Party Diplomat Ivan Drago wrote:<singing, flamenco style>

"People diiied!,
People diiiiiiiied!!!"

DA! DAAA!!!

Now everybody clap your hands, stomp your feet, and sing:

"When George Bush lied, so many people di-ied!"

YEE-HAW!

"When George Bush lied, so many people di-ied!"

Now let's all collapse and enjoy a little HBO . . .

<off> AhHaaHahAhAahahAhaahaAhaAhaAahaahAA !!!!!!!!!!!! Ah... ok... I got it out of my system...

When George Bush lied, so many people di-ied! Yes! I think Drago has gotten it! By George Bush he got it! You see, blaming Bush with your mistakes and thought crimes is how a crafty Party member gets off the hook... why, the man is responsible for everything! Personal responsibility? Baaah! Never heard of it, your crime, drug addiction, sticky fingers and other problems with "morality" (as if it really exists!) is the direct cause of George Bush, Capitalism and racist, warmongering America. If anything we should be subsidizing you for thought crimes, Comrade Drago!

But, unfortunately for us, we can't subsidize people for "shortcomings" until we achieve pure Communism (The Progressive World of Next Tuesday™) and instead have to opt to put them out of their misery with a humanitarian death squad. It is the humane thing to do and we are all about being humane here.

However, with that crap said, I think your apology is sufficient and will keep you alive until the Party deems otherwise. Congratulations!

Before I leave to engage in my daily evening orgy, I just want everyone to know that raunchy sex with appliances is so last week. The latest rage – which is taking Hollywood and your local participating Starbucks by storm – is guilt-free sex with coffee cans in very, very public places. Everyone is doing it now! Just the other day I saw an old man with a pony-tail going to town on a coffee can at my local Barnes & Nobles. Everyone was just perplexed watching this old guy plow a can of Maxwell House. But, nonetheless, it is all the rage now, so I suggest you all hook up with your favorite brand so that you can “fit-in” with the rest of us trendy progressives.

Coffee cans are not an appliance?

One class of objects includes items that are custom-fitted to an individual for the purpose of correction of a physical or dental problem such as prosthetic, orthotic appliances and dental braces.

You may have sexual relations with dental braces, store mannequins (I fancy a few at Macy's myself), back braces, a full body cast or anything else which tickles your fancy, Commissar Pupovich. Anything goes as far as the Party is concerned!

However, when we talk of Appliance-Americans, we are talking about household appliances which have a plug or a place to put batteries... we aren't talking about faux appliances which think they are real appliances, just like Fox News which thinks they are a real news network (yeah right, give us a break!). Some Appliances - the one's that vibrate or move in some fashion or another, like a blender for instance - are more equal than other appliances, like, for example, your orthotic appliances.

Sometimes one has to question the "applianceness" of an appliance, just like we question the "blackness" of Barack Obama. It just has to be done... for the Children™, of course.

You are correct of course Chairman. I know I should have come to you for guidance on Appliances. So what is your take on why the trend is away from appliances to coffee cans? Is it because true progressives wish to reduce their carbon footprint... well, I suppose it is not properly a "footprint," but you catch my drift. I read recently from a link here about solar powered appliances, but that too is a global warming menace for even a rechargable battery requires the raping of the planet to produce. Plus I suppose a non-powered "aide" will help in our fight against childhood obesity which would definitely make that For the Children™.

So after posting here yesterday, I like came up with this totally brill idea--a politically correct, off-Broadway musical revival of "My Fair Lady" called "My Fair Lefty."

I thought about the story of a professor--say from Berkeley or Colorado State--who drags this lowly unknown prole out of the salt mines and gives her a makeover, teaches her to recite the DNC talking points, etc., after making a bet with some superfluous talking head like Geraldo that he can pass her off as a high-ranking Party donor at Hillary's Inaugural Ball in '09.

At the Ball, she'll be blessed by the Empress and hit on by Bill--and then, her usefulness having ended, she'll be discarded and thrown back into the swamps from whence she came.

I was ready to pitch this idea to the Politburo, let them take credit for the idea, and offer them all the rights and profits, since they were going to take them anyway, and then it hit me: Except for the bit about the Empress, they already toured the U.S. with a fairly faithful rendition of this show last year.

Yes, I remember now. Cindy Sheehan played Eliza Doolittle.

Damn! Guess I'll have to work on my other idea--"Seven Bribes for Seven Bolsheviks."

Pinkie -

Another medal! In fact, we were thinking of setting up a special section for Revisionist Book Club a while ago, starting with the revised Bible and followed by Punchenko's "Lenin Code." Perhaps it's an idea whose time has come!

