Image

CIA Distanced From Credible

User avatar
“The CIA did not consider the scenario of a Ukrainian attack to be very credible”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/1 ... krainians/

The nuanced territory between credible and very, and then back to credible, again, is bigger than the territory explored by Louis and Clark.

Pretending CIA knows anything about credible, or credibility, as denial of credibility is the job.

User avatar
jackalopelipsky wrote:
10/2/2022, 2:06 pm
 

It's like asking the fox, "Who raided the henhouse?"

User avatar
Joe Biden states, "If Russia invades Ukraine, there will be no Nord Stream pipeline." When asked how that could be since the USSA doesn't control it, he responds by saying, "I promise you, we'll be able to do it."

So far the suspects that have been suggested are Russia, Gasprom (because who doesn't go around blowing up their own expensive equipment and infrustructure, their very means of making money?), USSA, Russia, Ukraine, Russia, a rouge NGO or Corporate entity, Russia, a Scandinavian competitor and Russia. We might as well throw Australia and New Zealand into the mix because, well, why not? Oh, and don't forget Russia.

User avatar
Coming out of The State Department spin cycle, now.

https://yournews.com/2022/10/01/2425697 ... portunity/

Hanging German people out to dry.

User avatar
Most Equally Esteemed Komrads,

Help a fish understand. Is “reduce demand for natural gas” the same as “freeze to death in the dark”? Just wondering.

Curious in the Current Truth™,

Red Salmon

User avatar
Dying is not a requirement, Comrade Fish, merely a fringe benefit. And it certainly reduces demand for a scarce resource. It's a Heroic™ sacrifice for The Greater Good™.

I hope this answers your question.

User avatar
jackalopelipsky wrote:
10/3/2022, 8:48 am
Hanging German people out to dry.

That would be freeze dry, comrade.


 
POST REPLY