Komissar al-Blogunov wrote: ↑

2/20/2025, 11:14 pm

While I still hold out some hope that Trump's remarks are part of a negotiation strategy, I do want to address the major allegations raised recently about Zelensky.

Comrade, two things can be true at the same time.
 

Before Zelensky there was FBI WACO, TEXAZISTAN operations. Exporting that FBI OP to Ukraine… now that’s some Big Ugly fixing to unleash on the Senator without a State.

Venn Diagrams are overlapping in Kash’s To Do list.

https://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog ... 24330.html

Colonel Obyezyana wrote: ↑

2/21/2025, 5:21 am

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote: ↑

2/20/2025, 11:14 pm

While I still hold out some hope that Trump's remarks are part of a negotiation strategy, I do want to address the major allegations raised recently about Zelensky.

Comrade, two things can be true at the same time.

Of course. But the three points mentioned...

350 billion to Ukraine 
Zelensky is to blame for the war 
Zelensky is an unelected dictator 

...are false.

Russian propaganda owns the right.

 

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote: ↑

2/21/2025, 9:30 pm

Of course. But the three points mentioned...

350 billion to Ukraine 
Zelensky is to blame for the war 
Zelensky is an unelected dictator 

...are false.

Russian propaganda owns the right

Comrade, if you'd satirically stated those points from the start of this post instead of making us sit through a boring 10-minute video from a predictably partisan source, you might have gotten more replies.

Some of us stray from satire and parody from time to time, and that can be forgiven, but to say that Russian propaganda "owns the right" is a gross generalization and an insult to those of us who clearly see it and never fall for it. There are more rational explanations for the current truth. 

Did $350 billion go to Ukraine? We won't know until DOGE digs up the truth of the matter because the criminal Biden Administration went on such a pervasive secret spending spree.

Is Zelensky to blame for the war? Obviously not, but he won't be responsible for the end of the war without both belligerents making some concessions.

Is Zelensky an unelected dictator? Not under the Ukrainian Constitution, but the rest of the world might have a better impression of him if he'd at the very least tried to hold elections (like the one Lincoln won during the Civil War). 

Comrade, when you bring serious treatments of contentious issues to a satire site, the humor is lost. You've already created a dedicated Facebook page for your persistent. non-humorous activism— https://www.facebook.com/groups/8551745844897010/ —and I suggest you keep it there, because it's become tiresome here.



P.S. The quote blocks in your most recent post (above this post) are mis-formatted and make me appear to say things that you said. 

Komissar al-Blogunov wrote: ↑

2/22/2025, 1:48 pm

I didn't "make" anyone sit through tenish minutes of my tedious monotone. But you are to be congratulated for doing so. And see? You learned something about Ukrainian government. This gives me hope.

And congratulations for sidestepping the matter of your allegation that "Russia owns the right."

This is all you've shown:


You don't want to be "that guy."  Bring your humor here like you used to.

Comrade al-Blogunov, 
 
I won't argue with you. It's pointless to do so.
 
Your position is obvious: Support Ukraine at all costs to the exclusion of any and all other considerations, combined with My exclusive sources are better than anyone else’s, and I am uniquely positioned to determine what’s false, along with Those who disagree are uninformed and/or under the influence of Russian propaganda. 
 
That’s not only irrational and fascistic, that's fanatical.
 
The People’s Cube thrives on opinions because it’s a political humor site with a tradition of open discussion through satire and parody.
 
Solemn commentary over a topic is not unknown here, even if best expressed somewhere other than a humor site. 
 
However, repeatedly using The Cube as a platform for a continuing series of solemn, partisan, single-issue advocacy posts strays from the purpose and spirit of the site, especially when a member arrogantly speaks from self-imagined intellectual/moral high ground to openly—and preemptively—condemn those who don’t adhere to his orthodoxy of thought.
 
Comrade, your commentary may fly in the ideological bubble of your Facebook page, but not here. We know tinfoil-hat pontification when we see it, and it’s not welcome no matter who or where it comes from.
 
Colonel Obyezyana,
Acting Director,
ThePeople’sCube.com

More to come. Thanks for keeping my page at the top.