My only concern is that if the site acquires too many sections, workers and peasants may become intimidated by its excessive volume and diversity and run away to simpler sites, like Daily Kos or Democratic Underground that offer the same news and opinions but in a more accessible format.

Hmmmm, now wait just a minute.... I see a fatal flaw in that My Fair Lefty storyline.

"who drags this lowly unknown prole out of the salt mines and gives her a makeover, teaches her to recite the DNC talking points, etc."

The prole would be a union member already so he would not need to be trained to recite DNC talking points, it's a requirement to be in the union already. No, we need this to be someone pulled from a non-unionized job, and a job or field of endeavor not normally associated with DNC talking points. As one who has walked the walk, I think a biker would be an excellent candidate to be rescued from the wasteland of self reliance and one who has been rebellious toward all state restrictions just as the Pup himself has seen the light!

Question? Has this thread been denounced? Since last night, it seems when I try to come here from my email notification, I receive "The topic or post you requested does not exist." Yet when I come to the site, here it is.

I love Comrade Pinkie's idea! I LOVE IT!

Comrade Pinkie, if you were a rich broad from Palm Beach I think I would ask your hand in marriage... of course then - after our star-studded marriage ceremony in Beverly Hills - I would spend all your money, disgust your parents, and then dump you for someone much younger after my lawyer and I take whatever else is left in your name - possibly the house and the few vacation homes I made you foot the bill for. Yes, it would be the perfect progressive fairy tale!

Chairman! I beg of you. Yes, the play is a good idea, but the mine worker makes no sense! He/She/It would already be a union member so already a democrat. Oh woe is me.... first I find myself forced to ask a question of the Hillary, and now you. Oh, I may as well get my shovel out. But I refuse to take any blame for this! Not a shred of blame! First I am getting signals from my tin foil hat, then Bush lied, and finally, I was forced to accept a short straw for my Icee tonight! A short straw! What sort of treatment is that? It's not as if I have the luxury of drinking fine drinks like some here. It's just too much for one Commissar to bear in one day. Now it even seems I am having to man the barricades for a second and third shift here at the cube today while others are out doing Lenin knows what! For all intents and porpoises, I have been alone since SMO took off with her pod early this morning. It's just not my fault! If I have to go down, I am going to be naming names, and Lenin only knows what story I am going to come up with.

OK, so instead of a mine worker she can be a well-to-do rich capitalist whore. Yes! And then our Professor can pluck her from her plush surroundings and transform her into a first-class subsidized ghetto queen complete with a drug addiction and food stamps! Brilliant! <pats self on back> Ugh, I amaze myself sometimes, I really do.

After her “transformation” into a self-righteous progressive dependent on government handouts, she can then be flaunted by the Clinton campaign as a member of the other America in need of entitlement programs, affordable housing, free healthcare, flex-time, free daycare for her newly crapped out quintuplets, multiple food debit cards, $5,000 a kid and the list goes on and on and on and on. She will be taught how to be a victim, how to panhandle, how to seek the media to document her harsh living conditions, etc. until finally – as Comrade Pinkie suggested – she is kicked to the curb and no longer “useful” to the cause. For the rest of her days she will live in subsidized housing shooting up heroine and demanding more yummy American tax dollars until she is old enough to collect Social Security! PROGRESS! IT IS PROGRESS, COMRADES!

Exactly! That was what I was saying, we need to take someone who would not be a democrat in the first place.... And lets face it, once we are in power, there won't be any more well to do rich capitalists anyway! So they may as well learn to be happy in our new reality. Actually, I am just surprised that so far, it appears I have made it through tonight after having my thoughts controlled today to the point I had to question the Empress.

Speaking of things.... where is Commissar Theocritus? We have hardly heard from him since Nancy and Murtha came for a visit.

I'm sure the Madam Speaker has him on his feet running around. Her Grace can be very demanding, especially after a day full of Botox injections.

I just hope someone has Our Empress smiling tonight. I... I...I even suspected you may have been involved with the odd transmissions I was receiving all day.

Commissar Pupovich wrote: Speaking of things.... where is Commissar Theocritus? We have hardly heard from him since Nancy and Murtha came for a visit.

He's probably busy as hell trying to get the serfs and the kulaks at his ranch to repair the damage that Nancski always leaves behind.

In the latest News from the People's Commonwealth of Virginia:

Comrade Gov. Tim Kaine demanded and received the resignation of an Arab AmeriKKKan doctor that he appointed to a commission to study immigration issues after a video tape surfaced showing this peace loving doctor, who toils to heal the unwashed masses, voicing his opinion supporting the peaceful and non-violent "jihad way". http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,298278,00.html

In other news, Richmond, VA city police are conducting a manhunt for a naked lunatic who climbed the VA state capitol screaming "Chelsea!!! Bark for me baby!!! Just like you used to!!!!". MEOW!!! You wouldn't happen to know about this ... would you?

