Image

The Gulf of Current Truth

User avatar
The Current Truth™ is that there is a gulf once known as the Gulf of Mexico and now known as the Gulf of America (at least in the U.S.)

Get used to it. 
 
The Gulf of Mexico name is officially recognized by the International Hydrographic Organization, which is not under U.S. control (but the U.S. is not obligated to adhere to its decisions either).
 
Almost all of the Gulf’s shoreline was once part of “The Spanish Main” during the period of Spanish conquest and colonization. Currently, the US portion of the Gulf coastline is about 1,700 miles, while Mexico’s portion is about 1,100 miles.
 
NOTE: Wikipedia’s article on this topic obfuscates this fact by not directly including including Mexico’s portion of the coastline and instead giving a figure that includes all of Mexico’s eastern cost’s length, Caribbean included. 
 
PREVIOUS GULF NAMES
 
“Heap Big Salty Water Place Where Sun Rise” - Pre-Columbian Aztecs
 
“Unnamed” - Despite Amerigo Vespucci’s 1497 survey of its coast
 
“Still Unnamed” - Despite being mapped by Spaniards in the early 1500s
 
"Gulf of Florida" - Early Spanish explorers
 
"Gulf of Cortés" - Early Spanish explorers.
 
"Gulf of St.Michael" - Early European maps
  
"Gulf of Yucatán" - Early European maps
 
"Yucatán Sea" - Early European maps
 
"Great Antillean Gulf" - Early European maps
 
"Cathayan Sea" - Early European maps
 
"Gulf of New Spain" - Early (Spanish) European maps
 
"Gulf of Mexico" - a 1550 world map
 
“Sea of the North” - 1584 map by a Spaniard
 
"Mexican Cove" - Spanish Admiralty charts, 1700s
 
"Mexican Sound” - Spanish Admiralty charts, 1700s
 
“Gulf of America” - Proposed repeatedly to U.S. Board of Geographical Names by some rando (1999-2012); named by by U.S. Presidential executive order (2025). 

Obviously, changing the name of the Gulf is a time-honored tradition.
 
NAME ACCEPTANCE OR RECOGNITION
 
Google will be changing its maps voluntarily because it sees which way the wind is blowing. 
 
Leftists will be changing their panties frequently because they're wetting their panties frequently because of predictable TDS over the name change.
 
WHY THE CHANGE?
 
Simple answer: To rise to the reality that the Gulf is no longer dominated by Spain and the U.S. owns the plurality of its coastline.
 
Simpler answer: To thwart the Biden executive order banning further U.S. oil or gas exploration or drilling in the Gulf of Mexico, which no longer exists (with that name).
 
Simplest answer: 

 

User avatar
Image

I checked this morning and google hasn't changed it yet.  Censorship can be done in real time, but we don't have the technology to change maps quickly yet.

Next up, I hope they change the names of all the military bases back to the old 'problematic' names. I'm getting too old to remember new names anymore. When they send me to some place called "Fort Moore" I have to look up what that is... oh, you mean Benning!

User avatar
Panem Et Circenses wrote:
1/28/2025, 12:12 pm
I checked this morning and google hasn't changed it yet.  Censorship can be done in real time, but we don't have the technology to change maps quickly yet.

Next up, I hope they change the names of all the military bases back to the old 'problematic' names. I'm getting too old to remember new names anymore. When they send me to some place called "Fort Moore" I have to look up what that is... oh, you mean Benning!
Agreed about the bases—the name changes are all libtarded virtue signaling, which is especially ironic since the former Confederate (democrat) names were incorporated by the Union to ease the (democrat) South's reconstruction by being a good sport and showing some honor to Confederate (democrat) military heroes. 

At least they never changed Fort Courage to Fort "Hekawi."
 

User avatar
Colonel Obyezyana wrote:
1/28/2025, 12:26 pm
Panem Et Circenses wrote:
1/28/2025, 12:12 pm
I checked this morning and google hasn't changed it yet.  Censorship can be done in real time, but we don't have the technology to change maps quickly yet.

Next up, I hope they change the names of all the military bases back to the old 'problematic' names. I'm getting too old to remember new names anymore. When they send me to some place called "Fort Moore" I have to look up what that is... oh, you mean Benning!
Agreed about the bases—the name changes are all libtarded virtue signaling, which is especially ironic since the former Confederate (democrat) names were incorporated by the Union to ease the (democrat) South's reconstruction by being a good sport and showing some honor to Confederate (democrat) military heroes. 

At least they never changed Fort Courage to Fort "Hekawi."

Can they name one of them "Camp Fakawi"?

Preferably near Pocahantas' old wigwam in Oklahoma.
 

User avatar
Might I submit, "Gulf of Hurricane's"? It is clear that the area is wrought with climate change, and should be taxed accordingly.

