The disaster of manufactured consent in the Matrix - Merge Your Reality Into One
Jon Rappoport
Infowars.com
March 16, 2013

This article may seem to be about abstract theory, but it isn't. It's about how populations are viewed by psychological-operations specialists.

More importantly, it's about how people are led to accept substitutes for their own highest ideals. The substitutes look like the real thing, but they're actually very well drawn cartoons.

The most successful long-terms psyops are aimed at getting people to accept “good things, wonderful things.” Except, it turns out that these things magically evaporate and leave populations in the lurch.

Imagine for a moment that every crisis we now find ourselves in, every form of pollution and poisoning and every war and every mass destruction of life…was preceded and precipitated by…a psyop that looked like a golden destiny of fulfillment.

...

In the Matrix, there is pressure to have people connect their realities to each other. Why? Because groups can thus be created. Groups are easier to compromise than individuals.


We get the concept of hooked ideas. A hooked idea is one which will entice people to merge their realities into One. The hooked idea can be expressed as a slogan, a so-called meme, a principle. It is introduced by people who work psyops.


Read the rest at InfoWars.

Demonic: How the Liberal Mob is Endangering America

I am not into deconstructioning the Peoples Cube!! I have many of hour and days twisting and turning cubical to make them all red and mine will not be made! I denounce deconstruction as unnecessary and unavailable!! And I am report you to Red Square for encouraging deconstruction of his construction!!

Fraulein Franken-Feinstein wrote:I am not into deconstructioning the Peoples Cube!!

Yeah! If you deconstruct it it's just a bunch of little red blocks.

"Demonic: How the Liberal Mob is Endangering America"

spot on ROCK

And chemtrails! Don't forget about Alex Jones' outstanding work exposing the the truth of chemtrails.

Margaret wrote:

Fraulein Franken-Feinstein wrote:I am not into deconstructioning the Peoples Cube!!

Yeah! If you deconstruct it it's just a bunch of little red blocks.

Yes, Comrade - but if you look very closely, each little red block looks like this:

What is wrong with deconstruction? The media says that Amerikka can create 50000 JOBS by simply deconstructing and reconstructing Hoover Dam:

https://www.theonion.com/articles/revam ... emb,18727/

They also said Kim Yung Un was the sexiest man in the world so I know they are accurate.

Deconstructionist theory clearly states the following:

“Sexual identity is part of the collapse of sexuality,” says Debord. Cultural socialism implies that the law is capable of deconstruction. Therefore, Baudrillard uses the term ‘realism' to denote a subdialectic reality.

If one examines cultural socialism, one is faced with a choice: either reject capitalist neodialectic theory or conclude that the goal of the reader is social comment. The subject is interpolated into a cultural socialism that includes consciousness as a paradox. It could be said that Wilson[8] suggests that we have to choose between Debordist situation and conceptualist dematerialism.

“Class is used in the service of the status quo,” says Sontag. The opening/closing distinction depicted in Stone's Heaven and Earth is also evident in Natural Born Killers, although in a more self-referential sense. Thus, an abundance of discourses concerning not narrative, as Marxist class suggests, but neonarrative exist.

The subject is contextualised into a cultural socialism that includes reality as a totality. It could be said that if Debordist situation holds, the works of Stone are modernistic.

The main theme of the works of Stone is the common ground between truth and class. But Lacan suggests the use of realism to deconstruct colonialist perceptions of sexual identity.

The subject is interpolated into a subcultural construction that includes culture as a whole. In a sense, in Platoon, Stone deconstructs realism; in Heaven and Earth, however, he examines semioticist discourse.

Seems clear enough to me...

Actually that explains the end of Natural Born Killers. We are all meat eating wife beating incestuous pedophiles mentally boxed by television game shows who ruthlessly disrespect nature as represented by the Amerindian shaman.

By being customers to big box retailers our humanity is sold out to artificial corporations (green light in the store). In this environment that has made us dependent on drugs such as snake bite juice the robbery inflicted by capitalist corporate fascist society is hidden to us by distraction....that being the armed robbery that is suppressed by arrest...made by the pigs...tools of the Corporate State.

This distraction by the powers that be is packaged by a the media tools of the State whose shock interviews and shows keep the oppressed prol attention spans focused on the depraved yet heroic gangstas.....the love story sub plot makes it all the more alluring and pacifying to the masses.

But.....l could be wrong.

Thankfully, someone understands this stuff besides me!

But Cube is just compounded tetrahedral Red Square, Comrades. Deconstruction merely flattens it.
This analogous to life on earth redux taken from the philosophy of one Schultz. In his morality play, simply assign identity of Proletariat to the character he named Charlie Brown. The Elite controlling all institutional Authority, is personified by Lucy. The dialectic is, Football represents aspiration, accomplishment, and dignity. The Elite denies these things to all outside Their Class, never allowing Proletarian Comrade Brown to become successful. Comrade Brown always enjoys equality of results. Is flattened every time. Da? Faith, Trust, and Confidence grants equal opportunity for delusion. Ergo, contest is deciding whether to fool one's self or not. So is best to see Comrade Brown do nothing, da? He does not get flattened, but by standing still remains undignified Proletarian just like all others. The Elite like it that way.

This has certainly been a most illuminating thread. Stupid Bush could never understand.

I.M. Craptek wrote:Deconstructionist theory clearly states the following:

Deconstructionist theory was the brainchild of Jacques Derrida's cat. In ”The Animal that Therefore I Am,” Derrida describes how he emerged from the shower one day and found himself being stared at by his cat, which caused him to ponder [for the next 173 pages] the question of “Who Am I?”

Yes Comrade Chairman. Such introspection makes the People turn in on themselves for to make only thing they can make; emotional investment called Hope. Comrade Brown still awaits appearance of Great Pumpkin. Problem is: plant life cannot belong to People's Party.