--
Blokhayev

Didn't you get my memo, Zam? Hmm? DIDN'T YOU GET THE MEMO THAT WE AREN'T SUPPOSE TO TALK ABOUT THAT! Everyone in the People's Commonwealth was told *nicely* to put it out of their mind before we put it out of their mind for them. We can't have any negative news hurting the Party's chances of replacing Non-Person W with Comrade Mark Warner (the other Warner, if you will). We can't allow it! We mustn't allow it! Sweet Stalin, man! Wake up and realize we are fighting for our lives in this intolerant, hate-filled, redneck laden and gun-toting state! Zam, I would expect more from you... but you disappointed me on this one. See, this is my disappointed face .

For the record... I was not on top of the State Capitol building, up on the flag pole, screaming and barking without any clothing on. No, I did have clothing on, I was wearing my Ushanka. Also, Doug Wilder wasn't exactly with me, no, he was at the bottom making sure city police couldn't identify me. I have apologized several times for the incident and as far as I'm concerned it would be best if everyone just moved on about it.

Using smiley faces again Meow?
You know there is only one official emoticon here at the Cube.

<rat-a-tat-tat-a-tat-tat>

Damn, missed....I better go to the range and get this AK47 sited better. That was a little low and to the left.
Nicked one of his Hummels though.
That should wise him up.

Chairman M. S. Punchenko wrote:Also, Doug Wilder wasn't exactly with me, no, he was at the bottom making sure city police couldn't identify me.

Hmmmm, so what you are saying is that the city police could identify you if they could get a clear view of your bottom Chairman?

HBO (Hate Bush Orgasms) are becoming increasingly trendy, but there have also been setbacks due to the inability to enforce control and weed out the fakers.

Thus, HBO was the official doctrine of America Coming Together (ACT), a progressive, political action, 527 group dedicated to get-out-the-vote activities. ACT went bust and was forced to pay $775,000 in fines for faking orgasms as well as serious timing issues. The Federal Election Commission accused ACT of false advertisement, bait-and-switch, and other violations resulting from the group's inability to come together simultaneously as stated in their name.
<br>To avoid such failures in the future we must expand Thought Police to include a Special HBO Unit that will ensure that none of the HBOs are faked. It will use progressive methodology developed at the Kinsey Institute to weed out traitors, turncoats, and all those who will fake anything to fit in with the glitterati.

HBO is of crucial importance for World Peace™ *, and since only a genuine HBO counts, the absence of genuine HBO will corrupt our statistics and undermine the advance of progress.

For more information please read this enlightening post written by me back in November of 2006 - https://thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopi ... =8960#8960

Last year on Dec. 22, all people of good will were trying to increase World Peace by staging a synchronized Global Orgasm - see https://www.globalorgasm.org (a real site). And the world's poorest masses who couldn't afford a partner, a pet, or an appliance to help them achieve HBO, could log in to https://www.masturbateforpeace.com (another real site) and visualize peace individually. Yes, in order to achieve HBO one must visualize peace.

We don't know if the Global Orgasm event will be repeated in 2007, but we can prepare for it in advance - or at least mark the 1-year anniversary with a feature story on the Cube about the importance of HBO and how to achieve it.

Comrade Pinkie is the most logical choice for this assignment. If she is afraid that her mom or her local commissar whom she secretly admires might read it, she may disguise her real name (Pinkie) with an allegorical nom de guerre, e.g., Ms. Middle-Finger.

_________________________
* World Peace™ = absence of opposition to progress. Thus, anyone who opposes the advance of international communism, socialism, and other facets of progress (lately also to include the international caliphate) are to be considered enemies of peace, hateful reactionary warmongers, child murderers, and little Eichmanns. On the other hand, anyone who kills, robs, tortures, imprisons, deports, and terrorizes these little Eichmanns is thereby advancing World Peace™. Fighters for World Peace may be violent communist guerillas, Islamic fundamentalists, and also their non-violent supporters in San Francisco who engage in HBO and other "Coming Together" activities.

This is wonderful and important work Red, and were it my fault, I would be ashamed I had not heard of this before. But I must say as I have said so many times, it would be helpful to the cause if these useful idiots were.... well, less idiotic. They should at least investigate certain things before proclaiming them so they are not so easily mocked.