User avatar
RE: "Agreed about the bases—the name changes are all libtarded virtue signaling, which is especially ironic since the former Confederate (democrat) names were incorporated by the Union to ease the (democrat) South's reconstruction by being a good sport and showing some honor to Confederate (democrat) military heroes."

Nothing against Colonel Hal Moore (great man who deserves all the respect we can give him), but it'll always be "Fort Benning." Same goes for Fort Novosel - CWO Novosel certainly deserves the honor, but it'll always be "Fort Rucker".

Unfortunately, "they" (the Pentagon Naming Commission and a few other politically correct weenies) decided to take John Singleton Mosby's name off of the Ranger Memorial, a range and an airstrip and several other things at Fort Benning.

The National Ranger Memorial Foundation took it to court (and at least two dozen former Rangers showed up to the hearing), but the judge tossed it.

Colonel Mosby fought for his home state of Virginia. Once the war was over he went on to serve the Republic for years, including as our ambassador to Hong Kong, and he supported U.S. Grant and did more for reconciliation than most former officers on either side, to the point of being called "traitor" by some of his former Confederate comrades. One thing about the man, he was never afraid to stand up and be counted, even when it was unpopular (ironic, in light of the current situation). He's one of my personal heroes.

Mosby's Rangers are legendary and Mosby did a lot to define the very term "Ranger".

His name belongs on that memorial, and he deserves to be remembered.

User avatar
Image

Yep, ditto on the most of the new names (Ugh, *not* looking at you Harvey Milk) - they are also great men.
As everyone here already understands, it isn't about that at all. It's about erasing our past so the next generation is off balance and doesn't even understand its own history, warts and all.
I personally believe that decades from now Trump will be seen as a major historic figure for rolling back all this garbage, up there with Washington, Lincoln, and Reagan.

Assuming the ideologically captured historians don't erase him like they've mostly done with Reagan.

User avatar
Panem Et Circenses wrote:
1/29/2025, 2:53 pm
 
Red Zeppelin wrote:
1/29/2025, 2:43 pm
 
Comrades, your observations are correct. All of these re-naming committees are no different from the statue destruction spawned during the BLM/Antifa militancy and have no place in civil society.

Ironic, isn't it, that these things were done by ostensible anti-racist absolutists aligned with the very party that fought for slavery and struggled to keep racism alive for a hundred years following the Civil War?

I say "ostensible" because they promoted the rabidly racist DEI scam.

Destroying history doesn't erase racism, it just conceals the perpetrators and perpetuators. 

User avatar
Colonel Obyezyana wrote:
1/29/2025, 5:40 pm
Panem Et Circenses wrote:
1/29/2025, 2:53 pm
 
Red Zeppelin wrote:
1/29/2025, 2:43 pm
 
Comrades, your observations are correct. All of these re-naming committees are no different from the statue destruction spawned during the BLM/Antifa militancy and have no place in civil society.

Ironic, isn't it, that these things were done by ostensible anti-racist absolutists aligned with the very party that fought for slavery and struggled to keep racism alive for a hundred years following the Civil War?

I say "ostensible" because they promoted the rabidly racist DEI scam.

Destroying history doesn't erase racism, it just conceals the perpetrators and perpetuators. 

The jackalope was a castaway trying to survive a past Alinsky torpedo attack while sailing in the Gulf of Current Truth™. When the jackalope saw pictures of the Professional Indian Protestor™ targeting innocent teenager, Nick Sandmann, the jackalope went on an Alinsky PTSD 5 Year Plan in full knowledge her "nice" well aged Alinsky Playing tormentors were actively initiating hate against American Historical Monuments. Their actions culminated in the eventual destruction of historic monuments , but saying so in the Gulf of Current Truth™ was crazy, unhelpful and mean spirited talk from a hare-brain.

Such Alinsky PTSD is what happens when leaked spinal fluid spreads toxic waste throughout an already health stricken body and the doctors advised Tylenol to relieve the pain. Why this toxic waste spill incited Alinsky PTSD happened the same time as orchestrated chaos burned down public trust, is up for spiritual speculation. The good thing is acupuncture is eliminating the residue of toxic spillage and the Alinskyites were arrested, but as yet unrepentant. The avoidance of the Alinsky truth for the jackalope's past 30 years has been hard on the rest of The Collective™ in general. That General Lee statue still went into the smelter. That's not satire, that's F.A.C.T.

The Gulf of Current Truth™ may yet be navigable for even a jackalope. At least for a pleasure cruise in the Gulf of America™ in the jackalope's sailing vessel. Who knows, maybe even a tour of America via the Great Loop Intracoastal Waterways. it feels so good to feel good again.


