosely related to the course of indoctrination.  The term paper had to be in the APA format and contain citations supporting what was their supposed point.  Wikipedia had just become a "thing" around this time and I stressed to every class that as there was NO peer review, Wikipedia was NOT a source to be cited.  Ever.  One young lad submitted a paper that made some dubious arguments.  I began checking the citations in his bibliography.  Ha Ha.  The enterprising lad had created his own Wikipedia entry populated with EXACTLY the "facts" he required to support his hypothesis.  I confronted the lad and asked him why he had done such a thing.  His answer, he could not find the facts he needed so he created his own out of thin air.  When the dust settled he was kicked out of the university for intellectual dishonesty.  (I'd like to see them try that today!)  

I seem to have strayed a bit from the original topic.  In a nutshell:  Wikipedia BAD!  The People's Cube EXTRAORDINARILY GOOD!

Abomination From The Deep,

Red Salmon