For instance, under the "Science of Orgasm for Peace" section, one will find this statement:

"The Zero Point Field or Quantum Field surrounds and is part of everything in the universe. It can be affected by human consciousness, as can be seen when simple observation of a subatomic particle changes the particle's state."

These idiots do not seem to understand even basic science on this subject. The reason the observation of a subatomic particle changes the particles state is, aside from any funny quantum strangeness, the fact that to observe a subatomic article, or anything for that matter, it must interact with something. For instance, when we look through a microscope at one of the Many Titted Cloven Hoof samples that Commissar Theocritus collects, we must shine light on the sample to see it. The very act of the light hitting the item means that a photon must strike said object to be reflected back to your eye.

Other than some of those minor points, this is a veritable Gulag of fascinating progressive ideas!

Laika,

Get some steel wool and scrub the front sight. There may be some schmutz on it from when you had the muzzle inside Comrade Gov. Tim Kaine's ear back when you and I had to go down there and "reason" with him after Frogface (Comrade Sen Jim Webb S-VA) begged me to due to Meow's "Chelsea/Border Collie Affair". You can imagine how scummy these "kulak politicians" like Kaine can be.

Meow,

It was a good thing that Doug Wilder ran interference for you. I ordered him to watch you if you ever left a kegger that the sorority girls throw, in another "chemically altered state". I mean, hell... it ain't like Doug is busy these days. You heard how our Many Tittied Empress' husband recently ordered an NYC restaurant to take down a picture of Chelsea. You better be happy it was a border collie and not Chelsey you violated. Shutting up Comrade Kaine is one thing. Shutting up our Empress' philandering spouse is a different thing altogether. It is a good thing that you are member of the Inner Circle™ for your strong revolutionary commitment. This makes it easier for me to quiet (i.e. threaten) the media after one of your binges. Keep that specially modified dog whistle Laika gave you with you at all times. If she howls, it ain't Chelsea. So don't try to copulate with it. Just because we are The Party™ does not mean we are a Frat party. We save that kind of fun for our Politburo meetings at Theo's Rancho del Rio Grande. You don't know how happy I am that that bastard Frogface did not call me kvetching about this. I swear to Lenin if he calls me again, for any reason, it's off to the gulag for him!

If you sober up sometime with in the next 2 weeks, meet with me up here in the People's Socialist County of Fairfax so we can discuss what the fuck is wrong with Comrade Gov. Kaine regarding why he forced such a "progressive" doctor like Esam Omeish to resign from this important commission?

--

Commissar Pupovich wrote:

Chairman M. S. Punchenko wrote:President Ahmydinnerjacket is well versed in Progressive logic

He has his uses as I have pointed out, yet how can we square progressiveness with his denial of homosexuals in Iran?

Greetings progressive friends and animals and animal lovers

Once again my apologies for my lateness and being now well and truly off-topic.

I believe the dilemma for progressives who really want to love AchmanthewomenIdidntjab but cannot get past his gay-killing and other seemingly non -progressive issues, can be best summed up by Homer. I believe this quote is from The Iliad

Well, you can't always have your yellowcake and eat it too.

Beezo

Pinkie, you're getting me hot and bothered with your wonderful attention to detail and it is false modesty to call yourself a lowly prole. I know it's damned useful but this is in camera, tovarisch, in camera, so you can strut your stuff.

<i>My Fair Leftie</i> is a really good idea except for one thing. A fair leftie is a contradiction in terms. After all, have you seen Molly Yard? Molly Ivins? Who could only be improved by death.

"The worms crawl in, the worms crawl out"

And let's not forget Our Many Titted Empress. When Hill gets really pissed she can make a vulture rocket off at Mach One, and once Bruno got really angry with her when she laughed at his get-up--well, it <i>was</i> funny, I've got to admit but I've learned better than to laugh at him. He got out that old bazooka I liberated and fired a round at Our Many Titted Empress who held up her hand, like Xena--get the connection?--and it shied around and destroyed some Hummels I'd gotten to replace those that she broke of Meow's.

(Not that I really care about Meow's Hummels--he's only using them as a diversion from Helen the Toaster, who sleeps with the microwaves.)

The problem is that there is no such thing as a fair leftie. What, after all, do you think turned me queer? I used to go threw bimbos a dozen a week, but as I accepted the True Religion, I realized that I wasn't spending my energy right and what was left? Babes like Nansky Peloski? Babs Mikulski? That Concorde-nosed Barbara?

Meow, settle down. Of <i>course</i> you weren't on top of the Capitol building. We believe you, honestly we do...Bruno, quit laughing, bitch, you'll wake up Nansky passed out on the floor...