User avatar
Ellsworth Toohey wrote:
1/28/2025, 5:02 pm
Colonel Obyezyana wrote:
1/28/2025, 12:26 pm
Panem Et Circenses wrote:
1/28/2025, 12:12 pm
I checked this morning and google hasn't changed it yet.  Censorship can be done in real time, but we don't have the technology to change maps quickly yet.

Next up, I hope they change the names of all the military bases back to the old 'problematic' names. I'm getting too old to remember new names anymore. When they send me to some place called "Fort Moore" I have to look up what that is... oh, you mean Benning!
Agreed about the bases—the name changes are all libtarded virtue signaling, which is especially ironic since the former Confederate (democrat) names were incorporated by the Union to ease the (democrat) South's reconstruction by being a good sport and showing some honor to Confederate (democrat) military heroes. 

At least they never changed Fort Courage to Fort "Hekawi."
Can they name one of them "Camp Fakawi"?

Preferably near Pocahantas' old wigwam in Oklahoma.
Welcome news! "Fort Liberty" is out and The Bragg School for Boy's has gotten its name back!

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... t-liberty/

And an upadate: FAA is making the switch to "Gulf of America."

 https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... f-america/




User avatar
Image

Right?  I love AP getting banned from POTUS press briefings lately and CNN coming to their defense then Trump and Leavitt shutting them down in real time.  What a glorious 4 years this is going to be!

Image

Uh, you're a bigot?

User avatar
Panem Et Circenses wrote:
2/14/2025, 11:32 am
Image

Right?  I love AP getting banned from POTUS press briefings lately and CNN coming to their defense then Trump and Leavitt shutting them down in real time.  What a glorious 4 years this is going to be!

Image

Uh, you're a bigot?
 I'm not Google. I am insensitive to whining. 
 

User avatar
Image

This would be fantastic!  Like going on an organizational hunger strike!  Except no one cares if they go out of business.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... f-america/


User avatar
Fort Bragg -> Fort Liberty -> Fort Bragg (not that Bragg, the other one)

Gulf of Mexico -> Gulf of America

Faggot -> Gay ->

Negro -> African American ->Black ->

Food Stamps ->  SNAP/EBT ->

Bribes and payoffs-> Under the table contributions and donations (with a 10% kickback to the big guy) -> USAID ->

Image

Keep going boss, the list is long and distinguished....

Image

Comrades, Hope and CHANGE™ is for us to control, not them.
 

User avatar
Ivan the Stakhanovets wrote:
2/16/2025, 8:09 pm
Fort Bragg -> Fort Liberty -> Fort Bragg (not that Bragg, the other one)

Gulf of Mexico -> Gulf of America

Faggot -> Gay ->

Negro -> African American ->Black ->

Food Stamps ->  SNAP/EBT ->

Bribes and payoffs-> Under the table contributions and donations (with a 10% kickback to the big guy) -> USAID ->

Image

Keep going boss, the list is long and distinguished....

Image

Comrades, Hope and CHANGE™ is for us to control, not them.

It gets better every day:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... from-lgbt/
 

User avatar
While we're on the topic of changing maps, there's an island chain west of the Philippines that really ought to consider a name change.


User avatar
Colonel Obyezyana wrote:
2/17/2025, 7:35 pm
While we're on the topic of changing maps, there's an island chain west of the Philippines that really ought to consider a name change.

Image

Some cracker might try that.

User avatar
AP's Style Manual is suddenly getting the exposure it deserves for reasons I indicated earlier in this thread.

This one has a short list of excellent examples:

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... qus_thread 

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025 ... qus_thread

Note: due to a glitch, these articles sometimes bring you to a page marked "forbidden." It may be hack but the above links look viable at the time of this writing.

This link definitely works:

https://newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/tim-gr ... book-lingo
 

User avatar
Ha, it keeps getting better and better! I love this:

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/202 ... ech-codes/

Just so I understand the concept: these news outlets are thinking they'll boycott covering the most newsworthy person we've seen in our lifetimes? Everything he does creates content and writes headlines. They will knowingly lose even more viewers/readers and relevance (what little they still possess) for their ... 'principles'? And the 'principles' in question are the right to stick to a Marxist styleguide that is so far removed from reality and blatantly partisan that everyone in the world sees it? You can't make this stuff up.

It's like the little kid that says they'll hold their breath until they get their way.

2025 was completely worth the pain and suffering of the Obama and Biden years.

User avatar
Panem Et Circenses wrote:
2/18/2025, 3:06 pm
And the 'principles' in question are the right to stick to a Marxist styleguide that is so far removed from reality and blatantly partisan that everyone in the world sees it? You can't make this stuff up.
"Marxist"?  Hardly.  Try Globalist "New World Order" Style Guide to lay a foundation for "The Great Reset" by setting Western Civilization on fire. 
 



 
POST REPLY