Meow, there is no question that it wasn't you. Because we know that your heart belongs at the bottom of the Potomac as you voyeuristically watch Helen consort with that Amana microwave.

In response to Dr. Ahmindeedinsane's statement at Columbia University, the Government of the Netherlands issued a statement today to show solidarity with the Iranian leader.
Jan Fokkenjou, Minister of Tertiary Sexual Characteristics stated "Since there are no homosexuals in Iran, we, the Dutch people, would like the whole world to know there are no dykes in Holland."

There certainly isn't a little boy with his finger in the dyke.

His mother's turkey baster, perhaps, but not his finger.

Honestly, guys! One little mildly suggestive post, and I feel like that episode of Seinfeld where Elaine left the X-rated message on Jerry's handheld recorder, and at the end the guys were all lined up staring at her as if their brains had just undergone collective meltdown. (Only which one of you has the stinky Chinese hair-restoring goop under his hat in hopes he'll "look like Stalin"?)

<Hee hee hee, Pinkie's still got it!>

Ah, gentlemen! Had your brains not melted, you might've realized that I decided to shelve my idea of "My Fair Leftie" because Cindy Sheehan already played the part to unsurpassable perfection last year, and Commissar Theocritus made a very good point about the "fair" part.

And as for Comrade Red Square and his insinuation that I might have a little crush on my local commissar, I'll have you know my heart belongs forever after to Ahmajughead. Who do you think that is in the blonde wig, holding up the sign in that picture? <sigh> Oh, he's so dreamy!

Ahmaladadingdong is the one for me, because of his sincere loathing for George W. Bush. Ahmafullofit is sweet and sensitive, and he understands me. I know he does, because he hates Bush. As for that other stuff--the homosexuals, the burqas--well, I'm just going to change all that! You laugh, but I will! And not only that, but I'm going to get him to put down the toilet seat and not drink milk straight out of the jug, either! Yes, siree, just you wait and see!

Pinkie, you have the spirit of the true Progressive. And I concur. Always project your wishes on people as forcefully as possible. Look at the wonders that that has done for others. If Mao hadn't projected his wishes on China, 50,000,000 people might not have had the chance to give their all to the Mother Country.

If Stalin had not projected his wishes on the Russian people, just think of the overcrowding in Ukraine.

But I don't think that you'll have to work to hard to get Ahmanancyboy to put down the toilet seat. That bit about there being no homosexuals in Iran. Phooey. I bet that Miss Amabadbadboy sits down to pee and when we see him booking a Cher concert, we'll know it for sure.

Hmmmm, do they even use imperialist "thrones" in Iran? I know the Arabs do not as a rule, but of course they are Persians. I work with a psychologist from Iran, but I wouldn't feel comfortable asking her such a question. It's funny in a way, I have known her for a few years, but I had always thought she didn't care much for me then. But ever since I had my health crisis last year, she has been extremely friendly with me. She went back home to visit her family about 6 months or so ago, and while I wanted to ask questions of her about things back home, I didn't for obvious reasons I suppose. But in the past few months, she has even came to my "office" if you will, and sat down and told me quite a bit about her experiences back home.

Here's an Iranian woman speaking...

<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>

That is very refreshing. I have been waiting for any of the moderate Muslims to speak out--and had come to the conclusion that they didn't exist. Or that the Islamofascists were so strong that the moderates were cowed into utter submission, which means that for practical purposes they do not exist.

While Hitler was cranking up killing Jews, some Catholics banded together in Germany to help the Jews, but Pius XII, a true piece of shit, a lickspittle to totalitarian murderers, gutted that organization, which in effect made all Germans complicit in the murder of Jews. No, there were some "good Germans" and there were attempts to rehabilitate them, in a fashion, after the war, but the fact remains that despite their wishes, because they were silenced, they did not matter.

Pius XII even decreed that every April 20, the Führer's birthday, every Catholic church read a birthday greeting from the pulpit. And the German Catholics who had tried to resist were silenced, <i>and remained silent</i>.

So even if there are moderate Muslims, their hearts do not matter. Only their stance.

No doubt most of you have seen this powerful video, but in case you missed it... Needless to say, this woman has a price on her head.<object width="425" height="353"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/2WLoasfOLpQ&r ... ram><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="353"></embed></object>

A very brave woman. Why do we have to go to YouTube to see this? But then since my peace of mind dictated that I abandon MSM, it might be on 24/ and I wouldn't know.

Hahahaha.

Why do you have to go to YouTube to see that? Probably because we wouldn't wish to offend Muslim sensibilities by the rash statements of a secular Syrian. Don't you just love the way those progressive Muslim thinkers handled her?

Safwan: The sun rises in the east
Muslim Intellectual: She is a heretic so I need not refute her.

Clearly this sort of thinking on the part of this heretic Safwan is dangerous to out glorious revolution and she must be shown the Wall soon. Imagine if those politicians in Washington were to show such backbone, such courage to put themselves at physical risk to speak as she? Our revolution would suffer a tremendous setback. Fortunately, we need not worry about that da? LOL!

When that video first came out, Naomi Ragen 'aired' it on her site... It's as powerful now as it was then, and the speaker is an incredibly brave woman...

This goes back a ways on ZionNeoCon - Boker Tov, Boulder (Boker Tov means Good Morning in Hebrew)... Yael quotes Naomi Ragen who is, as usual, brilliant.

It was good to see that piece again... it's been a while.

~ <img src=https://thepeoplescube.com/images/Heade ... racter.gif width=300>

You can fight bad ideas with good ideas. When all argument is in vain, there is only defending yourself.

OFF CHARACTER

If only more Americans, particularly those in position of leadership who would not even be particularly in more danger being non Arabs, had the backbone this woman has. The war in Iraq would have been over a long time ago.

<img src=https://thepeoplescube.com/images/Heade ... racter.gif width=300>

Comrade Otis wrote:~ <img src=https://thepeoplescube.com/images/Heade ... racter.gif width=300>

You can fight bad ideas with good ideas. When all argument is in vain, there is only defending yourself.

Congratulations! You have just officially become Israeli! And it doesn't matter where you sit on the political spectrum... (with the exception of the Orthos who have no rights to the country as they do nothing but suck the life out of it and give nothing in return), eventually, almost all find themselves accepting this truth and defending themselves... or leaving.

... when the person on the opposite side of the table won't have a conversation with you and their only response to anything you do or say is to try to kill you, then you can sit there and let the person kill you, or you can defend yourself up to whatever point is necessary... That's the definition of Israel.

<img src="/images/Header_OutOfCharacter.gif" height="100" width="400">Excellent posts... You are right on about Israel. It galls me when I hear these idiots talking about how Israel should return to prewar borders etc. they stole their land yada yada yada. Lets see, you attack a country and lose land in defeat. Attack again and lose yet more land in defeat... Doh! Guess what? That's the way it works in the real world. It really is sad in a way, and I do feel for the ordinary Palestinians in a way, but then their leaders brought this on themselves. They listened to their Arab "friends" in Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, and Syria who encouraged them to reject the UN accords promising them that the infant Israel would be wiped off the map... but that didn't happen so they lost land. Then years later, they tell them again how they were going to wipe Israel off the face of the map and the Palestinians believe their "friends" again, so war comes and they lose yet again, and forfeit yet more land. One would think that at some point more intelligent minds would start putting 2 and 2 together..... If they had any sense at all, they would accept that Israel has been finally willing to give them some land back asking only to be recognized for their rights to live in their former homeland as well (that seems to get lost somehow, that Israel occupied those lands for what, a thousand or so years?) and not be attacked. Say what you will about Egypt, Jordan, and to a degree, the rulers in Saudi Arabia, they have to a degree come to an acceptance of the reality of Israel, and in the case of Egypt and Jordan, have recovered some of the lands lost and lived in relative peace with Israel since (and I do mean in the sense of state to state relations, not that there are not still radical jihadist in those states and in the case of Saudi Arabia in particular, has to continue to give lip service against Israeli in large part because they are the home of the "Religion of Peace" major holy sites and the royal family has to walk a fine tight rope to maintain their position of power).

<img src="/images/Header_OutOfCharacter.gif" height="100" width="400">

Thank you for posting these interviews, gentlemen. It's refreshing indeed to see women who are truly courageous, fearless and strong, and capable of making the world a better place for all if only given half a chance. (And I must include La Malkin in that group--are any journalists besides her willing to give this young woman the time of day?)

No, Commissar Theocritus, you just don't see this on the MSM. Yet these are the kind of role models girls should be looking up to, instead of the Anita Hills and Paris Hiltons who are always being fussed and fawned over on the talk show circuit--and for what, when you compare them to the two women Red Square and Pupovich present for our consideration?

<character off>
If we're to get the boot in modern feminism as a stalking horse for radical leftism, I have some hob-nailed ones. My mother loathed feminists. I was brought up to say, in Texas terms, "You can do anything you're big enough to do" and "your rights end where my nose begins." But that there was a difference between men and women. You held the door for women, who thanked you instead of cursing you. (This really happened.)

She managed, through dint of personality, to make herself the most successful businesswoman in this small town, and the most respected person, whose word was law, without raising her voice, shoving, kicking or screaming. If she looked at a door, men rose to open it. She had a power which no feminist I've ever seen has had. She also had that moral authority which I think is traditionally carried through women, and which radical leftist feminists, through their experimentation, have thrown away. But that's really a leftist trait.

Have you read Maureen Dowd's <a href="https://www.jessicaswell.com/mt/archive ... isement</a> for a man? Triumphalist auto-proctological sneering.

That's not a woman, that's a harpy. But there is one thing about people like her. I am not under any onus whatsoever to defer to them in anything, any more than I would to a man just as objectionable. I will not let them have it both ways.

And I have a trump card. In the victimology sweepstakes, gay trumps female. If one is forced into that.

Commissar Theocritus wrote:<character off>
I was brought up to say, in Texas terms, "You can do anything you're big enough to do" and "your rights end where my nose begins." But that there was a difference between men and women. You held the door for women, who thanked you instead of cursing you. (This really happened.)

Character Off continues...

Oh, call me old fashioned, but I still believe this, and at least down south, this still seems to be mostly the case. Ok, no, I don't rush around to the other side of a car to open a door for a lady, but to a building? Yes, I still take my chances on not being cursed.

As for that ad.... shoot, as old fashioned as I am, I would be tickled pink to find a wimmin who made more than me and who wanted to adopt a Pup like me. But I really think that author missed the point as to the reason men may be less likely to seek women perceived as more intelligent or financially better off. At least I know in my case, I see a beautiful lady or one who makes more money would lower her sights for a lowly mutt such as I. Shoot, I would love to have any woman take an interest in this pup, but even more so one who makes more money and beyond my beauty imagination. I just don't see it happening though. I certainly would care less what others would think of lowly pup being in this better woman's doghouse.

Commissar Theocritus wrote:<character off>
Have you read Maureen Dowd's <a href="https://www.jessicaswell.com/mt/archive ... isement</a> for a man? Triumphalist auto-proctological sneering.

Pinkie <still off character, off her rocker, and out of her mind--of course she's always at least 2 out of 3 anyway>

Oh, BROTHER! Ms. Mulvey thinks men are intimidated by her smarts and sophistication? Puh-leeze! No, her real problem is that no man (or woman, or appliance) could even begin to compete with her for her affections.

And she complains of her date choking on his linguine because she spoke Italian to the restaurant owner? If her date was mute for the rest of the evening, then how does she know that's why? Her nose is so high in the air it's a wonder she doesn't choke on her own sn--(Pinkie, be a lady!) nasal discharges.

As for her epiphany that women nowadays have to "hang up their brains" to attract a decent man--where the hell has her head been stuck all her life? (Never mind, I think I know; she's just that deeply in love with herself.) There's a scene in the movie "Gone With the Wind" where Scarlett complains, "Why does a girl have to act so silly to catch a husband?"

Commissar Theocritus, may I lift my vodka flask and tilt my shovel in tribute to your mother!

<off, still, in many ways>
One of the things that I've never understood is how feminists abandoned traditional female strengths. Years ago women were not paid the same for the same work, it is alleged, although Thomas Sowell says for equal commitment, that was not true. Women now make 117% men's salaries in white-collar New York. So what's the beef? But I do know for a fact that 50 years ago in Texas women were not paid the same, and that wasn't right. I know that 25 years ago when I was doing computer consulting at Peat, Marwick in Dallas, women were given the elbow as much as possible. I do not think that's the case any more. And that's for the good.

But one of the great problems with the world is that there is no longer a class of dowagers, who is typified by a friend, Katie, 76, who when she needs to, becomes Madam Fullcharge. She was the first woman city councilman of Midland, and is the (emerita) campaign treasurer for the highest-ranking Republican in Texas, save the governor. She's wonderfully good company but I've seen that old girl in action when things are not going right. It takes a very brave man to cross her.

I still laugh when I read the superlative Bertie and Jeeves stores, which, oddly enough, translate very well to DVD with Hugh Laurie and Stephen Fry, and on audio CD. There is always the aunt with an eye that could open an oyster at 50 paces. And the dowager who could look through her lorgnette and cause even a Bolshie to shrivel up and die.

Some years the Alamo was to be razed for a shopping mall, I think, but Clara Driskoll (Driskoll Hotel, the most venerable in Austin), one of the pooh-bahs in the Daughters of the Texas Republic, decided that That Wouldn't Do.

At the time these women had no access to business but had excellent minds and organizational skills and knew all the power and money in Texas, and so she put together a coalition to save the Alamo. And to this day it's run better than any other institution I know--I was just there for the first time in 30 years. There really is a sense of holiness there, and I have no supernatural beliefs whatsoever; it may be the Texan in me, and I have not toured Civil War battlefields, nor seen the Normandy cemeteries, but the feeling was stronger than at the Naval cemetery at San Diego. But I was 18 then and callow.

And <i>you do not screw with these women</i>. Who are about half hispanic by the way. Well, all Texans.

About a decade ago some leftist revisionist Hispanic group decided to change the Alamo and started making demands. Rose without a trace. These women, a lot of them 5' tall, and 90 pounds, could look down their noses at Magic Johnson, who would slink into a hole.

Compare these women, and their power, to, say, Jill Ireland.

Who threw away what?

But, Pinkie, I have found one thing. I find that I have a goodly number of close women friends. Katie made the comment that it was so nice to have a male friend with there being no possibility of any sort of sexual whispering, and the <i>mauvais langues</i> do whisper. "...a good gay man is a godsend." And other women have told me much the same thing. Their reaction, I think, to the fact that a lot of men really are driven by sex. A man starts out utterly motivated by sex--I know, I know, I know--but learns to respect and like other people. With me, and women, there just wasn't that extra step. And also I can see things a little bit differently from most men, but that's another story. (But it also for a while made men jumpy, which is funny in a way. I was utterly controlled and discreet and trustworthy, but men found it disturbing to think that a man might look at them the way that they knew they looked at women. Which is funny, when you think about it. What's sauce for the goose really <i>is</i> sauce for the gander.

We will build the new socialist man, and he will be devoid of all these flaws Comrade! Look at the progress we have already made? I know there still remains a disturbing remnant of manly men, even manly gay men, mostly concentrated in the south. But the progress being made is astounding. Yes, are some biological tendencies that have proven hard to overcome, men driven by sex... But even there we have progressed by encouraging sex as simply something one does when they are bored playing on one's X Box, so the young "hook up" in a neutral manner, just a guilt free diversion from the boredom caused by life under imperialist rule.

That's why it's called an X Box--it's owned by a woman you don't know the name of.

I wouldn't touch that line with the Chairmans 10 foot prole....

wouldn't touch that line with the Chairmans 10 foot prole....

Damn! What does he feed those things to make them grow so big?

You can be sure he feeds them more than the usual line....

I don't know whether to be impressed, or disgusted.

Ask Bruno. He'll say impressed.

I'm not sure I want to. Being in close proximity with that guy is kinda creepy. Like being in the cage of a hungry lion with no idea whether he will kill you, or just stare into your soul like some kinda weird... eyeball looking... thingy....

That so could have turned out better.

They're empty, Betty, they're empty and they feed on the souls of others. They cannot sit alone in a room.

Exactly. I'm going to hide under my bed now....

Commissar Theocritus wrote:They're empty, Betty, they're empty and they feed on the souls of others. They cannot sit alone in a room.

I am sure they must be starving if they have only been around us progressives... for who among us have a soul?

Not me! I sold mine for pizza and bacon flavored Hot Pockets ages ago. And it has made me a happier person because of it. I just wish I had more to sell.

Betty, haven't you learned by now that you only sell what belongs to other people? We've sold the soul of the nation, you know: self-reliance was sold out to the entitlement culture. Work was sold out to the entitlement culture. Self-respect was sold out to the entitlement culture.

You get the picture.

Excellent lesson on Party economics Commissar. Though I am not sure if it really applies to the Premier. So what if he sold a "soul" that we know doesn't exist, to some fools who value such imaginative creations for extra pizza and bacon flavored Hot Pockets rations? He can sell this "soul" to as many gullible fools as he wishes. In a sense, he is indeed selling something that belongs to someone else since it only exists in the weak minds of those who believe in a soul in the first place.

Did you not know that we are constructs? That we are nothing but constructs? You do not have to believe in an immortal soul (I don't) to believe that it is useful for the party to believe that we are what we say we are and therefore it is only a small step to getting the weak minded to believe that they are what we say they are. It worked in the Red Brigade, for those fools who think that sexuality is malleable, that we are all malleable. And guess who gets to play god?

Well that is all well and good for the proles to believe.... but ask my appliance if I was just a "construct" this morning, or last night, or will be tonight. Was that just some "construct" that had to be mopped up at your dacha when Nancy was through with her visit?

Of course it was a construct. It is an article of <i>faith</i> that we are all constructs.

Oh, so that knife the Empress is sharpening right now is but a construct?

I don't get worried; she always gets mesmerized by the sound of the grinding stone and mutters, in a trance, "Joseph Stalin, Joseph Stalin, Joseph Stalin..." until she passes out.